Skip to main content

How can universities facilitate academic spin-offs? An entrepreneurial competency perspective

Abstract

Some universities are successfully involved in creating and developing new high-growth technology businesses while others struggle to do so. Clearly, the characteristics of the university and its environment are important, but explain only part of this variation. We explore how universities can promote new research-based businesses by suggesting that the nature of the support supplied depends on the demands of the spin-off firms. Adopting a demand side perspective, we seek to understand the challenges faced by new technology businesses and hence identify how universities can assist their start-up and development. From the academic entrepreneurship literature, we derive how universities can supply support for the development of firm competencies either directly or indirectly. The paper nuances the common conception of a university as one uniform entity in relation to spin-offs, and assesses the literature including all levels within the university, from central university administration, TTO, department, research group, scientist, and students.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Aldridge, T. T., & Audretsch, D. (2011). The bayh-dole act and scientist entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1058–1067. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambos, T. C., Mäkelä, K., Birkinshaw, J., & D’Este, P. (2008). When does university research get commercialized? creating ambidexterity in research institutions. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1424–1447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E. (1997). New, technology-based firms in innovation networks symplectic and generative impacts. Research Policy, 26(3), 263–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., George, G., & Alexy, O. (2011). International entrepreneurship and capability development—qualitative evidence and future research directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 11–37. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00421.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, C. M., & Burton, M. D. (2008). Founding the future: Path dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO. Organization Science, 19(1), 3–24. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organization Science, 19(1), 69–89. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bienkowska, D., & Klofsten, M. (2012). Creating entrepreneurial networks: academic entrepreneurship, mobility and collaboration during PhD education. Higher Education, 64(2), 207–222. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9488-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E. G., Anderson, M. S., Causino, N., & Louis, K. S. (1997). Withholding research results in academic life science—evidence from a national survey of faculty. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 277(15), 1224–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonardo, D., Paleari, S., & Vismara, S. (2011). Valuing university-based firms: The effects of academic affiliation on IPO performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(4), 755–776. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00369.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunitz, S. M., O’Shea, R. P., & Allen, T. J. (2008). University commercialization strategies in the development of regional bioclusters. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(2), 129–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brush, C. G., Green, P. G., & Hart, M. M. (2001). From initial idea to unique advantage: The entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a resource base. Academy of Management Executive, 15(1), 64–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brush, C. G., Manolova, T. S., & Edelman, L. F. (2008). Properties of emerging organizations: An empirical test. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(5), 547–566. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2007.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buenstorf, G. (2007). Evolution on the shoulders of giants: Entrepreneurship and firm survival in the German laser industry. Review of Industrial Organization, 30(3), 179–202. doi:10.1007/s11151-007-9132-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529–555. doi:10.1093/icc/11.3.529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarysse, B., & Moray, N. (2004). A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: The case of a research-based spin-off. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 55–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarysse, B., Tartari, V., & Salter, A. (2011a). The impact of entrepreneurial capacity, experience and organizational support on academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1084–1093. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., de Velde, E. V., & Vohora, A. (2005). Spinning out new ventures: a typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 183–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van de Velde, E. (2011b). Entrepreneurial origin, technological knowledge, and the growth of spin-off companies. Journal of Management Studies,. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00991.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, T. H., & Rasmussen, E. (2013). Parallel business models and the innovativeness of research-based spin-off ventures. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(6), 836–849. doi:10.1007/s10961-012-9294-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, M. G., D’Adda, D., & Piva, E. (2010). The contribution of university research to the growth of academic start-ups: An empirical analysis. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(1), 113–140. doi:10.1007/s10961-009-9111-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, M. G., & Piva, E. (2012). Firms’ genetic characteristics and competence-enlarging strategies: A comparison between academic and non-academic high-tech start-ups. Research Policy, 41(1), 79–92. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmar, F., & Shane, S. (2004). Legitimating first: Organizing activities and the survival of new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3), 385–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Este, P., Mahdi, S., Neely, A., & Rentocchini, F. (2012). Inventors and entrepreneurs in academia: What types of skills and experience matter? Technovation, 32(5), 293–303. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2011.12.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32(2), 209–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt, J. T., & Shane, S. A. (2003). Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3), 333–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ensley, M. D., & Hmieleski, K. A. (2005). A comparative study of new venture top management team composition, dynamics and performance between university-based and independent start-ups. Research Policy, 34(7), 1091–1105. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., Santoni, S., & Sobrero, M. (2011). Complements or substitutes? The role of universities and local context in supporting the creation of academic spin-offs. Research Policy, 40(8), 1113–1127. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fini, R., Lacetera, N., & Shane, S. (2010). Inside or outside the IP system? Business creation in academia. Research Policy, 39(8), 1060–1069. doi:10.1016/j.respo1.2010.05.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, S., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2001). Academic and surrogate entrepreneurs in university spin-out companies. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1/2), 127–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, A. W., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2012). When stars shine: The effects of faculty founders on new technology ventures. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(3), 220–235. doi:10.1002/sej.1140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganco, M., & Agarwal, R. (2009). Performance differentials between diversifying entrants and entrepreneurial start-ups: A complexity approach. The Academy of Management Review, 34(2), 228–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, M., MacMillan, I. C., & Thompson, J. D. (2008). Look before you leap: Market opportunity identification in emerging technology firms. Management Science, 54(9), 1652–1665. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1080.0877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2012). The development of an entrepreneurial university. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(1), 43–74. doi:10.1007/s10961-010-9171-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., Cunningham, J., & Organ, D. (2014). Entrepreneurial universities in two European regions: A case study comparison. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 415–434. doi:10.1007/s10961-012-9287-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S., Cadeaux, J., & Dubelaar, C. (2006). Uncovering multiple champion roles in implementing new-technology ventures. Journal of Business Research, 59(5), 549–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurdon, M. A., & Samsom, K. J. (2010). A longitudinal study of success and failure among scientist-started ventures. Technovation, 30(3), 207–214. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2009.10.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. T., & Leitch, C. (2010). Voodoo institution or entrepreneurial university? Spin-off companies, the entrepreneurial system and regional development in the UK. Regional Studies, 44(9), 1241–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayter, C. S. (2011). In search of the profit-maximizing actor: motivations and definitions of success from nascent academic entrepreneurs. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 340–352. doi:10.1007/s10961-010-9196-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. M., & Higgins, C. A. (1990). Champions of technological innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), 317–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S., George, G., & Maltarich, M. (2009). Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity. Research Policy, 38(6), 922–935. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. (2001). Proofs and prototypes for sale: The licensing of university inventions. American Economic Review, 91(1), 240–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J., & Gartner, W. B. (1988). Properties of emerging organizations. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 429–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M., & Goe, W. R. (2004). The role of social embeddedness in professorial entrepreneurship: A comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley and Stanford. Research Policy, 33(5), 691–707. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2003.11.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krabel, S., & Mueller, P. (2009). What drives scientists to start their own company? An empirical investigation of Max Planck Society scientists. Research Policy, 38(6), 947–956. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landry, R., Amara, N., & Rherrad, I. (2006). Why are some university researchers more likely to create spin-offs than others? Evidence from Canadian universities. Research Policy, 35(10), 1599–1615. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, B. M. B., & Brush, C. G. (2001). How do “resource bundles” develop and change in new ventures? A dynamic model and longitudinal exploration. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(Spring), 37–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K. S., Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M. E., & Stoto, M. A. (1989). Entrepreneurs in academe: An exploration of behaviors among life scientists. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(1), 110–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moray, N., & Clarysse, B. (2005). Institutional change and resource endowments to science-based entrepreneurial firms. Research Policy, 34(7), 1010–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosey, S., & Wright, M. (2007). From human capital to social capital: A longitudinal study of technology-based academic entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(November), 909–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, C., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2012). Formal venture capital acquisition: Can entrepreneurs compensate for the spatial proximity benefits of South East England and ‘star’ golden-triangle universities? Environment and Planning A, 44(2), 281–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, F. (2004). The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: Sharing the laboratory life. Research Policy, 33(4), 643–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustar, P., Wright, M., & Clarysse, B. (2008). University spin-off firms: Lessons from ten years of experience in Europe. Science and Public Policy, 35(2), 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaou, N., & Birley, S. (2003). Social networks in organizational emergence: The university spinout phenomenon. Management Science, 49(12), 1702–1725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of US universities. Research Policy, 34(7), 994–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Morse, K. P., O’Gorman, C., & Roche, F. (2007). Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience. R&D Management, 37(1), 1–16. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2007.00454.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, J. B., & McDougall, P. P. (2005). University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: A resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3), 291–311. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radosevich, R. (1995). A model for entrepreneurial spin-offs from public technology sources. International Journal of Technology Management, 10(7–8), 879–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, E. (2011). Understanding academic entrepreneurship: Exploring the emergence of university spin-off ventures using process theories. International Small Business Journal, 29(5), 448–471. doi:10.1177/0266242610385395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, E., & Borch, O. J. (2010). University capabilities in facilitating entrepreneurship: A longitudinal study of spin-off ventures at mid-range universities. Research Policy, 39(5), 602–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, E., Mosey, S., & Wright, M. (2011). The evolution of entrepreneurial competencies: A longitudinal study of university spin-off venture emergence. Journal of Management Studies,. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00995.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, E., Mosey, S., & Wright, M. (2014). The influence of university departments on the evolution of entrepreneurial competencies in spin-off ventures. Research Policy, 43(1), 92–106. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, E., & Sørheim, R. (2012). How governments seek to bridge the financing gap for university spin-offs: Proof-of-concept, pre-seed, and seed funding. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(7), 663–678. doi:10.1080/09537325.2012.705119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renault, C. S. (2006). Academic capitalism and university incentives for faculty entrepreneurship. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(2), 227–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E. B., & Malone, D. E. (1996). Policies and structures for spinning off new companies from research and development organizations#. R&D Management, 26(1), 17–48. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1996.tb00927.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science, 48(1), 154–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2015). University technology transfer offices, licensing, and start-ups. In A. Link, D. S. Siegel, & M. Wright (Eds.), Chicago handbook of university technology transfer and academic entrepreneurship (Vol. Forthcoming). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. L., & Ho, K. (2006). Measuring the performance of Oxford University, Oxford Brookes University and the government laboratories’ spin-off companies. Research Policy, 35(10), 1554–1568. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 153–193). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toole, A. A., & Czarnitzki, D. (2010). Commercializing science: Is there a university “brain drain” from academic entrepreneurship? Management Science, 56(9), 1599–1614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Burg, E., Romme, A. G. L., Gilsing, V. A., & Reymen, I. (2008). Creating university spin-offs: A science-based design perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(2), 114–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Looy, B., Landoni, P., Callaert, J., van Pottelsberghe, B., Sapsalis, E., & Debackere, K. (2011). Entrepreneurial effectiveness of European universities: An empirical assessment of antecedents and trade-offs. Research Policy, 40(4), 553–564. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanaelst, I., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Moray, N., & S’Jegers, R. (2006). Entrepreneurial team development in academic spinouts: An examination of team heterogeneity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(2), 249–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincett, P. S. (2010). The economic impacts of academic spin-off companies, and their implications for public policy. Research Policy, 39(6), 736–747. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visintin, F., & Pittino, D. (2014). Founding team composition and early performance of university—Based spin-off companies. Technovation, 34(1), 31–43. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2013.09.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy, 33(1), 147–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wennberg, K., Wiklund, J., & Wright, M. (2011). The effectiveness of university knowledge spillovers: Performance differences between university spinoffs and corporate spinoffs. Research Policy, 40(8), 1128–1143. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Mustar, P., & Lockett, A. (Eds.). (2007). Academic entrepreneurship in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Van de Velde, E., & Larraneta, B. (2007). Knowledge conversion capability and the performance of corporate and university spin-offs. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 569–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414–431.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mike Wright.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rasmussen, E., Wright, M. How can universities facilitate academic spin-offs? An entrepreneurial competency perspective. J Technol Transf 40, 782–799 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9386-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9386-3

Keywords

  • Academic entrepreneurship
  • Entrepreneurial competency
  • New venture creation
  • Research commercialization
  • Technology transfer
  • University spin-off

JEL classification

  • L26
  • M13
  • O31
  • O32
  • O38