The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 105–131

Entrepreneurial activity and regional competitiveness: evidence from European entrepreneurial universities

Article

Abstract

The interesting relationship between entrepreneurial activity and regional competitiveness has been a major focus of academics, university managers, and policy makers during the past decades—in particular the role of institutions in the establishment of political, social, and economic rules-. For example, since the enactment of the US BayhDole Act more than 30 years ago, many American cities and regions are increasingly viewing universities as potential engines of economic growth. In these new socioeconomic scenarios, the role of entrepreneurial universities is not only generates/transfers knowledge but also contributes/provides leadership for the creation of entrepreneurial thinking, actions, and institutions. Previous studies have shown the university’s role in economic development, but no empirical study has analyzed the entrepreneurial activity generated by university students per university at the country/regional level of analysis. The purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of the university’s entrepreneurial activity on regional competitiveness. Adopting the institutional economics and the endogenous growth approaches, a proposed conceptual framework was developed and tested with structural equation modeling using data from 102 universities located in 56 NUTS II of 12 European countries. Our results evidenced that informal factors (e.g., attitudes, role models) have a higher influence on university entrepreneurial activity than formal factors (e.g., support measures, education and training). Our results also evidenced a higher contribution of universities on regional competitiveness, in particular, when we used social measures (talent human capital) instead economic measures (GDP per capita).

Keywords

Entrepreneurial activity Institutional economics Endogenous economic growth Regional competitiveness Entrepreneurial universities Europe 

JEL Classification

M13 (New Firms; Startups) L26 (Entrepreneurship) I23 (Higher Education Research Institutions) I28 (Education Government Policy) 

References

  1. Aldrich, H. E. (2012). The emergence of entrepreneurship as an academic field: A personal essay on institutional entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 41(7), 1240–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Annoni, P., & Dijkstra, L. (2013). EU regional competitiveness index. RCI 2013. Working paper. Accessed 25 June 2013 from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/studies/pdf/6th_report/rci_2013_report_final.pdf.
  3. Audretsch, D. (2004). Sustaining innovation and growth: Public policy support for entrepreneurship. Industry and Innovation, 11(3), 167–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Audretsch, D. (2009). The entrepreneurial society. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(3), 245–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Audretsch, D. (2014). From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 313–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Audretsch, D., Bönte, W., & Keilbach, M. (2008). Entrepreneurship capital and its impact on knowledge diffusion and economic performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 687–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Audretsch, D., Hülsbeck, M., & Lehmann, E. (2012). Regional competitiveness, university spillovers, and entrepreneurial activity. Small Business Economics, 39, 587–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Audretsch, D., & Keilbach, M. (2004). Entrepreneurship capital and economic performance. Regional Studies, 38(8), 949–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2008). Resolving the knowledge paradox: Knowledge-spillover entrepreneurship and economic growth. Research Policy, 37(10), 1697–1705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Audretsch, D., & Lehmann, E. E. (2005). Do university policies make a difference? Research Policy, 34(3), 343–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Audretsch, D., & Peña-Legazkue, I. (2012). Entrepreneurial activity and regional competitiveness: An introduction to the special issue. Small Business Economics, 39, 531–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baumol, W. J. (1994). Convergence of productivity: Cross-national studies and historical evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bessette, R. W. (2003). Measuring the economic impact of university-based research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(3–4), 355–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bollen, K. A. (1998). Structural equation models. NYC: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Bonardo, D., Paleari, S., & Vismara, S. (2010). The M&A dynamics of European science-based entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, 141–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Boschma, R. A. (2004). Competitiveness of regions from an evolutionary perspective. Regional Studies, 38, 1001–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bramwell, A., & Wolfe, D. A. (2008). Universities and regional economic development: The entrepreneurial University of Waterloo. Research Policy, 37(8), 1175–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Busenitz, L. W., Plummer, L. A., Klotz, A. C., Shahzad, A., & Rhoads, K. (2014). Entrepreneurship research (1985–2009) and the emergence of opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(5), 981–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carree, M., Della Malva, A., & Santarelli, E. (2012). The contribution of universities to growth: Empirical evidence for Italy. The Journal of Technology Transfer,. doi:10.1007/s10961-012-9282-7.Google Scholar
  20. Chrisman, J. J., Hynes, T., & Fraser, S. (1995). Faculty entrepreneurship and economic development: The case of the University of Calgary. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(4), 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities. Oxford, US: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  22. Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Van de Velde, E., & Vohora, A. (2005). Spinning out ventures: A typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 183–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Commission, European. (1999). Sixth periodic report on the social and economic situation of regions in the EU. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  25. Degroof, J., & Roberts, E. (2004). Overcoming weak entrepreneurial infrastructures for academic spin-off ventures. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3–4), 1573–7047.Google Scholar
  26. Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32, 209–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Doloreux, D., Dionne, S., & Lapointe, D. (2007). Institutional structure and modes of governance in non-metropolitan innovation systems. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 7, 405–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Douglas, E. J. (2012). Reconstructing entrepreneurial intentions to identify predisposition for growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(5), 633–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fayolle, A. (2007a). Entrepreneurship and new value creation: The dynamic of the entrepreneurial process. UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fayolle, A. (2007b). Handbook of research in entrepreneurship education: A general perspective. USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Feldman, M. (2014). The character of innovative places: Entrepreneurial strategy, economic development, and prosperity. Small Business Economics, 43, 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Nonnormal and categorical data in structural equation models. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), A second course in structural equation modeling (pp. 269–314). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
  33. Fox, J. (1980). Effects analysis in structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 9, 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Goldstein, H. A. (1990). Estimating the regional economic impact of universities: An application of input-output analysis. Planning for Higher Education, 18(1), 51–64.Google Scholar
  35. Goldstein, H. A., & Renault, C. S. (2004). Contributions of universities to regional economic development: A quasi experimental approach. Regional Studies, 38(7), 733–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Grandi, A., & Grimaldi, R. (2005). Academics’ organizational characteristics and the generation of successful business ideas. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(6), 821–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  38. Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1045–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Guerrero, M., & Peña-Legazkue, I. (2013). The effect of intrapreneurial experience on corporate venturing: Evidence from developed economies. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 9(3), 397–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Guerrero, M., Rialp, J., & Urbano, D. (2008). The impact of desirability and feasibility on entrepreneurial intentions: A structural equation model. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(1), 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2012). The development of an entrepreneurial university. Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(1), 43–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2014). Academics’ start-up intentions and knowledge filters: An individual perspective of the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 43(1), 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., Cunningham, J., & Organ, D. (2014). Entrepreneurial universities in two European regions: A case study comparison. The journal of technology Transfer, 39(3), 415–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gunasekara, C. (2006). Reframing the role of universities in the development of regional innovation systems. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hanson, M. (2001). Institutional theory and educational change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37, 637–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Heblich, S., & Slavtchev, V. (2013). Parent universities and the location of academic startups. Small Business Economics,. doi:10.1007/s11187-013-9470-3.Google Scholar
  47. Hülsbeck, M., Lehmann, E. E., & Starnecker, A. (2013). Performance of technology transfer offices in Germany. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(3), 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jacob, M., Lundqvist, M., & Hellsmark, H. (2003). Entrepreneurial transformations in the Swedish university system: The case of Chalmers University of Technology. Research Policy, 32(9), 1555–1569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kirby, D. A., Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2011). The theoretical and empirical side of entrepreneurial universities: An institutional approach. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 28, 302–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lehmann, E., Braun, T., & Krispin, S. (2012). Entrepreneurial human capital, complementary assets, and takeover probability. Journal of Technology Transfer, 37, 589–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Li, X. (2009). China’s regional innovation capacity in transition: An empirical approach. Research Policy, 38(2), 338–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Liñán, F., Urbano, D., & Guerrero, M. (2011). Regional variations in entrepreneurial cognitions: Start-up intentions of university students in Spain. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 23(3), 187–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Link, A., & Scott, J. (2005). Opening the ivory tower’s door: An analysis of the determinants of the formation of US university spin-off companies. Research Policy, 34(7), 1106–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Loehlin, J. C. (1992). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path and structural analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  55. Louis, K. S., Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M. E., & Stoto, M. A. (1989). Entrepreneurs in academe: An exploration of behaviours among life scientists. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(1), 110–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lucas, R, Jr. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Morgan, B. (2002). Higher education and regional economic development in wales: An opportunity for demonstrating the efficacy of devolution in economic development. Regional Studies, 36(1), 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mueller, P. (2007). Exploiting entrepreneurial opportunities: The impact of entrepreneurship on growth. Small Business Economics, 28(4), 355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mustar, P., & Wright, M. (2010). Convergence or path dependency in policies to foster the creation of university spin-off firms? A comparison of France and the United Kingdom. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(1), 42–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Morse, K. P., O’Gorman, C., & Roche, F. (2007). Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience. R & D Management, 37(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  63. OECD. (2012). A guiding framework for entrepreneurial universities. Project report strengthening entrepreneurship and economic development at local level in Eastern Germany. http://www.oecd.org/site/cfecpr/guiding-framework.htm.
  64. Parker, S. (2011). Intrapreneurship or entrepreneurship? Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Porter, M. (2007). Colleges and universities and regional economic development: A strategic perspective. Forum for the Future of Higher Education. Cambridge, US: Cambridge Mass.Google Scholar
  66. Powers, J., & McDougall, P. P. (2005). University start-up formation and technological licensing with firms that go public: A resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 291–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Reynolds, P., Bosma, N., Autio, E., Hunt, S., De Bono, N., Servais, I., et al. (2005). Global entrepreneurship monitor: Data collection design and implementation 1998–2003. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 205–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Romer, P. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Romer, P. (1994). The origins of endogenous growth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (1995). Economic convergence and economic policies (No. w5039). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w5039.pdf.
  71. Shane, S. (2005). Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation. Massachusetts, US: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  72. Shook, C., Ketchen, D., Hult, T., & Kacmar, M. (2004). An assessment of the use of structural equation modeling in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Siegel, D., & Wessner, C. (2012). Universities and the success of entrepreneurial ventures: Evidence from the small business innovation research program. Journal of Technology Transfer, 37, 404–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sobel, M. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290–312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  75. Solow, R. (1956). A contribution to the economic growth theory. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S., & Al-Laham, A. (2007). Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 566–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sterlacchini, A. (2008). R&D, higher education and regional growth: Uneven linkages among European regions. Research Policy, 37(6), 1096–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  79. Thornton, P., Ribeiro, D., & Urbano, D. (2011). Socio-cultural factors and entrepreneurial activity: An overview. International Small Business Journal, 29, 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Urbano, D., & Guerrero, M. (2013). Entrepreneurial universities: Socio-economic impacts of academic entrepreneurship in a European region. Economic Development Quarterly, 27(1), 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Uyarra, E. (2012). Conceptualizing the regional roles of universities, Implications and contradictions control variables at regional level. European Planning Studies, 18(8), 1227–1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Veciana, J. M., & Urbano, D. (2008). The institutional approach to entrepreneurship research: An introduction. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4, 365–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Venkataraman, S. (2004). Regional transformation through technological entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wong, P., Ho, Y., & Autio, E. (2005). Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: Evidence from GEM data. Small Business Economics, 24, 335–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Mustar, P., & Lockett, A. (2007). Academic entrepreneurship in Europe. Massachusetts, US: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Deusto Business SchoolUniversity of Deusto and Orkestra-Basque Institute of CompetitivenessDonostia-San SebastianSpain
  2. 2.Department of BusinessUniversitat Autonoma BarcelonaBellateraSpain
  3. 3.Department of Strategy and OrganizationsEMLYON Business SchoolÉcullyFrance

Personalised recommendations