Advertisement

The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 41, Issue 5, pp 1135–1147 | Cite as

Technology commercialization in entrepreneurial universities: the US and Russian experience

  • Elias G. CarayannisEmail author
  • Alexey Y. Cherepovitsyn
  • Alina A. Ilinova
Article

Abstract

US universities are leading the way in technology commercialization, while universities in Russia lag far behind. This paper discusses the best American practices, as well as the main issues of technology commercialization at the US universities. As an example, we consider the experience of the University of Maryland, College Park. In the next section, we turn to technology commercialization in Russia, where it struggles for several reasons. In this paper, we propose that Russia can improve its technology commercialization by studying the example of the leading US entrepreneurial universities and implementing proper procedures. And the important overarching point is that Russian universities need to improve their collaboration with industry, and they need to develop new standards of administrative, research, and business activity that will promote innovation and entrepreneurship.

Keywords

Technology innovation Technology entrepreneurship Technology transfer and commercialization Entrepreneurial university 

JEL Classification

O31 O32 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Research presented in this paper was conducted with support from the International Research and Exchanges Board (IREX), and the US Russia Foundation for Economic Advancement and the Rule of Law (USRF). The authors thank Dr. Kai Duh for his help in the organization of the research project at the University of Maryland. Also thanks to Paul Dudenhefer for editing this paper and anonymous reviewers for their recommendations regarding the paper improvements.

References

  1. American Councils for International Education. (2014). Advancing research universities and russia in the innovation economy. Draft White Paper.Google Scholar
  2. Bradley, S., Hayter, C., & Link, A. (2013). Models and methods of university technology transfer. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 9(6), 571–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bremer, H. W. (1998). University technology transfer: Evolution and revolution. Council on Government Relations.Google Scholar
  4. Carayannis, E., & Dubina, I. (2014). Thinking beyond the box: Game-theoretic and living lab approaches to innovation policy and practice improvement. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5(3), 427–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carayannis, E., Dubina, I., & Ilinova, A. (2014). Licensing in the context of entrepreneurial university activity: An empirical evidence and a theoretical model. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12, http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13132-014-0234-3
  6. Friedman, J., & Silberman, J. (2003). University technology transfer: Do incentives, management, and location matter? Journal of Technology Transfer, 28, 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Leyden, D., & Link, A. (2013). Knowledge spillovers, collective entrepreneurship, and economic growth: the role of universities. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 797–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Panagopoulos, A., & Carayannis, E. (2011). A policy for enhancing the disclosure of university faculty invention. Journal of Technology Transfer, http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10961-011-9244-5
  9. Radosevic, S. (2002). Regional innovation systems in central and eastern europe: determinants, organizers and alignments. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Schoonmaker, M., Carayannis, E., & Rau, P. (2012). The role of marketing activities in the fuzzy front end of innovation: a study of the biotech industry. Journal of Technology Transfer, http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10961-012-9296-1
  11. Shane, S. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Speser, P. L. (2006). The art and science of technology transfer. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Tieckelman, R., Kordal, R. & Sanga, A. (2010). AUTM Licensing Activity Survey FY2008: Survey Summary. Deerfield, Ill.: Association of University Technology Managers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elias G. Carayannis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alexey Y. Cherepovitsyn
    • 2
  • Alina A. Ilinova
    • 2
  1. 1.GWUWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Mining UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations