Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 37, Issue 7, pp 860–874 | Cite as

Adolescent Siblings’ Looking Glass Self-Orientations: Patterns of Liabilities and Associations with Parenting

Empirical Research


A looking glass self-orientation refers to the tendency to incorporate the opinions of social partners to form a self-representation and approve of one’s self. These orientations were assessed for two adolescent siblings in 438 families with surveys accessed on-line. Younger (M = 11.6 years, SD = 1.8) and older (M = 14.3, SD = 2.1) siblings and their mothers (82.7% European-American) participated. The siblings shared similar orientations in relying on either classmates or the other sibling for approval, prior to self approval. Relying on classmate approval was significantly associated with adjustment and academic performance as reported by both the self and mothers. Siblings were also identified as sources of approval with implications for adjustment, but the magnitude of the associations with adjustment were lower. Comparisons of the older and younger siblings revealed that both groups were equally as liable to poor outcomes when reflecting the opinions of classmates or siblings. The results of SEM analyses implicate parenting characterized as coercive, rejecting, and chaotic in association with the tendency to rely on others for approval. A mediating role for looking glass self-orientations in associations between parenting and depressive symptoms, anxiety or academic performance was also found.


Sibling relationships Self-representations Looking glass self-orientations or metatheories Parenting Adjustment Academic performance 


  1. Allison, P. D. (2003). Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 545–557.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arbuckle, J. L. (2005). AMOS 6.0 [computer software]. Spring House, PA: Amos Development Corporation.Google Scholar
  3. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouchey, H. A., & Harter, S. (2005). Reflected appraisals, academic self-perceptions, and math/science performance during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 673–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Bretherton, I. (1991). Pouring new wine in old bottles: The social self as internal working model. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self processes and development: The Minnesota Symposia on Child Development (Vol. 23, pp. 1–41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Brody, G. H. (1998). Sibling relationship quality: Its causes and consequences. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 1–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Cassidy, J. (1990). Theoretical and methodological considerations in the study of attachment and the self in young children. In M. T. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti, & E. M. Cummings (Eds.), Attachment in the preschool years: Theory, research, and intervention (pp. 87–120). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cassidy, J., Ziv, Y., Mehta, T.G., & Feeney, B. C. (2003). Feedback seeking in children and adolescents: Associations with self-perceptions, attachment representations, and depression. Child Development, 74, 612–628.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chorpita, B. F., Yim, L., Moffitt, C., Umemoto, L. A., & Francis, S. E. (2000). Assessment of symptoms of the DSM-IV anxiety and depression in children: A revised child anxiety and depression scale. Behavior Research and Therapy, 38, 835–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribner’s and Sons.Google Scholar
  15. Coopersmith, S. (1967). The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  16. Crittenden, P. M. (1990). Internal representational models of attachment relationships. Infant Mental Health Journal, 11, 259–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Damon, W., & Hart, D. (1988). Self-understanding in childhood and adolescence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. DuBois, D. L., Felner, R. D., Sherman, M. D., & Bull, C. A. (1994). Socio-environmental experiences, self-esteem, and emotional/behavioral problems in adolescence. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 371–397.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dunn, J. (2002). Sibling relationships. In P. K. Smith & C. H. Hart (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of childhood social development (pp. 223–237). Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  20. Dunn, J., & Kendrick, C. (1982). Siblings: Love, envy, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. East, P. (1998). Impact of adolescent childbearing on families and younger siblings: Effects that increase younger siblings’ risk for early pregnancy. Applied Developmental Science, 2, 62–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eccles, J. S., & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage/environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for early adolescents. In R. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 3, pp. 139–181). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  23. Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 430–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Feinberg, M., Neiderhiser, J. M., Simmens, S., Reiss, D., & Hetherington, E. M. (2000). Sibling comparison of differential parental treatment in adolescence: Gender, self-esteem, and emotionality as mediators of the parenting-adjustment association. Child Development, 71, 1611–1628.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fiering, C., & Taska, L. S. (1996). Family self-concept: Ideas on its meaning. In B. A. Bracken (Ed.), Handbook of self-concept: Development, social and clinical considerations (pp. 317–373). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Frey, K. S., & Ruble, D. N. (1990). Strategies for comparative evaluation: Maintaining sense of competence across the life span. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Kollingian Jr. (Eds.), Competence considered (pp. 167–189). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Harter, S. (1986). Processes underlying the construction, maintenance, and enhancement of the self-concept in children. In J. Suls & A.G. Greenwald (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 3, pp. 137–181). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Harter, S. (1987). The determinants and mediational role of global self-worth in children. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Contemporary issues in developmental psychology (pp. 219–242). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Harter, S. (1990). Causes, correlates and the functional role of global self-worth: A life-span perspective. In J. Kolligian & R. Sternberg (Eds.), Perceptions of competence and incompetence across the life span. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Harter, S. (1998). The development of self-representations. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Harter, S. (1999a). The construction of the self: A developmental perspective. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  32. Harter, S. (1999b). Symbolic interactionism revisited: Potential liabilities for the self constructed in the crucible of interpersonal relationships. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 677–703.Google Scholar
  33. Harter, S., & Pike, R. (1984). The pictoral scale of perceived competence and social-acceptance for young children. Child Development, 55, 1969–1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harter, S., & Stocker, C. (1993). A model of the perceived directionality of the link between approval and self-worth. Unpublished manuscript, University of Denver, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
  35. Harter, S., Stocker, C., & Robinson, N. (1996). The perceived directionaly of the link between approval and self-worth: The liabilities of a looking glass self-orientation among young adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6, 285–308.Google Scholar
  36. Harter, S., & Whitesell, N. R. (2003). Beyond the debate: Why some adolescents report stable self-worth over time and situation, whereas others report changes in self-worth. Journal of Personality, 71, 1027–1058.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hazen, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Holmbeck, G. N. (1997). Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators. Examples from the child clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 599–610.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hoyle, R. H. (1995). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In R. K. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 1–15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Ingoldsby, E. M., Shaw, D. S., & Garcia, M. M. (2001). Intrafamily conflict in relation to boys’ adjustment in school. Development and Psychopathology, 13, 35–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jenkins, J. M., Dunn, J., O’Connor, T. G., Rasbash, J., & Behnke, P. (2005). Change in maternal perception of sibling negativity: Within- and between family influences. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 533–541.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Joiner, T. E., Katz, J., & Lew, A. S. (1997). Self-verification and depression among youth psychiatric inpatients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 608–618.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kernis, M. H. (1993). The roles of stability and level of self-esteem in psychological functioning. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard (pp. 167–180). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  44. Kowal, A., & Kramer, L. (1997). Children’s understanding of parental differential treatment. Child Development, 61, 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kupersmidt, J. B., & Dodge, K. A. (2004). Children’s peer relationship: From development to intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  46. Lamborn, S. D., Mounts, N. S., Steinberg, L., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1991). Patterns of Competence and adjustment among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent and neglectful families. Child Development, 62, 1049–1065.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lewin, L. M., Hops, H., Davis, B., & Dishion, T. J. (1993). Multimethod comparison of similarity in school adjustment of siblings and unrelated children. Developmental Psychology, 6, 963–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McGuire, S., McHale, S. M., & Updegraff, K. (1996). Children’s perceptions of the sibling relationship in middle childhood: Connections within and between family relationships. Personal Relationships, 3, 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  50. McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McHale, S. M., & Crouter, A. C. (1996). The family contexts of sibling relationships. In G. Brody (Ed.), Sibling relationships their causes and consequences. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  52. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: validations of inferences form persons’ response and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  54. Oosterwegel, A., & Oppenheimer, L. (1993). The self-esteem: Developmental changes between and within self-concepts. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  55. Parke, R. D., & O’Neil. R. (2000). The influence of significant others on learning about relationships: From families to friends. In R. Mills & S. Duck (Eds.), The developmental psychology of personal relationships (2nd ed., pp. 29–60). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  56. Pike, A., Coldwell, J., & Dunn, J. F. (2005). Sibling relationships in early/middle childhood: Links with individual adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 523–532.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rodgers, J. L., & Rowe, D. C. (1990). Adolescent sexual activity and mildly deviant behavior: Sibling and friendship effects. Journal of Family Issues, 11, 274–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rosenberg, M. (1986). Self-concept from middle childhood through adolescence. In J. Suls & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Psychological perspective on the self. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  59. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivators: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schachter, F. F., Shore, E., Feldman-Rotman, S., Marquis, R., E., & Campbell, S. (1976). Sibling deidentification. Developmental Psychology, 12, 418–427.Google Scholar
  61. Schachter, F. F., & Stone, R. K. (1987). Comparing and contrasting siblings: Defining the self. Journal of Children in Contemporary Society, 19, 55–75.Google Scholar
  62. Shebloski, B., Conger, K. J., & Widaman, K. F. (2005). Reciprocal links among differential parenting, perceived partiality, and self-worth: A three-wave longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 633–642.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Skinner, E., Johnson, S., & Snyder, T. (2005). Six dimensions of parenting: A motivational model. Parenting: Science and Practice, 5, 175–205.Google Scholar
  64. Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J. G., & Regan, C. (1986). The “Parents as Social Context Questionnaire” (PASCQ): Parent- and child-reports of parent involvement, structure, and autonomy support. (Tech Rep.), Rochester, NY: University of Rochester.Google Scholar
  65. Slomkowski, C., Rende, R., Conger, K. J., Simons, R. L., & Conger, R. D. (2001). Sisters, brothers, and delinquency: Evaluating social influence during early and middle adolescence. Child Development, 72, 271–283.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Slomkowski, C., Rende, R., Novak, S., Lloyd-Richardson, E., & Niaura, R. (2005). Sibling effects on smoking in adolescence: Evidence for social influence from a genetically informative design. Addiction, 100, 430–438.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290–312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  68. Stipek, D. J. (1981). Children’s perceptions of their own and their classmates’ ability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 404–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stocker, C., Dunn, J., & Plomin, R. (1989). Sibling relationships: Links with child temperament, maternal behavior, and family structure. Child Development, 60, 715–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Trzeniewski, K. H., Donnellan, M. B., & Robins, R. W. (2003). Stability of self-esteem across the life-span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tucker, C. J., McHale, S. M., & Crouter, A. C. (2001). Conditions of sibling support in adolescence. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 254–271.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Yeh, H. C., & Lempers, J. D. (2004). Perceived sibling relationships and adolescent development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Family Studies and Human DevelopmentUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.The Pennsylvania State UniversityYorkUSA

Personalised recommendations