Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Electronic and School-Based Victimization: Unique Contexts for Adjustment Difficulties During Adolescence

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research suggests that school-based and electronic victimization have similar negative consequences, yet it is unclear whether these two contexts offer overlapping or unique associations with adolescents’ adjustment. 802 ninth-graders (43% male, mean age = 15.84 years), majority being Caucasian (82%), completed measures assessing the prevalence of school and electronic victimization, as well as self-reports on self-esteem, self-efficacy, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and locus of control. Results revealed that the majority of adolescents did not report being victimized in either the electronic (75.3%) or the school (72.9%) context. Victimization in both contexts was associated with lower self-esteem and self-efficacy as well as higher stress, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and locus of control. Importantly, even after controlling for school-based victimization, electronic victimization remained as a significant predictor for all outcome measures. Different types of electronic victimization were also associated with different psychological outcomes. The findings suggest that it is important to distinguish between victimization contexts and specific adjustment outcomes as school and health officials continue to battle the effects of peer victimization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Christiansen, E. J., & Evans, W. P. (2005). Adolescent victimization: Testing models of resiliency by gender. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 25, 298–316. doi:10.1177/0272431605276931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. A., Maxwell, M. A., Dukewich, T. L., & Yosick, R. (2010). Targeted peer victimization and the construction of positive and negative self-cognitions: Connections to depressive symptoms in children. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 39, 421–435. doi:10.1080/15374411003691776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, N. R., & Bigbee, M. A. (1998). Relational and overt forms of peer victimization: A multi-informant approach. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 337–347. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.66.2.337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, N. R., & Nelson, D. A. (2002). Relational and physical victimization within friendships: Nobody told me there’d be friends like these. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 599–607. doi:10.1023/A:1020811714064.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • David-Ferdon, C., & Hertz, M. F. (2007). Electronic media, violence, and adolescents: An emerging public health problem. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S1–S5. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dehue, F., Bolman, C., & Völlink, T. (2009). Cyberbullying: Youngsters’ experiences and parental perception. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 217–223. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erath, S. A., Flanagan, K. S., Bierman, K. L., & Tu, K. M. (2010). Friendships moderate psychosocial maladjustment in socially anxious early adolescents. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31, 15–26. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2009.05.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fekkes, M., Pijpers, F. I. M., Fredriks, M., Vogels, T., & Verloove-Vanhorick, S. P. (2006). Do bullied children get ill or do ill children get bullied? A prospective cohort study on the relationship between bullying and health-related symptoms. Pediatrics, 117, 1568–1574. doi:10.1542/peds.2005-0187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatick, K. M., Dulin, A., & Piko, B. (2010). Bullying and depressive symptomatology among low-income African-American youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 634–645. doi:10.1007/s10964-009-9426-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawker, D. S. J., & Boulton, M. J. (2000). Twenty years’ research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 441–455. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2007). Offline consequences of online victimization: School violence and delinquency. Journal of School Violence, 6, 89–112. doi:10.1300/J202v06n03_06.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior, 29, 129–156. doi:10.1080/01639620701457816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S22–S30. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lenhart, A., Arafeh, S., Smith, A., & Macgill, A. (2008). Writing, technology and teens. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved March 23, 2010. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org.

  • Madell, D. C., & Muncer, S. J. (2007). Control over social interactions: An important reason for young people’s use of the internet and mobile phones for communication? CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 137–140. doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishina, A., Juvonen, J., & Witkow, M. R. (2005). Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will make me feel sick: The psychosocial, somatic, and scholastic consequences of peer harassment. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34, 37–48. doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp3401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrov, J. M. (2008). Forms of aggression and peer victimization during early childhood: A short-term longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 311–322. doi:10.1007/s10802-007-9179-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4, 148–169. doi:10.1177/1541204006286288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raskauskas, J., & Stoltz, A. D. (2007). Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 43, 564–575. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.564.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2004). Behavior assessment system for children (2nd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, K. (1998). Suicidal ideation and bullying among Australian secondary school children. Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 15, 45–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1982). The development and application of social learning theory. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandstrom, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2003). Sociometric status and children’s peer experiences: Use of the daily diary method. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 427–452. doi:10.1353/mpq.2003.0025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 376–385. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Solberg, M. E., & Olweus, D. (2003). Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus bully/victim questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 239–268. doi:10.1002/ab.10047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Aa, N., Overbeek, G., Engels, R. C. M. E., Scholte, R. H. J., Meerkerk, G., & Van den Eijnden, R. J. J. M. (2008). Daily and compulsive internet use and well-being in adolescence: A diathesis-stress model based on big five personality traits. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 765–776. doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9298-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Iannotti, R. J., & Nansel, T. R. (2009). School bullying among adolescents in the United States: Physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45, 368–375. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.03.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. R., & Guerra, N. G. (2007). Prevalence and predictors of internet bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S14–S21. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolak, J., Mitchell, K. J., & Finkelhor, D. (2007). Does online harassment constitute bullying? An exploration of online harassment by known peers and online-only contacts. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S51–S58. doi:10.1016/j.jadolhealth.2007.08.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ybarra, M. L. (2004). Linkages between depressive symptomatology and internet harassment among young regular internet uses. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 247–257. doi:10.1089/109493104323024500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ybarra, M. L., Alexander, C., & Mitchell, K. J. (2005). Depressive symptomatology, youth Internet use, and online interactions: A national survey. Journal of Adolescent Health, 36, 9–18. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.10.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ybarra, M. L., Diener-West, M., & Leaf, P. J. (2007). Examining the overlap in internet harassment and school bullying: Implications for school intervention. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S42–S50. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.09.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zins, J. E., & Elias, M. J. (Eds.). (2007). Bullying, victimization, and peer harassment: A handbook of prevention and intervention. New York: Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the adolescents, parents, and teachers who participated in this study. Special thanks should also be extended to Cassandra Coddington and Somer Bishop for their thoughtful comments on an earlier version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bridget K. Fredstrom.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fredstrom, B.K., Adams, R.E. & Gilman, R. Electronic and School-Based Victimization: Unique Contexts for Adjustment Difficulties During Adolescence. J Youth Adolescence 40, 405–415 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9569-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9569-7

Keywords

Navigation