The Geography of Normative Climates: An Application to Adolescent Substance Use
- 489 Downloads
The existing research on risk factors for adolescent substance use highlights the importance of peers’ direct influence on risky behaviors, yet two key limitations persist. First, there is considerably less attention to the ways in which peers shape overall (e.g., school-level) normative climates of attitudes and expectations about substance use, and, second, the role of the broader geographic contexts in which these climates are embedded is essentially neglected. In light of shifting trends in geographic differences in adolescent substance use, the current study uses data from the 2007 Nebraska Risk and Protective Factor Student Survey (n = 26,647; 80 % non-Hispanic White; 51 % female) to (a) explore whether geographic context shapes the character (permissiveness) and consistency (homogeneity) of normative climates and (b) examine the consequences (effects) of such climates on adolescent substance use risk across the rural–urban continuum. Normative climates are a consistent predictor of substance use, yet the geographic context in which schools are located matters for both the nature and influence of these climates, and the patterns differ between normative climates about alcohol and marijuana. These findings illustrate that school normative climates do indeed matter for substance use behavior, and the ways in which they do depend on their broader, geographic context. Thus, future research on youth’s substance use should be attuned to these more nuanced distinctions.
KeywordsNormative climate Schools Adolescence Peers Substance use Urban/rural
This research uses data from the Nebraska Risk and Protective Factors Student Survey. The 2007 Nebraska Risk and Protective Factor Student Survey (NRPFSS) was sponsored by Nebraska Partners in Prevention through funding awarded by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) to the Nebraska Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive Grant. The survey was administered by the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services, the Nebraska Department of Education, and Bach Harrison, L.L.C. No direct support was received from SAMHSA for this analysis. This study was not supported by any direct funding source.
C.T. conceived of the study, and executed the analyses, interpreted the results, and drafted the manuscript. TW assisted with conceptual model for the study, assisted in manuscript writing (including providing critical revisions to all sections), and aided in model design and interpretation of results. Both C.T. and T.W. have read and approve the final manuscript.
Conflict of interest
C. Thrash declares that she has no conflicts of interest. T. Warner declares that she has no conflicts of interest.
This study was an analysis of secondary data. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Both authors CT and TW affirm that the manuscript is in compliance with the ethical standards outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social change. New Jersey: Prentice-Hill.Google Scholar
- Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and moral life of the inner city. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Crockett, L. J., Shanahan, M. J., & Jackson-Newsom, J. (2000). Rural youth: Ecological and life course perspectives. In R. Montemayor, G. R. Adams, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), Adolescent diversity in ethnic, economic, and cultural contexts: Advances in adolescent development (Vol. 10, pp. 43–74). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Edwards, R. W., Stanley, L. R., Marquart, B. S., & Swaim, R. C. (2011). Adolescent substance use in rural and small urban communities. Journal of Rural Community Psychology, E14(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
- Eisenberg, M. E., Toumbourou, J. W., Catalano, R. F., & Hemphill, S. A. (2014). Social norms in the development of adolescent substance use: A longitudinal analysis of the International Youth Development Study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(9), 1486–1497.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Gale, J. A., Lenardson, J. D., Lambert, D., & Hartley, D. (2012). Adolescent alcohol use: Do risk and protective factors explain rural–urban differences. Maine Rural Health Research Centers Working Paper #48. University of Southern Maine, Muskie School of Public Service, Rural Health Research and Policy Centers.Google Scholar
- Gfroerer, J. C., Larson, S. L., & Colliver, J. D. (2007). Drug use patterns and trends in rural communities. Epidemiology and Etiology of Drug Use, 23, 10–15.Google Scholar
- Jensen, L., McLaughlin, D. K., & Slack, T. (2003). Rural poverty: The persisting challenge. In D. L. Brown & L. E. Swanson (Eds.), Challenges for rural America in the twenty-first century (pp. 118–131). University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
- Leifheit, K. M., Parekh, J., Matson, P. A., Moulton, L. H., Ellen, J. M., & Jennings, J. M. (2015). Is the association between neighborhood drug prevalence and marijuana use independent of peer drug and alcohol norms? Results from a household survey of urban youth. Journal of Urban Health, 92(4), 773–783.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miech, R. A., Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2015). Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2014: Volume 1, Secondary school students. Ann Arbor: Institute of Social Research, The University of Michigan. http://monitoringthefuture.org/pubs.html#monographs.
- Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1942). Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Singh, K., & Dika, S. (2003). The educational effects of rural adolescents’ social networks. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 18(2), 114–128.Google Scholar
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2011). Results from the 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of national findings. NSDUH Series h-41, HHS Publication No. (SMA) 11-4658. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.Google Scholar
- Szapocznik, J., & Coatsworth, J. D. (1999). An ecodevelopmental framework for organizing the influences on drug abuse: A developmental model of risk and protection. In M. D. Glantz & C. R. Hartel (Eds.), Drug abuse: Origins and interventions (pp. 331–366). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Warner, T. D., Giordano, P. C., Manning, W. D., & Longmore, M. A. (2011). Everybody’s doin’ it (right?): Neighborhood norms and sexual activity in adolescence. Social Science Research, 21(3), 199–205.Google Scholar
- Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar