Self-report questionnaires are frequently used in youth research, but doubt remains whether total anonymity affects the results. This study compared the responses of 704 mainly 16–17-year-old adolescents to self-report measures of various health indicators in 2 groups: anonymous and confidential collection. For most health indicators no significant differences were found. Perceived health, use of alcohol, and aggressive behavior (for boys) were reported significantly less frequently in the confidential group (small effect size). It appeared that pupils with high scores on social desirability do not respond differently at most health indicators in the 2 conditions. For most health characteristics, epidemiologically useful outcomes may be derived from confidential self-report measures, which are also valuable for detecting individual at-risk children. Similar studies in lower grades and other types of education should confirm the results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bjarnason, T., and Adalbjarnardottir, S. (2000). Anonymity and confidentiality in school surveys on alcohol, tobacco and cannabis use. J. Drug Issues 30(2): 335–344.
CBS (2001). Jeugd, cijfers en feiten. Voorburg/Heerlen.
Cohen, J. (1988). In Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences (Rev. edn.). Academic, New York.
de Zwart, R. (1999). Nationaal scholierenonderzoek 1996. Deel 2: Gedrag en gezondheid van scholieren. NIBUD, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Garnefski, N., and Diekstra, R. F. W. (1993). Scholierenonderzoek 1992: landelijke uitkomsten rond een onderzoek naar gedrag en gezondheid van ca. 11,000 scholieren van het voortgezet onderwijs. Rijksuniversiteit Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Hancock, D. R., and Flowers, C. P. (2001). Comparing social desirability responding on world wide web and paper-administered surveys. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 49: 5–14.
Junger-Tas, J., van der Laan, P. H., and Kruisink, M. (1992). Ontwikkeling van de jeugdcriminaliteit en de justitiële jeugdbescherming: periode 1980–1990. Gouda Quint, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
King, F. W. (1970). Anonymous versus identifiable questionnaires in drug usage surveys. Am. Psychol. 25: 982–985.
Koeter, M. W. J., and Ormel, J. (1991). General Health Questionnaire. Dutch version, manual. Swets and Zeitlinger, Lisse The Netherlands.
Kulik, J. A., Stein, K. B., and Sarbin, T. R. (1968). Disclosure of delinquent behavior under conditions of anonymity and nonanonymity. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 32(5): 506–509.
Malvin, J. H., and Moskowitz, J. M. (1983). Anonymous versus identifiable self-reports of adolescent drugs attitudes, intentions, and use. Public Opin. Q. 47(4): 557–566.
O’Malley, P. M., Johnston, L. D., Bachman, J. G., and Schulenberg, J. (2000). A comparison of confidential versus anonymous survey procedures: Effects on reporting of drug use and related attitudes and beliefs in a national study of students. J. Drug Issues 30(1): 35–54.
Ong, A. D., and Weiss, D. J. (2000). The impact of anonymity on responses to sensitive questions. J. Appl. Psychol. 30(8): 1691–1708.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-image. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Smits, J. A. E., and Vorst, H. C. M. (1982). Schoolvragenlijst voor basisonderwijs en voortgezet onderwijs. Handleiding voor gebruikers. Berkhout B.V, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Stoel, W. G. R. (1980). De relatie tussen de grootte van scholen voor voortgezet onderwijs en het welbevinden van de leerlingen. Deel I: Resultaten van een empirisch onderzoek in de Nederlandse onderwijssituatie. Deel II: De ontwikkeling van een schoolbelevingsschaal. Research Instituut voor het Onderwijs in het Noorden (RION), Haren, The Netherlands.
Tourangeau, R., Rasinsky, K., Jobe, J. B., Smith, T. W., and Pratt, W. (1997). Sources of error in a survey of sexual behavior. J. Off. Stat. 131: 341–365.
Tourangeau, R., Rips, L., and Rasinski, K. (2000). The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
van der Linden, F. J., Dijkman, T. A., and Roeder, P. J. B. (1983). Schoolgaande jongeren, hun leefwereld en zelfbeleving. Hoogveldt Instituut, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Youth Department, Municipal Health Service Rotterdam area. Main research interests are emotional and behavioral problems of adolescents, youth health care, monitoring.
Youth Department, Municipal Health Service Rotterdam area. Main research interests are emotional and behavioral problems of adolescents, youth health care, monitoring.
Research Department, Municipal Health Service Rotterdam area. Major research interests include emotional and behavioral problems of adolescents, suicidal behavior, youth health care, monitoring.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van de Looij-Jansen, P.M., Goldschmeding, J.E.J. & Jan de Wilde, E. Comparison of Anonymous Versus Confidential Survey Procedures: Effects on Health Indicators in Dutch Adolescents. J Youth Adolescence 35, 652–658 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-9027-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-9027-0