Extracurricular Participation and Academic Outcomes: Testing the Over-Scheduling Hypothesis
- 4k Downloads
There is a growing concern that some youth are overscheduled in extracurricular activities, and that this increasing involvement has negative consequences for youth functioning. This article used data from the Educational Longitudinal Study (ELS: 2002), a nationally representative and ethnically diverse longitudinal sample of American high school students, to evaluate this hypothesis (N = 13,130; 50.4% female). On average, 10th graders participated in between 2 and 3 extracurricular activities, for an average of 5 h per week. Only a small percentage of 10th graders reported participating in extracurricular activities at high levels. Moreover, a large percentage of the sample reported no involvement in school-based extracurricular contexts in the after-school hours. Controlling for some demographic factors, prior achievement, and school size, the breadth (i.e., number of extracurricular activities) and the intensity (i.e., time in extracurricular activities) of participation at 10th grade were positively associated with math achievement test scores, grades, and educational expectations at 12th grade. Breadth and intensity of participation at 10th grade also predicted educational status at 2 years post high school. In addition, the non-linear function was significant. At higher breadth and intensity, the academic adjustment of youth declined. Implications of the findings for the over-scheduling hypothesis are discussed.
KeywordsExtracurricular activities Academic achievement Youth sports Educational expectations
This research was supported by a grant from the American Educational Research Association which receives funds for its “AERA Grants Program” from the National Science Foundation and the National Center for Education Statistics of the Institute of Education Sciences (US Department of Education) under NSF Grant #DRL-0634035. A special thanks to Amy Bohnert for helpful comments on a previous version of this manuscript.
- Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 243–277). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Coleman, J. S. (1961). The adolescent society. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
- Côté, J., Baker, J., & Abernethy, B. (2003). From play to practice: A developmental framework for the acquisition of expertise in team sports. In J. Starkes & K. A. Ericsson (Eds.), Expert performance in sports: Advances in research on sport expertise (pp. 89–110). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
- Dahl, R. E. (1999). The consequences of insufficient sleep for adolescents: Link between sleep and emotional regulation. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 354–359.Google Scholar
- Eccles, J. S., & Gootman, J. A. (Eds.). (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Elkind, D. (2001). The hurried child: Growing up too fast, too soon. Cambridge, MA: DA Capa Press.Google Scholar
- Fredricks, J. A. (2011). Commentary: Extracurricular activities: An essential aspect of education. Teachers College Record. Retrieved at http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=16414.
- Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Is extracurricular participation associated with beneficial outcomes: Concurrent and longitudinal relations? Developmental Psychology, 42, 698–713. doi: 10.1037/0012-1618.104.22.1688.
- Gilbert, S. (1999). For some children, it’s an after-school pressure cooker. New York Times, 7.Google Scholar
- Holland, A., & Andre, T. (1987). Participation in extracurricular activities in secondary school: What is known, what needs to be known? Review of Educational Research, 57, 437–466.Google Scholar
- Ingels, S. J., Pratt, D. J., Wilson, D., Burns, L. J., Currivan, D., Roger, J. E., et al. (2007). Education longitudinal study of 2002: Base-year to second follow-up data file documentation (NCES 2008–347). Washington, DC: US Department of Education.Google Scholar
- Luthar, S. S., & Sexton, C. (2004). The high price of affluence. In R. V. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development (Vol. 32, pp. 126–162). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Mahoney, J. L., Harris, A. L., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Organized activity participation, positive youth development, and the over-scheduling hypothesis. Society for Research in Child Development: Social Policy Report, 20, 1–30.Google Scholar
- Mahoney, J., Vandell, D. L., Simpkins, S., & Zarrett, N. (2009). Adolescent out-of-school activities. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (3rd ed., pp. 228–269). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Marsh, H. W., & Kleitman, S. (2002). Extracurricular school activities: The good, the bad, and the non-linear. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 464–514.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Noonan, D. (2001). Stop stressing me: For a growing number of kids, the whirlwind of activities can be overwhelming. How to spot burnout. Newsweek, 54–55.Google Scholar
- Rosenfeld, A., & Wise, N. (2000). The overscheduled child: Avoiding the hyper-parenting trap. New York: St. Martin’s Press Griffin.Google Scholar
- Shaw, S., Caldwell, L. L., Kleiber, D., & Douglas, A. (1996). Boredom, stress, and social control in daily activities of adolescents. Journal of Leisure Research, 28, 274–292.Google Scholar