Corporate R&D engineers, being usually the initiators of a patent, are important contributors to the patenting performance of their employers. Hence, patenting motives of R&D engineers encompass an interesting and promising research field. However, the literature on patenting motivation of the engineers in the corporate context is scarce. We apply self-determination theory on human motivation to investigate patenting motives of a sample of local R&D engineers in China employed by a European-based multi-national corporation. Factor analysis reveals four groups of motives: “reward and recognition”, “reputation and promotion”, “making a contribution” and “interest and sense of achievement”. The results of multiple hierarchical regression show the influence of working climate on “making a contribution” and “interest and sense of achievement” motivation factors. Implications for patent management are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Amabile, T. M. (1993). Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review,3(3), 185–201.
Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,66, 950–967.
Arundel, A., van de Paal, G., & Soete, L. (1995). Innovation strategies of Europe’s largest industrial firms. Results of the PACE survey for information sources, public research, protection of innovations and government programmes. Final report. Maastricht, Limburg: Merit.
Baldini, N. (2011). University patenting: Patterns of faculty motivations. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,23(2), 103–121.
Baumeister, R., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong. Desire for interpersonal attachments as fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin,117, 497–529.
Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change and the individual level. Organization Science,19, 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0295.
Blind, K., Cremers, K., & Mueller, E. (2009). The influence of strategic patenting on companies’ patent portfolios. Research Policy,38(2), 428–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.003.
Blind, K., Edler, J., Frietsch, R., & Schmoch, U. (2006). Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany. Research Policy,35(5), 655–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.002.
Blind, K., Pohlisch, J., & Zi, A. (2018). Publishing, patenting and standardization: Motives and barriers of scientists. Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.011.
Chang, S. B., & Chang, S. M. (2010). Exploring the perception and behavior of software engineers about computer software patent. WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications,11(7), 1358–1367.
Cohen, W. M., Goto, A., Nagata, A., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States. Research Policy,31(8), 1349–1367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00068-9.
Countinho, M., Balbachevky, E., Holzhacker, D., Patrao, D., Vencio, R., Silva, R., et al. (2003). Intellectual property and public research in biotechnology: The scientists opinion. Scientometrics,58, 641–656.
deCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation. New York: Academic Press.
Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry,11(4), 227–268.
Deci, E., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2004). Self-determination theory and basic need satisfaction: Understanding human development in positive psychology. Ricerche di Psicologia,27(1), 23–40.
Duguet, E., & Kabla, I., (1998). Appropriation strategy and the motivations to use the patent system: An econometric analysis at the firm level in French manufacturing. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique, 49/50, 289–327. Retrieved from: http://www.insee.fr/fr/publications-et-services/docs_doc_travail/g9717.pdf.
Figueiredo Moutinho, P. S., Fontes, M., & Godinho, M. (2007). Do individual factors matter? A survey of scientists’ patenting in Portuguese public research organisations. Scientometrics,70(2), 355–377.
Fowler, F. J. (1995). Improving survey questions: Design and evaluation. Applied Social Research Methods Series (Vol. 38). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Göktepe-Hulten, D., & Mahagaonkar, P. (2010). Inventing and patenting activities of scientists: In the expectation of money or reputation? The Journal of Technology Transfer,35(4), 401–423.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,16, 250–279.
Hu, A. G., Zhang, P., & Zhao, L. (2017). China as number one? Evidence from China’s most recent patenting surge. Journal of Development Economics,124, 107–119.
Hussler, C., & Penin, J. (2012). Proactive versus reactive motivations for patenting and their impact on patent production at universities. International Journal of Technology Management,58(3–4), 213–235.
Hutcheson, G., & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist. London: Sage.
Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,22, 80–87.
Kline, P. (1999). The handbook of psychological testing (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Lam, A. (2011). What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization: ‘Gold’, ‘ribbon’ or ‘puzzle’? Research Policy,40, 1354–1368.
Mathew, M., & Chakraborty, N. B. (2012). Aspiration of Indian inventors moderated by patenting experience, age and sector. Journal of High Technology Management Research,23, 71–81.
Norusis, M. (2004). SPSS 13.0. Statistical procedures companion. Upper Saddle-River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
OECD, Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy. (2003). Preliminary results of OECD/BIAC survey on the use and perception of patents in the business community (Ed.). Working Party on Innovation and Policy, 19–20 June, 2003.
Olander, H., Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., & Heilmann, P. (2015). Human resources—strength and weakness in protection of intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital,16(4), 742–762.
Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2001). To patent or not: Faculty decisions and institutional success at technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer,26, 99–114.
Pelletier, L. G., Tuson, K. M., & Haddad, N. K. (1997). Client motivation for therapy scale: A measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation for therapy. Journal of Personality Assessment,68, 414–435.
Pitkethly, R. H. (2001). Intellectual property in Japanese and UK companies: Patent licensing decisions and learning opportunities. Research Policy,30(3), 425–442.
Rahn, G. (1994). Patentstrategien japanischer Unternehmen. Gewerblicher Rechtschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil,5, 377.
Ryan, R. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00501.x
Ryan, R., & Connell, J. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,57, 749–761.
Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology,25, 54–67.
Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist,55(1), 68–78.
Schalk, H. J., Täger, U. C., & Brander, S. (1999). Wissensverbreitung und Diffusionsdynamik im Spannungsfeld zwischen innovierenden und imitierenden Unternehmen (Eds.). Ifo-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, München.
Shane, S. (2001). Technology regimes and new firm formation. Management Science,47(9), 1173–1190.
Siegel, D. S., Waldmann, D. A., & Link, A. N. (2003). Assessing the impact of organisational practices on the productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy,32(1), 27–48.
Somaya, D. (2003). Strategic determinants of decision not to settle patent litigation. Strategic Management Journal,24(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.281.
Somaya, D., Williamson, I. O., & Zhang, X. (2007). Combining patent law expertise with R&D for patenting performance. Organization Science,18, 922–937. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0292.
Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy,15, 285–305.
Thursby, J. G., Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. C. (2001). Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major U.S. universities. Journal of Technology Transfer,26, 59–72.
Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2002). Who is selling to the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing. Management Science,48(1), 90–104.
Tolmie, A., Muijs, D., & McAteer, E. (2011). Quantitative methods in educational and social research using SPSS. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Torrisi, S., Gambardella, A., Giuria, P., Harhoff, D., Hoisl, K., & Mariani, M. (2016). Used, blocking and sleeping patents: Empirical evidence from a large-scale inventor survey. Research Policy,45(7), 1374–1385.
Vallerand, R. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 271–360). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Veer, T., & Jell, F. (2012). Contributing to markets for technology? A comparison of patent filing motives of individual inventors, small companies and universities. Technovation,32, 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.03.002.
White, R. W. (1963). Ego and reality in psychoanalytic theory. New York: International University Press.
About this article
Cite this article
Potekhina, A., Blind, K. What motivates the engineers to patent? A study at the Chinese R&D laboratories of a European MNC. J Technol Transf 45, 461–480 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9707-z
- Patenting motivation
- R&D management
- Self-determination theory