The Age–Crime Curve in Adolescence and Early Adulthood is Not Due to Age Differences in Economic Status
One of the most consistent findings in developmental criminology is the “age–crime curve”—the observation that criminal behavior increases in adolescence and decreases in adulthood. Recently, Brown and Males (Justice Policy J 8:1–30, 2011) conducted an analysis of aggregate arrest, poverty, and population data from California and concluded that the widely-observed adolescent peak in rates of offending is not a consequence of developmental factors, but rather an artifact of age differences in economic status. Youngsters, they argue, offend more than adults because they are poorer than adults. The present study challenges Brown and Males’ proposition by analyzing data from the National Longitudinal Study of Youth (NLSY97; N = 8,984; 51 % female; 26 % Black, 21 % Hispanic, 52 % non-Black, non-Hispanic; ages 12–18 at Wave 1), which collected measures of criminal behavior and economic status at multiple time points. Consistent with scores of other studies, we find that criminal offending peaks in adolescence, even after controlling for variation in economic status. Our findings both counter Brown and Males’ claim that the age–crime curve is illusory and underscore the danger of drawing inferences about individual behavior from analysis of aggregated data.
KeywordsAge–crime curve Juvenile offending Crime Developmental Longitudinal
- Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Roth, J. A., & Visher, C. (Eds.). (1986). Criminal careers and “career criminals” (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Brown, E., & Males, M. (2011). Does age or poverty level best predict criminal arrest and homicide rates? A preliminary investigation. Justice Policy Journal, 8, 1–30.Google Scholar
- Farrington, D. P. (1986). Age and crime. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 7, pp. 189–250). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Farrington, D. P. (1998). Individual differences and offending. In M. Tonry (Ed.), The handbook of crime and punishment (pp. 241–268). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Piquero, A. R., Farrington, D. P., & Blumstein, A. (2003). The criminal career paradigm. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 30, pp. 359–506). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Quetelet, A. (1831). Research on the propensity to crime of different ages. Brussels: Hayez.Google Scholar
- Reyna, V. F., & Farley, F. (2006). Risk and rationality in adolescent decision-making: Implications for theory, practice, and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(1), 1–44.Google Scholar
- Sampson, R. J., & Wilson, W. J. (1995). Toward a theory of race, crime, and urban inequality. In J. Hagan & R. Peterson (Eds.), Crime and inequality (pp. 37–56). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Shulman, E. P., & Cauffman, E. (2013). Deciding in the dark: Age differences in intuitive risk judgment. Developmental Psychology. doi:10.1037/a0032778.
- Smith, D. A. (1986). The neighborhood context of police behavior. In A. Reiss & M. Tonry (Eds.), Crime and justice (Vol. 8, pp. 313–341). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Sweeten, G., Piquero, A. R., & Steinberg, L. (2013). Age and the explanation of crime, revisited. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. doi:10.1007/s10964-013-9926-4.
- Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (2002). Comparison of self-report and official data for measuring crime. In J. V. Pepper & C. V. Petrie (Eds.), Measurement problems in criminal justice research: Workshop summary (pp. 43–94). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (2010). The 1997 HHS Guidelines. Retrieved from: http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/97poverty.htm.