Civic participation does not necessarily equate to civic engagement. However, to date, integrated measures of civic engagement that go beyond civic behaviors have not been developed. In this article, we propose an integrated construct of civic engagement, active and engaged citizenship (AEC), that includes behavioral, cognitive, and socioemotional constructs. Using data from 909 adolescents (62.4% girls) who took part in the Grades 8–10 assessments of the longitudinal 4-H Study of Positive Youth Development (PYD), we assessed the structure and measurement invariance of AEC. AEC was proposed as a second-order latent construct that encompasses four first-order latent factors: Civic Duty, Civic Skills, Neighborhood Social Connection, and Civic Participation. Measurement invariance was tested over time (from Grade 8 to Grade 10) and between boys and girls. The results supported strong invariance of AEC over time and between sexes. Implications of AEC for future research and practice are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.
Baltes, P. B., Lindenberger, U., & Staudinger, U. M. (2006). Lifespan theory in developmental psychology. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 1 (6th ed.). New York: Wiley.
Baltes, P. B., Reese, H. W., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1977). Life-span developmental psychology: Introduction to research methods. Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole.
Bentler, P. M., & Hu, L. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
Bobek, D. L., Zaff, J., Li, Y., & Lerner, R. M. (2009). Cognitive, emotional, and behavioral components of civic action: Towards an integrated measure of civic engagement. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(5), 615–627.
Brandtstädter, J. (1998). Action perspectives on human development. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development, Vol. 1 (5th ed., pp. 807–863). New York: Wiley.
Brandtstädter, J. (2006). Action perspectives on human development. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Theoretical models of human development. Vol. 1 of Handbook of Child Psychology (6th ed., pp. 516–568). Editors-in-chief: W. Damon and R. M. Lerner. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Burton, L. M., & Jarrett, R. L. (2000). In the mix, yet on the margins: The place of families in urban neighborhood and child development research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1114–1135.
Byrne, B. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Byrne, B., & Stewart, S. M. (2004). The MACS approach to testing for multigroup invariance of a second-order structure: A walk through the process. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 287–321.
Byrne, B., & Watkins, D. (2003). The issue of measurement invariance revisited. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 34, 155–175.
Chavis, D. M., & Wandersman, A. (1990). Sense of community in the urban environment: A catalyst for participation and community development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 55–81.
Chen, F. F., Sousa, K. H., & West, S. G. (2005). Testing measurement invariance of second-order factor models. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 471–492.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2000). Assessing extreme and acquiescence response sets in cross-cultural research using structural equation modeling. Journal of Cross-Cultural Research, 31, 187–212.
Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1995). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16–29.
Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society. New York: WW. Norton & Co.
Farrington, D. (1991). Longitudinal research strategies: Advantages, problems, and prospects. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 30(3), 369–374.
Feldt, T., Leskinen, E., Kinnunen, U., & Mauno, S. (2000). Longitudinal factor analysis models in the assessment of the stability of sense of coherence. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 239–257.
Flanagan, C. A., & Faison, N. (2001). Youth civic development: Implications of research for social policy and programs. Social Policy Reports, 15, 3–14.
Flanagan, C., Cumsille, G., & Gallay, L. S. (2007a). School and community climates and civic commitments: Patterns for ethnic minority and majority students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 421–431.
Flanagan, C. A., Syversten, A. K., & Stout, M. D. (2007b). Civic measurement models: Tapping adolescents’ civic engagement. CIRCLE Working Paper 55. Medford, MA: CIRCLE.
Flanagan, C., Levine, P., & Settersten, R. (2009). Civic engagement and the changing transition to adulthood. Medford, MA: Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement.
Ford, D. H., & Lerner, R. M. (1992). Developmental systems theory: An integrative approach. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 382–388.
Fredericks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence/. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.
Gestsdottir, S. & Lerner, R. M. (2007). Intentional self-regulation and positive youth development in early adolescence: Findings from the 4-H study of positive youth development. Developmental Psychology, 43, 508–521.
Ginwright, S. A. (2007). Black youth activism and the role of critical social capital in black community organizations. American Behavioral Scientist, 51, 403–418.
Greenberger, E., & Bond, L. (1984). User’s manual for the “psychosocial maturity inventory”. Irvine, CA: University of California.
Grusec, J. E., Goodnow, J. J., & Cohen, L. (1996). Household work and the development of concern for others. Developmental Psychology, 32, 999–1007.
Jelicic, H., Bobek, D., Phelps, E. D., Lerner, J. V., Lerner, R. M. (2007). Using positive youth development to predict contribution and risk behaviors in early adolescence: Findings from the first two waves of the 4-H Study of Positive Youth Development. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(3), 263–273.
Jelicic, H., Phelps, E., & Lerner, R. M. (2009). Use of missing data methods in longitudinal studies: The persistence of bad practices in developmental psychology. Developmental Psychology, 45(4), 1195–1199.
Larson, R. (2000). Towards a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist, 55, 170–183.
Leffert, N., Beson, P. L., Scales, P. C., Sharma, A. R., Drake, D. R., & Blyth, D. A. (1998). Developmental assets: Measurement and prediction of risk behaviors among adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 2, 209–230.
Lerner, J. V., Phelps, E., Forman, Y. E., & Bowers, E. (2009). Positive youth development. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology: Individual bases of adolescent development, Vol. 1 (3rd ed., pp. 524–558). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Lerner, R. M. (2004). Liberty: Thriving and civic engagement among America’s youth. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Almerigi, J., Theokas, C., Phelps, E., Gestsdottir, S., et al. (2005). Positive youth development, participation in community youth development programs, and community contributions of fifth grade adolescents: Findings from the first wave of the 4-H Study of Positive Youth Development. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(1), 17–71.
Levine, P. & Youniss, J. (2006). Youth and civic participation: Introduction. In P. Levine & J. Youniss (eds.). Youth civic engagement: An institutional turn: Circle Working Paper 45, (pp. 3–6). Baltimore, MD: The Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement.
Marcelo, K. B., Lopez, M. H., & Kirby, E. (2007). Civic engagement among young men and women. Medford, MA: CIRCLE.
Marcia, J. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In J. Adelson (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology. New York: Wiley.
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543.
Phelps, E., Zimmerman, S., Warren, A. E., Jelicic, H., von Eye, A., & Lerner, R. M. (2009). The structure and developmental course of positive youth development (PYD) in adolescence: Implications for theory and practice. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 571–584.
Pitts, S. C., West, S. G., & Tein, J. (1996). Longitudinal measurement models in evaluation research: Examining stability and change. Evaluation and Program Planning, 19, 333–350.
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1988). Scaling corrections for chi square statistics in covariance structure analysis. ASA 1988 Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sherrod, L. (2007). Civic engagement as an expression of positive youth development. In R. Silbereisen & R. Lerner (Eds.), Approaches to positive youth development. London: Sage.
Sherrod, L. R., & Lauckhardt, J. (2009). The development of citizenship. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology: Contextual influences on adolescent development, Vol. 2 (3rd ed., pp. 372–408). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Small, S. A., & Rodgers, K. B. (1995). Teen assessment project (TAP) survey question bank. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Theiss-Morse, E., & Hibbing, J. R. (2004). Citizenship and civic engagement. Annual Review of Political Science, 8, 227–249.
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–69.
Widaman, K. F., & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In K. J. Bryant, M. Windle, & S. G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281–324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Youniss, J. (2006). Reshaping a developmental theory for political-civic development. In P. Levine & J. Youniss (Eds.), Youth civic engagement: An institutional turn. Medford, MA: CIRCLE.
Zaff, J. F., Malanchuk, O., & Eccles, J. S. (2008). Predicting positive citizenship from adolescence to young adulthood: The effects of a civic context”. Applied Development Science, 12, 38–53.
Zaff, J. F., & Michelsen, E. (2001). Background for community-level work on positive citizenship among adolescents: A review of antecedents, programs, and investment strategies. Report prepared for the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. Washington, DC: Child Trends.
This research was supported in part by a grant from the National 4-H Council.
About this article
Cite this article
Zaff, J., Boyd, M., Li, Y. et al. Active and Engaged Citizenship: Multi-group and Longitudinal Factorial Analysis of an Integrated Construct of Civic Engagement. J Youth Adolescence 39, 736–750 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9541-6
- Civic engagement
- Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)
- Measurement invariance
- Multi-group CFA
- Longitudinal research