Skip to main content

Associations of Parental and Peer Characteristics with Adolescents’ Social Dominance Orientation

Journal of Youth and Adolescence volume 40, pages 694–706 (2011)Cite this article

Abstract

Studies with adults of social dominance orientation (SDO), a preference for inequality among social groups, have found correlations with various prejudices and support for discriminatory practices. This study explores the construct among adolescents at an age when they are beginning to recognize the social groups in their environment, particularly adolescent crowds. The relationship of SDO and perceptions of parents’ responsiveness and demandingness were also investigated. Subjects were in grades 9–12 (N = 516, 53% female, 96% White). Mother’s and father’s responsiveness significantly predicted adolescent’s SDO scores, with greater perceived responsiveness associated with lower SDO. To analyze the multiple crowd memberships of the 76% belonging to more than one crowd, two-step cluster analysis was used to identify patterns, resulting in 8 clusters of distinct, heterogeneous composition. SDO differed significantly among males in different clusters, but not females. The importance of membership was positively associated with SDO among high-status crowds and negatively associated with SDO among the academic and normal crowds. The findings have implications for prejudices that may be developing in adolescence and indicate a need for further research into the social context of SDO and its development.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Allison, M. D., & Sabatelli, R. M. (1988). Differentiation and individuation as mediators of identity and intimacy in adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Research, 3(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumrind, D. (1991). The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance abuse. Journal of Early Adolescence, 11(1), 56–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (1993). A cognitive-developmental approach to racial stereotyping and reconstructive memory in Euro-American children. Child Development, 64, 1507–1518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, P. (2004). Jocks, teckers, and nerds: The role of the adolescent peer group in the formation and maintenance of secondary school institutional culture. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 25(3), 351–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. B. (1989). Social type ratings interview manual. Retrieved from http://prsg.education.wisc.edu/Measures.html#m3.

  • Brown, B. B., Herman, M., Hamm, J. V., & Heck, D. J. (2008). Ethnicity and image: Correlates of crowd affiliation among ethnic minority youth. Child Development, 79, 529–546.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. B., & Lohr, M. J. (1987). Peer-group affiliation and adolescent self-esteem: An integration of ego-identity and symbolic-interaction theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 47–55.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. B., Mory, M. S., & Kinney, D. (1994). Casting adolescent crowds in a relational perspective: Caricature, channel, and context. In R. Montemayor, G. R. Adams, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), Personal relationships during adolescence (pp. 123–166). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. B., Mounts, N., Lamborn, S. D., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting practices and peer group affiliation. Child Development, 64, 467–482.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chazal, S., & Guimond, S. (2003). La theorie de la dominance sociale et les choix d’orientation scolaire et de roles sociaux des filles et des garcons/social dominance theory and the choices of academic orientations and social roles among girls and boys. Orientation-Scolaire-et-Professionnelle, 32(4), 595–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1979). High school subcultures and the adult world. Adolescence, 55, 491–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, J. R. (in press). Crowds. In R. J. R. Levesque (Ed.), Encyclopedia of adolescence. New York: Springer.

  • Cross, J. R., & Fletcher, K. L. (2009). The challenge of adolescent crowd research: Defining the crowd. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 747–764.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidov, M., & Grusec, J. E. (2006). Untangling the links of parental responsiveness to distress and warmth to child outcomes. Child Development, 77(1), 44–58.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delsing, M. J. M. H., ter Bogt, T. F. M., Engels, R. C. M. E., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2007). Adolescents’ peer crowd identification in the Netherlands: Structure and associations with problem behaviors. Journal of Research on Adolescents, 17(2), 467–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolcini, M. M., & Adler, N. E. (1994). Perceived competencies, peer group affiliation, and risk behavior among early adolescents. Health Psychology, 13(6), 496–506.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2000). Aversive racism and selection decisions: 1998 and 1999. Psychological Science, 11, 315–319.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2004). Aversive racism. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 36, pp. 1–52). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41–113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duriez, B., & Soenens, B. (2006). Personality, identity styles and authoritarianism: An integrative study among late adolescents. European Journal of Personality, 20(5), 397–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duriez, B., Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2008). The intergenerational transmission of authoritarianism: The mediating role of parental goal promotion. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 622–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S. (2007). Families, schools, and developing achievement-related motivations and engagement. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 665–691). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, P. (1989). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., & Morris, A. S. (2004). Moral cognitions and prosocial responding in adolescence. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd ed., pp. 155–188). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N., Gylje, M., & Zakrisson, I. (2004). What matters most to prejudice: Big five personality, social dominance orientation, or right-wing authoritarianism? European Journal of Personality, 18, 463–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galambos, N. L., Almeida, D. M., & Peterson, A. C. (1990). Masculinity, femininity, and sex role attitudes in early adolescence: Exploring gender intensification. Child Development, 61, 1905–1914.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, R., Bootcheck, J., Lorr, M., & Rauch, K. (2006). The adolescent society revisited: Cultures, crowds, climates and status structures in seven secondary schools. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(6), 1023–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garson, G. D. (2008). Cluster analysis. Retrieved May 3, 2008 from http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/cluster.htm.

  • Gore, P. A., Jr. (2000). Cluster analysis. In H. Tinsley & S. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingshead, A. B. (1949). Elmtown’s youth: The impact of social class on adolescents. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingshead, A. B. (1975). Elmtown’s youth and Elmtown revisited (rev ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopmeyer-Gorman, A., Brown, B. B., Kim, B., & Wax, A. (2010, March). Who knows crowd affiliations better? Comparing expert and non-expert ratings. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, Philadelphia, PA.

  • Huang, L.-L., & Liu, J. H. (2005). Personality and social structural implications of the situational priming of social dominance orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(2), 267–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killen, M., Lee-Kim, J., McGlothlin, H., & Stangor, C. (2002). How children and adolescents evaluate gender and racial exclusion. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67(4), vii.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinney, David A. (1990). Dweebs, headbangers and trendies: Adolescent identity formation and change within socio-cultural contexts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.

  • La Greca, A. M., & Harrison, H. M. (2005). Adolescent peer relations, friendships, and romantic relationships: Do they predict social anxiety and depression? Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34, 49–61.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Greca, A. M., Landoll, R. R., & Lai, B. S. (2010, March). Adolescent peer crowds: Categorical and dimensional approaches. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, Philadelphia, PA.

  • Lamborn, S. D., Mounts, N. S., Steinberg, L., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1991). Patterns of competence and adjustment among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families. Child Development, 62, 1049–1065.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leaper, C., & Friedman, C. K. (2007). The socialization of gender. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 561–587). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, D., & Pals, H. (2005). Motives and contexts of identity change: A case for network effects. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(4), 289–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narter, D. (2006). The development of prejudice in children. In B. E. Whitley & M. E. Kite (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice and discrimination (pp. 260–297). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olweus, D., & Endresen, I. M. (1998). The importance of sex-of-stimulus object: Age trends and sex differences in empathic responsiveness. Social Development, 7, 370–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkins, I. S., Fishbein, H. D., & Ritchey, P. N. (2006). The influence of personality on workplace bullying and discrimination. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 2554–2577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. M., & Bigler, R. S. (2006). Preschool children’s attention to environmental messages about groups: Social categorization and the origins of intergroup bias. Child Development, 77(4), 847–860.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulson, S. E. (1994). Construction and validation of parenting style and parental involvement scales. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Pearson, A. R., Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2009). The nature of contemporary prejudice: Insights from aversive racism. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 314–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poteat, V. P., Espelage, D. L., & Green, H. D., Jr. (2007). The socialization of dominance: Peer group contextual effects on homophobic and dominance attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1040–1050.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigsby, L. C., & McDill, E. L. (1975). Value orientations of high school students. In H. R. Stub (Ed.), The sociology of education: A sourcebook (pp. 53–75). Homewood, IL: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Garcia, J. M., & Wagner, U. (2009). Learning to be prejudiced: A test of unidirectional and bidirectional models of parent–offspring socialization. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33, 516–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutland, A., Cameron, L., Milne, A., & McGeorge, P. (2005). Social norms and self-presentation: Children’s implicit and explicit intergroup attitudes. Child Development, 76(2), 451–466.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwendinger, H., & Schwendinger, J. R. (1985). Adolescent subcultures and delinquency. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwendinger, H., & Schwendinger, J. R. (1997). Charting subcultures at a frontier of knowledge. British Journal of Sociology, 48(1), 71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., Sinclair, S., & Pratto, F. (2006). Social dominance orientation, gender, and increasing educational exposure. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(7), 1640–1653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Son Hing, L. S., Bobocel, D. R., Zanna, M. P., & McBride, M. V. (2007). Authoritarian dynamics and unethical decision making: High social dominance orientation leaders and high right-wing authoritarianism followers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 67–81.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. R., & Brown, B. B. (1998). In the eye of the beholder: Adolescents’ perceptions of peer crowd stereotypes. In R. Muuss (Ed.), Adolescent behavior and society: A book of readings (5th ed., pp. 158–169). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. R., & Brown, B. B. (1999). Identity claims and projections: Descriptions of self and crowds in secondary school. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 84, 7–20.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strouse, D. L. (1999). Adolescent crowd orientations: A social and temporal analysis. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 84, 37–54.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sussman, S., Dent, C. W., & McCullar, W. J. (2000). Group self-identification as a prospective predictor of drug use and violence in high-risk youth. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 14(2), 192–196.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sussman, S., Pokhrel, P., Ashmore, R. D., & Brown, B. B. (2007). Adolescent peer group identification and characteristics: A review of the literature. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 1602–1627.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 25(4), 79–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urberg, K. A. (1992). Locus of peer influence: Social crowd and best friend. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21(4), 439–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Zalk, N. B., & Kerr, M. (2010, March). Shy punks, goths, and other eye-catching peer crowds: Are they more prone to problem behavior compared to other shy youths? In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, Philadelphia, PA.

  • Whitley, B. E. (1999). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(1), 126–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E., & Kite, M. E. (Eds.). (2006). The psychology of prejudice and discrimination. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youniss, J., McLellan, J. A., & Mazer, B. (2001). Voluntary service, peer group orientation, and civic engagement. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16(5), 456–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youniss, J., McLellan, J. A., & Strouse, D. (1994). “We’re popular, but we’re not snobs”: Adolescents describe their crowds. In R. Montemayor, G. R. Adams, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), Personal relationships during adolescence (pp. 101–122). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Center for Gifted Education, The College of William and Mary, P.O. Box 8795, Williamsburg, VA, 23187, USA

    Jennifer Riedl Cross

  2. Department of Educational Psychology, Teachers College, Room 524, Ball State University, Muncie, IN, 47306-0595, USA

    Kathryn L. Fletcher

Authors
  1. Jennifer Riedl Cross
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kathryn L. Fletcher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Riedl Cross.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cross, J.R., Fletcher, K.L. Associations of Parental and Peer Characteristics with Adolescents’ Social Dominance Orientation. J Youth Adolescence 40, 694–706 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9585-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9585-7

Keywords

  • Crowd
  • Parenting
  • Social dominance orientation
  • Social cognition