With or Without You? Contextualizing the Impact of Romantic Relationship Breakup on Crime Among Serious Adolescent Offenders
- 992 Downloads
The decline and delay of marriage has prolonged adolescence and the transition to adulthood, and consequently fostered greater romantic relationship fluidity during a stage of the life course that is pivotal for both development and offending. Yet, despite a growing literature of the consequences of romantic relationships breakup, little is known about its connection with crime, especially among youth enmeshed in the criminal justice system. This article addresses this gap by examining the effects of relationship breakup on crime among justice-involved youth—a key policy-relevant group. We refer to data from the Pathways to Desistance Study, a longitudinal study of 1354 (14 % female) adjudicated youth from the juvenile and adult court systems in Phoenix and Philadelphia, to assess the nature and complexity of this association. In general, our results support prior evidence of breakup’s criminogenic influence. Specifically, they suggest that relationship breakup’s effect on crime is particularly acute among this at-risk sample, contingent upon post-breakup relationship transitions, and more pronounced for relationships that involve cohabitation. Our results also extend prior work by demonstrating that breakup is attenuated by changes in psychosocial characteristics and peer associations/exposure. We close with a discussion of our findings, their policy implications, and what they mean for research on relationships and crime among serious adolescent offenders moving forward.
KeywordsRomantic relationships Breakup Crime Cohabitation Transition to adulthood
The research was supported by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (2000-MU–MU-0007), the National Institute of Justice (199-IJ-CX-0053), the National Institute of Drug Abuse (R01 DA019697-01), the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the William T. Grant Foundation, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, The Center for Disease Control, The William Penn Foundation, The Arizona Governor’s Justice Commission, and the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency. We are grateful for their support. The content of this paper, however, is the sole responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of these agencies.
ML and GS contributed equally to the final manuscript. ML conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, and drafted the manuscript; GS participated in the design, analyses, and interpretation of the data, and manuscript revisions; AP participated in the coordination of the study, manuscript revisions, and methodological advising. All authors read and approved this final manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
- Arnett, J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Carver, K., Joyner, K., & Udry, J. R. (2003). National estimates of adolescent romantic relationships. In P. Florsheim (Ed.), Adolescent romantic relationships and sexual behavior: Theory, research, and practical implications (pp. 291–329). New York: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
- Cohn, D., Passel, J. S., Wang, W., & Livingston G. (2011). Barely half of U.S. adults are married—A record low. Pew Social and Demographic Trends. http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/files/2011/12/Marriage-Decline.pdf.
- Connolly, J., & McIsaac, C. (2011). Romantic relationships in adolescence. In Marion K. Underwood & Lisa H. Rosen (Eds.), Social development: Relationships in infancy, childhood, and adolescence (pp. 180–206). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Crouter, A., & Booth, A. (2006). Romance and sex in adolescence and emerging adulthood: Risks and opportunities. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Ageton, S. S. (1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Farrington, D. P. (1986). Age and crime. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (pp. 189–250). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Field, T., Diego, M., Pelaez, M., Deeds, O., & Delgado, J. (2009). Breakups distress in university students. Adolescence, 176, 705–727.Google Scholar
- Fisher, H. (2006). Broken hearts: The nature and risks of romantic rejection. In Ann C. Crouter & Alan Booth (Eds.), Romance and sex in adolescence and emerging adulthood: Risks and opportunities (pp. 3–28). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Florsheim, P. (2003). Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior: Theory, research, and practical implications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Furman, W., & Hand, L. S. (2006). The slippery nature of romantic relationships: Issues in definition and differentiation. In Ann C. Crouter & Alan Booth (Eds.), Romance and sex in adolescence and emerging adulthood: Risks and opportunities (pp. 171–178). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., & Weis, J. G. (1981). Measuring delinquency. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2001). Understanding desistance from crime. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 28, 1–69.Google Scholar
- Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
- Manning, W. D., Longmore, M., Copp, J., & Giordano, P. (2014). The complexities of adolescent dating and sexual relationships: Fluidity, meaning(s), and implications for young adults’ well-being. In E. S. Lefkowitz & S. A. Vasilenko (Eds.), Positive and negative outcomes of sexual behaviors: New directions for child and adolescent development (pp. 53–69). San Francisco, CA: Wiley Periodicals.Google Scholar
- Park, L., Sanchez, D. T., & Brynildsen, K. (2011). Maladaptive responses to relationship dissolution: The role of relationship contingent self-worth. Journal of Applied Psychology, 41, 1749–1773.Google Scholar
- Pham, C., Keenan, T., & Han, B. (2013). Evaluating impacts of early adolescent romance in high school on academic outcomes. Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research, 3, 14–33.Google Scholar
- Roy, K., & Jones, N. (2014). Theorizing alternative pathways through adulthood: Unequal social arrangements in the lives of young disadvantaged men. In K. Roy & N. Jones (Eds.), Pathways to adulthood for disconnected young men in low-income communities: New directions in child and adolescent development (pp. 1–9). San Francisco, CA: Wiley Periodicals.Google Scholar
- Rubin, D. B. (2004). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (2009). A life-course theory and long-term project on trajectories of crime. Monatsschrift Fur Kriminologie Und Strafrechtsreform, 92, 226–239.Google Scholar
- Siennick, S. E., Staff, J., Osgood, D. W., Schulenberg, J. E., Bachman, J. G., & VanEseltine, M. (2014). Partnership transitions and antisocial behavior in young adulthood: A within-person, multi-cohort analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51, 735–758. doi: 10.1177/0022427814529977.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- StataCorp. (2013). Stata statistical software: Release 13.1. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.Google Scholar
- Uggen, C., & Wakefield, S. (2005). Young adults reentering the community from the criminal justice system: The challenge of becoming an adult. In D. W. Osgood, M. Foster, C. Flanagan, & G. Ruth (Eds.), On your own without a net: The transition to adulthood for vulnerable populations (pp. 114–144). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar