ICT clusters have attracted much attention because of their rapid growth and their value for other economic activities. Using a nested multi-level model, we examine how conditions at the country level and at the city level affect ICT clustering activity in 227 cities across 22 European countries. We test for the influence of three country regulations (starting a business, registering property, enforcing contracts) and two city conditions (proximity to university, network density) on ICT clustering. We consider heterogeneity within the sector and study two types of ICT activities: ICT product firms and ICT content firms. Our results indicate that country conditions and city conditions each have idiosyncratic implications for ICT clustering, and further, that these can vary by activities in ICT products or ICT content manufacturing.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
For example, a European Commission report indicated that initiatives on licensing procedures are based on the assumption that simplification in licensing procedures leads to the creation of more firms (2011: Introduction).
Lichtenstein and Austria were dropped from both samples as only one city per country observation was available. The higher number of Eastern European cities in the ICT product sample could be explained by relocation effects (Manolova et al., 2008).
NACE stands for "Nomenclature Generale des Activites Economiques dans I`Union Europeenne" and is the European standard for industry classification, introduced in 1970. The most recent version (2008) is based on International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC) of the United Nations for economic activities. Of eight aggregated sectors, two (construction; ICT and other services) were dropped to avoid perfect multicollinearity.
Acs, Z., & Armington, C. (2004). Employment growth and entrepreneurial activity in cities. Regional Studies, 38(8), 911–927.
Ács, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476–494.
Acs, Z. J., Desai, S., & Klapper, L. F. (2008). What does “entrepreneurship” data really show? Small Business Economics, 31(3), 265–281.
Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455.
Aidis, R., Estrin, S., & Mickiewicz, T. (2008). Institutions and entrepreneurship development in Russia: A comparative perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 656–672.
Armington, C., & Acs, Z. J. (2002). The determinants of regional variation in new firm formation. Regional Studies, 36(1), 33–45.
Audretsch, D., & Feldman, M. (1996). RandD spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86, 630–640.
Audretsch, D., & Keilbach, M. (2007). The theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 1242–1254.
Audretsch, D., & Lehmann, E. (2005). Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Research Policy, 34, 1191–1202.
Beckman, C., Eisenhardt, K., Kotha, S., Meyer, A., & Rajagopalan, N. (2012). Technology entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(2), 89–93.
Bell, M., & Pavitt, K. (1993). Technological accumulation and industrial growth: Contrasts between developed and developing countries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2, 157–209.
Besag, J., York, J., & Mollie, A. (1991). Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 43, 1–75.
Bhat, C. R. (2000). A multi-level cross-classified model for discrete response variables. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 34(7), 567–582.
Bilbao-Osorio, B., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2004). From R&D to innovation and economic growth in the EU. Growth and Change, 35(4), 434–455.
Borgatti, S. P. (2005). Centrality and network flow. Social Networks, 27(1), 55–71.
Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2011). The emerging empirics of evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 11(2), 295–307.
Brenner, T. (2001). Simulating the evolution of localised industrial clusters-an identification of the basic mechanisms. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 4(3), 4.
Brenner, T. (2004). Local industrial clusters: Existence, emergence and evolution. London: Routledge.
Brenner, T., & Mühlig, A. (2013). Factors and mechanisms causing the emergence of local industrial clusters: A summary of 159 cases. Regional Studies, 47(4), 480–507.
Bresnahan, T., Gambardella, A., & Saxenian, A. (2001). Old economy’ inputs for ‘new economy’outcomes: Cluster formation in the new Silicon Valleys. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 835–860.
Breznitz, D. (2007). Industrial R&D as a national policy: Horizontal technology policies and industry-state co-evolution in the growth of the Israeli software industry. Research Policy, 36(9), 1465–1482.
Bruton, G., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 3, 421–440.
Cappelli, R., Czarnitzki, D., & Kraft, K. (2014). Sources of spillovers for imitation and innovation. Research Policy, 43, 115–120.
Chavis, L., Klapper, L., & Love, I. (2011). The impact of the business environment on young firm financing. World Bank Economic Review, 25, 486–507.
Cooke, P., Boekholt, P., & Todtling, F. (2000). The governance of innovation in Europe. London: Pinter.
Desai, S., Acs, Z. J., & Weitzel, U. (2013). A model of destructive entrepreneurship insight for conflict and postconflict recovery. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 57(1), 20–40.
Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). The regulation of entry. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 1–37.
Druilhe, C., & Garnsey, E. (2000). Emergence and growth of high-tech activity in Cambridge and Grenoble. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12(2), 163–177.
Estrin, S., Korosteleva, J., & Mickiewicz, T. (2013). Which institutions encourage entrepreneurial growth aspirations? Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 564–580.
European Commission, (2011). Business Dynamics: Start-ups, Business Transfers and Bankruptcy: The economic impact of legal and administrative procedures for licensing, business transfers and bankruptcy on entrepreneurship in Europe. Accessed June 21, 2013.
European Commission. (2012). ICT Technologies Work Programme 2013. http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/docs/ict-wp2013-10-7-2013.pdf, date last accessed 21 June 2013. Accessed 15 July 2014.
Eurostat. (2012). City statistics urban audit. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/region_cities/city_urban. Accessed 7 April 2013.
Eurostat. (2015). What is a city?—Spatial units. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/cities/spatial-units. Accessed 7 March 2015.
Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41(5), 685–697.
Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32, 277–300.
Gilbert, R. J., & Newbery, D. M. (1982). Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly. The American Economic Review, 72(3), 514–526.
Glaeser, E., Rosenthal, S., & Strange, W. (2010). Urban economics and entrepreneurship. Journal of Urban Economics, 67, 1–14.
Glaeser, E., Scheinkman, J., & Shleifer, A. (1995). Economic growth in a cross-section of cities. Journal of Monetary Economics, 36, 117–143.
Hoang, H. A., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2010). Leveraging internal and external experience: Exploration, exploitation, and R&D project performance. Strategic Management Journal, 31(7), 734–758.
Holmen, M., & McKelvey, M. (2005). Systematic evolutionary studies of regional restructuration it and biotech case-studies in Sweden. European Urban and Regional Studies, 12(3), 209–228.
Iammarino, S., & Jona-Lasinio, C. (2015). ICT production and labour productivity in the Italian regions. European Urban and Regional Studies, 22(2), 218–237.
Innovation Observatory. (2013). Selling ICT products and services to business: Better market segmentation report. http://www.innovationobservatory.com/reports/latesttitles. Accessed 21 June 2013.
Jorgenson, D., Stiroh, K., Gordon, R., & Sichel, D. (2000). Raising the speed limit: US economic growth in the information age. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 125–235.
Klapper, L., Laeven, L., & Rajan, R. (2006). Entry regulation as barrier to entrepreneurship. Journal of Financial Economics, 82, 591–629.
Krugman, P. R. (1991). Geography and trade. Massachusetts: MIT press.
Lambert, D. M., Cooper, M. C., & Pagh, J. D. (1998). Supply chain management: Implementation issues and research opportunities. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 9(2), 1–20.
Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 461–477.
Langford, I. H., Leyland, A. H., Rasbash, J., & Goldstein, H. (1999). Multilevel modelling of the geographical distributions of diseases. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 48(2), 253–268.
LEAD. (2014). E-leadership skills for competitiveness and innovation. European Commission, Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/ict/files/eskills/insead_eleadership_en.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2014.
Leitao, J., Baptista, R. (2008). Inward FDI and ICT: Are they a joint technological driver of entrepreneurship? In engineering management conference. IEMC Europe 2008 (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
Leitao, J., & Baptista, R. (2011). Inward FDI and ICT: Are they a joint technological driver of entrepreneurship? International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 10(3), 268–288.
Manolova, T., Eunni, R., & Gyoshev, B. (2008). Institutional environments for entrepreneurship: Evidence from emerging economies in Eastern Europe. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 32, 203–218.
McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2015). Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to European Union cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1291–1302.
Mullan, E. (2011). What is digital content? EContent magazine. http://www.econtentmag.com/Articles/Resources/Defining-EContent/What-is-Digital-Content-79501.htm. Accessed 7 March 2015.
Mundlak, Y. (1988). Endogenous technology and the measurement of productivity (pp. 316–331). Washington, D.C: IFPRI.
Phan, P., & Foo, M. (2004). Technological entrepreneurship in emerging regions. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 1–5.
Porter, M. E. (1990). Competitive advantage of nations. London: Macmillan.
Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90.
Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A., & Pickles, A. (2005). Maximum likelihood estimation of limited and discrete dependent variable models with nested random. Journal of Econometrics, 128, 301–323.
Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2001). Is R&D investment in lagging areas of Europe worthwhile? Theory and empirical evidence. Papers in Regional Sciences, 80(3), 275–295.
Rothaermel, F. T., & Deeds, D. L. (2004). Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 25(3), 201–221.
Rowley, T., Behrens, D., & Krackhardt, D. (2000). Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 369–386.
Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in silicon valley and route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Saxenian, A. (1999). Silicon Valley’s new immigrant entrepreneurs. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
Shan, W., Walker, G., & Kogut, B. (1994). Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 15(5), 387–394.
Siegel, D. (Ed.). (2006). Technological entrepreneurship. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Skrondal, A., & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2004). Generalized latent variable modeling: Multilevel, longitudinal, and structural equation models. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Sobel, R. (2008). Testing Baumol: Institutional quality and the productivity of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 641–655.
Soda, G., Usai, A., & Zaheer, A. (2004). Network memory: The influence of past and current networks on performance. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 893–906.
Stenholm, P., Acs, Z., & Wuebker, R. (2013). Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on rate and type of entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 176–193.
Stuart, T., & Sorenson, O. (2003). The geography of opportunity: Spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms. Research Policy, 32, 229–253.
Szerb, L., Acs, Z., Autio, E., Ortega-Argiles, R., Komlosi, E. et. al. (2013). REDI: The Regional Entrepreneurship and Development Index—Measuring regional entrepreneurship. Final report. European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional and Urban policy. REGIO DG 02-Communication.
The State of European Cities Report. (2007). http://www.eukn.org/France/fr_en/E_library/Urban_Policy. Accessed 7 March 2015.
Thurik, R., Carree, M., van Stel, A., & Audretsch, D. (2008). Does self-employment reduce unemployment? Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 673–686.
Van der Linde, C. (2003). The demography of clusters—Findings from the cluster meta-study. In J. Bröcker, D. Dohse, & R. Soltwedel (Eds.), Innovation clusters and interregional competition (pp. 130–149). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
Villasenor, J. (2013). Six ‘Megatrends’ that will shape the future of digital media. Forbes magazine. http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2013/05/01-megatrends-future-digital-media-villasenor. Accessed 7 March 2015.
Vu, K. (2011). ICT as a source of economic growth in the information age: Empirical evidence from the 1996–2005 period. Telecommunications Policy, 35, 357–372.
Walter, J., Lechner, C., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2013). Learning activities, exploration, and the performance of strategic initiatives. Journal of Management. doi:10.1177/0149206313506463.
Wiklund, J., Davidsson, P., Audretsch, D., & Karlsson, C. (2011). The future of entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 1–9.
Woolley, J. L. (2014). The creation and configuration of infrastructure for entrepreneurship in emerging domains of activity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(4), 721–747.
Woolley, J. L., & Rottner, R. M. (2008). Innovation policy and nanotechnology entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(5), 791–811.
World Bank. (2012). Doing business report. www.doingbusiness.org. Accessed 19 March 2013.
Zahra, S. A., & Wright, M. (2011). Entrepreneurship’s next act. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(4), 67–83.
Ziedonis, R. H. (2004). Don’t fence me in: Fragmented markets for technology and the patent acquisition strategies of firms. Management Science, 50(6), 804–820.
We thank Zoltan Acs, David Audretsch and participants of the 2013 Transatlantic Policy Consortium.
About this article
Cite this article
Belitski, M., Desai, S. What drives ICT clustering in European cities?. J Technol Transf 41, 430–450 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9422-y