The Association Between Cyber Victimization and Subsequent Cyber Aggression: The Moderating Effect of Peer Rejection
- 2.1k Downloads
Adolescents experience various forms of strain in their lives that may contribute jointly to their engagement in cyber aggression. However, little attention has been given to this idea. To address this gap in the literature, the present longitudinal study examined the moderating influence of peer rejection on the relationship between cyber victimization at Time 1 (T1) and subsequent cyber aggression at Time 2 (T2; 6 months later) among 261 (150 girls) 6th, 7th, and 8th graders. Our findings indicated that both peer rejection and cyber victimization were related to T2 peer-nominated and self-reported cyber aggression, both relational and verbal, after controlling for gender and T1 cyber aggression. Furthermore, T1 cyber victimization was related more strongly to T2 peer-nominated and self-reported cyber aggression at higher levels of T1 peer rejection. These results extend previous findings regarding the relationship between peer rejection and face-to-face aggressive behaviors to the cyber context. In addition, our findings underscore the importance of utilizing multiple methods, such as peer-nomination and self-report, to assess cyber aggression in a school setting.
KeywordsLongitudinal Cyberbullying Cyber aggression Peer nomination Peer rejection Cyber victimization Adolescent
Michelle F. Wright conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination of the study, performed the statistical analyses, interpreted the data, and drafted and revised the manuscript. Yan Li participated in the design of the study, and helped with manuscript revisions.
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
- Boneva, B., Quinn, A., Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., & Sklovski, I. (2006). Teenage communication in the instant messaging era. In R. Brynin & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Information technology at home (pp. 612–672). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- DeVoe, J., & Murphy, C. (2011). Student reports of bullying and cyber-bullying: Results from the 2009 school crime supplement to the National Crime Victimization Survey. Retrieved from: http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2011336.
- Espelage, D. L. (2002). Bullying in early adolescence: The role of the peer group. ERIC Digest. Champaign, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED471912).Google Scholar
- Finkelhor, D., Mitchell, K. J., & Wolak, J. (2005). Online victimization: What youth tell us. In S. W. Cooper, R. J. Estes, A. P. Giardino, N. D. Kellogg, & V. I. Vieth (Eds.), Medical, legal, and social science aspects of child sexual exploitation: A comprehensive review of pornography, prostitution, and Internet crimes (Vol. 1, pp. 437–467). St. Louis: GW Medical Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
- Hemphill, S., Kotevski, A., Tollit, M., Smith, R., Herrenkohl, T., Toumbourou, J., et al. (2012). Longitudinal predictors of cyber and traditional bullying perpetration in Australian secondary school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51(1), 59–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.11.019.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. (2009). Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- i-SAFE America Inc. (2004). Cyber Bullying: Statistics and tips. Stop Bullying Now. Retrieved from http://www.isafe.org/channels/sub.php?ch=op&sub_id=media_cyber_bullying.
- Juvonen, J., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2001). Self-views and peer perceptions of victim status among early adolescents. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 105–124). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media & mobile internet use among teens and young adults. Retrieved from: http://web.pewinternet.org/~/media/files/reports/2010/pip_social_media_and_young_adults_report_final_with_toplines.pdf.
- Pettit, G. S., Lansford, J. E., Malone, P. S., Dodge, K. A., & Bates, J. E. (2010). Domain specificity in relationship history, social-information processing, and violent behavior in early adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 190–200. doi: 10.1037/a0017991.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Prinstein, M. J., & La Greca, A. M. (2004). Childhood peer rejection and aggression as predictors of adolescent girls’ externalizing and health risk behaviors: A 6-year longitudinal study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(1), 103–112. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.1.103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Reijntjes, A., Thomaes, S., Kamphuis, J., Bushman, B., de Castro, B., & Teich, M. (2011). Explaining the paradoxical rejection-aggression link: The mediating effects of hostile intent attributions, anger, and decreases in state self-esteem on peer rejection-induced aggression in youth. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(7), 955–963. doi: 10.1177/04146167211410247.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sanders, J. (2009, August). Cyberbullies: Their motives, characteristics, and types of bullying. Presentation at the XIV. European Conference of Developmental Psychology, Vilnius, Lithuania.Google Scholar
- Schad, M. M., Szwedo, D. E., Antonishak, J., Hare, A., & Allen, J. P. (2008). The broader context of relational aggression in adolescent romantic relationships: Predictions from peer pressure and links to psychosocial functioning. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(3), 346–358. doi: 10.1007/s10964-007-9226-y.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schwartz, D., Gorman Hopmeyer, A., Nakamoto, J., & McKay, T. (2006). Popularity, social acceptance and aggression in adolescent peer groups: Links with academic performance and school attendance. Developmental Psychology, 42(6), 1116–1127. doi: 10.1037/0012-16188.8.131.526.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Soper, D. (2010). Interaction! Unpublished copyrighted software. Retrieved from httpc:www.danielsoper.com.
- Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Munniksma, A., & Dijkstra, J. (2010). The complex relation between bullying, victimization, acceptance, and rejection: Giving special attention to status, affect, and sex differences. Child Development, 81(2), 480–486. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624-2009.01411.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vitaro, F., Boivin, M., & Tremblay, R. (2007). Peers and violence: A two-sided developmental perspective. In: D. J. Flannery, Alexander T., & Waldman, D. (Eds.). The Cambridge handbook of violent behavior and aggression (pp. 361–387). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Volling, B. L., MacKinnon-Lewis, C., Rabiner, D., & Baradaran, L. P. (1993). Children’s social competence and sociometric status: Further exploration of aggression, social withdrawal, and peer rejection. Development and Psychopathology, 5(3), 459–483. doi: 10.1017/S0954579400004521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wallace, L. H., Patchin, J. W., & May, J. D. (2005). Reactions of victimized youth: Strain as an explanation of school delinquency. Western Criminology Review, 6(1), 104–116.Google Scholar