Perceived Social Environment and Adolescents’ Well-Being and Adjustment: Comparing a Foster Care Sample With a Matched Sample

  • Susan P. Farruggia
  • Ellen Greenberger
  • Chuansheng Chen
  • Jutta Heckhausen
Article

Previous research has demonstrated that former foster care youth are at risk for poor outcomes (e.g., more problem behaviors, more depression, lower self-esteem, and poor social relationships). It is not clear, however, whether these findings reflect preemancipation developmental deficits. This study used 163 preemancipation foster care youth and a matched sample of 163 comparison youth. Results showed that foster-care youth did not differ from the comparison sample on measures of well-being, including depressed mood, problem behavior, and self-esteem. Foster care youth reported higher levels of work orientation, but lower levels of academic achievement, aspirations, and expectations. In addition, compared to the matched sample, foster care youth perceived better social environments with respect to their important nonparental adults (VIPs) and peers, but poorer social environments relating to their parents. These differences in social environments may have offset each other and resulted in similar levels of psychological well-being for the two groups of youth. Regression analyses further showed that social environments were linked to selected adolescent outcomes, and nonparental VIPs were especially important for the foster care sample.

Key Words

foster care problem behavior depressed mood child maltreatment 

REFERENCES

  1. Beam, M. R., Chen, C., and Greenberger, E. (2002). The nature of adolescents’ relationships with their “very important” nonparental adults. Am. J. Community Psychol. 30: 305–325.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benedict, M. I., Zuravin, S., and Stallings, R. Y. (1996). Adult functioning of children who lived in kin versus nonrelative family foster homes. Child Welfare 75: 529–549.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Blome, W. W. (1997). What happens to foster kids: Educational experiences of a random sample of foster care youth and a matched group of non-foster care youth. Child. Adolesc. Soc. Work J. 14: 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blyth, D. A., Hill, J. P., and Thiel, K. S. (1982). Early adolescents’ significant others: Grade and gender differences in perceived relationships with familial and nonfamilial adults and young people. J. Youth Adolesc. 11: 425–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buehler, C., Orme, J. G., Post, J., and Patterson, D. A. (2000). The long-term correlates of family foster care. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 22: 595–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chang, E. S., Chen, C., Greenberger, E., Dooley, D., and Heckhausen, J. (in press). What do they want in life? The life goals of a multi-ethnic, multi-generational sample of high school seniors. J. Youth Adolesc. Google Scholar
  7. Chen, C., Greenberger, E., Farruggia, S., Bush, K., and Dong, Q. (2003). Beyond parents and peers: The role of important non-parental adults (VIPs) in adolescent development in China and the United States. Psychol. Sch. 40: 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, C., Greenberger, E., Lester, J., Dong, Q., and Guo, M.-S. (1998). A cross-cultural study of family and peer correlates of adolescent misconduct. Dev. Psychol. 34: 770–781.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cook, S. K. (1992). Long term consequences of foster care for adult well-being. Dissert. Abstr. Int. 53(4-A): 1278.Google Scholar
  10. Cook-Fong, S. K. (2000). The adult well-being of individuals reared in family foster care placement. Child Youth Care Forum 29: 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Courtney, M. E., Dworsky, A., Terao, S., Bost, N., Ruth, G., Keller, T., and Havlicek, J. (2005). Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth. University of Chicago, Chapin Hall Center for Children, Chicago.Google Scholar
  12. Department of Social Services (2002). Child welfare services supervised children placed in relative homes and foster family homes by county. Retrieved on December 7, 2005 from http://www.dss.cahwnet.gov/research/res/pdf/compchildrept7_02.pdf.Google Scholar
  13. Dodge, K., and Pettit, G. (2003). A biopsychosocial model of the development of chronic conduct problems in adolescence. Dev. Psychol. 39: 349–371.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Festinger, T. (1983). No One Ever Asked Us: A Postscript to Foster Care. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Greenberger, E., Chen, C., and Beam, M. R. (1998) The role of “very important” nonparental adults in adolescent development. J. Youth Adolesc. 27: 321–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greenberger, E., Chen, C., Beam, M. R., Whang, S., and Dong, Q. (2000). The perceived social contexts of adolescents’ misconduct: A comparative study of youths in three cultures. J. Res. Adolesc. 10: 365–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Greenberger, E., Josselson, R., Knerr, C., and Knerr, B. (1975). The measurement and structure of psychosocial maturity. J. Youth Adolesc. 4: 127–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jacobsen, R. H., Lahey, B. B., and Strauss, C. C. (1983). Correlates of depressed mood in normal children. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 11: 29–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jessor, R., and Jessor, S. (1977). Problem Behavior and Psychosocial Development: A Longitudinal Study of Youth. Academic, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Kortenkamp, K., and Ehrle, J. (2002). The well-being of children involved with the child welfare system: A national overview. Urban Inst. B-43: 1–7.Google Scholar
  21. Kraus, J. (1981). Juvenile drug abuse and delinquency: Some differential associations. Br. J. Psychiatry 139: 422–430.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mangine, S. J., Royse, D., Wiehe, V. R., and Nietzel, M. T. (1990). Homelessness among adults raised as foster children: A survey of drop-in center users. Psychol. Rep. 67: 739–745.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McCord, J., McCord, W., and Thurber, E. (1960). The effects of foster home placement in the prevention of adult antisocial behavior. Soc. Serv. Rev. 34: 415–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McDonald, T. P., Allen, R. I., Westerfelt, A., and Piliavin, I. (1996). Assessing the long-term effects of foster care: A research synthesis. CWLA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  25. Mitic, W., and Rimer, M. (2003). The educational attainment of children in care in British Columbia. Child Youth Care Forum 31: 397–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Orangewood Children’s Foundation (2001). Fact Sheet. Orangewood Children’s Foundation, Orange, CA.Google Scholar
  27. Parker, J. G., and Asher, S. R. (1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Dev. Psychol. 29: 611–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Petersen, A. C., Sarigiani, P. A., and Kennedy, R. E. (1991). Adolescent depression: Why more girls? J. Youth Adolesc. [Special: The emergence of depressive symptoms during adolescence] 20: 247–271.Google Scholar
  29. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 1: 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rhodes, J. E., Ebert, L., and Fischer, L. (1992). Natural mentors: An overlooked resource in the social networks of young, African American mothers. Am. J. Community Psychol. 20: 445–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  32. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2004). The AFCARS Report: Preliminary FY2002 Estimates as of August, 2004. Retrieved May 15, 2005 from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/publications/afcars/report9.pdf.Google Scholar
  33. Zetlin, A., Weinberg, L., and Kimm, C. (2004). Improving education outcomes for children in foster care: Intervention by an education liaison. J. Educ. Stud. Place. Risk 9: 421–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan P. Farruggia
    • 1
  • Ellen Greenberger
    • 2
  • Chuansheng Chen
    • 1
  • Jutta Heckhausen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology and Social BehaviorUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineUSA
  2. 2.School of Social EcologyUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations