Advertisement

The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 558–592 | Cite as

Public cluster policy and performance

  • Erik E. Lehmann
  • Matthias Menter
Article

Abstract

While the conditions for creating clusters and modalities of how clusters should be configured have been investigated intensively, evidence about the performance evaluation of public cluster policy is scarce. This paper addresses this issue and investigates the promotion of ‘leading-edge clusters’ by the German federal government in 2007 as a part of the “High-Tech Strategy 2020”. Based on a unique balanced panel including all 150 German metropolitan areas ranging from 1998 to 2012, we apply treatment and difference-in-differences estimation techniques to evaluate this kind of governmental cluster policy. These leading-edge clusters, selected and intensively supported by the government, encompass 21 of the total 150 German metropolitan areas. In particular, we evaluate whether the treated clusters show a different performance path compared to the control group. Our results strongly support the effect of an active public cluster policy measured by regional GDP growth, yet highlight the importance of robust evaluation approaches and techniques. Our results also shed light on the complementary effects of pre-existing entrepreneurial and innovative ecosystems to spur regional wealth and make cluster policy successful at work.

Keywords

Public cluster policy Strategic management of places University-industry collaborations Regional clusters Knowledge spillover theory Evaluation 

JEL Classification

I23 O32 O38 R11 

References

  1. Abadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2015). Comparative politics and the synthetic control method. American Journal of Political Science, 59(2), 495–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. J., Anselin, L., & Varga, A. (2002). Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy, 31(7), 1069–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., Braunerhjelm, P., & Carlsson, B. (2004). The missing link: The knowledge filter and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 4783.Google Scholar
  4. Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2013). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 757–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32(1), 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Acs, Z. J., & Plummer, L. A. (2005). Penetrating the “knowledge filter” in regional economies. The Annals of Regional Science, 39(3), 439–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Andries, P., & Czarnitzki, D. (2014). Small firm innovation performance and employee involvement. Small Business Economics, 43(1), 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2015). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Arthurs, D., Cassidy, E., Davis, C. H., & Wolfe, D. (2009). Indicators to support innovation cluster policy. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3–4), 263–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Audretsch, D. B. (2015). Everything in its place: Entrepreneurship and the strategic management of cities, regions, and states. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Audretsch, D. B., Coad, A., & Segarra, A. (2014a). Firm growth and innovation. Small Business Economics, 43(4), 743–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 630–640.Google Scholar
  14. Audretsch, D. B., Heger, D., & Veith, T. (2015a). Infrastructure and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 44(2), 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Audretsch, D. B., Hülsbeck, M., & Lehmann, E. E. (2012). Regional competitiveness, university spillovers, and entrepreneurial activity. Small Business Economics, 39(3), 587–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2008). Resolving the knowledge paradox: Knowledge-spillover entrepreneurship and economic growth. Research Policy, 37(10), 1697–1705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2005). Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Research Policy, 34(8), 1191–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2015). The seven secrets of Germany: Economic resilience in an era of global turbulence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Menter, M. (2016). Public cluster policy and new venture creation. Economia e Politica Industriale (Journal of Industrial and Business Economics), 43(4), 357–381. doi: 10.1007/s40812-016-0050-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Paleari, S. (2015b). Academic policy and entrepreneurship: A European perspective. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(3), 363–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Warning, S. (2005). University spillovers and new firm location. Research Policy, 34(7), 1113–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Wright, M. (2014b). Technology transfer in a global economy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Audretsch, D. B., Link, A. N., & Walshok, M. L. (2015c). The Oxford handbook of local competitiveness. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Audretsch, D. B., & Peña-Legazkue, I. (2012). Entrepreneurial activity and regional competitiveness: an introduction to the special issue. Small Business Economics, 39(3), 531–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Autant-Bernard, C., Fadairo, M., & Massard, N. (2013). Knowledge diffusion and innovation policies within the European regions: Challenges based on recent empirical evidence. Research Policy, 42(1), 196–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Bakhshi, H., Edwards, J. S., Roper, S., Scully, J., Shaw, D., Morley, L., et al. (2015). Assessing an experimental approach to industrial policy evaluation: Applying RCT+ to the case of creative credits. Research Policy, 44(8), 1462–1472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Belitski, M., & Desai, S. (2015). What drives ICT clustering in European cities? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(3), 430–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 249–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Bhat, C. R., Paleti, R., & Singh, P. (2014). A spatial multivariate count model for firm location decisions. Journal of Regional Science, 54(3), 462–502.Google Scholar
  30. BMBF. (2014a). Die neue hightech-strategie—innovationen für Deutschland. Berlin: Federal Ministry of Education and Research.Google Scholar
  31. BMBF. (2014b). Horizont 2020 im Blick. Berlin: Federal Ministry of Education and Research.Google Scholar
  32. BMBF. (2015). Germany’s leading-edge clusters. Berlin: Federal Ministry of Education and Research.Google Scholar
  33. Breznitz, S. M., & Feldman, M. P. (2012). The engaged university. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(2), 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Carlino, G., & Kerr, W. R. (2014). Agglomeration and innovation: National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER Working Paper No. 20367.Google Scholar
  35. Carree, M., Della Malva, A., & Santarelli, E. (2014). The contribution of universities to growth: Empirical evidence for Italy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 393–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ciccone, A., & Hall, R. (1996). Productivity and the density of economic activity. American Economic Review, 86(1), 54–70.Google Scholar
  37. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Economic Journal, 99, 569–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Cooke, P. (2007). European asymmetries: A comparative analysis of German and UK biotechnology clusters. Science and public policy, 34(7), 454–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Crespo, J., Suire, R., & Vicente, J. (2014). Lock-in or lock-out? How structural properties of knowledge networks affect regional resilience. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(1), 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Cunningham, J. A., Menter, M., & Young, C. (2017). A review of qualitative case methods trends and themes used in technology transfer research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(4), 923–956. doi: 10.1007/s10961-016-9491-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Delgado, M., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2014). Clusters, convergence, and economic performance. Research Policy, 43(10), 1785–1799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Díez-Vial, I., & Fernández-Olmos, M. (2014). Knowledge spillovers in science and technology parks: how can firms benefit most? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(1), 70–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Dohse, D. (2000). Technology policy and the regions—the case of the BioRegio contest. Research Policy, 29(9), 1111–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Dohse, D. (2007). Cluster-based technology policy—The German experience. Industry and Innovation, 14(1), 69–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Duranton, G., Martin, P., Mayer, T., & Mayneris, F. (2010). The economics of clusters. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Eckey, H.-F., Kosfeld, R., & Türck, M. (2006). Abgrenzung deutscher Arbeitsmarktregionen. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 64(4), 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Eickelpasch, A., & Fritsch, M. (2005). Contests for cooperation—A new approach in German innovation policy. Research Policy, 34(8), 1269–1282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Falck, O., Heblich, S., & Kipar, S. (2008). The extension of clusters: Differences-in-difference evidence from the Bavarian state-wide cluster policy. Jena Economic Research Paper No. 2008–073.Google Scholar
  49. Falck, O., Heblich, S., & Kipar, S. (2010). Industrial innovation: Direct evidence from a cluster-oriented policy. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40(6), 574–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Feldman, M. P. (2000). Location and innovation: the new economic geography of innovation, spillovers, and agglomeration. In G. L. Clark, M. S. Gertler, & M. P. Feldman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of economic geography (pp. 373–394). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Feldman, M. P., & Audretsch, D. B. (1999). Innovation in cities: Science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. European Economic Review, 43(2), 409–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Fossen, F. M. & Martin, T. (2016). Entrepreneurial spillovers over space and time. DIW Discussion Paper No. 1618.Google Scholar
  53. Fritsch, M., Bublitz, E., Sorgner, A., & Wyrwich, M. (2014). How much of a socialist legacy? The re-emergence of entrepreneurship in the East German transformation to a market economy. Small Business Economics, 43(2), 427–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Fuchs, G., & Shapira, P. (2005). Rethinking regional innovation and change: Path dependency or regional breakthrough (Vol. 30). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Garone, L. F., Maffioli, A., de Negri, J. A., Rodriguez, C. M., & Vázquez-Baré, G. (2015). Cluster development policy, SME’s performance, and spillovers: evidence from Brazil. Small Business Economics, 44(4), 925–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ghio, N., Guerini, M., Lehmann, E. E., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2015). The emergence of the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 44(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. D., & Shleifer, A. (1992). Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100(6), 1126–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. González-Pernía, J. L., Peña-Legazkue, I., & Vendrell-Herrero, F. (2012). Innovation, entrepreneurial activity and competitiveness at a sub-national level. Small Business Economics, 39(3), 561–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 92–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Guerrero, M., Cunningham, J. A., & Urbano, D. (2015). Economic impact of entrepreneurial universities’ activities: An exploratory study of the United Kingdom. Research Policy, 44(3), 748–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2012). The development of an entrepreneurial university. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(1), 43–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., Cunningham, J., & Organ, D. (2014). Entrepreneurial universities in two European regions: a case study comparison. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 415–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., & Fayolle, A. (2016). Entrepreneurial activity and regional competitiveness: Evidence from European entrepreneurial universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(1), 105–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Guerzoni, M., Aldridge, T. T., Audretsch, D. B., & Desai, S. (2014). A new industry creation and originality: Insight from the funding sources of university patents. Research Policy, 43(10), 1697–1706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Hewitt-Dundas, N. (2013). The role of proximity in university-business cooperation for innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(2), 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Hospers, G.-J., Desrochers, P., & Sautet, F. (2009). The next Silicon Valley? On the relationship between geographical clustering and public policy. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 5(3), 285–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Huggins, R., & Thompson, P. (2015). Entrepreneurship, innovation and regional growth: A network theory. Small Business Economics, 45(1), 103–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Isaksen, A., & Karlsen, J. (2014). Emergence of clusters: By chance or by design. The rise of the Oslo Cancer Cluster. Paper presented at the ERSA conference papers. Google Scholar
  69. Jaffe, A. B. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: evidence from firms’ patents, profits and market value: national bureau of economic research. NBER Working Paper No. 1815.Google Scholar
  70. Karlsson, C., & Warda, P. (2014). Entrepreneurship and innovation networks. Small Business Economics, 43(2), 393–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Kerr, W. R., & Kominers, S. D. (2015). Agglomerative forces and cluster shapes. Review of Economics and Statistics, 97(4), 877–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ketels, C. (2013). Recent research on competitiveness and clusters: what are the implications for regional policy? Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 6(2), 269–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Klarl, T., Lehmann, E. E., & Menter, M. (2016). In search of excellence: A case study of the first excellence initiative of Germany. Available at SSRN 2832605.Google Scholar
  74. Krugman, P. R. (1991). Geography and trade. Cambridge: Leuven University, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  75. Kuratko, D. F., & Menter, M. (2017). The Role of Public Policy in Fostering Technology-Based Nascent Entrepreneurship. In J. A. Cunningham & C. O’Kane (Eds.), Technology-Based Nascent Entrepreneurship: Implications for Economic Policymaking (pp. 19–52). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Lehmann, E. E. (2015). The role of universities in local and regional competitiveness. In D. B. Audretsch, A. N. Link, & M. L. Walshok (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of local competitiveness (pp. 211–236). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Lehmann, E. E., & Menter, M. (2016). University-Industry Collaboration and Regional Wealth. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(6), 1284–1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Lehmann, E. E., & Menter, M. (2017). Public cluster policy and neighboring regions: Beggar-thy-neighbor? Economics of Innovation and New Technology. doi: 10.1080/10438599.2017.1374039.Google Scholar
  79. Leyden, D. P., & Link, A. N. (2013). Knowledge spillovers, collective entrepreneurship, and economic growth: the role of universities. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 797–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Leyden, D. P., & Link, A. N. (2015). Toward a theory of the entrepreneurial process. Small Business Economics, 44(3), 475–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Leyden, D. P., & Menter, M. (2017). The legacy and promise of Vannevar Bush: rethinking the model of innovation and the role of public policy. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. doi: 10.1080/10438599.2017.1329189. forthcoming.Google Scholar
  82. Link, A. N. (1995). A generosity of spirit: The early history of the Research Triangle Park. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Foundation of North Carolina.Google Scholar
  83. Link, A. N. (2015). Yet another measure of ignorance. In C. Antonelli & A. N. Link (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of the Economics of Knowledge (pp. 1–6). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  84. Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2005). Opening the ivory tower’s door: An analysis of the determinants of the formation of US university spin-off companies. Research Policy, 34(7), 1106–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Magro, E., & Wilson, J. R. (2013). Complex innovation policy systems: Towards an evaluation mix. Research Policy, 42(9), 1647–1656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2006). Localized learning revisited. Growth and Change, 37(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics (1920th ed.). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  88. May-Strobl, E. (2005). Neue unternehmerische Initiative in den Regionen Deutschlands—Positionsbestimmung und Ursachenanalyse auf Basis des regionalstatistischen Datenkatalogs (pp. 61–105). Institut für Mittelstandsforschung Bonn: Jahrbuch zur Mittelstandsforschung 2/2004, Schriften zur Mittelstandsforschung Nr. 107 NF, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  89. McGuirk, H., Lenihan, H., & Hart, M. (2015). Measuring the impact of innovative human capital on small firms’ propensity to innovate. Research Policy, 44(4), 965–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Michelacci, C. (2003). Low Returns in R&D Due to the Lack of Entrepreneurial Skills. The Economic Journal, 113(484), 207–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Mueller, P. (2006). Exploring the knowledge filter: How entrepreneurship and university–industry relationships drive economic growth. Research Policy, 35(10), 1499–1508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Nishimura, J., & Okamuro, H. (2011). R&D productivity and the organization of cluster policy: An empirical evaluation of the Industrial Cluster Project in Japan. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(2), 117–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. OECD. (2015). OECD innovation policy platform, www.oecd.org/innovation/policyplatform.
  94. Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., et al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review, 68(2), 73–93.Google Scholar
  96. Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Robin, S., & Schubert, T. (2013). Cooperation with public research institutions and success in innovation: Evidence from France and Germany. Research Policy, 42(1), 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Rocha, H. O. (2013). Entrepreneurship and regional development: The role of clusters. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. The journal of political economy, 94(5), 1002–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. RWI. (2014). Begleitende Evaluierung des Förderinstruments “Spitzencluster-Wettbewerb” des BMBF. Essen: Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
  101. Saxenian, A. (1994). Silicon Valley versus Route 128. Inc, 16(2), 25–29.Google Scholar
  102. Schmiedeberg, C. (2010). Evaluation of cluster policy: A methodological overview. Evaluation, 16(4), 389–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Steinle, C., & Schiele, H. (2002). When do industries cluster?: A proposal on how to assess an industry’s propensity to concentrate at a single region or nation. Research Policy, 31(6), 849–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Sternberg, R. (2003). New firms, regional development and the cluster approach—what can technology policies achieve? Innovation Clusters and Interregional Competition (pp. 347–371). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203–1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Wolman, H., & Hincapie, D. (2015). Clusters and cluster-based development policy. Economic Development Quarterly, 29(2), 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Business and EconomicsUniversity of AugsburgAugsburgGermany
  2. 2.CCSE – Cisalpino Institute for Comparative Studies in EuropeUniversity of AugsburgAugsburgGermany

Personalised recommendations