Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 36, Issue 8, pp 1102–1103 | Cite as

Maureen Drysdale, B. J. Rye, Taking Sides: Clashing Views in Adolescence

McGraw-Hill, Dubuque, Iowa, 2006, ISBN 10: 0073515086
  • Tom HollensteinEmail author
Book Review

Adolescence is inherently controversial. Caught between the developmental expectations of childhood and adulthood, society has a great interest in what adolescents should and should not be able to do. Adolescents have a different perspective and are indeed driven towards behaviors that are often at odds with societal forces. In Taking Sides: Clashing Views of Adolescence(Drysdale and Rye 2006), 18 issues pertaining to society’s proscriptions for adolescent behavior (e.g., should adolescents have access to condoms) or the deleterious effects of events during this period (e.g., the effect of divorce on adolescent development) are explored in a “didactic, dialectical fashion” (p. v). The authors introduce an interesting format for considering opposing views on each of these issues. Targeted toward student readers, the intent of the book is to “foster critical and incisive thinking about issues that may have a significant impact on adolescent development in the 21st century.” (p. v)....


Critical Thinking Adolescent Health Adolescent Development Opposing View Critical Thinking Skill 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Collett, T. S. (2001). Testimony before the subcommittee on the constitution, committee on the judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives (September 6, 2001).Google Scholar
  2. Engels, R. C. M. E., Scholte, R. H. J., van Lieshout, C. F. M., de Kemp, R., & Overbeek, G. (2006). Peer group reputation and smoking and alcohol consumption in early adolescence. Addictive Behaviors, 31, 440–449.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gross, E. F., Juvonen, J., & Gable, S. L. (2002). Internet use and well-being in adolescence. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jayson, S. (2005). Teens define sex in new ways. USA Today Magazine, October 19.Google Scholar
  5. Lapierre, Y. D. (2003). Suicidality with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: Valid claim? Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, 28, 340–347.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. McCreary, D. R., & Sassee, D. K. (2000). An exploration of the drive for muscularity in adolescent boys and girls. Journal of American College Health, 48, 297–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mears, D. P. (2001). Getting tough with juvenile offenders: Explaining support for sanctioning youths as adults. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 206–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Steinberg, L., & Scott, E. S. (2003). Less guilty by reason of adolescence: Developmental immaturity, diminished responsibility, and the juvenile death penalty. American Psychologist, 58, 1009–1018.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sullum, J, (2002). Sex, drugs, and techno music. Reason, 33, 26–34.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations