This paper connects to several of Andrew Sherratt’s abiding interests: grand narrative, general theory, Mitteleuropa, typology, the problems of comparative method, and, tangentially, the question of the origin and nature of the relationship between faith and reason. In addition, what I have to say builds strongly on the work of David Clarke, whose powerful influence was exerted on me principally via Andrew. The title reference is to the Middle Upper Palaeolithic mammoth ivory marionette of a male human figure from Brno, Czech Republic, which serves as a pivot for my argument (although the paper does not pretend to present a detailed and fully contextualised account). By building on observations and contentions concerning the unique life-world of humans, it is possible to argue that a recognizably modern form of human intelligence appeared (and perhaps could only have appeared) as a product of some essentially accidental, initially perhaps epiphenomenal, interactions between minds and material artefacts. I want to show that the familiar idea of a genetically-driven reorganisation of cognition, moving from mind to culture, in our genus, can be challenged by a reverse proposition, using a materiality perspective to work from culture to mind.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Belting, H. (1994). Likeness and presence: A history of the image before the era of art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chernykh, E. N. (1992). Ancient metallurgy in the USSR. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clarke, D. L. (1968). Analytical archaeology. London: Methuen.
Dawkins, R. (1979). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dawkins, R. (1996). Climbing mount improbable. London: Penguin.
Gellner, E. (1989). Culture, constraint and community: Semantic and coercive compensations for the genetic under-determination of Homo sapiens sapiens. In P. Mellars & C. B. Stringer (Eds.), The human revolution: Behavioural and biological perspectives on the origins of modern humans (pp. 514–525). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Gombrich, E. H. (1948). Icones symbolicae: The visual image in neo-Platonic thought. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institute, 11, 163–192.
Günther, H. F. K. (1927). The racial elements of European history. London: Methuen.
Herrnstein, R., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.
Lewis-Williams, D. (2002). The mind in the cave: Consciousness and the origins of art. London: Thames & Hudson.
McGrath, A. (2007). The Dawkins delusion? Atheist fundamentalism and the denial of the divine. London: SPCK.
Mithen, S. (1996). The prehistory of the mind. London: Thames & Hudson.
Oliva, M. (1996). Mladopaleolitický hrob Brno II jako příspěvek k počátkům šamanismu. Archeologické Rozhledy, 48(3), 353–383.
Oliva, M. (2000). The Brno II Upper Palaeolithic burial. In W. Roebroeks, M. Mussi, L. Svoboda, & K. Fennema (Eds.), Hunters of the golden age: The Mid Upper Palaeolithic of Eurasia 30,000–20,000 BP (pp. 143–153). Leiden: University of Leiden.
Oliva, M. (2005). Palaeolithic and Mesolithic Moravia. Brno: Brno Museum.
Olsen, B. (2010). In defense of things: Archaeology and the ontology of objects. Lanham: Altamira Press.
Pettitt, P. B. (2011). The Palaeolithic origins of human burial. London: Routledge.
Pettitt, P. B., & Trinkaus, E. (2000). Direct radiocarbon dating of the Brno 2 Gravettian human remains. Anthropologie (Brno), 38, 149–150.
Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. Allen Lane: London.
Renfrew, C. (2008). Neuroscience, evolution and the sapient paradox: The factuality of value and of the sacred. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 363(1499), 2041–2047.
Rilke, R. M. (1983 ). Die vierte Elegie. In R. M. Rilke Duineser Elegien/Die Sonette an Orpheus (pp. 21–23). Baden–Baden: Insel.
Sartre, J.-P. (1976). Critique of dialectical reason. London: New Left Books.
Shanks, M. (2007). Symmetrical archaeology. World Archaeology, 39(4), 589–596.
Sherratt, A., & Taylor, T. (1989). Metal vessels in Bronze Age Europe and the context of Vulchetrun. In J. G. B. Best & N. M. W. de Vries (Eds.), Thracians and Mycenaeans: Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Thracology, Rotterdam, September 24, 1984 (pp. 106–134). Leiden: Brill.
Sherratt, A., & Taylor, T. (1997). Metal vessels in Bronze Age Europe and the context of Vulchetrun. In A. G. Sherratt (Collected Papers) Economy and society in prehistoric Europe (pp. 431–56). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Sologub, F. (1990). B плeнy/In Bondage. In G. Struve (Ed.), Russian Stories/Pyccкue paccкaзы: A dual language book (pp. 238–269). New York: Dover.
Taylor, T. (2002). The buried soul: How humans invented death. Boston: Beacon.
Taylor, T. (2006). Why the Venus of Willendorf has no face. Archäologie Österreichs, 17(1), 26–29.
Taylor, T. (2008a). The Willendorf Venuses: Notation, iconology and materiality. Mitteilungen der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft in Wien, 138, 37–49.
Taylor, T. (2008b). Materiality. In R. A. Bentley, H. D. G. Maschner, & C. Chippindale (Eds.), Archaeological theories (pp. 297–320). Lanham: AltaMira.
Taylor, T. (2009). Inventing death. In A. Azoulay, A. Demian, & D. Frioux (Eds.), 100,000 years of beauty (pp. 128–131). Paris: Gallimard.
Taylor, T. (2010). The artificial ape: How technology changed the course of human evolution. New York: Palgrave.
Valoch, K. (2009). The Brno puppet. In A. Azoulay, A. Demian, & D. Frioux (Eds.), 100,000 years of beauty (pp. 180–183). Paris: Gallimard.
von Kleist, H. (2007 ). Über das Marionettentheater. Heilbronn: Kleist-Archiv Sembdner, Internet-Editionen.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978 ). Mind and society. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
Webmoor, T., & Witmore, C. L. (2008). Things are us! A commentary on human/things relations under the banner of a ‘social’ archaeology. Norwegian Archaeology Review, 41(1), 1–18.
White, L. A. (1959). The concept of culture. American Anthropologist, 61(2), 227–251.
Wylie, A. (1989). The interpretive dilemma. In V. Pinsky & A. Wylie (Eds.), Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology (pp. 18–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Having signalled in some detail my debts to Andrew throughout this paper, I should also record the encouragement and influence of the late Ernest Gellner. Proximally, I wish to thank Martin Oliva and Gerhard Trnka; the referees for their helpful suggestions for improvement; and (of course) the Managing Editor. The inferences are my responsibility, as is the roughness of the translations from Kleist and Rilke (which if not simply inept, underscore the translational reality of the Whorf hypothesis, with its Herderian pedigree, lending little support to the Chomsky–Pinker idea of universal ‘mentalese’).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taylor, T. The Brno Effect: From Culture to Mind. J World Prehist 24, 213–225 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10963-011-9052-8
- Brno II
- Upper Palaeolithic art
- Sapient paradox