Abstract
This work analyzes the impact of university–industry collaborations (UICs) on the innovation performance of a sample of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) located in Veneto, a region in the north-east of Italy, which is considered particularly representative of the often-cited “innovation without research” model. We consider two aspects of such UICs that have never been at the center of theoretical and empirical debates on the innovation capacity of SMEs and whose importance has only recently been recognized. The first aspect is the variety of forms that UIC can take. Specifically, we distinguish between formal and informal collaborations. The second aspect is the possible influence of the absorptive capacity of SMEs on their ability to gaining from UICs in terms of innovation performance. We combine statistical analysis of the results of a survey administered to 179 SMEs in Veneto with a collection of anecdotal evidence to show that UICs effectively increase SMEs’ innovation performance.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This report classifies European regions into four categories, ranging from the most innovative to the least innovative: innovation leaders, strong innovators, moderate innovators, and modest innovators. Each category is subdivided into three groups, and “plus” is the most innovative within each group.
These figures represent our calculations based on data provided by the Italian National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT) on the online data source: dati.istat.it.
More information on the data source and the variables and data used can be found at http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/regional_en
During the interviews, we specified the differences between the various types of collaborations (shown in as Table 1) by carefully instructing the interviewers.
The questionnaire is available upon request.
The details of the industry, included its identification using the NACE Rev. 2 at the 2-digit level, can be accessed at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/Annexes/htec_esms_an3.pdf.
For more information about the methodology adopted and the districts identified in each region can be found at https://www.istat.it/it/archivio/150320.
References
Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1988). Innovation in large and small firms: An empirical analysis. American Economic Review, 78(4), 678–690.
Ankrah, S., & Al-Tabbaa, O. (2015). Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3), 387–408.
Antonioli, D., Mancinelli, D., & Mazzanti, M. (2013). Is environmental innovation embedded within high-performance organisational changes? The role of human resource management and complementarity in green business strategies. Research Policy, 42(4), 975–988.
Archibugi, D., & Planta, M. (1996). Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation, 16(9), 451–519.
Asheim, B. T., & Coenen, L. (2005). Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy, 34(8), 1173–1190.
Audretsch, D. B. (2004). Sustaining innovation and growth: Public policy support for entrepreneurship. Industry and Innovation, 11(3), 167–191.
Baba, Y., Shichijo, N., & Sedita, S. R. (2009). How do collaborations with universities affect firms’ innovative performance? The role of “Pasteur scientists” in the advanced materials field. Research Policy, 38(5), 756–764.
Becattini, G. (1990). The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion. In F. Pyke, G. Becattini, & W. Sengenberger (Eds.), Industrial districts and inter-firm co-operation in Italy (pp. 37–51). Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.
Bellandi, M. (1996). Innovation and change in the Marshallian industrial districts. European Planning Studies, 4(3), 357–368.
Belussi, F., & Gottardi, G. (2000). Models of localised technological change. In F. Belussi & G. Gottardi (Eds.), Evolutionary patterns of local industrial systems (pp. 13–48). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Belussi, F., & Sammarra, A. (Eds.). (2009). Business networks in clusters and industrial districts: The governance of the global value chain. New York: Routledge.
Belussi, F., & Sedita, S. R. (2012). Industrial districts as open learning systems: Combining emergent and deliberate knowledge structures. Regional Studies, 46(2), 165–184.
Belussi, F., Sedita, S. R., Aage, T., & Porcellato, D. (2011). Inward flows of information and knowledge in low-tech industrial districts: Contrasting the “few firms gatekeeper” and “direct peer” models. In P. Robertson & D. Jacobson (Eds.), Knowledge transfer and technology diffusion (pp. 64–89). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Bettiol, M., De Marchi, V., Di Maria, E., & Grandinetti, R. (2013). Determinants of market extension in knowledge-intensive business services: Evidence from a regional innovation system. European Planning Studies, 21(4), 498–515.
Bodas Freitas, I. M., Marques, R. A., & de Paula e Silva, E. M. (2013). University–industry collaboration and innovation in emergent and mature industries in new industrialized countries. Research Policy, 42(2), 443–453.
Boix, R., & Galletto, V. (2009). Innovation and industrial districts: a first approach to the measurement and determinants of the I-district effect. Regional Studies, 43(9), 1117–1133.
Bonaccorsi, A., & Piccaluga, A. (1994). A theoretical framework for the evaluation of university-industry relationships. R&D Management, 24(3), 229–247.
Bougrain, F., & Haudeville, B. (2002). Innovation, collaboration and SMEs internal research capacities. Research Policy, 31(5), 735–747.
Bryman, A. (2015). Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L., & Yang, S. (2002). Intangible assets: Computers and organizational capital. Brookings Papers on Economic activity: Macroeconomics, 1, 137–181.
Cainelli, G., & De Liso, N. (2005). Innovation in industrial districts: Evidence from Italy. Industry and Innovation, 12(3), 383–398.
Cakar, N. D., & Erturk, A. (2010). Comparing innovation capability of small and medium-sized enterprises : Examining the effects of organizational culture. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(3), 325–359.
Caloghirou, Y., Tsakanikas, A., & Vonortas, N. S. (2001). University-industry cooperation in the context of the European framework programmes. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1–2), 153–161.
Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2009). Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Camuffo, A., & Grandinetti, R. (2011). Italian industrial districts as cognitive systems: Are they still reproducible? Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 23(9–10), 815–852.
Cassiman, B., Di Guardo, M. C., & Valentini, G. (2010). Organizing links with science: Cooperate or contract? A project-level analysis. Research Policy, 39(7), 882–892.
Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2002). R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evidence from Belgium. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1169–1184.
Cohen, W. L., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.
Colombo, U., & Lanzavecchia, G. (1997). Science and technology in Italian industry: A unique model. Technology in Society, 19(3–4), 467–491.
Coltorti, F., Resciniti, R., Tunisini, A., & Varaldo, R. (Eds.). (2013). Mid-sized manufacturing companies: The new driver of Italian competitiveness. Milan: Springer-Verlag Italia.
Cooke, P., Boekholt, P., & Tödtling, F. (2000). The governance of innovation in Europe: Regional perspectives on global competitiveness. London: Pinter.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.
De Marchi, V., Gereffi, G., & Grandinetti, R. (2018). Evolutionary trajectories of industrial districts in global value chains. In V. De Marchi, E. Di Maria, & G. Gereffi (Eds.), Local clusters in global value chains: Linking actors and territories through manufacturing and innovation (pp. 33–50). Abingdon: Routledge.
De Marchi, V., & Grandinetti, R. (2017). Regional innovation systems or innovative regions? evidence from Italy. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 108(2), 234–249.
Dess, G. G., & Shaw, J. D. (2001). Voluntary turnover, social capital, and organizational performance. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 446–456.
Ding, C. S., Wu, Q., Hsieh, C. T., & Pedram, M. (1998). Stratified random sampling for power estimation. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 17(6), 465–471.
Dornbusch, F., & Neuhäusler, P. (2015). Composition of inventor teams and technological progress: The role of collaboration between academia and industry. Research Policy, 44(7), 1360–1375.
Ebersberger, B., Bloch, C., Herstad, S. J., & van de Velde, E. (2012a). Open innovation practices and their effect on innovation performance. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 9(6), 1–22.
Ebersberger, B., Bloch, C., Herstad, S. J., & Van De Velde, E. L. S. (2012b). Open innovation practices and their effect on innovation performance. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 9(06), 1250040.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.
Fontana, R., Geuna, A., & Matt, M. (2006). Factors affecting university–industry RD projects: The importance of searching, screening and signalling. Research Policy, 35(2), 309–323.
Frederiksen, L., & Sedita, S. R. (2012). Embodied knowledge transfer for innovation: Comparing interfirm labor mobility between music and manufacturing industries. In F. Belussi & U. Staber (Eds.), Managing networks of creativity (pp. 121–143). New York: Routledge.
Garcia-Perez-de-Lema, D., Madrid-Guijarro, A., & Martin, D. P. (2017). Influence of university-firm governance on SMEs innovation and performance levels. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 250–261.
Garriga, H., Von Krogh, G., & Spaeth, S. (2013). How constraints and knowledge impact open innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 34(9), 1134–1144.
Gilsing, V., & Nooteboom, B. (2005). Density and strength of ties in innovation networks: an analysis of multimedia and biotechnology. European Management Review, 2(3), 179–197.
Grandinetti, R. (2016). Absorptive capacity and knowledge management in small and medium enterprises. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 14(2), 159–168.
Grimpe, C., & Hussinger, K. (2013). Formal and informal knowledge and technology transfer from academia to industry: Complementarity effects and innovation performance. Industry and Innovation, 20(8), 683–700.
Hewitt-Dundas, N. (2013). The role of proximity in university-business cooperation for innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(2), 93–115.
Hewitt-Dundas, N., & Roper, S. (2010). Output additionality of public support for innovation: Evidence for Irish manufacturing plants. European Planning Studies, 18(1), 107–122.
Huergo, E., & Jaumandreu, J. (2004). How does probability of innovation change with firm age? Small Business Economics, 22(3–4), 193–207.
Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 36(5), 680–693.
Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602–611.
Jiménez-Barrionuevo, M. M., García-Morales, V. J., & Molina, L. M. (2011). Validation of an instrument to measure absorptive capacity. Technovation, 31(5–6), 190–202.
Jones, J., & Corral de Zubielqui, G. (2017). Doing well by doing good: A study of university-industry interactions, innovationess and firm performance in sustainability-oriented Australian SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 262–270.
Kanter, R. B. (1994). Collaborative advantage: The art of alliances. Harvard Business Review, 72(4), 96–108.
Kitagawa, F., & Woolgar, L. (2008). Regionalisation of innovation policies and new university–industry links in Japan: Policy review and new trends. Prometheus, 26(1), 55–67.
Kobarg, S., Stumpf-Wollersheim, J., & Welpe, I. M. (2018). University-industry collaborations and product innovation performance: The moderating effects of absorptive capacity and innovation competencies. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(6), 1696–1724.
Lasagni, A. (2012). How can external relationships enhance innovation in SMEs? new evidence for Europe. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 310–339.
Laursen, K., & Foss, N. J. (2003). New human resources management practices, complementarities and the impact on innovation performance. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27(2), 243–263.
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150.
Lazzarotti, V., Manzini, R., & Pellegrini, L. (2015). Is your open-innovation successful? The mediating role of a firm’s organizational and social context. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(19), 2453–2485.
Liao, J., Welsch, H., & Stoica, M. (2003). Organizational absorptive capacity and responsiveness: An empirical investigation of growth-oriented SMEs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(1), 63–86.
Love, J. H., & Ganotakis, P. (2013). Learning by exporting: Lessons from high-technology SMEs. International Business Review, 22(1), 1–17.
Love, J. H., & Roper, S. (2015). SME innovation, exporting and growth: A review of existing evidence. International Small Business Journal, 33(1), 28–48.
March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 101–123.
Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Research, 17(2), 13–17.
Messeni Petruzzelli, A. M. (2011). The impact of technological relatedness, prior ties, and geographical distance on university–industry collaborations: A joint-patent analysis. Technovation, 31(7), 309–319.
Messeni Petruzzelli, A., & Rotolo, D. (2015). Institutional diversity, internal search behaviour, and joint-innovations: Evidence from the US biotechnology industry. Management Decision, 53(9), 2088–2106.
Mitsuhashi, H. (2002). Uncertainty in selecting alliance partners: The three reduction mechanisms and alliance formation processes. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 10(2), 109–133.
Mohnen, P., & Hoareau, C. (2003). What type of enterprise forges close links with universities and government labs? evidence from CIS 2. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24(2–3), 133–145.
Mohnen, P., & Röller, L. H. (2005). Complementarities in innovation policy. European Economic Review, 49(6), 1431–1450.
Moncada-Paternò-Castello, P., Ciupagea, C., & Piccaluga, A. (2006). L’innovazione industriale in Italia: persiste il modello “senza ricerca”? L’industria, 27(3), 533–552.
Motohashi, K. (2005). University–industry collaborations in Japan: The role of new technology-based firms in transforming the National Innovation System. Research Policy, 34(5), 583–594.
Muscio, A. (2007). The impact of absorptive capacity on SMEs’ collaboration. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(8), 653–668.
Narula, R. (2004). R&D collaboration by SMEs: New opportunities and limitations in the face of globalisation. Technovation, 24(2), 153–161.
Nooteboom, B. (2007). Social capital, institutions and trust. Review of Social Economy, 65(1), 29–53.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Oughton, C., Landabaso, M., & Morgan, K. (2002). The regional innovation paradox: Innovation policy and industrial policy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 97–110.
Paoli, M., & Prencipe, A. (1999). The role of knowledge bases in complex product systems: Some empirical evidence from the aero engine industry. Journal of Management and Governance, 3(2), 137–160.
Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1994). The continuing, widespread (and neglected) importance of improvements in mechanical technologies. Research Policy, 23(5), 533–545.
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., et al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442.
Rajalo, S., & Vadi, M. (2017). University-industry innovation collaboration: Reconceptualization. Technovation, 62–63, 42–54.
Reischauer, G. (2018). Industry 4.0 as policy-driven discourse to institutionalize innovation systems in manufacturing. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.02.012.
Rõigas, K., Mohnen, P., & Varblane, U. (2018). Which firms use universities as cooperation partners? a comparative view in Europe. International Journal of Technology Management, 76(1–2), 32–57.
Salomon, R. M., & Shaver, J. M. (2005). Learning by exporting: New insights from examining firm innovation. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 14(2), 431–460.
Schmiedeberg, C. (2008). Complementarities of innovation activities: An empirical analysis of the German manufacturing sector. Research Policy, 37(9), 1492–1503.
Sedita, S. R., De Noni, I., & Pilotti, L. (2017). Out of the crisis: An empirical investigation of place-specific determinants of economic resilience. European Planning Studies, 25(2), 155–180.
Sirmon, D., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 273–292.
Smith, K.H. (2005). Measuring innovation. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (pp. 148–177) New York, US: Oxford University Press.
Spithoven, A., Clarysse, B., & Knockaert, M. (2010). Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries. Technovation, 30(2), 130–141.
Subramanian, A. M., Lim, K., & Soh, P. H. (2013). When birds of a feather don’t flock together: Different scientists and the roles they play in biotech R&D alliances. Research Policy, 42(3), 595–612.
Tijssen, R. J. (2018). Anatomy of use-inspired researchers: From Pasteur’s Quadrant to Pasteur’s Cube model. Research Policy, 47(9), 1626–1638.
Veugelers, R. (1997). Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing. Research Policy, 26(3), 303–315.
Walsh, J. P., Baba, Y., Goto, A., & Yasaki, Y. (2008). Promoting university–industry linkages in Japan: Faculty responses to a changing policy environment. Prometheus, 26(1), 39–54.
Wiersema, M. F., & Bowen, H. P. (2009). The use of limited dependent variable techniques in strategy research: Issues and methods. Strategic Management Journal, 30(6), 679–692.
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.
Zucker, L. G., & Darby, M. R. (1996). Star scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93(23), 12709–12716.
Funding
Funding was provided by Regione del Veneto.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Apa, R., De Marchi, V., Grandinetti, R. et al. University-SME collaboration and innovation performance: the role of informal relationships and absorptive capacity. J Technol Transf 46, 961–988 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09802-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09802-9