With or Without You? Contextualizing the Impact of Romantic Relationship Breakup on Crime Among Serious Adolescent Offenders

Abstract

The decline and delay of marriage has prolonged adolescence and the transition to adulthood, and consequently fostered greater romantic relationship fluidity during a stage of the life course that is pivotal for both development and offending. Yet, despite a growing literature of the consequences of romantic relationships breakup, little is known about its connection with crime, especially among youth enmeshed in the criminal justice system. This article addresses this gap by examining the effects of relationship breakup on crime among justice-involved youth—a key policy-relevant group. We refer to data from the Pathways to Desistance Study, a longitudinal study of 1354 (14 % female) adjudicated youth from the juvenile and adult court systems in Phoenix and Philadelphia, to assess the nature and complexity of this association. In general, our results support prior evidence of breakup’s criminogenic influence. Specifically, they suggest that relationship breakup’s effect on crime is particularly acute among this at-risk sample, contingent upon post-breakup relationship transitions, and more pronounced for relationships that involve cohabitation. Our results also extend prior work by demonstrating that breakup is attenuated by changes in psychosocial characteristics and peer associations/exposure. We close with a discussion of our findings, their policy implications, and what they mean for research on relationships and crime among serious adolescent offenders moving forward.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. 1.

    This scale includes the following items: purposely destroyed or damaged property, forced someone to have sex with you, killed someone, shot someone, shot at someone, attacked and seriously harmed someone, been in a fight, threatened/attacked someone as part of gang, purposely set a fire to house, car, etc., taken something by force with weapon, taken something by force without weapon, entered or broken into a building to steal, stolen something from a store, bought, received, or sold something stolen, used checks or credit cards illegally, stolen a car or motorcycle to keep or sell, sold marijuana, sold other illegal drugs (coke, crack, heroine), carjacked someone, driven while you were drunk or high, been paid by someone to have sex, and carried a gun.

  2. 2.

    NT refers to N (sample size) multiplied by T (number of years/waves).

  3. 3.

    Because variety scores have a hard upper limit, they do not technically conform to the Poisson or negative binomial distribution. However, because no cases in our sample approach this upper limit (the maximum value is 19 of 22 offenses), the offending variety score conforms to a negative binomial model without difficulty. This is a common statistical approach when using variety scores (e.g. Paternoster and Pogarsky 2009; Sweeten et al. 2013).

References

  1. Allison, P. D. (1994). Using panel data to estimate the effects of events. Sociological Methods & Research, 23, 174–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allison, P. D., & Waterman, R. P. (2002). Fixed-effects negative binomial regression models. Sociological Methodology, 32, 247–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Apel, R., Blokland, A., Nieuwbeerta, P., & van Schellen, M. (2010). The impact of imprisonment on marriage and divorce: A risk set matching approach. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26, 269–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arnett, J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baumeister, R. F., Wotman, S., & Stillwell, A. (1993). Unrequited love: On heartbreak, anger, guilt, scriptlessness, and humiliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 377–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bersani, B. E., & Doherty, E. E. (2013). When the ties that bind unwind: Examining the enduring and situational processes of change behind the marriage effect. Criminology, 51, 399–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Capaldi, D., Kim, H. K., & Owen, L. D. (2008). Romantic partners’ influence on men’s likelihood of arrest in early adulthood. Criminology, 46, 267–299.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carbone-Lopez, K., Rennison, C. M., & Macmillan, R. (2012). The transcendence of violence across relationships: New methods for understanding men’s and women’s experiences of intimate partner violence across the life course. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28, 319–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carver, K., Joyner, K., & Udry, J. R. (2003). National estimates of adolescent romantic relationships. In P. Florsheim (Ed.), Adolescent romantic relationships and sexual behavior: Theory, research, and practical implications (pp. 291–329). New York: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cherlin, A. (2004). The deinstitutionalizing of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chung, M. C., Farmer, S., Grant, K., Newton, R., Payne, S., Perry, M., et al. (2003). Coping with post-traumatic stress symptoms following relationship dissolution. Stress and Health, 19, 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohn, D., Passel, J. S., Wang, W., & Livingston G. (2011). Barely half of U.S. adults are married—A record low. Pew Social and Demographic Trends. http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/files/2011/12/Marriage-Decline.pdf.

  14. Collins, W. A. (2003). More than myth: The developmental significance of romantic relationships during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Collins, W. A., Welsh, D. P., & Furman, W. (2009). Adolescent romantic relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 631–652.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Connolly, J. A., & Johnson, A. M. (1996). Adolescents’ romantic relationships and the structure and quality of their close interpersonal ties. Personal Relationships, 3, 185–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Connolly, J., & McIsaac, C. (2011). Romantic relationships in adolescence. In Marion K. Underwood & Lisa H. Rosen (Eds.), Social development: Relationships in infancy, childhood, and adolescence (pp. 180–206). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Connolly, J., McIsaac, C., Shuman, S., Wincentak, K., Joly, L., Heifetz, M., & Bravo, V. (2014). Development of romantic relationships in adolescence and emerging adulthood: Implications for community mental health. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 33, 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Crouter, A., & Booth, A. (2006). Romance and sex in adolescence and emerging adulthood: Risks and opportunities. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Davis, D., Shaver, P. R., & Vernon, M. L. (2003). Physical, emotional, and behavioral reactions to breaking up: The roles of gender, age, emotional involvement, and attachment style. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 871–884.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Derogatis, L., & Melisaratos, N. (1983). The Brief Symptom Inventory: An introductory report. Psychological Medicine, 13, 595–605.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dmitrieva, J., Monahan, K. C., Cauffman, E., & Steinberg, L. (2012). Arrested development: The effects of incarceration on the development of psychosocial maturity. Development and Psychopathology, 24, 1073–1090.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Doherty, E. E., & Ensminger, M. E. (2013). Marriage and offending among a cohort of disadvantaged African Americans. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50, 104–131.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. East, P. L., & Hokoda, A. (2015). Risk and protective factors for sexual and dating violence victimization: A longitudinal, prospective study of Latino and African American adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 1288–1300.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Ageton, S. S. (1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fagundes, C. P. (2012). Getting over you: Contributions of attachment theory for post-breakup emotional adjustment. Personal Relationships, 19, 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Farrington, D. P. (1986). Age and crime. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (pp. 189–250). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Farrington, D. P. (2003). Developmental and life-course criminology: Key theoretical and empirical issues—The 2002 Sutherland award address. Criminology, 41, 221–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Field, T., Diego, M., Pelaez, M., Deeds, O., & Delgado, J. (2009). Breakups distress in university students. Adolescence, 176, 705–727.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fisher, H. (2006). Broken hearts: The nature and risks of romantic rejection. In Ann C. Crouter & Alan Booth (Eds.), Romance and sex in adolescence and emerging adulthood: Risks and opportunities (pp. 3–28). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fisher, H., Brown, L. B., Anon, A., Strong, G., & Mashek, D. (2010). Reward, addiction, and emotion regulation systems associated with rejection in love. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104, 51–60.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fleming, C., White, H. R., Oesterle, S., Haggerty, K. P., & Catalano, R. (2010). Romantic relationship status changes and substance use among 18- to 20-year-olds. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 71, 847–856.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Florsheim, P. (2003). Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior: Theory, research, and practical implications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Forrest, W. (2014). Cohabitation, relationship quality, and desistance from crime. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 539–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Furman, W. (2002). The emerging field of adolescent romantic relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 177–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Furman, W., & Collibee, C. (2014). A matter of timing: Developmental theories of romantic involvement and psychosocial adjustment. Development and Psychopathology, 26, 1149–1160.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Furman, W., & Hand, L. S. (2006). The slippery nature of romantic relationships: Issues in definition and differentiation. In Ann C. Crouter & Alan Booth (Eds.), Romance and sex in adolescence and emerging adulthood: Risks and opportunities (pp. 171–178). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Furstenberg, F. F, Jr. (2010). On a new schedule: Transitions to adulthood and family change. The Future of Children, 20, 67–87.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Giordano, P. C. (2003). Relationships in adolescence. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 257–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Giordano, P. C. (2010). Legacies of crime: A follow-up of the children of highly delinquent girls and boys. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Halaby, C. N. (2003). Panel models for the analysis of change and growth in life course studies. In J. Mortimer and M. Shanahan (Eds.), Handbook of the Life Course (pp. 503–527). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Halpern-Meekin, S., Manning, W. D., Giordano, P. C., & Longmore, M. A. (2013). Relationship churning, physical violence, and verbal abuse in young adult relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 2–12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Harding, D. J. (2007). Cultural context, sexual behavior, and romantic relationships in disadvantaged neighborhoods. American Sociological Review, 72, 341–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hausman, J., Hall, B. H., & Grilliches, Z. (1984). Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrics, 52, 909–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Haynie, D. L. (2002). Friendship networks and delinquency: The relative nature of peer delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 99–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Haynie, D. L., Giordano, P. C., Manning, W. D., & Longmore, M. A. (2005). Adolescent romantic relationships and delinquency involvement. Criminology, 43, 177–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., & Weis, J. G. (1981). Measuring delinquency. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Horney, J., Osgood, D. W., & Marshall, I. H. (1995). Criminal careers in the short term: Intra-individual variability in crime and its relation to local life circumstances. American Sociological Review, 60, 655–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Inderbitzin, M. (2009). Reentry of emerging adults: Adolescent inmates’ transition back into the community. Journal of Adolescent Research, 24, 453–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Joyner, K., & Udry, J. R. (2000). You don’t bring me anything but down: Adolescent romance and depression. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41, 369–391.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Kenward, M. G., & Carpenter, J. (2007). Multiple imputation: Current perspectives. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 16, 199–218.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. King, R., & South, S. J. (2011). Crime, race, and the transition to marriage. Journal of Family Issues, 32, 99–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Larson, M., & Sweeten, G. (2012). Breaking up is hard to do: Romantic dissolution, offending, and substance use during the transition to adulthood. Criminology, 50, 605–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2001). Understanding desistance from crime. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 28, 1–69.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Leonard, K., & Rothbard, J. C. (1999). Alcohol and the marriage effect. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 13, 139–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Loeber, R., & Farrington, D. P. (2012). From juvenile delinquency to adult crime: Criminal careers, justice policy, and prevention. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Lonardo, R. A., Manning, W. D., Giordano, P. C., & Longmore, M. A. (2010). Offending, substance use, and cohabitation in young adulthood. Sociological Forum, 25, 787–803.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Lopoo, L., & Western, B. (2005). Incarceration and the formation and stability of marital unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 721–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Lyngstad, T. H., & Skardhamar, T. (2013). Changes in criminal offending around the time of marriage. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50, 608–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Magdol, L., Moffitt, T. E., & Caspi, A. (1998). Hitting without a license: Testing explanations for differences in partner abuse between young adult daters and cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Manning, W. D., Longmore, M., Copp, J., & Giordano, P. (2014). The complexities of adolescent dating and sexual relationships: Fluidity, meaning(s), and implications for young adults’ well-being. In E. S. Lefkowitz & S. A. Vasilenko (Eds.), Positive and negative outcomes of sexual behaviors: New directions for child and adolescent development (pp. 53–69). San Francisco, CA: Wiley Periodicals.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Massoglia, M., & Uggen, C. (2010). Settling down and aging out: Toward an interactionist theory of desistance and the transition to adulthood. American Journal of Sociology, 116, 543–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. McGloin, J. M., & Piquero, A. R. (2010). On the relationship between co-offending network redundancy and offending versatility. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47, 63–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Mears, D. P., Cochran, J. C., Siennick, S. E., & Bales, W. D. (2012). Prison visitation and recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 29, 888–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Meier, A., & Allen, G. (2009). Romantic relationships from adolescence to young adulthood: Evidence from the national longitudinal study of adolescent health. The Sociological Quarterly, 50, 308–335.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Harrington, H., & Milne, B. J. (2002). Males on the life-course-persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways: Follow-up at age 26 years. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 179–207.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Rutter, M., & Silva, P. A. (2001). Sex differences in antisocial behavior: Conduct disorder, delinquency, and violence in the Dunedin longitudinal study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Monroe, S. M., Rohde, P., Seeley, J. R., & Lewinsohn, P. M. (1999). Life events and depression in adolescence: Relationship loss as a prospective risk factor for first onset of major depressive disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 606–614.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Mulvey, E. P. (2004). Introduction: Pathways to Desistance Study. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2, 211–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Osgood, D. W. (2010). Statistical models of life events and criminal behavior. In D. Weisburd & A. Piquero (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative criminology (pp. 375–396). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Osgood, D. W., Foster, E. M., & Courtney, M. E. (2010). Vulnerable populations and the transition to adulthood. The Future of Children, 20, 209–229.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Osgood, D. W., Wilson, J. K., O’Malley, P., Bachman, J. G., & Johnston, L. D. (1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 61, 635–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Overbeek, G., Vollebergh, W., Engels, R. C. M. E., & Meeus, W. (2003). Young adults’ relationship transitions and the incidence of mental disorders. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 38, 669–676.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Park, L., Sanchez, D. T., & Brynildsen, K. (2011). Maladaptive responses to relationship dissolution: The role of relationship contingent self-worth. Journal of Applied Psychology, 41, 1749–1773.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Paternoster, R., & Pogarsky, G. (2009). Rational choice, agency and thoughtfully reflective decision making: The short and long-term consequences of making good choices. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 103–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Pham, C., Keenan, T., & Han, B. (2013). Evaluating impacts of early adolescent romance in high school on academic outcomes. Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research, 3, 14–33.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Piquero, A. R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Haapanen, R. (2002). Crime in emerging adulthood. Criminology, 40, 137–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Raley, R. K., Crissey, S., & Muller, C. (2007). Of sex and romance: Late adolescent relationships and young adult union formation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 1210–1226.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Rhoades, G., Atkins, C. M., Kamp Dush, C. M., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2011). Breaking up is hard to do: The impact of unmarried relationship dissolution on mental health and life satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 366–374.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., Kelmer, G., & Markman, H. J. (2010). Physical aggression in unmarried relationships: The roles of commitment and constraints. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 678–687.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2012). The impact of the transition to cohabitation on relationship functioning: Cross-sectional and longitudinal findings. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 348–358.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Rindfuss, R. R. (1991). The young adult years: Diversity, structural change, and fertility. Demography, 28, 493–512.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Rindfuss, R. R., & VandenHeuvel, A. (1990). Cohabitation: A precursor to marriage or an alternative to being single? Population and Development Review, 16, 703–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Roberts, J., & Horney, J. (2010). The life event calendar method in criminological research. In D. Weisburd & A. R. Piquero (Eds.), Handbook of Quantitative Criminology (pp. 289–312). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Robins, R. W., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2002). It’s not just who you’re with, it’s who you are: Personality and relationship experiences across multiple relationships. Journal of Personality, 70, 925–964.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Roy, K., & Jones, N. (2014). Theorizing alternative pathways through adulthood: Unequal social arrangements in the lives of young disadvantaged men. In K. Roy & N. Jones (Eds.), Pathways to adulthood for disconnected young men in low-income communities: New directions in child and adolescent development (pp. 1–9). San Francisco, CA: Wiley Periodicals.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Rubin, D. B. (2004). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (2009). A life-course theory and long-term project on trajectories of crime. Monatsschrift Fur Kriminologie Und Strafrechtsreform, 92, 226–239.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Sampson, R. J., Laub, J. H., & Wimer, C. (2006). Does marriage reduce crime? A counterfactual approach to within-individual causal effects. Criminology, 44, 465–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Schubert, C. A., Mulvey, E. P., Steinberg, L., Cauffman, E., Losova, S. H., Hecker, T., & Knight, G. P. (2004). Operational lessons from the pathways to desistance project. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2, 237–255.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Seiffge-Krenke, I. (2003). Testing theories of romantic development from adolescence to young adulthood: Evidence of a developmental sequence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 519–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Shanahan, M. J. (2000). Pathways to adulthood in changing societies: Variability and mechanisms in life course perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 667–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Siennick, S. E., & Osgood, D. W. (2008). A Review of Research on the Impact on Crime of Transitions into Adult Roles. In A. Liberman (Ed.), The long view of crime: A synthesis of longitudinal research (pp. 161–187). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Siennick, S. E., Staff, J., Osgood, D. W., Schulenberg, J. E., Bachman, J. G., & VanEseltine, M. (2014). Partnership transitions and antisocial behavior in young adulthood: A within-person, multi-cohort analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51, 735–758. doi:10.1177/0022427814529977.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Simons, R. L., & Barr, A. (2012). Shifting perspectives: Cognitive changes mediate the impact of romantic relationships on desistance from crime. Justice Quarterly. doi:10.1080/07418825.2012.704388.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Simpson, J. A. (1987). The dissolution of romantic relationships: Factors involved in relationship stability and emotional distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 683–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Smith, P. H., Homish, G. G., Leonard, K. E., & Cornelius, J. R. (2012). Women ending marriage to a problem drinking partner decrease their own risk for problem drinking. Addiction, 107, 1453–1461.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Sprecher, S., Felmlee, D., Metts, S., Fehr, B., & Vanni, D. (1998). Factors associated with distress following the breakup of a close relationship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 791–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. StataCorp. (2013). Stata statistical software: Release 13.1. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.

  105. Steinberg, L., Chung, H. L., & Little, M. (2004). Reentry of young offenders from the justice system a developmental perspective. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2, 21–38.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 83–110.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Sweeten, G. (2012). Scaling criminal offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28, 533–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Sweeten, G., Piquero, A. R., & Steinberg, L. (2013). Age and the explanation of crime, revisited. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 921–938.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Theobald, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2013). The effects of marital breakdown on offending: Results from a prospective longitudinal survey of males. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19, 391–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Thornberry, T. P., Lizotte, A. J., Krohn, M. D., Farnworth, M., & Jang, S. J. (1994). Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of interactional theory. Criminology, 32, 47–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Uggen, C., & Wakefield, S. (2005). Young adults reentering the community from the criminal justice system: The challenge of becoming an adult. In D. W. Osgood, M. Foster, C. Flanagan, & G. Ruth (Eds.), On your own without a net: The transition to adulthood for vulnerable populations (pp. 114–144). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  112. van Schellen, M., Poortman, A., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2012). Partners in crime? Criminal offending, marriage formation, and partner selection. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 59, 545–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Warr, M. (1998). Life-course transitions and desistance from crime. Criminology, 36, 183–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Weinberger, D. A., & Schwartz, G. E. (1990). Distress and restraint as superordinate dimensions of self-reported adjustment: A typological perspective. Journal of Personality, 58, 381–417.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Western, B., & Wildeman, C. (2009). The black family and mass incarceration. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 621, 221–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. (2002). The development of romantic relationships and adaptations in the system of peer relationships. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31, 216–225.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (2000-MU–MU-0007), the National Institute of Justice (199-IJ-CX-0053), the National Institute of Drug Abuse (R01 DA019697-01), the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the William T. Grant Foundation, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, The Center for Disease Control, The William Penn Foundation, The Arizona Governor’s Justice Commission, and the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency. We are grateful for their support. The content of this paper, however, is the sole responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of these agencies.

Author contributions

ML and GS contributed equally to the final manuscript. ML conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, and drafted the manuscript; GS participated in the design, analyses, and interpretation of the data, and manuscript revisions; AP participated in the coordination of the study, manuscript revisions, and methodological advising. All authors read and approved this final manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Larson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Larson, M., Sweeten, G. & Piquero, A.R. With or Without You? Contextualizing the Impact of Romantic Relationship Breakup on Crime Among Serious Adolescent Offenders. J Youth Adolescence 45, 54–72 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0318-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Romantic relationships
  • Breakup
  • Crime
  • Cohabitation
  • Transition to adulthood