Skip to main content

A startup postdoc program as a channel for university technology transfer: the case of the Runway Startup Postdoc Program at the Jacobs Technion–Cornell Institute at Cornell Tech

The Journal of Technology Transfer volume 45, pages 1611–1633 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

Academic entrepreneurship at universities allows students to leverage entrepreneurship education, entrepreneurial activities and university resources, when exploiting the deep knowledge of their research. The establishment of a new research university in NYC—Cornell Tech—offered the opportunity to experiment with a startup postdoc program, initiated there, called Runway, examining technology transfer by postdoc startups based on the notion that committed postdocs could be effective agents in commercializing their research. The program has unique features that differentiate it from incubator and accelerator programs. It is framed and structured as a postdoctoral program embedded in and legitimated by the university’s research and education institutions; it provides entrepreneurial postdocs with a structured educational program for translational research and company founding to transform them from scientists into entrepreneurs; and it offers a simple, startup-friendly intellectual property and financial model. Action research, common in educational program experiments, was used as the research model. The program was launched in 2014 and has incorporated 25 postdocs and their startups. This program shows that a university startup postdoc track can be an effective channel for technology transfer, and provide a career option for Ph.D. graduates. Contributions to technology transfer and academic entrepreneurship research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Notes

  1. The postdoc’s company.

References

  • Abrue, M., Demirel, P., Grinevich, V., & Karatas-Ozkan, M. (2016). Entrepreneurial practices in research-intensive and teaching-led universities. Small Business Economics, 47, 695–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adam, A. F., & Fayolle, A. (2015). Bridging the entrepreneurial intention-behavior gap: The role of commitment and implementation intention. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2015.068775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astebro, T., Bazzazian, N., & Braguinsky, S. (2012). Startups by recent university graduates and their faculty: Implications for university entrepreneurship policy. Research Policy, 41, 663–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. (2014). From the entrepreneurial university to the university for entrepreneurial society. Journal of Technology Transfer, 39, 313–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. R., & Locke, E. A. (2004). The relation of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 587–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blank, S. (2019). How to stop playing “Target Market Roulette”: A new addition to the lean toolset. https://steveblank.com/2019/05/07/how-to-stop-playing-target-market-roulette-a-new-addition-to-the-lean-toolset/ Accessed 7 May 2019.

  • Boh, W., De-Haan, U., & Strom, R. (2016). University technology transfer through entrepreneurship: Faculty and students in spinoffs. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 661–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, C., & Johnson, P. (2006). Action research: Explaining the diversity. Human Relations, 59, 783–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., Huang, F., & Zeng, W. (2018). Comments on systematic methodologies of action research in the new millennium: A review of publications 2000–2014. Action Research, 16, 341–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciuchta, M. P., Letwin, C., Stevenson, R., McMahon, S., & Huvaj, M. N. (2018). Betting on the coachable entrepreneur: Signaling and social exchange in entrepreneurial pitches. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 42, 860–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cometto, M. T., & Piol, A. (2013). Tech and the city: The making of New York’s startup community. New York, NY: Mirandola Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, E. (2015). Remodelling technology transfer. Nature Nanotechnology, 10(4), 184. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, T. (2002). Entrepreneurial capital: The emerging venture’s most important asset and competitive advantage. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 275–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M., Feller, I., Bercovitz, J., & Burton, R. (2002). Equity and the technology strategies of American research universities. Management Science, 48, 105–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francois, V., & Philippart, P. (2019). A university spinoff launch failure: Explanation by legitimation process. Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 1188–1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, M., & Tal, S. (2017). Where to Play, 3 steps for discovering your most valuable market opportunities. London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffer, T. B., Milesi, C., Selfa, L., Grigorian, K., Foley, D. J., Milan, L. M., et al. (2011). Unemployment among doctoral scientists and engineers remained below the national average in 2008. National Science Foundation InfoBrief SRS: NSF 11-308. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf11308/nsf11308.pdf.

  • Huang-Saad, A., Fay, J., & Sheridan, L. (2017). Closing the divide: Accelerating technology commercialization by catalyzing the university entrepreneurial ecosystem with i-Corps. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 1466–1486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolympris, C., & Klein, P. G. (2017). The effect of incubators on university innovation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11, 145–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzocchi, C., Kitagawa, F., & Sanchez-Barrioluengo, M. (2017). Evolving missions and university entrepreneurship: Academic spin-offs and graduate start-ups in the entrepreneurial society. Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9619-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, B. A., Wolfe, M. T., & Syed, I. (2017). Passion and grit, an exploration of the pathways leading to venture success. Journal of Business Venturing, 32, 260–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation, Division of Science Research Statistics for 2008 (2018).

  • National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2015). Doctorate Recipients from US Universities 2014.

  • Noh, H., & Lee, S. (2019). Where technology transfer originated and where it is going: a quantitative analysis of literature published between 1980–2015. Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 700–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichert, S. (2019). EUA study. The role of universities in regional innovation ecosystems. Brussels: European University Association Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagor, R. (2011). The action research guidebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., Locke, E. A., & Collins, C. J. (2003). Entrepreneurial motivation. Human Resource Management Review, 13, 257–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2015). Academic entrepreneurship: Time for a rethink? British Journal of Management, 26, 582–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, D. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant. Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toole, A. A., & Czarnitzki, D. (2010). Commercializing science: Is there a university “brain drain” from academic entrepreneurship. Management Science, 56, 1599–1614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy, 33, 147–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., Siegel, D., & Mustar, P. (2017). An emerging ecosystem for student start-ups. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(4), 909–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

    Uzi de Haan

  2. Technion DRIVE Accelerator, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

    Shuli C. Shwartz

  3. Jacobs Technion-Cornell Institute, Cornell Tech, New York City, USA

    Fernando Gómez-Baquero

Authors
  1. Uzi de Haan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shuli C. Shwartz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fernando Gómez-Baquero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uzi de Haan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Shuli C. Shwartz: Formerly with the Jacobs Technion–Cornell Institute at Cornell Tech, NYC, USA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Haan, U., Shwartz, S.C. & Gómez-Baquero, F. A startup postdoc program as a channel for university technology transfer: the case of the Runway Startup Postdoc Program at the Jacobs Technion–Cornell Institute at Cornell Tech. J Technol Transf 45, 1611–1633 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-019-09764-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-019-09764-7

Keywords

  • Academic entrepreneurship
  • Graduate students’ startups
  • University spinoffs
  • Translational research
  • Technology transfer
  • Action research

JEL Classification

  • I23
  • L26
  • M13
  • O31
  • O32
  • O34