Advertisement

The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 346–360 | Cite as

Researchers’ participation in standardisation: a case study from a public research institute in Germany

  • Aikaterini Zi
  • Knut BlindEmail author
Article

Abstract

In this paper we examine public sector researchers’ participation in standardisation bodies. Whereas previous research emphasized on patents and publications as outputs of research activities, we also consider standardisation as another activity of researchers. The latter has not been adequately taken into account. Assuming that publishing and patenting activities have an influence on researchers’ involvement in standardisation we seek evidence based on objective publishing, patenting and standardisation data. Based on individual data of more than 600 researchers from the BAM Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing in Germany, we perform multivariate regression analyses to determine the characteristics that influence researchers’ participation in standardisation at different levels. The estimation results show a negative relationship between high quality scientific publications productivity and participation in standardisation committees and a positive relationship between technical and industry-oriented publications productivity and standardisation activities. Patenting and standardisation activities appear to be contradictory only in a few model specifications. Academic qualifications of the researchers have a positive and statistically significant impact on the probability of participating in standardisation committees. Our findings reveal important insights for analysing researchers’ activities in the future, but also for the management of research institutes and for policy makers.

Keywords

Standardisation Knowledge and technology transfer Research productivity Scientific publications Patent applications 

JEL Classification

I23 L15 L24 O34 

References

  1. Blind, K. (2006). Explanatory factors for participation in formal standardisation processes: Empirical evidence at firm level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15(2), 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blind, K., & Gauch, S. (2009). Research and standardisation in nanotechnology: Evidence from Germany. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34, 320–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blind, K., & Mangelsdorf, A. (2013). Alliance formation of SMEs: Empirical evidence from standardization committees. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 60(1), 148–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blind, K., & Thumm, N. (2004). Interdependencies between intellectual property protection and standardisation strategies. Research Policy, 33, 1583–1598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BMBF. (2010). Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung—Federal Ministry of Education and Research. Ideas. Innovation. Prosperity. High-Tech Strategy 2020 for Germany, Bonn, Berlin.Google Scholar
  6. Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29, 627–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Choi, D. G., Lee, H., & Sung, T. (2011). Research profiling for ‘standardization and innovation’. Scientometrics, 88, 259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. European Commission. (2008). Communication from the commission to the council, the European Parliament and the European economic and social committee: Towards an increased contribution from standardisation to innovation in Europe, COM (2008) 133 final, March 11, 2008, Brussels.Google Scholar
  9. Grant, E. B., & Gregory, M. J. (1997). Tacit knowledge, the life cycle and international manufacturing transfer. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 9(2), 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hise, R., Choi, Y., Shin, J., & Park, M. (2010). Standardisation/adaptation strategies of South Korean food product companies. International Journal of Business Strategy, 10(1), 78.Google Scholar
  11. Landry, R., Saïhi, M., Amara, N., & Ouimet, M. (2010). Evidence on how academics manage their portfolio of knowledge transfer activities. Research Policy, 39, 1387–1403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Martin, B. R., & Irvine, J. (1983). Assessing basic research: Some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy. Research Policy, 12, 61–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. OECD. (2002). Frascati Manual: Proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development (6th ed.). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department S, Quality InfrastructureBAM Federal Institute for Materials Research and TestingBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Chair of Innovation EconomicsTechnische Universität BerlinBerlinGermany
  3. 3.Fraunhofer Institute of Open Communication SystemsBerlinGermany
  4. 4.Chair of Standardisation, Rotterdam School of ManagementErasmus UniversityRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations