Advertisement

Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 37, Issue 6, pp 674–684 | Cite as

Procedural Justice in Family Conflict Resolution and Deviant Peer Group Involvement Among Adolescents: The Mediating Influence of Peer Conflict

  • Jennifer Stuart
  • Mark Fondacaro
  • Scott A. Miller
  • Veda Brown
  • Eve M. Brank
Original Paper

Abstract

The involvement of adolescents with deviant peer groups is one of the strongest proximal correlates to juvenile delinquency and stems from a variety of causes. Past research has linked ineffective parenting with peer variables, including deviant peer group involvement and peer conflict during adolescence. In this study, adolescents’ appraisals of procedural justice within the family (adolescents’ appraisals of how fairly they are treated by parents in the process of resolving family conflict) were examined as one aspect of effective parenting that may relate to deviant peer group involvement in early adolescence. Data from 1660 middle school students (ages 11–14, mean = 12.6) indicated that higher appraisals by adolescents of procedural justice during family conflict resolution were related to lower levels of both peer conflict and deviant peer group involvement. A structural model was tested in which the relationship between adolescents’ appraisals of procedural justice in the family and deviant peer group involvement was partially mediated by measures of peer conflict. This model was found to have adequate fit to the data, indicating that part of the relationship between procedural justice appraisals and deviant peer group involvement can be explained by levels of peer conflict. Implications of these findings are discussed.

Keywords

Procedural justice Family conflict Deviant peers Juvenile delinquency 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the U.S. Department of Education: Fund for the Improvement of Education Program PR/Award Number R215U010016. We would like to acknowledge Jennifer Woolard, Steven Boggs, William Cliett, Mel Lucas, Stephen Smith, Imicuk Loyuk, Anca Mirsu-Paun, Jennifer Luescher, and Ramona Chinn for their work on this project. A final report on the grant research was provided to the U.S. Department of Education in December 2003. Preliminary findings from this study were presented at the 2006 meeting of the American Psychology - Law Society, St. Petersburg, FL. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Jennifer L. Stuart, Department of Psychology, University of Florida, P.O. Box 112250, Gainesville, FL 32611-5950; e-mail: jlstuart@ufl.edu.

References

  1. Agnew, R. (1991). The interactive effects of peer variables on delinquency. Criminology, 29, 47–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, B. B., & Lohr, M. J. (1987). Peer group affiliation and adolescent self-esteem: An integration of ego-identity and symbolic interaction theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 47–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cairns, R. B., & Cairns, B. D. (1991). Social cognition and social networks: A developmental perspective. In D. J. Pepler & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 249–178). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Diamond, A. (2003). Linking procedural and distributive justice in family decision-making to adolescent family functioning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida.Google Scholar
  9. Diamond, A., Luescher, J., Fondacaro, M. R. (2000). Procedural and distributive justice in family decision making: A psychosocial analysis of individual and family functioning during adolescence. Poster presented at the Biennial Conference of the American Psychology-Law Society, New Orleans, Louisiana.Google Scholar
  10. Dilalla, L. F. (2000). Structural equation modeling: Uses and issues. In H. E. A. Tinsley & S. D. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 439–464). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dishion, T. J. (1990). The family ecology of boys’ peer relations in middle childhood. Child Development, 61, 874–892.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dishion, T. J., & Owen, L. D. (2002). A longitudinal analysis of friendships and substance use: Bidirectional influence from adolescence to adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 38, 480–491.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dishion, T. J., & Patterson, G. R. (1997). The timing of severity on antisocial behaviour: Three hypotheses within an ecological framework. In D. M. Stoff & J. Breiling (Eds.), Handbook of antisocial behavior (pp. 205–217). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Dishion, T. J., Patterson, G. R., & Griesler, P. C. (1994). Peer adaptations in the development of antisocial behavior: A confluence model. In L. R. Huesmann (Ed), Aggressive behavior: Current perspectives. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dishion, T. J., Patterson, G. R., Stoolmiller, M., & Skinner, M. L. (1991). Family, school, and behavioral antecedents to early adolescent involvement with antisocial peers. Developmental Psychology, 27, 172–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Ageton, S. S. (1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  17. Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Menard, S. (1989). Multiple-problem youth: Delinquency, substance use, and mental health problems. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  18. Elliott, D. S., & Menard, S. (1996). Delinquent friends and delinquent behavior: Temporal and developmental patterns. In J. D. Hawkins (Ed), Delinquency and crime (pp. 28–67). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Farrington, D. P. (1991). Childhood aggression and adult violence: Early precursors and later life outcomes. In D. J. Pepler & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 5–30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Finkbeiner, C. (1979). Estimation for the multiple factor model when data are missing. Psychometrika, 44, 409–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fondacaro, M. R., Dunkle, M. E., & Pathak, M. K. (1998). Procedural justice in resolving family disputes: A psychosocial analysis of individual and family functioning in late adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 27, 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fondacaro, M. R., Jackson, S. L., & Luescher, J. (2002). Toward the assessment of procedural and distributive justice in resolving family disputes. Social Justice Research, 15, 341–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frazier, P.A., Tix, A.P., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fuligni, A. J., Eccles, J. S., Barber, B. L., & Clements, P. (2001). Early adolescent peer orientation and adjustment during high school. Developmental Psychology, 37, 28–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Granic, I., Hollenstein, T., Dishion, T. J., & Patterson, G. R. (2003). Longitudinal analysis of flexibility and reorganization in early adolescence: A dynamic systems study of family interactions. Developmental Psychology, 39, 606–617.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Griffin, K. W., Botvin, G. J., Scheier, L. M., Diaz, T., & Miller, N. L. (2000). Parenting practices as predictors of substance use, delinquency, and aggression among urban minority youth: Moderating effects of family structure and gender. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 14, 174–184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hawkins, J. D., Herrenkohl, T. I., Farrington, D. P., Brewer, D., Catalano, R. F., Harachi, T. W., et al. (2000). Predictors of youth violence. Juvenile Justice Bulletin of the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Retrieved October 1, 2004, from http://www.ncjrs.gov/html/ojjdp/jjbul2000_04_5/contents.html.Google Scholar
  28. Jackson, S., & Fondacaro, M. (1999). Procedural justice in resolving family conflict: Implications for youth violence prevention. Law & Policy, 21, 101–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jaycox, L. H., & Repetti, R. L. (1993). Conflict in families and the psychological adjustment of preadolescent children. Journal of Family Psychology, 7, 344–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Krueger, R. F., Schmutte, P. S., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Campbell, K., & Silva, P. A. (1994). Personality traits are linked to crime among men and women: Evidence from a birth cohort. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 328–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In K.J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Weiss (Eds), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  32. Linden, E., & Hackler, J. C. (1973). Affective ties and delinquency. Pacific Sociological Review, 16, 27–46.Google Scholar
  33. Miller, S. A., Fondacaro, M. F., Woolard, J. L., Boggs, S., Brank, E., Cliett, W., Lucas, M., & Smith, S. W. (2003). National middle school survey: School violence and beliefs about self, others, and the future. Final report to US Department of Education.Google Scholar
  34. Moffitt, T. E. (1993a). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moffitt, T. E. (1993b). The neuropsychology of conduct disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moos, R. H., & Moos, B. S. (1992). Life stressors and social resources inventory-youth form manual. Palo Alto, CA: Center for Health Care Evaluation, Stanford University and Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.Google Scholar
  37. Patterson, G. R., DeBaryshe, B. D., & Ramsey, E. (1989). A developmental perspective on antisocial behavior. American Psychologist, 44, 329–335.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Patterson, G. R., Dishion, T. J., & Yoerger, K. (2000). Adolescent growth in new forms of problem behavior: Macro- and micro-peer dynamics. Prevention Science, 1, 3–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Patterson, G. R., Forgatch, M. S., Yoerger, K. L., & Stoolmiller, M. (1998). Variables that initiate and maintain an early-onset trajectory for juvenile offending. Development and Psychopathology, 10, 531–547.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Quinsey, V. L., Skilling, T. A., Lalumiere, M. L., & Craig, W. M. (2004). Juvenile delinquency: Understanding the origins of individual differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  41. Russel, D. W., Kahn, J. H., Spoth, R., & Altmaier, E. M. (1998). Analyzing data from experimental studies: A latent variable structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and non-experimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smetana, J. G. (1995). Parenting styles and conceptions of parental authority during adolescence. Child Development, 66, 299–316.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Loeber, R., Wei, E., Farrington, D. P., Wikstrom, P. H. (2002). Risk and promotive effects in the explanation of persistent serious delinquency in boys. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 111–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stuart, J. (2006). Family justice appraisals and involvement with deviant peers among adolescents. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Florida.Google Scholar
  46. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  47. Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  48. Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 830–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tyler, T. R. (1994). Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 850–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tyler, T. R., & Degoey, P. (1995). Trust in organizational authorities: The influence of motive attributions on willingness to accept decisions. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 331–336). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  51. Tyler, T. R., Degoey, P., & Smith, H. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 25 San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  53. Vuchinich, S., Bank, L., & Patterson, G. R. (1992). Parenting, peers, and the stability of antisocial behavior in preadolescent boys. Developmental Psychology, 28, 510–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Warr, M. (1998). Life-course transitions and desistance from crime. Criminology, 36, 183–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Warr, M. (2005). Making delinquent friends: Adult supervision and children’s affiliations. Criminology, 43, 77–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer Stuart
    • 1
  • Mark Fondacaro
    • 2
  • Scott A. Miller
    • 1
  • Veda Brown
    • 3
  • Eve M. Brank
    • 1
  1. 1.University of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.John Jay College of Criminal JusticeNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Prairie View A & M UniversityPrairie ViewUSA

Personalised recommendations