Advertisement

Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 45, Issue 8, pp 1587–1603 | Cite as

The Geography of Normative Climates: An Application to Adolescent Substance Use

  • Courtney R. ThrashEmail author
  • Tara D. Warner
Empirical Research

Abstract

The existing research on risk factors for adolescent substance use highlights the importance of peers’ direct influence on risky behaviors, yet two key limitations persist. First, there is considerably less attention to the ways in which peers shape overall (e.g., school-level) normative climates of attitudes and expectations about substance use, and, second, the role of the broader geographic contexts in which these climates are embedded is essentially neglected. In light of shifting trends in geographic differences in adolescent substance use, the current study uses data from the 2007 Nebraska Risk and Protective Factor Student Survey (n = 26,647; 80 % non-Hispanic White; 51 % female) to (a) explore whether geographic context shapes the character (permissiveness) and consistency (homogeneity) of normative climates and (b) examine the consequences (effects) of such climates on adolescent substance use risk across the rural–urban continuum. Normative climates are a consistent predictor of substance use, yet the geographic context in which schools are located matters for both the nature and influence of these climates, and the patterns differ between normative climates about alcohol and marijuana. These findings illustrate that school normative climates do indeed matter for substance use behavior, and the ways in which they do depend on their broader, geographic context. Thus, future research on youth’s substance use should be attuned to these more nuanced distinctions.

Keywords

Normative climate Schools Adolescence Peers Substance use Urban/rural 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research uses data from the Nebraska Risk and Protective Factors Student Survey. The 2007 Nebraska Risk and Protective Factor Student Survey (NRPFSS) was sponsored by Nebraska Partners in Prevention through funding awarded by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) to the Nebraska Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive Grant. The survey was administered by the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services, the Nebraska Department of Education, and Bach Harrison, L.L.C. No direct support was received from SAMHSA for this analysis. This study was not supported by any direct funding source.

Author Contributions

C.T. conceived of the study, and executed the analyses, interpreted the results, and drafted the manuscript. TW assisted with conceptual model for the study, assisted in manuscript writing (including providing critical revisions to all sections), and aided in model design and interpretation of results. Both C.T. and T.W. have read and approve the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest

C. Thrash declares that she has no conflicts of interest. T. Warner declares that she has no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study was an analysis of secondary data. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Both authors CT and TW affirm that the manuscript is in compliance with the ethical standards outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social change. New Jersey: Prentice-Hill.Google Scholar
  2. Allison, K. W., Crawford, I., Leone, P. E., Trickett, E., Perez-Febles, A., Burton, L. M., et al. (1999). Adolescent substance use: Preliminary examinations of school and neighborhood context. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27(2), 111–141.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and moral life of the inner city. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  4. Atav, S., & Spencer, G. A. (2002). Health risk behaviors among adolescents attending rural, suburban, and urban schools: A comparative study. Family & Community Health, 25(2), 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beggs, J. J., Haines, V. A., & Hurlbert, J. S. (1996). Revisiting the rural–urban contrast: Personal networks in nonmetropolitan and metropolitan settings. Rural Sociology, 61(2), 306–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonell, C., Fletcher, A., Jamal, F., Wells, H., Harden, A., Murphy, S., et al. (2013). Theories of how the school environment impacts on student health: Systematic review and synthesis. Health & Place, 24, 242–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brechwald, W. A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2011). Beyond homophily: A decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 166–179.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Brenner, A. B., Bauermeister, J. A., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2011). Neighborhood variation in adolescent alcohol use: Examination of socioecological and social disorganization theories. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 72(4), 651.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Butler, A. C. (2005). Gender differences in the prevalence of same-sex sexual partnering: 1988–2002. Social Forces, 84(1), 417–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cleveland, M. J., Feinberg, M. E., Bontempo, D. E., & Greenberg, M. T. (2008). The role of risk and protective factors in substance use across adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 43(2), 157–164.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Cleveland, H. H., & Wiebe, R. P. (2003). The moderation of adolescent-to-peer similarity in tobacco and alcohol use by school levels of substance use. Child Development, 74(1), 279–291.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Crockett, L. J., Shanahan, M. J., & Jackson-Newsom, J. (2000). Rural youth: Ecological and life course perspectives. In R. Montemayor, G. R. Adams, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), Adolescent diversity in ethnic, economic, and cultural contexts: Advances in adolescent development (Vol. 10, pp. 43–74). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de la Haye, K., Green, H. D., Kennedy, D. P., Pollard, M. S., & Tucker, J. S. (2013). Selection and influence mechanisms associated with marijuana initiation and use in adolescent friendship networks. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(3), 474–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Edwards, R. W., Stanley, L. R., Marquart, B. S., & Swaim, R. C. (2011). Adolescent substance use in rural and small urban communities. Journal of Rural Community Psychology, E14(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  16. Eisenberg, M. E., Toumbourou, J. W., Catalano, R. F., & Hemphill, S. A. (2014). Social norms in the development of adolescent substance use: A longitudinal analysis of the International Youth Development Study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(9), 1486–1497.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Ennett, S. T., Flewelling, R. L., Lindrooth, R. C., & Norton, E. C. (1997). School and neighborhood characteristics associated with school rates of alcohol, cigarette, and marijuana use. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38(1), 55–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Flay, B. R. (1999). Understanding environmental, situational and intrapersonal risk and protective factors for youth tobacco use: The Theory of Triadic Influence. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 1(Suppl 2), S111–S114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fordham, S., & Ogbu, J. U. (1986). Black students’ school success: Coping with the “burden of ‘acting white’”. The Urban Review, 18(3), 176–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gale, J. A., Lenardson, J. D., Lambert, D., & Hartley, D. (2012). Adolescent alcohol use: Do risk and protective factors explain rural–urban differences. Maine Rural Health Research Centers Working Paper #48. University of Southern Maine, Muskie School of Public Service, Rural Health Research and Policy Centers.Google Scholar
  21. Gardner, L., & Shoemaker, D. J. (1989). Social bonding and delinquency: A comparative analysis. The Sociological Quarterly, 30(3), 481–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Garnier, H. E., & Stein, J. A. (2002). An 18-year model of family and peer effects on adolescent drug use and delinquency. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(1), 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gfroerer, J. C., Larson, S. L., & Colliver, J. D. (2007). Drug use patterns and trends in rural communities. Epidemiology and Etiology of Drug Use, 23, 10–15.Google Scholar
  24. Giordano, P. C. (2003). Relationships in adolescence. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 257–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harding, D. J. (2007). Cultural context, sexual behavior, and romantic relationships in disadvantaged neighborhoods. American Sociological Review, 72, 341–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hartup, W. W. (1996). The company they keep: Friendships and their developmental significance. Child Development, 67, 1–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Jensen, L., McLaughlin, D. K., & Slack, T. (2003). Rural poverty: The persisting challenge. In D. L. Brown & L. E. Swanson (Eds.), Challenges for rural America in the twenty-first century (pp. 118–131). University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Jessor, R. (1993). Successful adolescent development among youth in high-risk settings. American Psychologist, 48(2), 117.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Keyes, K. M., Schulenberg, J. E., O’Malley, P. M., Johnston, L. D., Bachman, J. G., Li, G., et al. (2011). The social norms of birth cohorts and adolescent marijuana use in the united states, 1976–2007. Addiction, 106(10), 1790–1800.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Kumar, R., O’Malley, P. M., Johnston, L. D., Schulenberg, J. E., & Bachman, J. G. (2002). Effects of school-level norms on student substance use. Prevention Science, 3(2), 105–124.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kuntsche, E., & Jordan, M. D. (2006). Adolescent alcohol and cannabis use in relation to peer and school factors: Results of multilevel analyses. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 84(2), 167–174.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lambert, D., Gale, J. A., & Hartley, D. (2008). Substance abuse by youth and young adults in rural America. The Journal of Rural Health, 24(3), 221–228.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Leifheit, K. M., Parekh, J., Matson, P. A., Moulton, L. H., Ellen, J. M., & Jennings, J. M. (2015). Is the association between neighborhood drug prevalence and marijuana use independent of peer drug and alcohol norms? Results from a household survey of urban youth. Journal of Urban Health, 92(4), 773–783.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Levine, S. B., & Coupey, S. M. (2003). Adolescent substance use, sexual behavior, and metropolitan status: Is “urban” a risk factor? Journal of Adolescent Health, 32(5), 350–355.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lichter, D. T., & Brown, D. L. (2011). Rural America in an urban society: Changing spatial and social boundaries. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 565–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Martino, S. C., Ellickson, P. L., & McCaffrey, D. F. (2008). Developmental trajectories of substance use from early to late adolescence: A comparison of rural and urban youth. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 69(3), 430.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Mason, M. J., Cheung, I., & Walker, L. (2004). Substance use, social networks, and the geography of urban adolescents. Substance Use and Misuse, 39(10–12), 1751–1777.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Mason, M. J., Valente, T. W., Coatsworth, J. D., Mennis, J., Lawrence, F., & Zelenak, P. (2010). Place-based social network quality and correlates of substance use among urban adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 33(3), 419–427.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Mason, W. A., & Windle, M. (2001). Family, religious, school, and peer influences on adolescent alcohol use: A longitudinal study. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 62(1), 44–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Maxwell, K. A. (2002). Friends: The role of peer influence across adolescent risk behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(4), 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McGloin, J. M., Sullivan, C. J., & Thomas, K. J. (2014). Peer influence and context: the interdependence of friendship groups, schoolmates and network density in predicting substance use. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(9), 1436–1452.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Mennis, J., & Mason, M. J. (2011). People, places, and adolescent substance use: Integrating activity space and social network data for analyzing health behavior. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(2), 272–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Miech, R. A., Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2015). Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2014: Volume 1, Secondary school students. Ann Arbor: Institute of Social Research, The University of Michigan. http://monitoringthefuture.org/pubs.html#monographs.
  44. Mollborn, S. (2010). Predictors and consequences of adolescents’ norms against teenage pregnancy. The Sociological Quarterly, 51(2), 303–328.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Mrug, S., Gaines, J., Su, W., & Windle, M. (2010). School-level substance use: Effects on early adolescents’ alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana use. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 71(4), 488–495.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Payne, D. C., & Cornwell, B. (2007). Reconsidering peer influences on delinquency: Do less proximate contacts matter? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23(2), 127–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rhew, I. C., Hawkins, J. D., & Oesterle, S. (2011). Drug use and risk among youth in different rural contexts. Health & Place, 17(3), 775–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rountree, P. W., & Clayton, R. R. (1999). A contextual model of adolescent alcohol use across the rural–urban continuum. Substance Use and Misuse, 34(4–5), 495–519.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Santor, D. E., Messervey, D., & Kusumakar, V. (2000). Measuring peer pressure, popularity, and conformity in adolescent boys and girls: Predicting school performance, sexual attitudes, and substance abuse. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29(2), 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Scaramella, L. V., & Keyes, A. W. (2001). The social contextual approach and rural adolescent substance use: Implications for prevention in rural settings. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 4(3), 231–251.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Scheer, S. D., Borden, L. M., & Donnermeyer, J. F. (2000). The relationship between family factors and adolescent substance use in rural, suburban, and urban settings. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 9(1), 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schinke, S. P., Fang, L., & Cole, K. C. (2008). Substance use among early adolescent girls: Risk and protective factors. Journal of Adolescent Health, 43(2), 191–194.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1942). Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  54. Shears, J., Edwards, R. W., & Stanley, L. R. (2006). School bonding and substance use in rural communities. Social Work Research, 30(1), 6–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Singh, K., & Dika, S. (2003). The educational effects of rural adolescents’ social networks. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 18(2), 114–128.Google Scholar
  56. Spano, R., & Nagy, S. (2005). Social guardianship and social isolation: An application and extension of lifestyle/routine activities theory to rural adolescents. Rural Sociology, 70(3), 414–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Steen, J. A. (2010). A multilevel study of the role of environment in adolescent substance use. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 19(5), 359–371. doi: 10.1080/1067828X.2010.502479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stewart, E. A. (2003). School social bonds, school climate, and school misbehavior: A multilevel analysis. Justice Quarterly, 20(3), 575–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2011). Results from the 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of national findings. NSDUH Series h-41, HHS Publication No. (SMA) 11-4658. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.Google Scholar
  60. Szapocznik, J., & Coatsworth, J. D. (1999). An ecodevelopmental framework for organizing the influences on drug abuse: A developmental model of risk and protection. In M. D. Glantz & C. R. Hartel (Eds.), Drug abuse: Origins and interventions (pp. 331–366). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Warner, T. D. (2016). Up in smoke: Neighborhood contexts of marijuana use from adolescence through young adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(1), 35–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Warner, T. D., Giordano, P. C., Manning, W. D., & Longmore, M. A. (2011). Everybody’s doin’ it (right?): Neighborhood norms and sexual activity in adolescence. Social Science Research, 21(3), 199–205.Google Scholar
  63. Warr, M. (2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wilcox, P. (2003). An ecological approach to understanding youth smoking trajectories: Problems and prospects. Addiction, 98, 57–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  66. Wilson, J. M., & Donnermeyer, J. F. (2006). Urbanity, rurality, and adolescent substance use. Criminal Justice Review, 31(4), 337–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wright, E. M., Fagan, A. A., & Pinchevsky, G. M. (2014). Penny for your thoughts? The protective effect of youths’ attitudes against drug use in high-risk communities. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice. doi: 10.1177/1541204014562074.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations