Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Academic entrepreneurship: founding and governance determinants in university spin-off ventures

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Academic research is generally seen as one of the most important goals of a university, but universities are being called upon simultaneously to assist in building a local entrepreneurial ecosystem and contributing to economic growth. Universities can be the source of startups based on academic research results and thereby influence a given industrial context. This paper investigates the impact of academic entrepreneurship on the economic performance of university spin-offs (USOs) and, in particular, how the composition of the founding team, the diversity of academic ownership, CEO duality, and the presence of women on the board of directors affect USO success. We study these relationships with a cross-sectional sample of 136 firms in southern Italy. Our findings highlight that governance and ownership can influence various indicators that are often used for measuring enterprise success in different ways and that, based on the specific success metrics, managers or policymakers should consider different aspects to better understand a USO’s potential for success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A., Ferretti, M., & Parmentola, A. (2012). An individual-level assessment of the relationship between spin-off activities and research performance in universities. R&D Management, 42(3), 225–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Algieri, B., Aquino, A., & Succurro, M. (2013). Technology transfer offices and academic spin-off creation: The case of Italy. Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(4), 382–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, M., Ng, Y. L., & Kulik, C. T. (2014). Board age and gender diversity: A test of competing linear and curvilinear predictions. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(3), 497–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amason, A. C., & Sapienza, H. J. (1997). The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of Management, 23(4), 495–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B. (2014). From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 313–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backes-Gellner, U., Mohnen, A., & Werner, A. (2006, March). Team size and effort in start-up teams-another consequence of free-riding and peer pressure in partnerships. SSRN Working Paper. Available at SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=518443.

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. J., Jr. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27(6), 625–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, C. M. (2006). The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 741–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, C. M., Burton, M. D., & O'Reilly, C. (2007). Early teams: The impact of team demography on VC financing and going public. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2), 147–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianco, M., & Casavola, P. (1999). Italian corporate governance: Effects on financial structure and firm performance. European Economic Review, 43(4–6), 1057–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørnåli, E. S., & Gulbrandsen, M. (2010). Exploring board formation and evolution of board composition in academic spin-offs. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(1), 92–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bøhren, Ø., & Strøm, R. Ø. (2010). Governance and politics: Regulating independence and diversity in the board room. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 37(9–10), 1281–1308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolzani, D., Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., Santoni, S., & Sobrero, M. (2014, June 28). Fifteen years of academic entrepreneurship in Italy: Evidence from the TASTE Project. Technical report, University of Bologna. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2460301.

  • Bonardo, D., Paleari, S., & Vismara, S. (2010). The M&A dynamics of European science-based entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(1), 141–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, B. K. (1995). CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model. Strategic Management Journal, 16(4), 301–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breznitz, S., & Anderson, W. P. (2006). Boston metropolitan area biotechnology cluster. Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 28(2), 249–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, C. G., Greene, P. G., & Hart, M. M. (2001). From initial idea to unique advantage: The entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a resource base. Academy of Management Perspectives, 15(1), 64–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R. J. (2000). Women on corporate boards of directors: Understanding the context. In R. J. Burke & M. Mattis (Eds.), Women on corporate boards of directors: International challenges and opportunities (pp. 179–196). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 435–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, D. A., D'Souza, F., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38(1), 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, S. (2005). Demographic diversity for building an effective entrepreneurial team: Is it important? Journal of Business Venturing, 20(6), 727–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarysse, B., & Moray, N. (2004). A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: The case of a research-based spin-off. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 55–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Van de Velde, E., & Vohora, A. (2005). Spinning out new ventures: A typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 183–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., Florida, R., Randazzese, L., & Walsh, J. (1998). Industry and the academy: Uneasy partners in the cause of technological advance. In R. Noll (Ed.), Challenges to research universities (pp. 171–199). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, M. G., Croce, A., & Murtinu, S. (2014). Ownership structure, horizontal agency costs and the performance of high-tech entrepreneurial firms. Small Business Economics, 42(2), 265–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, M. G., D’Adda, D., & Piva, E. (2010). The contribution of university research to the growth of academic start-ups: An empirical analysis. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(1), 113–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, M. G., & Grilli, L. (2005). Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view. Research Policy, 34(6), 795–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, M. G., & Grilli, L. (2010). On growth drivers of high-tech start-ups: Exploring the role of founders' human capital and venture capital. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(6), 610–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, M. G., & Piva, E. (2012). Firms’ genetic characteristics and competence-enlarging strategies: A comparison between academic and non-academic high-tech start-ups. Research Policy, 41(1), 79–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conceição, O., Fontes, M., & Calapez, T. (2012). The commercialisation decisions of research-based spin-off: Targeting the market for technologies. Technovation, 32(1), 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. C., & Bruno, A. V. (1977). Success among high-technology firms. Business Horizons, 20(2), 16–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T., Jr. (2001). Creating the multicultural organization: A strategy for capturing the power of diversity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Este, P., & Perkmann, M. (2011). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 316–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlstrand, Å. L., & Politis, D. (2013). Women business ventures in Swedish university incubators. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 78–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debacker, K., & Veugelers, R. (2005). The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Research Policy, 34(3), 321–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmar, F., & Davidsson, P. (2000). Where do they come from? Prevalence and characteristics of nascent entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmar, F., Davidsson, P., & Gartner, W. B. (2003). Arriving at the high-growth firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 189–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Berardino, D. (2016). Corporate governance and firm performance in new technology ventures. Procedia Economics and Finance, 39, 412–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32(2), 209–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Druilhe, C., & Garnsey, E. (2004). Do academic spin-outs differ and does it matter? Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3–4), 269–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egeln, J., Gottschalk, S., Rammer, C., & Spielkamp, A. (2003). Spinoff-Gründungen aus der öffentlichen Forschung in Deutschland. Baden-Baden: ZEW-Wirtschaftsanalysen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990). Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among US semiconductor ventures, 1978–1988. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 504–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ensley, M. D., & Hmieleski, K. M. (2005). A comparative study of new venture top management team composition, dynamics and performance between university-based and independent start-ups. Research Policy, 34(7), 1091–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2009). Factors fostering academics to start up new ventures: An assessment of Italian founders’ incentives. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(4), 380–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S., & D’aveni, R. A. (1994). CEO duality as a double-edged sword: How boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1079–1108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. (1996). Top executives and their effects on organizations. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.

  • Franklin, S., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2001). Academic and surrogate entrepreneurs in university spin-out companies. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1–2), 127–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frohman, A. L., & Bitondo, D. (1981). Coordinating business strategy and technical planning. Long Range Planning, 14(6), 58–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabrielsson, M., Gabrielsson, P., & Dimitratos, P. (2014). International entrepreneurial culture and growth of international new ventures. Management International Review, 54(4), 445–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaver, J. J., & Gaver, K. M. (1995). Compensation policy and the investment opportunity set. Financial Management, 24(1), 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. A. (2010). The “entrepreneurial turn” and regional economic development mission of universities. Annals of Regional Science, 44(1), 83–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandi, A., & Grimaldi, R. (2003). Exploring the networking characteristics of new venture founding teams: A study of Italian academic spin-off. Small Business Economics, 21(4), 329–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandi, A., & Grimaldi, R. (2005). Academics' organizational characteristics and the generation of successful business ideas. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(6), 821–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groysberg, B., & Bell, D. (2013). Dysfunction in the boardroom. Harvard Business Review, 91(6), 89–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gübeli, M. H., & Doloreux, D. (2005). An empirical study of university spin-off development. European Journal of Innovation Management, 8(3), 269–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurdon, M. A., & Samsom, K. J. (2010). A longitudinal study of success and failure among scientist-started ventures. Technovation, 30(3), 207–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the future: Breakthrough strategies for seizing control of your industry and creating markets of tomorrow. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heirman, A., & Clarysse, B. (2004). How and why do research-based start-ups differ at founding? A resource-based configurational perspective. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3–4), 247–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, D. A., & Denison, D. R. (1989). Stepwise regression in social and psychological research. Psychological Reports, 64(1), 251–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Paetzold, R. L. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies, 37(2), 235–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindle, K., & Yencken, J. (2004). Public research commercialisation, entrepreneurship and new technology based firms: An integrated model. Technovation, 24(10), 793–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunsdiek, D. (1987). Unternehmensgrundung als Folgeinnovation. Struktur, Hemmnisse und Erfolgsbedingungen der Grundung industrieller Unternehmen. Stuttgart: Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacobucci, D., Iacopini, A., Micozzi, A., & Orsini, S. (2011). Fostering entrepreneurship in academic spin-offs. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 12(4), 513–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S., George, G., & Maltarich, M. (2009). Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity. Research Policy, 38(6), 922–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, H. S. (1999). Owner as manager, extended horizons and the family firm. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 6(1), 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassicieh, S. K., Kirchhoff, B. A., Walsh, S. T., & McWhorter, P. J. (2002). The role of small firms in the transfer of disruptive technologies. Technovation, 22(11), 667–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knockaert, M., Ucbasaran, D., Wright, M., & Clarysse, B. (2011). The relationship between knowledge transfer, top management team composition, and performance: The case of science-based entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(4), 777–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, R., Semadeni, M., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. (2014). CEO duality: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 40(1), 256–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulicke, M., & Krupp, H. (1987). The formation, relevance and public promotion of new technology-based firms. Technovation, 6(1), 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langowitz, N. S., Minniti, M., & Arenius, P. (2005). Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2004 Report on women and entrepreneurship. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1509263.

  • Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 325–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lendner, C. (2003). How university business incubators help start-ups to succeed: An international study. In Babson Kauffmann entrepreneurship research conference, Babson College, MA.

  • Lockett, A., Siegel, D., Wright, M., & Ensley, M. D. (2005). The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: Managerial and policy implications. Research Policy, 34(7), 981–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockett, A., Wright, M., & Franklin, S. (2003). Technology transfer and universities' spin-out strategies. Small Business Economics, 20(2), 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundqvist, M. A. (2014). The importance of surrogate entrepreneurship for incubated Swedish technology ventures. Technovation, 34(2), 93–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, M., & Marlow, S. (2010). Gender practices and practicing gender in copreneurial teams. London: Institute for Small Business and Entrepreneurship Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mian, S. A. (1997). Assessing and managing the university technology business incubator: An integrative framework. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(4), 251–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minichilli, A., Corbetta, G., & MacMillan, I. C. (2010). Top management teams in family-controlled companies: “Familiness”, “faultlines”, and their impact on financial performance. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 205–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosey, S., & Wright, M. (2007). From human capital to social capital: A longitudinal study of technology-based academic entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(6), 909–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, B. (2006). Human capital and successful academic spin-off. ZEW discussion papers, No. 06-081. Mannheim: Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW).

  • Muscio, A., Quaglione, D., & Ramaciotti, L. (2016). The effects of university rules on spinoff creation: The case of academia in Italy. Research Policy, 45(7), 1386–1396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustar, P. (1997). How French academics create hi-tech companies: The conditions for success or failure. Science and Public Policy, 24(1), 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustar, P. (2002). Public support for the spin-off companies from higher educations and research institution. In Conference STRATA Brussels, April 22–23, 2002.

  • Mustar, P., Renault, M., Colombo, M. G., Piva, E., Fontes, M., Lockett, A., et al. (2006). Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: A multi-dimensional taxonomy. Research Policy, 35(2), 289–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustar, P., Wright, M., & Clarysse, B. (2008). University spin-off firms: Lessons from ten years of experience in Europe. Science and Public Policy, 35(2), 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, R. H. (1990). Classical and modern regression with applications (Vol. 2). Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NETVAL. (2018). La rete del trasferimento tecnologico si rafforza con la clinical innovation. In A. Piccaluga, L. Ramaciotti, & C. Daniele (Eds.), XIV Rapporto Netval. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbert, S. L., Gopalakrishnan, S., & Kirchhoff, B. A. (2008). Looking beyond resources: Exploring the importance of entrepreneurship to firm-level competitive advantage in technologically intensive industries. Technovation, 28(1–2), 6–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaou, N., & Birley, S. (2003). Academic networks in a trichotomous categorisation of university spinouts. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 333–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, R. P., Chugh, H., & Allen, T. J. (2008). Determinants and consequences of university spinoff activity: A conceptual framework. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(6), 653–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortín-Ángel, P., & Vendrell-Herrero, F. (2014). University spin-offs vs. other NTBFs: Total factor productivity differences at outset and evolution. Technovation, 34(2), 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packalen, K. A. (2007). Complementing capital: The role of status, demographic features, and social capital in founding teams’ abilities to obtain resources. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 31(6), 873–891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palumbo, R. (2010). Dall' Università al mercato. Governance e performance degli spinoff universitari in Italia. Milan: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmentola, A., & Ferretti, M. (2018). Stages and trigger factors in the development of academic spin-offs: An explorative study in southern Italy. European Journal of Innovation Management, 21(3), 478–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parson, L. A., Sands, R. G., & Duane, J. (1992). Sources of career support for university faculty. Research in Higher Education, 33(2), 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pazos, D. R., López, S. F., González, L. O., & Sandiás, A. R. (2012). A resource-based view of university spin-off activity: New evidence from the Spanish case. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 21(3), 255–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez, M. P., & Sánchez, A. M. (2003). The development of university spin-offs: Early dynamics of technology transfer and networking. Technovation, 23(10), 823–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prencipe, A. (2016). Board composition and innovation in university spin-offs: Evidence from the Italian context. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 11(3), 33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugliese, A., & Wenstøp, P. Z. (2007). Board members’ contribution to strategic decision-making in small firms. Journal of Management & Governance, 11(4), 383–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaciotti, L., & Rizzo, U. (2015). The determinants of academic spin-off creation by Italian universities. R&D Management, 45(5), 501–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, M. A., & Lodh, S. C. (2011). Corporate governance and performance of small and medium sized enterprise (SME): Evidence from Bangladesh. Faculty of Commerce Papers (2011) (pp. 1–44). Available at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/commpapers/2459/.

  • Rasmussen, E. (2011). Understanding academic entrepreneurship: Exploring the emergence of university spin-off ventures using process theories. International Small Business Journal, 29(5), 448–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, E., & Borch, O. J. (2010). University capabilities in facilitating entrepreneurship: A longitudinal study of spin-off ventures at mid-range universities. Research Policy, 39(5), 602–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, E., & Wright, M. (2015). How can universities facilitate academic spin-offs? An entrepreneurial competency perspective. Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(5), 782–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renders, A., Gaeremynck, A., & Sercu, P. (2010). Corporate-governance ratings and company performance: A cross-European study. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(2), 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. D., Camp, S. M., Bygrave, W. D., Autio, E., & Hay, M. (2001). Global Entrepreneurship monitor 2001 summary report. Kansas City, KS: Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership at the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, O. C., Roh, H., & Pieper, J. R. (2013). The link between diversity and equality management practice bundles and racial diversity in the managerial ranks: Does firm size matter? Human Resource Management, 52(2), 215–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E. B. (1991). Entrepreneurs in high technology: Lessons from MIT and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, P., & Dawson, A. (2006). Gender and the commercialization of university science: Academic founders of spinout companies. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 18(4), 341–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, C. (2007). Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 404–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, R. (1990s). Successful industrial innovation: Critical factors for the 1990s. R&D Management, 22(3), 221–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runyan, R. C., Huddleston, P., & Swinney, J. (2006). Entrepreneurial orientation and social capital as small firm strategies: A study of gender differences from a resource-based view. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2(4), 455–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schjoedt, L., & Kraus, S. (2009). Entrepreneurial teams: Definition and performance factors. Management Research News, 32(6), 513–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmelter, L. (2004). Selbstgesteuertes oder potenziell expansives Fremdsprachenlernen im Tandem. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and economic growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. A. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science, 48(1), 154–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrader, C. B., Blackburn, V. B., & Iles, P. (1997). Women in management and firm financial performance: An exploratory study. Journal of Managerial Issues, 9(3), 355–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader, R., & Siegel, D. S. (2007). Assessing the relationship between human capital and firm performance: Evidence from technology-based new ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(6), 893–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, S. F., & Mohr, J. J. (2006). Successful development and commercialization of technological innovation: Insights based on strategy type. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smilor, R. W., Gibson, D. V., & Dietrich, G. B. (1990). University spin-out companies: Technology start-ups from UT-Austin. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(1), 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. G., Smith, K. A., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., Jr., O'Bannon, D. P., & Scully, J. A. (1994). Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), 412–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinkühler, R. H. (1994). Technologiezentren und Erfolg von Unternehmensgründungen. Wiesbaden: DUV.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, P. E., & El-Ganainy, A. (2007). The entrepreneurial puzzle: Explaining the gender gap. Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(5), 475–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A., & March, J. G. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 260–290). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tekleab, A. G., Karaca, A., Quigley, N. R., & Tsang, E. W. (2016). Re-examining the functional diversity–performance relationship: The roles of behavioral integration, team cohesion, and team learning. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3500–3507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2005). Gender patterns of research and licensing activity of science and engineering faculty. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(4), 343–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanaelst, I., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Moray, N., & S'Jegers, R. (2006). Entrepreneurial team development in academic spinouts: An examination of team heterogeneity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(2), 249–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visintin, F., & Pittino, D. (2014). Founding team composition and early performance of university—Based spin-off companies. Technovation, 34(1), 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy, 33(1), 147–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, L. Q., & Wu, L. (2013). What a diverse top management team means: Testing an integrated model. Journal of Management Studies, 50(3), 389–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinzimmer, L. G., Nystrom, P. C., & Freeman, S. J. (1998). Measuring organizational growth: Issues, consequences and guidelines. Journal of Management, 24(2), 235–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wennberg, K., Wiklund, J., & Wright, M. (2011). The effectiveness of university knowledge spillovers: Performance differences between university spinoffs and corporate spinoffs. Research Policy, 40(8), 1128–1143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerberg, M., & Wincent, J. (2008). Entrepreneur characteristics and management control: Contingency influences on business performance. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 20(1), 37–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. Y., & O'Reilly, C. A., III. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, F., Kickul, J., & Marlino, D. (2007). Gender, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial career intentions: Implications for entrepreneurship education 1. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(3), 387–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woo, C. Y., Willard, G. E., & Daellenbach, U. (1992). Spin-off performance: A case of overstated expectations? Strategic Management Journal, 13(6), 433–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., Birley, S., & Mosey, S. (2004a). Entrepreneurship and university technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3–4), 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., Vohora, A., & Lockett, A. (2004b). The formation of high-tech university spinouts: The role of joint ventures and venture capital investors. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3–4), 287–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusubova, A., Andries, P., & Clarysse, B. (2019). The role of incubators in overcoming technology ventures’ resource gaps at different development stages. R&D Management, 49(5), 803–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Van de Velde, E., & Larraneta, B. (2007). Knowledge conversion capability and the performance of corporate and university spin-offs. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 569–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. (2009). The performance of university spin-offs: An exploratory analysis using venture capital data. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(3), 255–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. A. (2008). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on the capital raised through an initial public offering. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(3), 391–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Armstrong, J. (1998). Geographically localized knowledge: Spillovers or markets? Economic Inquiry, 36(1), 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Management, and Institutions, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy

    Mauro Sciarelli, Giovanni Catello Landi, Lorenzo Turriziani & Mario Tani

  2. Department of Economics, Management, and Institutions, University of Naples Federico II, Complesso Universitario Monte S. Angelo, Via Cintia 26, 80126, Naples, Italy

    Giovanni Catello Landi

Authors
  1. Mauro Sciarelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Giovanni Catello Landi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lorenzo Turriziani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mario Tani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Catello Landi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sciarelli, M., Landi, G.C., Turriziani, L. et al. Academic entrepreneurship: founding and governance determinants in university spin-off ventures. J Technol Transf 46, 1083–1107 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09798-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09798-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation