The focus of this paper is to review the qualitative case methods that have been used in technology transfer research over the last 20 years from 1996 to 2015. Case methods allow for more in-depth analyses and provide the opportunity to place research into a certain context due to the selection of e.g. specific sectors, institutions, countries, etc. Using a systematic literature review of five of the top journals in the field of technology transfer research, namely Journal of Technology Transfer, Research Policy, Science and Public Policy, R&D Management and Technovation, it yielded 107 articles using the search terms: “Technology Transfer” AND (“Case Study” OR “Case Method” OR “Qualitative”). Our findings indicate a clustering of themes using qualitative case methods around technology transfer mechanisms and TTOs, academic entrepreneurship, university-industry collaboration, commercialization as well as R&D and firm knowledge transfer. We also identify trends in case method technology transfer research with respect to authorship, location of papers, sectoral contexts, data collection, numbers of cases and data analysis software. We conclude our paper discussing the implications of trends and themes and suggest that researchers need to reflect on used terminology and their utilization and postulate a need for more plurality of data collection methods.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
We use terms in this section of the paper such case methods, case based research and case studies these all refer to qualitative case methods.
Due to multiple authorships, the number of authors exceeds the number of papers.
Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Licht, G. (2016). National systems of innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer,. doi:10.1007/s10961-016-9481-8.
Acworth, E. (2008). University–industry engagement: The formation of the Knowledge Integration Community (KIC) model at the Cambridge-MIT Institute. Research Policy, 37(8), 1241–1254.
Albors, J., Hervas, J. L., & Hidalgo, A. (2006). Analysing High Technology Diffusion and Public Transference Programs—The Case of the European Game Program. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(6), 647–661.
Andersen, M. M. (2011). Silent innovation: Corporate strategizing in early nanotechnology evolution. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(6), 680–696.
Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems: The integration of local ‘sticky’ and global ‘ubiquitous’ knowledge. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 77–86.
Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., Paleari, S., & Vismara, S. (2016). Entrepreneurial finance and technology transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(1), 1–9.
Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Wright, M. (2014). Technology transfer in a global economy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 301–312.
Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy, 43(7), 1097–1108.
Bach, L., Cohendet, P., & Schenk, E. (2002). Technological transfers from the European space programs: A dynamic view and comparison with other R&D projects. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(4), 321–338.
Backman, M., Börjesson, S., & Setterberg, S. (2007). Working with concepts in the fuzzy front end: Exploring the context for innovation for different types of concepts at Volvo Cars. R&D Management, 37(1), 17–28.
Bathelt, H., Kogler, D. F., & Munro, A. K. (2010). A knowledge-based typology of university spin-offs in the context of regional economic development. Technovation, 30(9–10), 519–532.
Becheikh, N., Landry, R., & Amara, N. (2006). Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: A systematic review of the literature from 1993–2003. Technovation, 26(5–6), 644–664.
Becker, B., & Gassmann, O. (2006). Corporate incubators: Industrial R&D and what universities can learn from them. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(4), 469–483.
Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 369–386.
Beoku-Betts, J. (2005). ‘A lot of them thought I wouldn’t last there’: African women and career advancement in academic scientific careers. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(4), 397–407.
Bessant, J. (1999). The rise and fall of ‘supernet’: A case study of technology transfer policy for smaller firms. Research Policy, 28(6), 601–614.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices. In Textbooks collection. book 3. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/oa_textbooks/3.
Bianchi, M., Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2011). Organizing for external technology commercialization: evidence from a multiple case study in the pharmaceutical industry. R&D Management, 41(2), 120–137.
Boehm, D. N., & Hogan, T. (2014). ‘A jack of all trades’: The role of PIs in the establishment and management of collaborative networks in scientific knowledge commercialisation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(1), 134–149.
Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29(4), 627–655.
Bozeman, B., Fay, D., & Slade, C. P. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(1), 1–67.
Bozeman, B., Rimes, H., & Youtie, J. (2015). The evolving state-of-the-art in technology transfer research: Revisiting the contingent effectiveness model. Research Policy, 44(1), 34–49.
Cacciatori, E. (2008). Memory objects in project environments: Storing, retrieving and adapting learning in project-based firms. Research Policy, 37(9), 1591–1601.
Castellacci, F., & Natera, J. M. (2013). The dynamics of national innovation systems: A panel cointegration analysis of the coevolution between innovative capability and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 42(3), 579–594.
Chapple, W., Lockett, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2005). Assessing the relative performance of UK university technology transfer offices: Parametric and non-parametric evidence. Research Policy, 34(3), 369–384.
Chetty, S. (1996). The case study method for research in small-and medium-sized firms. International Small Business Journal, 15(1), 73–86.
Cho, H.-D., & Lee, J.-K. (2003). The developmental path of networking capability of catch-up players in Korea’s semiconductor industry. R&D Management, 33(4), 411–423.
Cooper, C. E., Hamel, S. A., & Connaughton, S. L. (2012). Motivations and obstacles to networking in a university business incubator. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(4), 433–453.
Coviello, N. E., & Jones, M. V. (2004). Methodological issues in international entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(4), 485–508.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Cruz-Castro, L., Sanz-Menéndez, L., & Martínez, C. (2012). Research centers in transition: Patterns of convergence and diversity. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(1), 18–42.
Cunningham, J., O’Reilly, P., O’Kane, C., & Mangematin, V. (2014). The inhibiting factors that principal investigators experience in leading publicly funded research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(1), 93–110.
Cunningham, J. A., O’Reilly, P., O’Kane, C., & Mangematin, V. (2015). Managerial challenges of publicly funded principal investigators. International Journal of Technology Management, 68(3–4), 176–202.
Cunningham, J. A., O’Reilly, P., O’Kane, C., & Mangematin, V. (2016). Publicly funded principal investigators as transformative agents of public sector entrepreneurship. In D. B. Audretsch & A. N. Link (Eds.), Essays in public sector entrepreneurship (pp. 67–94), Springer.
Daellenbach, U. S., & Davenport, S. J. (2004). Establishing trust during the formation of technology alliances. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(2), 187–202.
Darke, P., Shanks, G., & Broadbent, M. (1998). Successfully completing case study research: Combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism. Information systems journal, 8(4), 273–289.
Davies, A., & Brady, T. (2000). Organisational capabilities and learning in complex product systems: Towards repeatable solutions. Research Policy, 29(7–8), 931–953.
Debackere, K., & Veugelers, Reinhilde. (2005). The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Research Policy, 34(3), 321–342.
Denyer, D., & Neeley, A. (2004). Introduction to special issue: Innovation and productivity performance in the UK. International Journal of Management Reviews, 5–6(3–4), 131–135.
Derrick, G. E. (2014). Integration versus separation: Structure and strategies of the technology transfer office (TTO) in medical research organizations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(1), 105–122.
Díaz, A. J. R. (2012). Transferring knowledge in Quebec-Mexico partnerships: The case of the dairy industry. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(5), 631–647.
Doganova, L. (2013). Transfer and exploration: Two models of science-industry intermediation. Science and Public Policy, 40(4), 442–452.
Dubé, L., & Paré, G. (2003). Rigor in information systems positivist case research: current practices, trends, and recommendations. MIS quarterly, 27(4), 597–636.
Dul, J., & Hak, T. (2008). Case study methodology in business research. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Easton, G. (2010). Critical realism in case study research. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(1), 118–128.
Efstathiades, A., Tassou, S., Oxinos, G., & Antoniou, A. (2000). Advanced manufacturing technology transfer and implementation in developing countries. The case of the Cypriot manufacturing industry. Technovation, 20(2), 93–102.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
Ellram, L. M. (1996). The use of the case study method in logistics research. Journal of Business Logistics, 17(2), 93.
Etzkowitz, H. (2016). The evolution of technology transfer. In S. M. Breznitz & H. Etzkowitz (Eds.), University Technology Transfer: The globalization of academic innovation. Routledge Studies in Global Competition (pp. 3–22). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Fako, T. T., Linn, G. J., & Brown, B. E. (2000). Transferring health technology to South Africa: The importance of traditional African Culture. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 25(3), 299–305.
Ferrary, M. (2008). Strategic spin-off: A new incentive contract for managing R&D researchers. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(6), 600–618.
Festel, G. (2013). Academic spin-offs, corporate spin-outs and company internal start-ups as technology transfer approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(4), 454–470.
Fink, A. (1998). Conducting research literature reviews: From paper to the internet. London: Sage Publications.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
Gagnon, Y. C. (2010). The case study as research method. Canada: Presses de l’Université de Québec.
Gallaher, M. P., & Petrusa, J. E. (2006). Innovation in the US Service Sector. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(6), 611–628.
Garrett-Jones, S., Turpin, T., & Diment, K. (2010). Managing competition between individual and organizational goals in cross-sector research and development centres. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(5), 527–546.
Ghio, N., Guerini, M., Lehmann, E. E., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2015). The emergence of the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 44(1), 1–18.
Giaretta, E. (2013). The trust “builders” in the technology transfer relationships: An Italian science park experience. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(5), 675–678.
Goel, R. K., & Nelson, M. (2009). Determinants of software piracy: Economics, institutions, and technology. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(6), 637–658.
Golob, E. (2006). Capturing the Regional Economic Benefits of University Technology Transfer: A case study. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(6), 685–695.
Greiner, M. A., & Franza, R. M. (2003). Barriers and bridges for successful environmental technology transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(2), 167–177.
Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1045–1057.
Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2012). The development of an entrepreneurial university. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(1), 43–74.
Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., Cunningham, J., & Organ, D. (2014). Entrepreneurial universities in two European regions: a case study comparison. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 415–434.
Guimén, J. (2009). Government strategies to attract R&D-intensive FDI. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(4), 364–379.
Gulbrandsen, M., & Godoe, H. (2008). “We really don’t want to move, but…”: Identity and strategy in the internationalisation of industrial R&D. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(4), 379–392.
Handfield, R., & Melynk, S. (1998). The scientific theory-building process: A primer using the case of TQM. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 321–340.
Hansen, U. E., & Ockwell, D. (2014). Learning and technological capability building in emerging economies: The case of the biomass power equipment industry in Malaysia. Technovation, 34(10), 617–630.
Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. London: Sage Publications.
Henry, C., & Foss, L. (2015). Case sensitive? A review of the literature on the use of case method in entrepreneurship research. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 21(3), 389–409.
Hess, H., & Siegwart, R. Y. (2013). R&D Venture: Proposition of a technology transfer concept for breakthrough technologies with R&D cooperation: A case study in the energy sector. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(2), 153–179.
Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Wan, W., & Yiu, D. (1999). Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum. Journal of Management, 25(3), 417–456.
Howells, J. (2006). Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy, 35(5), 715–728.
Hussler, C., Picard, F., & Tang, M. F. (2010). Taking the ivory from the tower to coat the economic world: Regional strategies to make science useful. Technovation, 30(9–10), 508–518.
Intarakumnerd, P., & Charoenporn, P. (2015). Impact of stronger patent regimes on technology transfer: The case study of Thai automotive industry. Research Policy, 44(7), 1314–1326.
Ivarsson, M., & Gorschek, T. (2009). Technology transfer decision support in requirements engineering research: A systematic review of REj. Requirements Engineering, 14(3), 155–175.
Jackson, S., & Audretsch, D. B. (2004). The Indiana University Advanced Research and Technology Institute: A case study. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(2), 119–124.
Jain, S., & George, G. (2007). Technology transfer offices as institutional entrepreneurs: The case of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation and human embryonic stem cells. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 535–567.
Johansson, M., Jacob, M., & Hellström, T. (2005). The strength of strong ties: University spin-offs and the significance of historical relations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(3), 271–286.
Johnston, W. J., Leach, M. P., & Liu, A. H. (1999). Theory testing using case studies in business-to-business research. Industrial Marketing Management, 28(3), 201–213.
Jolly, D. R. (2004). Bartering technology for local resources in exogamic Sino-foreign joint ventures. R&D Management, 34(4), 389–406.
Juanola-Feliu, E., Colomer-Farrarons, J., Miribel-Català, P., Samitier, J., & Valls-Pasola, J. (2012). Market challenges facing academic research in commercializing nano-enabled implantable devices for in vivo biomedical analysis. Technovation, 32(3–4), 193–204.
Kidwell, D. K. (2014). Navigating the role of the principal investigator: A comparison of four cases. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(1), 33–51.
Kingsley, G., Bozeman, B., & Coker, K. (1996). Technology transfer and absorption: an ‘R&D value-mapping’ approach to evaluation. Research Policy, 25(6), 967–995.
Knie, A., & Lengwiler, M. (2008). Token endeavors: the significance of academic spin-offs in technology transfer and research policy in Germany. Science and Public Policy, 35(3), 171–182.
Kroll, H., & Liefner, I. (2008). Spin-off enterprises as a means of technology commercialisation in a transforming economy—Evidence from three universities in China. Technovation, 28(5), 298–313.
Kumar, U., Kumar, V., Dutta, S., & Fantazy, K. (2007). State sponsored large scale technology transfer projects in a developing country context. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(6), 629–644.
Lal, K. (1999). Determinants of the adoption of Information Technology: A case study of electrical and electronic goods manufacturing firms in India. Research Policy, 28(7), 667–680.
Landry, R., Amara, N., Cloutier, J. S., & Halilem, N. (2013). Technology transfer organizations: Services and business models. Technovation, 33(12), 431–449.
Leahy, J. (2003). Paths to market for supply push technology transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(3–4), 305–317.
Leitch, C. M., & Harrison, R. T. (2005). Maximising the potential of university spin-outs: The development of second-order commercialisation activities. R&D Management, 35(3), 257–272.
Levie, J. (2014). The university is the classroom: Teaching and learning technology commercialization at a technological university. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(5), 793–808.
Leyden, D. P., & Link, A. N. (2015). Public sector entrepreneurship: US technology and innovation policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Science and public policy, 23(5), 279–286.
Libaers, D. (2009). Industry relationships of DoD-funded academics and institutional changes in the US university system. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(5), 474–489.
Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2004). Evaluating public sector R&D programs: The advanced technology program’s investment in wavelength references for optical fiber communications. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1–2), 241–251.
Link, A., & Siegel, D. S. (2005). University-based technology initiatives: Quantitative and qualitative evidence. Research Policy, 34(4), 253–257.
Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., & Van Fleet, D. D. (2011). Public science and public innovation: Assessing the relationship between patenting at US National Laboratories and the Bayh-Dole Act. Research Policy, 40(8), 1094–1099.
Locke, K., & Golden-Biddle, K. (1997). Constructing opportunities for contribution: Structuring intertextual coherence and “problematizing” in organizational studies. Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 1023–1062.
Macpherson, A., & Holt, R. (2007). Knowledge, learning and small firm growth: A systematic review of the evidence. Research Policy, 36(2), 172–192.
Maia, C., & Claro, J. (2013). The role of a Proof of Concept Center in a university ecosystem: An exploratory study. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(5), 641–650.
Malik, K. (2002). Aiding the technology manager: A conceptual model for intra-firm technology transfer. Technovation, 22(7), 427–436.
Mangematin, V., O’Reilly, P., & Cunningham, J. (2014). PIs as boundary spanners, science and market shapers. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(1), 1–10.
Marcotte, C., & Niosi, J. (2000). Technology transfer to China: The issues of knowledge and learning. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 25(1), 43–57.
Markman, G. D., Gianiodis, P. T., Phan, P. H., & Balkin, D. B. (2004). Entrepreneurship from the Ivory Tower: Do Incentive Systems Matter? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3–4), 353–364.
Martinelli, A., Meyer, M., & von Tunzelmann, N. (2008). Becoming an entrepreneurial university? A case study of knowledge exchange relationships and faculty attitudes in a medium-sized, research-oriented university. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(3), 259–283.
Matsumoto, M., Yokota, S., Naito, K., & Itoh, J. (2010). Development of a model to estimate the economic impacts of R&D output of public research institutes. R&D Management, 40(1), 91–100.
Menke, M., Xu, Q., & Gu, L. (2007). An analysis of the universality, flexibility, and agility of total innovation management: A case study of Hewlett-Packard. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(1–2), 49–62.
Menter, M. (2016). Principal Investigators and the commercialization of knowledge. In D. Audretsch, E. E. Lehmann, S. Vismara, & M. Meoli (Eds.), University Evolution Entrepreneurial Activity and Regional Competitiveness (pp. 193–203). Heidelberg: Springer.
Meredith, J. (1998). Building operations management theory through case and field research. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 441–454.
Miles, M. B. (1979). Qualitative data as an attractive nuisance: The problem of analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 590–601.
Moncada-Paternò-Castello, P., Rojo, J., Bellido, F., Fiore, F., & Tübke, A. (2003). Early identification and marketing of innovative technologies: A case study of RTD result valorisation at the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre. Technovation, 23(8), 655–667.
Moore, K., & Thiongane, S. (2000). Rural Senegalese perceptions of environmental quality. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 25(3), 307–317.
Morandi, V. (2013). The management of industry–university joint research projects: How do partners coordinate and control R&D activities? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(2), 69–92.
Moultrie, J. (2015). Understanding and classifying the role of design demonstrators in scientific exploration. Technovation, 43, 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2015.05.002.
Mowery, D., Nelson, R., Sampat, B., & Ziedonis, A. (2015). Ivory tower and industrial innovation: University–industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh–Dole Act. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Nightingale, P. (2000). The product–process–organisation relationship in complex development projects. Research Policy, 29(7–8), 913–930.
Nilsson, A. S., Rickne, A., & Bengtsson, L. (2010). Transfer of academic research: Uncovering the grey zone. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(6), 617–636.
Odell, J. S. (2001). Case study methods in international political economy. International Studies Perspectives, 2(2), 161–176.
O’Kane, C., Cunningham, J., Mangematin, V., & O’Reilly, P. (2015a). Underpinning strategic behaviours and posture of principal investigators in transition/uncertain environments. Long Range Planning, 48(3), 200–214.
O’Kane, C., Mangematin, C., Geoghegan, W., & Fitzgerald, C. (2015b). University technology transfer offices: The search for identity to build legitimacy. Research Policy, 44(2), 421–437.
Ottosson, S. (2004). Dynamic product development—DPD. Technovation, 24(3), 207–217.
Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2001). To patent or not: Faculty decisions and institutional success at technology transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1), 99–114.
Park, J. B., Ryu, T. K., & Gibson, D. V. (2010). Facilitating public-to-private technology transfer through consortia: Initial evidence from Korea. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(2), 237–252.
Patton, D., Warren, L., & Bream, D. (2009). Elements that underpin high-tech business incubation processes. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(6), 621–636.
Peretz, J. H., & Tonn, B. E. (2005). Evaluating the short-run benefits of six Department of Energy R&D Projects. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(3), 287–301.
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., et al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442.
Perren, L., & Ram, M. (2004). Case-study method in small business and entrepreneurial research mapping boundaries and perspectives. International Small Business Journal, 22(1), 83–101.
Peters, L., Rice, M., & Sundararajan, M. (2004). The Role of Incubators in the Entrepreneurial Process. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 83–91.
Pittaway, L., & Cope, J. (2007). Entrepreneurship education: A systematic review of the evidence. International Small Business Journal, 25(5), 479–510.
Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004). Networking and innovation: A systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews., 5–6(3–4), 137–168.
Pittiglio, R., Sica, E., & Villa, S. (2009). Innovation and internationalization: The case of Italy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(6), 588–602.
Powell, J., & Moris, F. (2004). Different timelines for different technologies. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(2), 125–152.
Rasmussen, E., Moen, Ø., & Gulbrandsen, M. (2006). Initiatives to promote commercialization of university knowledge. Technovation, 26(4), 518–533.
Resende, D. N., Gibson, D., & Jarrett, J. (2013). BTP—Best transfer practices. A tool for qualitative analysis of tech-transfer offices: A cross cultural analysis. Technovation, 33(1), 2–12.
Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (2013). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage.
Rizzo, U. (2014). Why do scientists create academic spin-offs? The influence of the context. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(2), 198–226.
Roessner, D., Manrique, L., & Park, J. (2010). The economic impact of engineering research centers: Preliminary results of a pilot study. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(5), 475–493.
Ruan, Y., Hang, C. C., & Wang, Y. M. (2014). Government's role in disruptive innovation and industry emergence: The case of the electric bike in China. Technovation, 34(12), 785–796.
Salvador, E. (2011). Are science parks and incubators good “brand names” for spin-offs? The case study of Turin. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(2), 203–232.
Sanders, C. B., & Miller, F. A. (2010). Reframing norms: Boundary maintenance and partial accommodations in the work of academic technology transfer. Science and Public Policy, 37(9), 689–701.
Saragossi, S., & de la Potterie, B. V. P. (2003). What patent data reveal about universities: The case of Belgium. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 47–51.
Scandura, T. A., & Williams, E. A. (2000). Research methodology in management: Current practices, trends, and implications for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1248–1264.
Scapens, R. W. (1990). Researching management accounting practice: The role of case study methods. The British Accounting Review, 22(3), 259–281.
Schoen, A., de la Potterie, B., & Henkel, J. (2012). Governance typology of universities’ technology transfer processes. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 435–453.
Schoonmaker, M., Carayannis, E., & Rau, P. (2013). The role of marketing activities in the fuzzy front end of innovation: A study of the biotech industry. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(6), 850–872.
Schultz, L. I. (2011). Nanotechnology’s triple helix: A case study of the University at Albany’s College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(5), 546–564.
Sedaitis, J. (2000). Technology transfer in transitional economies: A test of market, state and organizational models. Research Policy, 29(2), 135–147.
Shakir, M. (2002). The selection of case studies: Strategies and their applications to IS implementation case studies. Research Letters in the Information and Mathematical Sciences, 3(1), 191–198.
Shane, S. (2004). Encouraging university entrepreneurship? The effect of the Bayh–Dole Act on university patenting in the United States. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 127–151.
Shen, X. (2005). A dilemma for developing countries in intellectual property strategy? Lessons from a case study of software piracy and Microsoft in China. Science and Public Policy, 32(3), 187–198.
Siegel, D. S., Veugelers, R., & Wright, M. (2007). Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: Performance and policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 640–660.
Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: Qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1), 115–142.
Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1), 27–48.
Stoecker, R. (1991). Evaluating and rethinking the case study. The sociological review, 39(1), 88–112.
Stone, V. I. (2003). Systematic technology transfer: A case study in assistive technology. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(3–4), 319–332.
Stuart, I., McCutcheon, D., Handfield, R., McLachlin, R., & Samson, D. (2002). Effective case research in operations management: A process perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 20(5), 419–433.
Swamidass, P. M. (2013). University startups as a commercialization alternative: Lessons from three contrasting case studies. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(6), 788–808.
Thune, T., & Gulbrandsen, M. (2014). Dynamics of collaboration in university-industry partnerships: Do initial conditions explain development patterns? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(6), 1–17.
Transfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222.
Villani, E., Rasmussen, E., & Grimaldi, R. (2016). How intermediary organizations facilitate university–industry technology transfer: A proximity approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.004.
Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy, 33(1), 147–175.
Vuola, O., & Hameri, A.-P. (2006). Mutually benefiting joint innovation process between industry and big-science. Technovation, 26(1), 3–12.
Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(2), 74–81.
Walter, J. (2000). Technological adaptation and “learning by cooperation”. A case study of a successful onshore technology transfer in Tierra del Fuego. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 25(1), 13–22.
Weckowska, D. (2014). Learning in university technology transfer offices: Transactions-focused and relations-focused approaches to commercialization of academic research. Technovation, 41, 62–74. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2014.11.003.
Welch, C., Piekkari, R., Plakoyiannaki, E., & Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. (2011). Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), 740–762.
Williams-Jones, B., Olivier, C., & Smith, E. (2014). Governing ‘dual-use’ research in Canada: A policy review. Science and Public Policy, 41(1), 76–93.
Woodside, A. G., & Wilson, E. J. (2003). Case study research methods for theory building. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 18(6/7), 493–508.
Wright, M. (2014). Academic entrepreneurship, technology transfer and society: Where next? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 322–334.
Wright, M., Piva, E., Mosey, S., & Lockett, L. (2009). Academic entrepreneurship and business schools. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(6), 560–587.
Xu, Q., Zhu, L., Zheng, G., & Wang, F. (2007). Haier’s Tao of innovation: A case study of the emerging total innovation management model. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(1–2), 27–47.
Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.
Youtie, K., Iacopetta, M., & Graham, S. (2008). Assessing the nature of nanotechnology: Can we uncover an emerging general purpose technology? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(3), 315–329.
Zi, A., & Blind, K. (2014). Researchers’ participation in standardisation: A case study from a public research institute in Germany. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(2), 346–360.
Ziegler, N., Ruether, F., Bader, M., & Gassmann, O. (2013). Creating value through external intellectual property commercialization: A desorptive capacity view. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(6), 930–949.
Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., Carr, J. C., & Griffin, M. (2013). Business research methods (9th ed.). Mason: Erin Joyner.
James A. Cunningham acknowledges the funding support of Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) and co-funded under the European Regional Development Fund under Grant Number 13/RC/2073.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest.
About this article
Cite this article
Cunningham, J.A., Menter, M. & Young, C. A review of qualitative case methods trends and themes used in technology transfer research. J Technol Transf 42, 923–956 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9491-6
- Technology transfer
- Case method
- Case study
- Research methods
- Data collection
- Academic entrepreneurship