Skip to main content

The expanded scientific and technical human capital model: the addition of a cultural dimension

The Journal of Technology Transfer volume 44, pages 681–699 (2019)Cite this article

Abstract

The original scientific and technical human capital (STHC) model (Bozeman et al. in Int J Technol Manag 22(7/8):716–740, 2001) has been applied in many different research policy studies over the past decade, yielding multiple applications for evaluating the capacity and career development of engineers and scientists. Despite increased use, the model could benefit from further conceptual development so as to be applicable to a wider variety of issues pertaining to capacity building and career development. Of particular importance, the original STHC model does not explicitly address various cultural issues related to gender, race, socioeconomic status, nationality, and disciplinary culture, all factors generally viewed as important to both scientific career trajectories and productivity. To address this issue, we propose a revised STHC model which includes a cultural dimension that overlays the human and social capital components of the original model. In particular, there is an advantage to incorporating a cultural dimension for the application of the STHC model to issues related to science and engineering careers for underrepresented groups and for understanding career barriers of scientists and graduate students.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

£ 29.95

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Notes

  1. Note: as a matter of convenience, we will hereafter use the term “scientists” as a shorthand for “scientists, engineers and mathematicians.”

  2. According to National Science Foundation data, in 2012 women accounted for 41.1 percent of science and engineering doctorate recipients, and minorities occupied only 31.5 percent of science and engineering doctorate recipients who are US citizens and permanent residents. See details http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2015/nsf15311/start.cfm.

References

  • Baruch, Y., Budhwar, P. S., & Khatri, N. (2007). Brain drain: Inclination to stay abroad after studies. Journal of World Business, 42(1), 99–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, M. A., & Fischer, M. J. (2012). Why they leave: The impact of stereotype threat on the attrition of women and minorities from science, math and engineering majors. Social Psychology of Education, 15(4), 427–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D. D., & Rosen, R. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration, part I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1(1), 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1962). Investment in human capital: A theorytical analysis. The Journal of Political Economy, 70(5), 9–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (2002). The age of human capital. In E. P. Lazear (Ed.), Education in the twenty-first century (pp. 3–8). Palo Alto: Hoover Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (2009). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, C. (2009). Government centrality to university-industry interactions: University research centers and the industry involvement of academic researchers. Research Policy, 38(10), 1505–1516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, C., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Role strain in university research centers. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(4), 430–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, C., & Corley, E. A. (2008). University research centers and the composition of research collaborations. Research Policy, 27, 900–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society, and culture. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. L., Moser, D., Ream, T. C., & Braxton, J. M. (2015). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate (Expanded). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B., & Boardman, C. (2013). Academic faculty in university research centers: Neither capitalism’s slaves nor teaching fugitives. The Journal of Higher Education, 84(1), 88–120. doi:10.2307/23324215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B., & Boardman, C. (2014). Research collaboration and team science: A state-of-the-art review and agenda. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. A. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B., Dietz, J. S., & Gaughan, M. (2001). Scientific and technical human capital: An alternative model for research evaluation. International Journal of Technology Management, 22(7/8), 716–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B., Fay, D., & Slade, C. P. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: The-state-of-the-art. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(1), 1–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2007). Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers’ interactions with industry. Research Policy, 36(5), 694–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2011). How do men and women differ in research collaborations? An analysis of the collaborative motives and strategies of academic researchers. Research Policy, 40(10), 1393–1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B., Rimes, H., & Youtie, J. (2015). The evolving state-of-the-art in technology transfer research: Revisiting the contingent effectiveness model. Research Policy, 44(1), 34–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cañibano, C., & Bozeman, B. (2009). Curriculum vitae method in science policy and research evaluation: The state-of-the-art. Research Evaluation, 18(2), 86–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chubin, D. E., May, G. S., & Babco, E. L. (2005). Diversifying the engineering workforce. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coff, R. W. (2002). Human capital, shared expertise, and the likelihood of impasse in corporate acquisitions. Journal of Management, 28(1), 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corley, E. A., Boardman, P. C., & Bozeman, B. (2006). Design and the management of multi-institutional research collaborations: Theoretical implications from two case studies. Research Policy, 35(7), 975–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corolleur, C. D. F., Carrere, M., & Mangematin, V. (2004). Turning scientific and technological human capital into economic capital: The experience of biotech start-ups in France. Research Policy, 33(4), 631–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, N., & Stout, J. G. (2014). Girls and women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: STEMing the tide and broadening participation in STEM careers. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, J. S. (2000). Building a social capital model of research development: The case of the experimental program to stimulate competitive research. Science and Public Policy, 27(2), 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, J. S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). Academic careers, patents, and productivity: Industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 34(3), 349–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drott, M. C. (1995). Reexamining the role of conference papers in scholarly communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(4), 299–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edler, J., Fier, H., & Grimpe, C. (2011). International scientist mobility and the locus of knowledge and technology transfer. Research Policy, 40(6), 791–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ejsing, A.-K., Kaiser, U., & Kongsted, H. C. (2011). Unraveling the role of public researcher mobility for industrial innovation. IZA Discussion Paper 5691.

  • Fisher, J., & Govindarajan, V. (1992). Profit center manager compensation: An examination of market, political and human capital factors. Strategic Management Journal, 13(3), 205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. F., & Bochner, S. (1982). Social difficulty in a foreign culture: An empirical analysis of culture shock. In S. Bochner (Ed.), Culture in contact: Studies in cross cultural interaction (pp. 161–198). Oxford: Pergamon.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gaughan, M., & Corley, E. A. (2010). Science faculty at US research universities: The impacts of university research center-affiliation and gender on industrial activities. Technovation, 30(3), 215–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaughan, M., & Robin, S. (2004). National science training policy and early scientific careers in France and the United States. Research Policy, 33(4), 569–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, A. L. (2010). Persistence of women and minorities in STEM field majors: Is it the school that matters? Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 911–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D., & Helfat, C. (1997). Specificity of CEO human capital and compensation. Strategic Management Journal, 18(11), 895–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha, Y., & Welch, E. W. (2010). Relational mechanisms governing multifaceted collaborative behavior of academic scientists in six fields of science and engineering. Research Policy, 39(9), 1174–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J., & Bozeman, B. (2012). Perspective: Adopting an asset bundles model to support and advance minority students’ careers in academic medicine and the scientific pipeline. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 87(11), 1488–1495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. D., Ruff, C., & Paretti, M. C. (2013). The impact of engineering identification and stereotypes on undergraduate women’s achievement and persistence in engineering. Social Psychology of Education, 16(3), 471–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonkers, K., & Cruz-Castro, L. (2013). Research upon return: The effect of international mobility on scientific ties, production and impact. Research Policy, 42(8), 1366–1377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonkers, K., & Tijssen, R. (2008). Chinese researchers returning home: Impacts of international mobility on research collaboration and scientific productivity. Scientometrics, 77(2), 309–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kato, M., & Ando, A. (2013). The relationship between research performance and international collaboration in chemistry. Scientometrics, 97(3), 535–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa, F. (2014). Collaborative doctoral programmes: Employer engagement, knowledge mediation and skills for innovation. Higher Education Quarterly, 68(3), 328–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A. (1987). Social class differences in family-school relationships: The importance of cultural capital. Sociology of Education, 60(2), 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A., & Weininger, E. B. (2003). Cultural capital in educational research: A critical assessment. Theory and Society, 32, 567–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, C., & Shibayama, S. (2015). International research visits and careers: An analysis of bioscience academics in Japan. Science and Public Policy, 42(5), 690–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. (2004). Foreign-born scientists in the United States—Do they perform differently than native-born scientists? Georgia Institute of Technology.

  • Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The Impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leech, N. L. (2012). Educating knowledgeable and skilled researchers in doctoral programs in schools of education: A new model. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. M., Ross, S., & Holden, T. (2012). The how and why of academic collaboration: Disciplinary differences and policy implications. Higher Education, 64(5), 693–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libaers, D., & Wang, T. (2012). Foreign-born academic scientists: Entrepreneurial academics or academic entrepreneurs? R&D Management, 42(3), 254–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, M.-W., & Bozeman, B. (2006). Researchers’ industry experience and productivity in university-industry research centers: A “scientific and technical human capital” explanation. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(2), 269–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longden, B. (2004). Interpreting student early departure from higher education through the lens of cultural capital. Tertiary Education and Management, 10(2), 121–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melkers, J., & Kiopa, A. (2010). The social capital of global ties in science: The added value of international collaboration. Review of Policy Research, 27(4), 389–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mincer, J. (1958). Investment in human capital and personal income distribution. The Journal of Political Economy, 66(4), 281–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, experience, and earnings. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, G., & Kiley, M. (2002). “It”s a PhD, not a Nobel Prize’: How experienced examiners assess research theses. Studies in Higher Education, 27(4), 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, F. (2004). The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: Sharing the laboratory life. Research Policy, 33, 643–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Engineering, & National Research Council of the National Academies. (2014). Career choices of female engineers. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine. (2011). Expanding underrepresented minority participation: America’s science and technology talent at the crossroads. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council of the National Academies. (2013). Seeking solutions: Maximizing American talent by advancing women of color in academia. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osland, J. S., & Bird, A. (2000). Beyond sophisticated stereotyping: Cultural sensemaking in context. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 14(1), 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pezzoni, M., Sterzi, V., & Lissoni, F. (2012). Career progress in centralized academic systems: Social capital and institutions in France and Italy. Research Policy, 41(4), 704–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponomariov, B. (2013). Government-sponsored university-industry collaboration and the production of nanotechnology patents in US universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(6), 749–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponomariov, B., & Boardman, C. (2010). Influencing scientists’ collaboration and productivity patterns through new institutions: University research centers and scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 39(5), 613–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, J. D. (2012). Research centers as agents of change in the contemporary academic landscape: Their role and impact in HBCU, EPSCoR, and Majority universities. Research Evaluation, 21(1), 15–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. W. (1963). The economic value of education. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, J. R., & Williams, A. M. (2012). The role of stereotype threats in undermining girls’ and women’s performance and interest in STEM fields. Sex Roles, 66(3–4), 175–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 339–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnert, G. (1995). What makes a good scientist? Determinants of peer evaluation among biologists. Social Studies of Science, 25(1), 35–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, X. (2014). Academic scientists’ affiliation with university research centers: Selection dynamics. Research Policy, 43(2), 382–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Throsby, D. (1999). Cultural capital. Journal of Cultural Economics, 23, 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisenfeld, U., & Ott, I. (2011). Academic discipline and risk perception of technologies: An empirical study. Research Policy, 40(3), 487–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, K. B., & Smith-Doerr, L. (2005). Gender and commercial science: Women’s patenting in the life sciences. Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(4), 355–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1983). Culture and society: 1780–1950. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, R., & Turpin, T. (2009). CV analysis as a complementary methodological approach: Investigating the mobility of Australian scientists. Research Evaluation, 18(2), 143–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, R., Turpin, T., Marceau, J., & Hill, S. (2008). Mobility matters: Research training and network building in science. Comparative Technology Transfer and Society, 6(3), 159–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Public Affairs, Arizona State University, 411 N. Central Avenue, Suite 450, Phoenix, AZ, 85004-0687, USA

    Elizabeth A. Corley, Barry Bozeman & Xuefan Zhang

  2. Institute of Public Affairs Management, National Sun Yat-sen University, 70 Lienhai Rd., Kaohsiung, 80424, Taiwan, ROC

    Chin-Chang Tsai

Authors
  1. Elizabeth A. Corley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Barry Bozeman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xuefan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chin-Chang Tsai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth A. Corley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Corley, E.A., Bozeman, B., Zhang, X. et al. The expanded scientific and technical human capital model: the addition of a cultural dimension. J Technol Transf 44, 681–699 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9611-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9611-y

Keywords

  • Human capital
  • Social capital
  • Cultural context
  • S&T policy
  • Scientists’ careers

JEL Classification

  • J24
  • I24
  • O30