Within the technology transfer field, there have been numerous empirical studies taking US data and context that have examined the impact and effect of government legislation aimed at supporting effective technology transfer, particularly from universities and federal research laboratories to the market. However, there is a paucity of such studies in other geographical domains. Existing studies have further not focused on examining the simultaneous effects on entrepreneurial and innovative outcomes of university focused technology transfer policies. We address these research gaps by examining the effects of a far-reaching legislation change in Germany, reforming the old ‘professor’s privilege’ (Hochschullehrerprivileg). The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether regional entrepreneurial and innovative outcomes have been affected by this legislative change in intellectual property rights of inventions made by scientists. Our results suggest that this legislative change did have an initial positive effect on universities as measured by start-ups and patents. The effect yet changed over time, leading to some unintended consequences. Our paper argues that policy makers and legislators need to give consideration to the replication of policy and legislative instruments from other contexts along with the criteria that are used to measure success.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Acs, Z. J., & Szerb, L. (2007). Entrepreneurship, economic growth and public policy. Small Business Economics, 28(2–3), 109–122.
Agrawal, A. K. (2001). University-to-industry knowledge transfer: Literature review and unanswered questions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(4), 285–302.
Aldridge, T. T., & Audretsch, D. (2011). The Bayh-Dole act and scientist entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1058–1067.
Anselin, L., Varga, A., & Acs, Z. (1997). Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of Urban Economics, 42(3), 422–448.
Audretsch, D. B. (2014). From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 313–321.
Audretsch, D. B., Cunningham, J. A., Kuratko, D. F., Lehmann, E. E., & Menter, M. (2019a). Entrepreneurial ecosystems: Economic, technological, and societal impacts. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(2), 313–325.
Audretsch, D. B., Hülsbeck, M., & Lehmann, E. E. (2012). Regional competitiveness, university spillovers, and entrepreneurial activity. Small Business Economics, 39(3), 587–601.
Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2004). Does entrepreneurship capital matter? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(5), 419–429.
Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2005). Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Research Policy, 34(8), 1191–1202.
Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Menter, M. (2016). Public cluster policy and new venture creation. Economia e Politica Industriale, 43(4), 357–381.
Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., Menter, M., & Seitz, N. (2019b). Public cluster policy and firm performance: Evaluating spillover effects across industries. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 31(1–2), 150–165.
Audretsch, D., Lehmann, E., & Warning, S. (2004). University spillovers: Does the kind of science matter? Industry and Innovation, 11(3), 193–206.
Baptista, R., & Preto, M. T. (2007). The dynamics of causality between entrepreneurship and unemployment. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 7(3), 215–224.
Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893–921.
Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2006). Entpreprenerial universities and technology transfer: A conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 175–188.
Bergmann, H., Hundt, C., & Sternberg, R. (2016). What makes student entrepreneurs? On the relevance (and irrelevance) of the university and the regional context for student start-ups. Small Business Economics, 47(1), 53–76.
Blenker, P., Trolle Elmholdt, S., Hedeboe Frederiksen, S., Korsgaard, S., & Wagner, K. (2014). Methods in entrepreneurship education research: A review and integrative framework. Education + Training, 56(8/9), 697–715.
Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E. G., Anderson, M. S., Causino, N., & Louis, K. S. (1997). Withholding research results in academic life science: Evidence from a national survey of faculty. JAMA, 277(15), 1224–1228.
Boettiger, S., & Bennett, A. B. (2006). Bayh-Dole: If we knew then what we know now. Nature Biotechnology, 24(3), 320.
Bramwell, A., & Wolfe, D. A. (2008). Universities and regional economic development: The entrepreneurial University of Waterloo. Research Policy, 37(8), 1175–1187.
Brown, R. (2016). Mission impossible? Entrepreneurial universities and peripheral regional innovation systems. Industry and Innovation, 23(2), 189–205.
Cattaneo, M., Meoli, M., & Signori, A. (2016). Performance-based funding and university research productivity: The moderating effect of university legitimacy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(1), 85–104.
Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1–23.
Cunningham, J. A., & Clinch, J. P. (2004). An organizing framework for the implementation of environmental voluntary approaches. European Environment, 14(1), 30–39.
Cunningham, J. A., Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2017a). Entrepreneurial universities—overview, reflections, and future research agendas. In J. A. Cunningham, M. Guerrero, & D. Urbano (Eds.), The world scientific reference on entrepreneurship (pp. 3–19). Singapur: World Scientific Publishing.
Cunningham, J., & Harney, B. (2006). Strategic management of technology transfer: The new challenge on campus. Oxfordshire: Oak Tree Press.
Cunningham, J. A., & Link, A. N. (2014). Fostering university-industry R&D collaborations in European Union countries. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(4), 849–860.
Cunningham, J. A., Menter, M., & O’Kane, C. (2018). Value creation in the quadruple helix: A micro level conceptual model of principal investigators as value creators. R&D Management, 48(1), 136–147.
Cunningham, J. A., Menter, M., & Wirsching, K. (2019). Entrepreneurial ecosystem governance: A principal investigator-centered governance framework. Small Business Economics, 52(2), 545–562.
Cunningham, J. A., Menter, M., & Young, C. (2017b). A review of qualitative case methods trends and themes used in technology transfer research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(4), 923–956.
Cunningham, J., O’Reilly, P., O’Kane, C., & Mangematin, V. (2014). The inhibiting factors that principal investigators experience in leading publicly funded research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(1), 93–110.
Cuntz, A., Dauchert, H., Meurer, P., & Philipps, A. (2012). Hochschulpatente zehn Jahre nach Abschaffung des Hochschullehrerprivilegs. In Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 13-2012, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI)—Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation. Berlin. http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:efisdi:132012.
Di Nauta, P., Merola, B., Caputo, F., & Evangelista, F. (2018). Reflections on the role of university to face the challenges of knowledge society for the local economic development. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9(1), 180–198.
Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix: University-industry-government innovation in action. London: Routledge.
Etzkowitz, H. (2014). The entrepreneurial university wave: From ivory tower to global economic engine. Industry and Higher Education, 28(4), 223–232.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.
Falck, O., Fritsch, M., & Heblich, S. (2011). The phantom of the opera: Cultural amenities, human capital, and regional economic growth. Labour Economics, 18(6), 755–766.
Faria, J. R., Cuestas, J. C., & Mourelle, E. (2010). Entrepreneurship and unemployment: A nonlinear bidirectional causality? Economic Modelling, 27(5), 1282–1291.
Fitzgerald, C., & Cunningham, J. A. (2016). Inside the university technology transfer office: Mission statement analysis. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(5), 1235–1246.
Florida, R. (1995). Toward the learning region. Futures, 27(5), 527–536.
Fritsch, M., & Franke, G. (2004). Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation. Research Policy, 33(2), 245–255.
Fritsch, M., & Schwirten, C. (1999). Enterprise-university co-operation and the role of public research institutions in regional innovation systems. Industry and Innovation, 6(1), 69–83.
Fritsch, M., & Wyrwich, M. (2014). The long persistence of regional levels of entrepreneurship: Germany, 1925–2005. Regional Studies, 48(6), 955–973.
Gately, C., & Cunningham, J. (2014a). The contributions and disconnections between writing a business plan and the start-up process for incubator technology entrepreneurs. In A. C. Corbett, D. S. Siegel, & J. A. Katz (Eds.), Academic entrepreneurship: Creating an entrepreneurial ecosystem (pp. 197–241). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
Gately, C., & Cunningham, J. (2014b). Building intellectual capital in incubated technology firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15(4), 516–536.
Geoghegan, W., & Pontikakis, D. (2008). From ivory tower to factory floor? How universities are changing to meet the needs of industry. Science and Public Policy, 35(7), 462–474.
Geuna, A., & Nesta, L. J. (2006). University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence. Research Policy, 35(6), 790–807.
Geuna, A., & Rossi, F. (2011). Changes to university IPR regulations in Europe and the impact on academic patenting. Research Policy, 40(8), 1068–1076.
Glauber, J., Wollersheim, J., Sandner, P., & Welpe, I. M. (2015). The patenting activity of German Universities. Journal of Business Economics, 85(7), 719–757.
Goldstein, H. A. (2010). The ‘entrepreneurial turn’and regional economic development mission of universities. The Annals of Regional Science, 44(1), 83.
Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after Bayh-Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1045–1057.
Grimm, H. M. (2011). The diffusion of Bayh-Dole to Germany: Did new public policy facilitate university patenting and commercialisation? International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 12(4), 459–478.
Guerrero, M., Cunningham, J. A., & Urbano, D. (2015). Economic impact of entrepreneurial universities’ activities: An exploratory study of the United Kingdom. Research Policy, 44(3), 748–764.
Guerrero, M., Toledano, N., & Urbano, D. (2011). Entrepreneurial universities and support mechanisms: A Spanish case study. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 13(2), 144–160.
Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2012). The development of an entrepreneurial university. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(1), 43–74.
Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., Cunningham, J., & Organ, D. (2014a). Entrepreneurial universities in two European regions: A case study comparison. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 415–434.
Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., & Salamzadeh, A. (2014b). Evolving entrepreneurial universities: Experiences and challenges in the Middle Eastern context. In A. Fayolle (Ed.), Handbook of research in entrepreneurship education: Entrepreneurial university handbook (pp. 163–187). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Harhoff, D., & Hoisl, K. (2007). Institutionalized incentives for ingenuity—patent value and the German Employees’ Inventions Act. Research Policy, 36(8), 1143–1162.
Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251–261.
Hsu, D. W., Shen, Y. C., Yuan, B. J., & Chou, C. J. (2015). Toward successful commercialization of university technology: Performance drivers of university technology transfer in Taiwan. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 25–39.
Huggins, R., & Thompson, P. (2015). Entrepreneurship, innovation and regional growth: A network theory. Small Business Economics, 45(1), 103–128.
Hülsbeck, M., Lehmann, E. E., & Starnecker, A. (2013). Performance of technology transfer offices in Germany. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(3), 199–215.
Hvide, H. K., & Jones, B. F. (2018). University Innovation and the Professor’s Privilege. American Economic Review, 108(7), 1860–1898.
Kallio, A., Harmaakorpi, V., & Pihkala, T. (2010). Absorptive capacity and social capital in regional innovation systems: The case of the Lahti region in Finland. Urban Studies, 47(2), 303–319.
Katz, J. A. (2003). The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education: 1876–1999. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 283–300.
Katz, J. A. (2008). Fully mature but not fully legitimate: A different perspective on the state of entrepreneurship education. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(4), 550–566.
Kirby, D. A., Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2011). Making universities more entrepreneurial: Development of a model. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 28(3), 302–316.
Koellinger, P. D., & Thurik, R. A. (2012). Entrepreneurship and the business cycle. Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(4), 1143–1156.
Kuratko, D. F., & Menter, M. (2017). The role of public policy in fostering technology-based nascent entrepreneurship. In J. A. Cunningham & C. O’Kane (Eds.), Technology-based nascent entrepreneurship technology-based nascent entrepreneurship (pp. 19–52). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lach, S., & Schankerman, M. (2008). Incentives and invention in universities. The Rand Journal of Economics, 39(2), 403–433.
Lee, Y. S. (1996). ‘Technology transfer’and the research university: A search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration. Research Policy, 25(6), 843–863.
Lehmann, E. E., & Menter, M. (2016). University–industry collaboration and regional wealth. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(6), 1284–1307.
Lehmann, E. E., & Menter, M. (2018a). Public cluster policy and performance. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(3), 558–592.
Lehmann, E. E., & Menter, M. (2018b). Public cluster policy and neighboring regions: Beggar-thy-neighbor? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 27(5–6), 420–437.
Lehmann, E. E., Menter, M., & Wirsching, K. (2017a). Firm performance and regional innovation mechanisms: The moderating role of absorptive capacities. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 37(11), 243–248.
Lehmann, E. E., & Seitz, N. (2017). Freedom and innovation: A country and state level analysis. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1009–1029.
Lehmann, E. E., Seitz, N., & Wirsching, K. (2017b). Smart finance for smart places to foster new venture creation. Economia e Politica Industriale, 44(1), 51–75.
Lehmann, E. E., & Stockinger, S. A. (2018). Entrepreneurship in higher education: The impact of competition- based policy programmes exemplified by the German excellence initiative. Higher Education Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12188.
Leyden, D. P., & Menter, M. (2018). The legacy and promise of Vannevar Bush: Rethinking the model of innovation and the role of public policy. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 27(3), 225–242.
Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of a Triple Helix of university—industry—government relations. Science and Public Policy, 23(5), 279–286.
Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., & Bozeman, B. (2007). An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 641–655.
Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., & Van Fleet, D. D. (2011). Public science and public innovation: Assessing the relationship between patenting at US National Laboratories and the Bayh-Dole Act. Research Policy, 40(8), 1094–1099.
Lumpkin, G. T., & Katz, J. A. (2007). An introduction to the special volume on entrepreneurial strategic processes. In Entrepreneurial strategic processes (pp. 1–7). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Markman, G. D., Phan, P. H., Balkin, D. B., & Gianiodis, P. T. (2005). Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 241–263.
Matlay, H. (2008). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial outcomes. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15(2), 382–396.
Menter, M. (2016). Principal investigators and the commercialization of knowledge. In D. B. Audretsch, E. E. Lehmann, S. Vismara, & M. Meoli (Eds.), University evolution entrepreneurial activity and regional competitiveness (pp. 193–203). Heidelberg: Springer.
Menter, M., Lehmann, E. E., & Klarl, T. (2018). In search of excellence: A case study of the first excellence initiative of Germany. Journal of Business Economics, 88(9), 1105–1132.
Minniti, M. (2008). The role of government policy on entrepreneurial activity: Productive, unproductive, or destructive? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(5), 779–790.
Moosa, I. A. (2018). Publish or perish: Perceived benefits versus unintended consequences. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2001). The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: An assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980. Research Policy, 30(1), 99–119.
Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2015). Ivory tower and industrial innovation: University-industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole Act. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N. (2004). The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and university–industry technology transfer: A model for other OECD governments? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1–2), 115–127.
Muscio, A., Quaglione, D., & Vallanti, G. (2013). Does government funding complement or substitute private research funding to universities? Research Policy, 42(1), 63–75.
Nabi, G., Liñán, F., Fayolle, A., Krueger, N., & Walmsley, A. (2017). The impact of entrepreneurship education in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(2), 277–299.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Kane, C., Mangematin, V., Geoghegan, W., & Fitzgerald, C. (2015). University technology transfer offices: The search for identity to build legitimacy. Research Policy, 44(2), 421–437.
O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of US universities. Research Policy, 34(7), 994–1009.
O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Morse, K. P., O’Gorman, C., & Roche, F. (2007). Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience. R&D Management, 37(1), 1–16.
Poyago-Theotoky, J., Beath, J., & Siegel, D. S. (2002). Universities and fundamental research: Reflections on the growth of university–industry partnerships. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), 10–21.
Ranga, L., Debackere, K., & Tunzelmann, N. (2003). Entrepreneurial universities and the dynamics of academic knowledge production: A case study of basic vs. applied research in Belgium. Scientometrics, 58(2), 301–320.
Rappert, B., Webster, A., & Charles, D. (1999). Making sense of diversity and reluctance: Academic–industrial relations and intellectual property. Research Policy, 28(8), 873–890.
Rasmussen, E., Moen, Ø., & Gulbrandsen, M. (2006). Initiatives to promote commercialization of university knowledge. Technovation, 26(4), 518–533.
Roper, S., & Love, J. H. (2006). Innovation and regional absorptive capacity: The labour market dimension. The Annals of Regional Science, 40(2), 437–447.
Salter, A. J., & Martin, B. R. (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: A critical review. Research Policy, 30(3), 509–532.
Sampat, B. N., Mowery, D. C., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2003). Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole act: A re-examination. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9), 1371–1390.
Saxenian, A. (2002). Silicon Valley’s new immigrant high-growth entrepreneurs. Economic development quarterly, 16(1), 20–31.
Shane, S. (2004). Encouraging university entrepreneurship? The effect of the Bayh-Dole Act on university patenting in the United States. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 127–151.
Shane, S. A. (2005). Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Siegel, D. S., Veugelers, R., & Wright, M. (2007). Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: Performance and policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 640–660.
Siegel, D. S., Wessner, C., Binks, M., & Lockett, A. (2003). Policies promoting innovation in small firms: Evidence from the US and UK. Small Business Economics, 20(2), 121–127.
Stolarick, K., & Florida, R. (2006). Creativity, connections and innovation: A study of linkages in the Montréal Region. Environment and Planning A, 38(10), 1799–1817.
Storper, M., & Scott, A. J. (2009). Rethinking human capital, creativity and urban growth. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(2), 147–167.
Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2011). Has the Bayh-Dole act compromised basic research? Research Policy, 40(8), 1077–1083.
Trequattrini, R., Lombardi, R., Lardo, A., & Cuozzo, B. (2018). The impact of entrepreneurial universities on regional growth: A local intellectual capital perspective. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9(1), 199–211.
Tseng, A. A., & Raudensky, M. (2014). Performance evaluations of technology transfer offices of major US research universities. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 9(1), 93–102.
Urbano, D., & Guerrero, M. (2013). Entrepreneurial universities: Socioeconomic impacts of academic entrepreneurship in a European Region. Economic Development Quarterly, 27(1), 40–55.
Valero, A., & Van Reenen, J. (2016). The economic impact of universities: Evidence from across the globe. National Bureau of Economic Research—No. w22501.
Von Proff, S., Buenstorf, G., & Hummel, M. (2012). University patenting in Germany before and after 2002: What role did the professors’ privilege play? Industry and Innovation, 19(1), 23–44.
Weckowska, D. M., Molas-Gallart, J., Tang, P., Twigg, D., Castro-Martínez, E., Kijeńska-Dąbrowska, I., et al. (2018). University patenting and technology commercialization–legal frameworks and the importance of local practice. R&D Management, 48(1), 88–108.
Wennekers, S., & Thurik, R. (1999). Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 13(1), 27–56.
Wennekers, S., Van Wennekers, A., Thurik, R., & Reynolds, P. (2005). Nascent entrepreneurship and the level of economic development. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 293–309.
Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., & Autio, E. (2005). Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: Evidence from GEM data. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 335–350.
Wright, M. (2007). Academic entrepreneurship in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Wright, M., Birley, S., & Mosey, S. (2004). Entrepreneurship and university technology transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3–4), 235–246.
Wu, Y., Welch, E. W., & Huang, W. L. (2015). Commercialization of university inventions: Individual and institutional factors affecting licensing of university patents. Technovation, 36, 12–25.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Cunningham, J.A., Lehmann, E.E., Menter, M. et al. The impact of university focused technology transfer policies on regional innovation and entrepreneurship. J Technol Transf 44, 1451–1475 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-019-09733-0
- German Employees’ Inventions Act
- Bayh-Dole Act
- Professor’s privilege
- Technology transfer