Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Regional cluster policies in Germany: challenges, impacts and evaluation practices

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past two decades, the cluster concept has become firmly established in regional and innovation policy, as well as regional and local economic development at all spatial levels across Germany. The coming of age of such cluster policies shifts the focus of academic interest to the assessment of their outcomes. This paper seeks to contribute to the growing literature on cluster-policy evaluation in three ways: firstly, it focuses on regional cluster policies below the level of federal states in Germany to complement the majority of studies on federal and state-level programmes. Secondly, it adopts a public-choice perspective, whereas most existing research concentrates on methodological and conceptual issues associated with cluster-policy evaluation. Thirdly, this paper attempts to see cluster policies as a whole by linking evaluation with the practices of policy design and implementation, which are interconnected in the policy cycle. Following a brief overview of regional cluster policies in Germany, we summarise the challenges, impacts and evaluation practices of seven case studies on a regional scale, i.e. below the level of federal states. Arguing that causal effects of such policies are difficult to measure, we suggest that the real impacts are rather qualitative improvements in regions’ organisational capacities, whereas independent evaluations not primarily serving to legitimise political decisions require more active engagement by the academic community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Source van den Berg et al. (1997: 206)

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angeles Diez, M. (2001). The evaluation of regional innovation and cluster policies: Towards a participatory approach. European Planning Studies,9(7), 907–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angeles Diez, M. (2002). Evaluating new regional policies: Reviewing the theory and practice. Evaluation,8(3), 285–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardy, B. (2011). Industrial and competitiveness policy: The Lisbon agenda. In A. M. El-Agraa (Ed.), The European Union: Economics and policies (9th ed., pp. 214–228). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, A., & Voelzkow, H. (2004). Recombining governance modes: The media sector in Cologne. In C. Crouch, P. le Galés, C. Trigilia, & H. Voelzkow (Eds.), Changing governance of local economies—Responses of European local production systems (pp. 261–282). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. J., & McCoshan, A. (1993). Enterprise and human resource development: Local capacity building. London: Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R. (2004). Competitiveness of regions from an evolutionary perspective. Regional Studies,38(9), 1001–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2011). Technological relatedness, related variety and economic geography. In P. N. Cooke, B. T. Asheim, R. Boschma, R. Martin, & D. Schwartz (Eds.), Handbook of regional innovation and growth (pp. 187–197). Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braunerhjelm, P. B., & Feldman, M. P. (Eds.). (2006). Cluster genesis: Technology-based economic development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruch-Krumbein, W., & Hochmuth, E. (2000). Cluster und Clusterpolitik: Begriffliche Grundlagen und empirische Fallbeispiele aus Ostdeutschland. Marburg: Schüren.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkert, F., Stumpf, C., Dreizner, K., Missfeld, T., Pütz, M., Beck, J.-P., et al. (2013). Evaluierung von wettbewerblichen Auswahlverfahren des Ziel 2-Programms (2007–2013). Endbericht im Auftrag des Ministeriums für Wirtschaft, Energie, Industrie, Mittelstand und Handwerk des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen. http://www.ziel2.nrw.de/1_NRW-EU_Ziel_2_Programm_2007-2013/3_Ergebnisse/Evaluierung_Wettbewerbsverfahren/Evaluierung_wettbewerbliche_Auswahlverfahren_Ziel_2_Endbericht.pdf. Accessed January 26, 2017.

  • Cooke, P. N. (2007). Growth cultures: The global bioeconomy and its bioregions. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P. N., & Morgan, K. (1993). The network paradigm—New departures in corporate and regional development. Environment and Planning D,11(5), 543–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, M., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2010). Clusters and entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Geography,10(4), 495–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, M., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2012). Clusters, convergence, and economic performance. (=NBER working paper, 18250). http://www.nber.org/papers/w18250. Accessed January 26, 2017.

  • Dohse, D. (2007). Cluster-based technology policy: The German experience. Industry and Innovation,14(1), 69–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duranton, G. (2011). California dreamin’: The feeble case for cluster policies. Review of Economic Analysis,3(1), 3–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, M. (1964). The symbolic uses of politics (=Illini Books, 42). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • EFI. (2015). Gutachten zu Forschung, Innovation und technologischer Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands. http://www.e-fi.de/fileadmin/Gutachten_2015/EFI_Gutachten_2015.pdf. Accessed January 26, 2017.

  • Enright, M. J. (2003). Regional clusters: What we know and what we should know. In J. Bröcker, D. Dohse, & R. Soltwedel (Eds.), Innovation clusters and interregional competition (pp. 99–129). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • ExperConsult. (2012). Wo steht die Wirtschaftsförderung 2012? Gesamtergebnisse. Dortmund: ExperConsult.

    Google Scholar 

  • ExperConsult. (2016). Wo steht die Wirtschaftsförderung 2016? Gesamtauswertung. Dortmund: ExperConsult.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falck, O., Heblich, S., & Kipar, S. (2010). Industrial innovation: Direct evidence from a cluster-oriented policy. Regional Science and Urban Economics,40(6), 574–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floeting, H., & Zwicker-Schwarm, D. (2008). Clusterinitiativen und Netzwerke: Handlungsfelder lokaler und regionaler Wirtschaftspolitik. In H. Floeting (Ed.), Cluster in der kommunalen und regionalen Wirtschaftspolitik: Vom Marketingbegriff zum Prozessmanagement (pp. 15–40). Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M., & Müller, P. (2004). The effects of new business formation on regional development over time. Regional Studies,38(8), 961–975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A., & Shleifer, A. (1992). Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy,100(6), 1126–1152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassmann, U. (2008). Beyond the German model of capitalism: Unorthodox local business development in the Cologne media industry. European Planning Studies,16(4), 465–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartz, P., & Kloepfer, I. (2007). Macht und Ohnmacht: Ein Gespräch mit Inge Kloepfer. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassink, R. (2010). Locked in decline? On the role of regional lock-ins in old industrial areas. In R. Boschma & R. L. Martin (Eds.), The handbook of evolutionary economic geography (pp. 450–468). Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidenreich, M. (2005). The renewal of regional capabilities: Experimental regionalism in Germany. Research Policy,34(5), 739–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dr. Heuser AG. (2005). Review dortmund-project: Evaluierung und Weiterentwicklung der Umsetzung. Unpublished policy report. Dortmund

  • Hofmann, J. (1995). Implicit theories in policy discourse: An inquiry into the interpretations of reality in German technology policy. Policy Sciences,28(2), 127–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollbach-Grömig, B., & Floeting, H. (2008). Kommunale Wirtschaftsförderung 2008: Strukturen, Handlungsfelder, Perspektiven. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hospers, G.-J. (2004). Auf der Suche nach neuen Kombinationen von Trends und Tradition. Wirtschaftsdienst,84(7), 450–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hospers, G.-J., & Beugelsdijk, S. (2002). Regional cluster policies: Learning by comparing? Kyklos,55(3), 381–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketels, C. H. M. (2013). Cluster policy: A guide to the state of debate. In P. Meusburger, J. Glückler, & M. El Meskioui (Eds.), Knowledge and economy (pp. 249–269). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiese, M. (2008a). Cluster approaches to local economic development: Conceptual remarks and case studies from Lower Saxony, Germany. In U. Blien & G. Maier (Eds.), The economics of regional clusters: Networks, technology and policy (pp. 269–303). Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiese, M. (2008b). Vom Hannover-Projekt zu hannoverimpuls: Clusterorientierte Wirtschaftsförderung in der Region Hannover. In M. Kiese & L. Schätzl (Eds.), Cluster und Regionalentwicklung: Theorie, Beratung und praktische Umsetzung (pp. 199–230). Dortmund: Rohn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiese, M. (2009). National styles of cluster promotion: Cluster policies between variety and convergence. In L. Hagbarth (Ed.), Innovative city and business regions (pp. 57–67). Bollschweil: Hagbarth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiese, M. (2010). Policy transfer and institutional learning: An evolutionary perspective on regional cluster policies in Germany. In D. Fornahl, S. Henn, & M.-P. Menzel (Eds.), Emerging clusters: Theoretical, empirical and political perspectives on the initial stage of cluster evolution (pp. 324–353). Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiese, M. (2012). Regionale Clusterpolitik in Deutschland: Bestandsaufnahme und interregionaler Vergleich im Spannungsfeld von Theorie und Praxis. Marburg: Metropolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiese, M. (2013). Regional cluster policies in Germany—A multi-level governance perspective on policy learning. European Review of Industrial Economics and Policy, 5. http://revel.unice.fr/eriep/index.html?id=3543. Accessed January 26, 2017.

  • Kiese, M., & Hundt, C. (2014). Cluster policies, organising capacity and regional resilience: Evidence from German case studies. Raumforschung und Raumordnung,72(2), 117–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiese, M., & Wrobel, M. (2011). A public choice perspective on regional cluster and network promotion in Germany. European Planning Studies,19(10), 1691–1712.

    Google Scholar 

  • LHH. (2016). Beteiligungsbericht 2016. http://www.hannover.de/content/download/372188/7456931/file/Beteiligungsbericht+2016+Landeshauptstadt+Hannover.pdf. Accessed January 26, 2017.

  • LHH (Landeshauptstadt Hannover). (2007). Stellungnahme der Verwaltung zur Evaluation der hannoverimpuls GmbH aus dem Jahr 2006 sowie Empfehlung zum Fortgang der zukünftigen Wirtschaftsentwicklungstätigkeiten. (=Beschlussdrucksache, 1060/2007, Anlage 1). Hannover: Landeshauptstadt Hannover.

  • Martin, R. A., & Sunley, P. (2003). Deconstructing clusters: Chaotic concept or policy panacea? Journal of Economic Geography,3(1), 5–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel, M. P., & Fornahl, D. (2010). Cluster life cycles—Dimensions and rationales of cluster evolution. Industrial and Corporate Change,19(1), 205–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, J. (2005). Urban Governance à la Wolfsburg. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung,32(9/10), 637–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1998). On competition. Boston: The Harvard Business School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • PRBS. (2007). projekt REGION BRAUNSCHWEIG GMBH stellt positive Leistungsbilanz für das Geschäftsjahr 2006 vor. Press release, March 02, 2007. http://www.projekt-region-braunschweig.de/de/Presse/2007/Leistungsbilanz_2006. Accessed March 26, 2008.

  • PRBS. (2008). projekt REGION BRAUNSCHWEIG GMBH: Positive Bilanz dank einzigartigem Netzwerk. Press release, February 14, 2008. http://www.projekt-region-braunschweig.de/de/Presse/2008/PRBS_Bilanz_2007. Accessed March 26, 2008.

  • PwC (PricewaterhouseCoopers AG). (2006). Evaluierungs- und Perspektivbericht über die Arbeit der hannoverimpuls GmbH. Unpublished report commissioned by hannoverimpuls GmbH. Hannover.

  • Raines, P. (2003). Cluster behaviour and economic development: New challenges in policy evaluation. International Journal of Technology Management,26(2), 191–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehfeld, D. (2006). Kompetenzfeldwirtschaft im Ruhrgebiet. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie,50(3–4), 245–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothgang, M., Cantner, U., Dehio, J., Engel, D., Fertig, M., & Graf, H. (2014). Begleitende Evaluierung des Förderinstruments „Spitzencluster-Wettbewerb“ des BMBF, Abschlussbericht – Kurzfassung (=RWI Materialien, 83). http://www.rwi-essen.de/media/content/pages/publikationen/rwi-materialien/rwi-materialien_83_spitzencluster.pdf. Accessed January 26, 2017.

  • Schilder, A. (2000). Government failures and institutions in public policy evaluation: The case of Dutch technology policy. Assen: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmiedeberg, C. (2010). Evaluation of cluster policy: A methodological overview. Evaluation,16(4), 389–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sölvell, Ö., Lindqvist, G., & Ketels, C. H. M. (2003). The cluster initiative greenbook. http://www.cluster-research.org/greenbook.htm. Accessed January 26, 2017.

  • Stadt Dortmund. (2014). Wirtschaftsstandort Dortmund 2014. http://www.wirtschaftsfoerderung-dortmund.de/tiny/4f. Accessed May 28, 2015.

  • Stadt Dortmund. (2016). Wirtschaftsförderung Dortmund, Halbjahresbericht 01/2016. Dortmund: Stadt Dortmund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R., Kiese, M., & Schätzl, L. (2004). Clusteransätze in der regionalen Wirtschaftsförderung: Theoretische Überlegungen und empirische Beispiele aus Wolfsburg und Hannover. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie,48(3–4), 159–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R., Kiese, M., & Stockinger, D. (2010). Cluster policies in the US and Germany: Varieties of capitalism perspective on two high-tech states. Environment and Planning C,28(6), 1063–1082.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M. C., & Walker, R. A. (1989). The capitalist imperative: Territory, technology, and industrial growth. New York: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uyarra, E., & Ramlogan, R. (2012). Cluster policy: A review of the evidence—Compendium of evidence on the effectiveness of innovation policy intervention. http://www.innovation-policy.org.uk/share/NESTA_Compendium_Clusters_20120529_linked.pdf. Accessed January 26, 2017.

  • van den Berg, L., Braun, E., & van den Meer, J. (1997). The organising capacity of metropolitan regions. Environment and Planning C,15(3), 253–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voges, J. (2002). Hartz Jobwunder gibt es schon. Taz, 16.08.2002 (p. 6).

  • Weingart, P. (2001). Die Stunde der Wahrheit? Zum Verhältnis der Wissenschaftzu Politik, Wirtschaft und Medien in der Wissensgesellschaft. Weilerswist: Velbrück.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widmer, T. (1996). Meta-Evaluation: Kriterien zur Bewertung von Evaluationen. Bern: Haupt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1964). The economics of discretionary behavior: Managerial objectives in a theory of the firm. (=The Ford Foundation Doctoral Dissertation Series, 1963). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfsburg AG. (2016). Engagiert für Arbeitsplätze und Lebensqualität. http://www.wolfsburg-ag.com/wolfsburg-ag/ueber-uns/daten-fakten.html. Accessed January 26, 2017.

  • Ziesemer, A. (2004). Strategische Stadtentwicklungsplanung im Ruhrgebiet. Eine Analyse am Beispiel der Städte Duisburg und Dortmund. Dortmund: Dortmunder Vertrieb für Bau- und Planungsliteratur.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Kiese.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kiese, M. Regional cluster policies in Germany: challenges, impacts and evaluation practices. J Technol Transf 44, 1698–1719 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9589-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9589-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation