Identity Profiles in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Youth: The Role of Family Influences
- 3.9k Downloads
Sexual identity development is a central task of adolescence and young adulthood and can be especially challenging for sexual minority youth. Recent research has moved from a stage model of identity development in lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) youth to examining identity in a non-linear, multidimensional manner. In addition, although families have been identified as important to youth’s identity development, limited research has examined the influence of parental responses to youth’s disclosure of their LGB sexual orientation on LGB identity. The current study examined a multidimensional model of LGB identity and its links with parental support and rejection. One hundred and sixty-nine LGB adolescents and young adults (ages 14–24, 56 % male, 48 % gay, 31 % lesbian, 21 % bisexual) described themselves on dimensions of LGB identity and reported on parental rejection, sexuality-specific social support, and non-sexuality-specific social support. Using latent profile analysis (LPA), two profiles were identified, indicating that youth experience both affirmed and struggling identities. Results indicated that parental rejection and sexuality-specific social support from families were salient links to LGB identity profile classification, while non-sexuality specific social support was unrelated. Parental rejection and sexuality-specific social support may be important to target in interventions for families to foster affirmed LGB identity development in youth.
KeywordsGay Lesbian Bisexual Sexual minority Parental rejection Social support
This research was supported by a grant from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01 HD055372-01A2) awarded to Neena M. Malik. We thank all of the families who so graciously gave of their time to participate in the research project.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Badgett, L. (2009). Best practices for asking questions about sexual orientation on surveys. UC Los Angeles: The Williams Institute.Google Scholar
- Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribner’s.Google Scholar
- D’Augelli, A. R. (2002). Mental health problems among lesbian, gay, and bisexual youths ages 14 to 21. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 7, 433–456.Google Scholar
- Herek, G. M. (1994). Assessing heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A review of empirical research with the ATLG scale. In B. Greene, G. M. Herek, B. Greene, & G. M. Herek (Eds.), Lesbian and gay psychology: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 206–228). Thousand Oaks, CA US: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
- Lesbian Gay Bisexual Youth Sexual Orientation Measurement Work Group. (2003). Measuring sexual orientation of young people in health research. San Francisco, CA: Gay and Lesbian Medical Association.Google Scholar
- McCutcheon, A. C. (1987). Latent class analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Mohr, J. J., & Fassinger, R. E. (2000). Measuring dimensions of lesbian and gay male experience. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 33, 66–90.Google Scholar
- Muthén, B. (2001). Second-generation structural equation modeling with a combination of categorical and continuous latent variables: New opportunities for latent class–latent growth modeling. In L. M. Collins, A. G. Sayer, L. M. Collins, & A. G. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 291–322). Washington, DC US: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide, 6th edn. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Rosario, M., Hunter, J., Maguen, S., Gwadz, M., & Smith, R. (2001). The coming-out process and its adaptational and health-related associations among gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths: Stipulation and exploration of a model. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(1), 113–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Troiden, R. R. (1988). Gay and lesbian identity: A sociological analysis. Dix Hills, NY: General Hall.Google Scholar
- Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2002). Latent class cluster analysis. In J. A. Hagenaars & A. L. McCutcheon (Eds.), Advances in latent class analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Westin, A. F. (1967). Privacy and freedom. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar