Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 104–115 | Cite as

“Role Magnets”? An Empirical Investigation of Popularity Trajectories for Life-Course Persistent Individuals During Adolescence

  • Jacob T. N. YoungEmail author
Empirical Research


Recent scholarship has focused on the role of social status in peer groups to explain the fact that delinquency is disproportionately committed during adolescence. Yet, the precise mechanism linking adolescence, social status, and antisocial behavior is not well understood. Dual-taxonomy postulates a testable mechanism that links the sudden increase in risky behavior among adolescents to the social magnetism of a small group of persistently antisocial individuals, referred to here as the “role magnet” hypothesis. Using semi-parametric group-based trajectory modeling and growth-curve modeling, this study provides the first test of this hypothesis by examining physical violence and popularity trajectories for 1,845 male respondents age 11–32 from a nationally representative sample (54 % non-Hispanic White; 21 % non-Hispanic African American; 17 % Hispanic; 8 % Asian). Individuals assigned to a “chronic violence” trajectory group showed consistently lower average levels of popularity from 11 to 19. But, these same individuals experienced increases in popularity during early adolescence and subsequent declines in late adolescence. These findings are linked to current research examining social status as a mechanism generating antisocial behavior during adolescence and the consequences of delayed entry into adult roles.


Social networks Popularity Dual-taxonomy Theory testing Semi-parametric group-based modeling Growth curve modeling 



I would like to thank J. C. Barnes, Carter Rees, Andrea Borrego, Brooks Louton, and Blaine Robbins for comments on earlier drafts. This research uses data from The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, a program project directed by Kathleen Mullan Harris and designed by J. Richard Udry, Peter S. Bearman, and Kathleen Mullan Harris at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and funded by grant P01-HD31921 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, with cooperative funding from 23 other federal agencies and foundations. Special acknowledgment is due to Ronald R. Rindfuss and Barbara Entwisle for assistance in the original design. Information on how to obtain the Add Health data files is available on the Add Health website ( No direct support was received from grant P01-HD31921 for this analysis.

Author contributions

All parts of this article were completed by JY.


  1. Agnew, R. (2003). An integrated theory of the adolescent peak in offending. Youth & Society, 34, 263–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, J. P., Porter, M. R., & McFarland, C. F. (2006). Leaders and followers in adolescent close friendships: Susceptibility to peer influence as a predictor of risky behavior, friendship instability, and depression. Development and Psychopathology, 18, 155–172.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes, J. C., & Beaver, K. M. (2010). An empirical examination of adolescence-limited offending: A direct test of Moffitt’s maturity gap thesis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 1176–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergman, L. R., & Andershed, A. (2009). Predictors and outcomes of persistent or age-limited registered criminal behavior: A 30-year longitudinal study of a Swedish urban population. Aggressive Behavior, 35, 164–178.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Broidy, L. M., Nagin, D. S., Tremblay, R. E., Bates, J. E., Dodge, K. E., Fergusson, D., et al. (2003). Developmental trajectories of childhood disruptive behavior disorders and adolescent delinquency: A six-site, cross-national study. Developmental Psychology, 39, 222–245.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, B. (2004). Adolescents’ relationships with peers. In R. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 294–362). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Card, N. A., & Little, T. D. (2006). Proactive and reactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis of differential relations with psychosocial adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 466–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cillessen, A. H. N., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147–163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DeLisi, M., & Piquero, A. R. (2011). New frontiers in criminal careers research, 2000–2011: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(4), 289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dijkstra, J. K., Lindenberg, S., Veenstra, R., Steglich, C., Isaacs, J., Card, N. A., et al. (2010). Influence and selection processes in weapon carrying during adolescence: The roles of status, aggression, and vulnerability. Criminology, 48, 187–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Farmer, T. W., Estell, D. B., Bishop, J. L., O’Neal, K. K., & Cairns, B. D. (2003). Rejected bullies or popular leaders? The social relations of aggressive subtypes of rural African American early adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 9, 992–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Felson, R. B., & Haynie, D. L. (2002). Pubertal development, social factors, and delinquency among adolescent boys. Criminology, 40, 967–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hagan, J. (1991). Destiny and drift: Subcultural preferences, status attainments, and the risks and rewards of youth. American Sociological Review, 56, 567–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hagan, J., & McCarthy, B. (1998). Mean streets: Youth crime and homelessness. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hawley, P. H. (2007). Social dominance in childhood and adolescence: Why social competence and aggression may go hand in hand. In P. H. Hawley, T. D. Little, & P. C. Rodkin (Eds.), Aggression and adaptation: The bright side to bad behavior (pp. 1–30). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Haynie, D. (2003). Contexts of risk? Explaining the link between girls’ pubertal development and their delinquency involvement. Social Forces, 82, 355–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haynie, D. L., & Piquero, A. R. (2006). Pubertal development and physical victimization in adolescence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43, 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Henry, D. B., Miller-Johnson, S., Simon, T. R., & Schoeny, M. E. (2006). The multi-site violent prevention. Validity of teacher ratings in selecting influential and aggressive adolescents for a targeted preventive intervention. Prevention Science, 7(1), 31–41.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huesmann, L. R., Eron, L. D., Lefkowitz, M. M., & Walder, L. O. (1984). Stability of aggression over time and generations. Developmental Psychology, 20, 1120–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jennings, W., & Reingle, J. M. (2012). On the number and shape of developmental/life-course violence, aggression, and delinquency trajectories: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 472–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones, B. L., & Nagin, D. S. (2007). Advances in group-based trajectory modeling and a SAS procedure for estimating them. Sociological Methods and Research, 35, 542–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Juvonen, J., Wang, Y., & Espinoza, G. (2012). Physical aggression, spreading of rumors, and social prominence in early adolescent: Reciprocal effects supporting gender similarities? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, published online Dec 30th, 1–10.Google Scholar
  24. Kreager, D. A. (2007). When it’s good to be ‘bad’: Violence and adolescent peer acceptance. Criminology, 45, 893–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kreager, D. A., Rulison, K., & Moody, J. (2011). Delinquency and the structure of adolescent peer groups. Criminology, 49, 95–127.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2002). Children’s stereotypes of popular and unpopular peers: A multi-method assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38, 635–647.Google Scholar
  27. Lease, A. M., Kennedy, C. A., & Axelrod, J. L. (2002). Children’s social constructions of popularity. Social Development, 11, 87–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Advanced quantitative techniques in the social sciences number 7. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  29. Lopoo, L. M., & Western, B. (2005). Incarceration and the formation and stability of marital unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 721–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mayeux, L., Sandstrom, M., & Cillessen, A. (2008). Is being popular a risky proposition? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 18, 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McGloin, J. M., & Kirk, D. S. (2010). Social network analysis. In A. R. Piquero & D. Weisburg (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative criminology (pp. 209–224). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moffitt, T. E. (1997). Adolescent-limited and life-course persistent offending: A complementary pair of developmental theories. In T. Thornberry (Ed.), Developmental theories of crime and delinquency (pp. 11–54). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  34. Moffitt, T. E. (2008). A review of research on the taxonomy of life-course persistent versus adolescence-limited antisocial behavior. In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright, & K. R. Blevins (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory (pp. 277–312). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  35. Moody, J. (1999). The structure of adolescent social relations: Modeling friendship in dynamic social settings. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
  36. Moody, J., Brynildsen, W. D., Osgood, D. W., Feinberg, M. E., & Gest, S. (2011). Popularity trajectories and substance use in early adolescence. Social Networks, 33, 101–112.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Morrow, M. T., Hubbard, J. A., Rubin, R. M., & McAuliffe, M. D. (2008). The relation between childhood aggression and depressive symptoms: The unique and joint mediating roles of peer rejection and peer victimization. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 54, 316–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nagin, D. S. (2005). Group-based modeling of development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Nagin, D. S. (2010). Group-based trajectory modeling: An overview. In A. R. Piquero & D. Weisburg (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative criminology (pp. 53–68). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pager, D. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. The American Journal of Sociology, 108, 937–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Parkhurst, J. T., & Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. Journal of Early Adolescence, 18, 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Piquero, A. R., Brezina, T., & Turner, M. G. (2005). Testing Moffitt’s account of delinquency abstention. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 42, 27–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Piquero, A. R., Diamond, B., Jennings, W. G., & Reingle, J. M. (2013). Adolescence-limited offending. In C. L. Gibson & M. D. Krohn (Eds.), Handbook of life-course criminology (pp. 129–142). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Piquero, A. R., Jennings, W. G., & Barnes, J. C. (2012). Violence in criminal careers: A review of literature from a developmental life-course perspective. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 171–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Prinstein, M. J., Brechwald, W. A., & Cohen, G. L. (2011a). Susceptibility to peer influence: Using a performance-based measure to identify adolescent males at heightened risk for deviant peer socialization. Developmental Psychology, 1, 1–6.Google Scholar
  46. Prinstein, M. J., Choukas-Bradley, S. C., Helms, S., Brechwald, W. A., & Rancourt, D. (2011b). High peer popularity longitudinally predicts adolescent health risk behavior, or does it? An examination of linear and quadratic associations. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 36, 980–990.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Prinstein, M. J., Meade, C. S., & Cohen, G. L. (2003). Adolescent oral sex, peer popularity, and perceptions of best friends’ sexual behavior. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 28, 243–249.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pulkkinen, L., Lyra, A., & Kokko, K. (2009). Life success of males on nonoffender, adolescence-limited, persistent, and adult-onset antisocial pathways: Follow-up from age 8 to 48. Aggressive Behavior, 35, 117–135.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2005). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  50. Rancourt, D., & Prinstein, M. J. (2009). Peer status and victimization as possible reinforcements of adolescent girls’ and boys’ weight-related behaviors and cognitions. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 35, 354–367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., & Van Acker, R. (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial Configurations. Developmental Psychology, 36(1), 14–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rubin, K. H., Coplan, R. J., & Bowker, J. C. (2009). Social withdrawal in childhood. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 141–171.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schwartz, D. (1978). Estimating dimensions of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. StataCorp. (2011). Stata statistical software: Release 12. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.Google Scholar
  55. Steinberg, L., & Monahan, K. C. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1531–1543.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Weerman, F. M., & Bijleveld, C. J. H. (2007). Birds of different feathers: School networks of serious delinquent, minor delinquent, and non-delinquent boys and girls. European Journal of Criminology, 4, 357–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Western, B. (2006). Punishment and inequality in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Criminology and Criminal JusticePhoenixUSA

Personalised recommendations