Abstract
Over the past two decades, the cluster concept has become firmly established in regional and innovation policy, as well as regional and local economic development at all spatial levels across Germany. The coming of age of such cluster policies shifts the focus of academic interest to the assessment of their outcomes. This paper seeks to contribute to the growing literature on cluster-policy evaluation in three ways: firstly, it focuses on regional cluster policies below the level of federal states in Germany to complement the majority of studies on federal and state-level programmes. Secondly, it adopts a public-choice perspective, whereas most existing research concentrates on methodological and conceptual issues associated with cluster-policy evaluation. Thirdly, this paper attempts to see cluster policies as a whole by linking evaluation with the practices of policy design and implementation, which are interconnected in the policy cycle. Following a brief overview of regional cluster policies in Germany, we summarise the challenges, impacts and evaluation practices of seven case studies on a regional scale, i.e. below the level of federal states. Arguing that causal effects of such policies are difficult to measure, we suggest that the real impacts are rather qualitative improvements in regions’ organisational capacities, whereas independent evaluations not primarily serving to legitimise political decisions require more active engagement by the academic community.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angeles Diez, M. (2001). The evaluation of regional innovation and cluster policies: Towards a participatory approach. European Planning Studies,9(7), 907–924.
Angeles Diez, M. (2002). Evaluating new regional policies: Reviewing the theory and practice. Evaluation,8(3), 285–305.
Ardy, B. (2011). Industrial and competitiveness policy: The Lisbon agenda. In A. M. El-Agraa (Ed.), The European Union: Economics and policies (9th ed., pp. 214–228). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baumann, A., & Voelzkow, H. (2004). Recombining governance modes: The media sector in Cologne. In C. Crouch, P. le Galés, C. Trigilia, & H. Voelzkow (Eds.), Changing governance of local economies—Responses of European local production systems (pp. 261–282). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bennett, R. J., & McCoshan, A. (1993). Enterprise and human resource development: Local capacity building. London: Chapman.
Boschma, R. (2004). Competitiveness of regions from an evolutionary perspective. Regional Studies,38(9), 1001–1014.
Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2011). Technological relatedness, related variety and economic geography. In P. N. Cooke, B. T. Asheim, R. Boschma, R. Martin, & D. Schwartz (Eds.), Handbook of regional innovation and growth (pp. 187–197). Cheltenham: Elgar.
Braunerhjelm, P. B., & Feldman, M. P. (Eds.). (2006). Cluster genesis: Technology-based economic development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bruch-Krumbein, W., & Hochmuth, E. (2000). Cluster und Clusterpolitik: Begriffliche Grundlagen und empirische Fallbeispiele aus Ostdeutschland. Marburg: Schüren.
Burkert, F., Stumpf, C., Dreizner, K., Missfeld, T., Pütz, M., Beck, J.-P., et al. (2013). Evaluierung von wettbewerblichen Auswahlverfahren des Ziel 2-Programms (2007–2013). Endbericht im Auftrag des Ministeriums für Wirtschaft, Energie, Industrie, Mittelstand und Handwerk des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen. http://www.ziel2.nrw.de/1_NRW-EU_Ziel_2_Programm_2007-2013/3_Ergebnisse/Evaluierung_Wettbewerbsverfahren/Evaluierung_wettbewerbliche_Auswahlverfahren_Ziel_2_Endbericht.pdf. Accessed January 26, 2017.
Cooke, P. N. (2007). Growth cultures: The global bioeconomy and its bioregions. London: Routledge.
Cooke, P. N., & Morgan, K. (1993). The network paradigm—New departures in corporate and regional development. Environment and Planning D,11(5), 543–564.
Delgado, M., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2010). Clusters and entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Geography,10(4), 495–518.
Delgado, M., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2012). Clusters, convergence, and economic performance. (=NBER working paper, 18250). http://www.nber.org/papers/w18250. Accessed January 26, 2017.
Dohse, D. (2007). Cluster-based technology policy: The German experience. Industry and Innovation,14(1), 69–94.
Duranton, G. (2011). California dreamin’: The feeble case for cluster policies. Review of Economic Analysis,3(1), 3–45.
Edelman, M. (1964). The symbolic uses of politics (=Illini Books, 42). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
EFI. (2015). Gutachten zu Forschung, Innovation und technologischer Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands. http://www.e-fi.de/fileadmin/Gutachten_2015/EFI_Gutachten_2015.pdf. Accessed January 26, 2017.
Enright, M. J. (2003). Regional clusters: What we know and what we should know. In J. Bröcker, D. Dohse, & R. Soltwedel (Eds.), Innovation clusters and interregional competition (pp. 99–129). Berlin: Springer.
ExperConsult. (2012). Wo steht die Wirtschaftsförderung 2012? Gesamtergebnisse. Dortmund: ExperConsult.
ExperConsult. (2016). Wo steht die Wirtschaftsförderung 2016? Gesamtauswertung. Dortmund: ExperConsult.
Falck, O., Heblich, S., & Kipar, S. (2010). Industrial innovation: Direct evidence from a cluster-oriented policy. Regional Science and Urban Economics,40(6), 574–582.
Floeting, H., & Zwicker-Schwarm, D. (2008). Clusterinitiativen und Netzwerke: Handlungsfelder lokaler und regionaler Wirtschaftspolitik. In H. Floeting (Ed.), Cluster in der kommunalen und regionalen Wirtschaftspolitik: Vom Marketingbegriff zum Prozessmanagement (pp. 15–40). Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik.
Fritsch, M., & Müller, P. (2004). The effects of new business formation on regional development over time. Regional Studies,38(8), 961–975.
Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A., & Shleifer, A. (1992). Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy,100(6), 1126–1152.
Glassmann, U. (2008). Beyond the German model of capitalism: Unorthodox local business development in the Cologne media industry. European Planning Studies,16(4), 465–486.
Hartz, P., & Kloepfer, I. (2007). Macht und Ohnmacht: Ein Gespräch mit Inge Kloepfer. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe.
Hassink, R. (2010). Locked in decline? On the role of regional lock-ins in old industrial areas. In R. Boschma & R. L. Martin (Eds.), The handbook of evolutionary economic geography (pp. 450–468). Cheltenham: Elgar.
Heidenreich, M. (2005). The renewal of regional capabilities: Experimental regionalism in Germany. Research Policy,34(5), 739–757.
Dr. Heuser AG. (2005). Review dortmund-project: Evaluierung und Weiterentwicklung der Umsetzung. Unpublished policy report. Dortmund
Hofmann, J. (1995). Implicit theories in policy discourse: An inquiry into the interpretations of reality in German technology policy. Policy Sciences,28(2), 127–148.
Hollbach-Grömig, B., & Floeting, H. (2008). Kommunale Wirtschaftsförderung 2008: Strukturen, Handlungsfelder, Perspektiven. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik.
Hospers, G.-J. (2004). Auf der Suche nach neuen Kombinationen von Trends und Tradition. Wirtschaftsdienst,84(7), 450–453.
Hospers, G.-J., & Beugelsdijk, S. (2002). Regional cluster policies: Learning by comparing? Kyklos,55(3), 381–402.
Ketels, C. H. M. (2013). Cluster policy: A guide to the state of debate. In P. Meusburger, J. Glückler, & M. El Meskioui (Eds.), Knowledge and economy (pp. 249–269). Berlin: Springer.
Kiese, M. (2008a). Cluster approaches to local economic development: Conceptual remarks and case studies from Lower Saxony, Germany. In U. Blien & G. Maier (Eds.), The economics of regional clusters: Networks, technology and policy (pp. 269–303). Cheltenham: Elgar.
Kiese, M. (2008b). Vom Hannover-Projekt zu hannoverimpuls: Clusterorientierte Wirtschaftsförderung in der Region Hannover. In M. Kiese & L. Schätzl (Eds.), Cluster und Regionalentwicklung: Theorie, Beratung und praktische Umsetzung (pp. 199–230). Dortmund: Rohn.
Kiese, M. (2009). National styles of cluster promotion: Cluster policies between variety and convergence. In L. Hagbarth (Ed.), Innovative city and business regions (pp. 57–67). Bollschweil: Hagbarth.
Kiese, M. (2010). Policy transfer and institutional learning: An evolutionary perspective on regional cluster policies in Germany. In D. Fornahl, S. Henn, & M.-P. Menzel (Eds.), Emerging clusters: Theoretical, empirical and political perspectives on the initial stage of cluster evolution (pp. 324–353). Cheltenham: Elgar.
Kiese, M. (2012). Regionale Clusterpolitik in Deutschland: Bestandsaufnahme und interregionaler Vergleich im Spannungsfeld von Theorie und Praxis. Marburg: Metropolis.
Kiese, M. (2013). Regional cluster policies in Germany—A multi-level governance perspective on policy learning. European Review of Industrial Economics and Policy, 5. http://revel.unice.fr/eriep/index.html?id=3543. Accessed January 26, 2017.
Kiese, M., & Hundt, C. (2014). Cluster policies, organising capacity and regional resilience: Evidence from German case studies. Raumforschung und Raumordnung,72(2), 117–131.
Kiese, M., & Wrobel, M. (2011). A public choice perspective on regional cluster and network promotion in Germany. European Planning Studies,19(10), 1691–1712.
LHH. (2016). Beteiligungsbericht 2016. http://www.hannover.de/content/download/372188/7456931/file/Beteiligungsbericht+2016+Landeshauptstadt+Hannover.pdf. Accessed January 26, 2017.
LHH (Landeshauptstadt Hannover). (2007). Stellungnahme der Verwaltung zur Evaluation der hannoverimpuls GmbH aus dem Jahr 2006 sowie Empfehlung zum Fortgang der zukünftigen Wirtschaftsentwicklungstätigkeiten. (=Beschlussdrucksache, 1060/2007, Anlage 1). Hannover: Landeshauptstadt Hannover.
Martin, R. A., & Sunley, P. (2003). Deconstructing clusters: Chaotic concept or policy panacea? Journal of Economic Geography,3(1), 5–35.
Menzel, M. P., & Fornahl, D. (2010). Cluster life cycles—Dimensions and rationales of cluster evolution. Industrial and Corporate Change,19(1), 205–238.
Niskanen, W. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
Pohl, J. (2005). Urban Governance à la Wolfsburg. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung,32(9/10), 637–647.
Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
Porter, M. E. (1998). On competition. Boston: The Harvard Business School Publishing.
PRBS. (2007). projekt REGION BRAUNSCHWEIG GMBH stellt positive Leistungsbilanz für das Geschäftsjahr 2006 vor. Press release, March 02, 2007. http://www.projekt-region-braunschweig.de/de/Presse/2007/Leistungsbilanz_2006. Accessed March 26, 2008.
PRBS. (2008). projekt REGION BRAUNSCHWEIG GMBH: Positive Bilanz dank einzigartigem Netzwerk. Press release, February 14, 2008. http://www.projekt-region-braunschweig.de/de/Presse/2008/PRBS_Bilanz_2007. Accessed March 26, 2008.
PwC (PricewaterhouseCoopers AG). (2006). Evaluierungs- und Perspektivbericht über die Arbeit der hannoverimpuls GmbH. Unpublished report commissioned by hannoverimpuls GmbH. Hannover.
Raines, P. (2003). Cluster behaviour and economic development: New challenges in policy evaluation. International Journal of Technology Management,26(2), 191–204.
Rehfeld, D. (2006). Kompetenzfeldwirtschaft im Ruhrgebiet. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie,50(3–4), 245–257.
Rothgang, M., Cantner, U., Dehio, J., Engel, D., Fertig, M., & Graf, H. (2014). Begleitende Evaluierung des Förderinstruments „Spitzencluster-Wettbewerb“ des BMBF, Abschlussbericht – Kurzfassung (=RWI Materialien, 83). http://www.rwi-essen.de/media/content/pages/publikationen/rwi-materialien/rwi-materialien_83_spitzencluster.pdf. Accessed January 26, 2017.
Schilder, A. (2000). Government failures and institutions in public policy evaluation: The case of Dutch technology policy. Assen: Van Gorcum.
Schmiedeberg, C. (2010). Evaluation of cluster policy: A methodological overview. Evaluation,16(4), 389–412.
Sölvell, Ö., Lindqvist, G., & Ketels, C. H. M. (2003). The cluster initiative greenbook. http://www.cluster-research.org/greenbook.htm. Accessed January 26, 2017.
Stadt Dortmund. (2014). Wirtschaftsstandort Dortmund 2014. http://www.wirtschaftsfoerderung-dortmund.de/tiny/4f. Accessed May 28, 2015.
Stadt Dortmund. (2016). Wirtschaftsförderung Dortmund, Halbjahresbericht 01/2016. Dortmund: Stadt Dortmund.
Sternberg, R., Kiese, M., & Schätzl, L. (2004). Clusteransätze in der regionalen Wirtschaftsförderung: Theoretische Überlegungen und empirische Beispiele aus Wolfsburg und Hannover. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie,48(3–4), 159–176.
Sternberg, R., Kiese, M., & Stockinger, D. (2010). Cluster policies in the US and Germany: Varieties of capitalism perspective on two high-tech states. Environment and Planning C,28(6), 1063–1082.
Storper, M. C., & Walker, R. A. (1989). The capitalist imperative: Territory, technology, and industrial growth. New York: Blackwell.
Uyarra, E., & Ramlogan, R. (2012). Cluster policy: A review of the evidence—Compendium of evidence on the effectiveness of innovation policy intervention. http://www.innovation-policy.org.uk/share/NESTA_Compendium_Clusters_20120529_linked.pdf. Accessed January 26, 2017.
van den Berg, L., Braun, E., & van den Meer, J. (1997). The organising capacity of metropolitan regions. Environment and Planning C,15(3), 253–272.
Voges, J. (2002). Hartz Jobwunder gibt es schon. Taz, 16.08.2002 (p. 6).
Weingart, P. (2001). Die Stunde der Wahrheit? Zum Verhältnis der Wissenschaftzu Politik, Wirtschaft und Medien in der Wissensgesellschaft. Weilerswist: Velbrück.
Widmer, T. (1996). Meta-Evaluation: Kriterien zur Bewertung von Evaluationen. Bern: Haupt.
Williamson, O. E. (1964). The economics of discretionary behavior: Managerial objectives in a theory of the firm. (=The Ford Foundation Doctoral Dissertation Series, 1963). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Wolfsburg AG. (2016). Engagiert für Arbeitsplätze und Lebensqualität. http://www.wolfsburg-ag.com/wolfsburg-ag/ueber-uns/daten-fakten.html. Accessed January 26, 2017.
Ziesemer, A. (2004). Strategische Stadtentwicklungsplanung im Ruhrgebiet. Eine Analyse am Beispiel der Städte Duisburg und Dortmund. Dortmund: Dortmunder Vertrieb für Bau- und Planungsliteratur.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kiese, M. Regional cluster policies in Germany: challenges, impacts and evaluation practices. J Technol Transf 44, 1698–1719 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9589-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9589-5