Entrepreneurial universities in two European regions: a case study comparison
An entrepreneurial university is a natural incubator that tries to provide a supportive environment in which the university community can explore, evaluate and exploit ideas that could be transformed into social and economic entrepreneurial initiatives. Entrepreneurial universities are involved in partnerships, networks and other relationships to generate an umbrella for interaction, collaboration and co-operation. Rapid developments in science, the multidisciplinary nature of frontier research, legislative changes such as the Bayh–Dole Act and demands from business and society have shaped knowledge-based entrepreneurship within universities. Despite sharing similar historical backgrounds, economic conditions and cultural and social structures, entrepreneurial universities in most countries remain distinct from one another by their institutional arrangements, traditions and characteristics unique to each organization. Interestingly, no comparative research has been conducted to understand the similarities and differences of the conditioning factors and the outcomes/outputs of entrepreneurial universities in different regions that share similar social, economic and political conditions. This paper addresses this research deficit, adopting institutional economics and resource-based view. We compare entrepreneurial universities in two European regions (Spain and Ireland) using an in-depth qualitative approach based on multiple case studies (two Spanish universities and two Irish universities) between 2006 and 2010. The findings provide organizational practices and approaches relevant to the transformation process of other regional universities seeking to become entrepreneurial.
KeywordsEntrepreneurial universities Institutional economics Resource-based view Europe
JEL ClassificationM13 L26 I23 I28
We are most grateful to several participants for their comments and suggestions. We are also grateful to comments and suggestions by two anonymous reviewers, which have decisively contributed to this improved final version of our paper. Maribel Guerrero acknowledges the funding provided by the Mexican Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT). David Urbano has received financial resources from ECO2010-16760 (Spanish Ministry of Education and Science) and 2005SGR00858 (Catalan Government’s Department for Universities, Research and Information Society). James Cunningham and Damien Organ acknowledge funding received from the Higher Education Authority, Programme for Research in Third Level Institutions Cycle 4, and co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund.
- ACUP. (2011). Impact of the Catalan Public Universities on society. Barcelona: Nexe Impressions.Google Scholar
- Adler, P., & Kwon, S. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27, 17–40.Google Scholar
- Caballero, R., & Hammour, M. (1994). The cleaning effect of recessions. American Economic Review, 84(5), 1350–1368.Google Scholar
- Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
- CRUE. (2007). Spanish higher education funding. Spain: Ministry of Education and Science.Google Scholar
- Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.Google Scholar
- GEM. (2010). Global entrepreneurship monitor—Spanish database. Wellesley, MA: London Business School, Babson College.Google Scholar
- Giblin, M. & Ryan, P. (2010). Tight clusters or loose networks? The critical role of inward foreign direct investment in cluster creation. Regional Studies. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2010.497137.
- Grupo SCImago. (2007). ISI productivity of Spanish Universities (2000–2004). The informationist, 16(4), 354–358.Google Scholar
- Harzig, C., Juteau, D., & Schmitt, I. (2006). The social construction of diversity: Recasting the master narrative of industrial nations. US: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
- North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Morse, K. P., O’Gorman, C., & Roche, F. (2007). Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience. R & D Management, 37(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2010). Higher education in regional and city development. The autonomous region of Catalonia, Spain. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
- Sandgren, A. & Strömqvist, G. (2006). Human resources and the entrepreneurial university: The cases of Finland, Spain, Sweden and the UK. URL: http://www.euerek.info/Public_Documents/Documents/Sandgren-Stromqvist-HRM.pdf. Last access September 2008.
- Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: Qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technological Management, 21, 115–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. London: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Van der Sijde, P., & Tilburg, J. (2000). Support of university spin-off companies (pp. 13–21). February: Entrepreneurship and Innovation.Google Scholar
- Webometrics (2010). Methodology of world university ranking. http://www.webometrics.info/methodology_es.html. Accessed September 28, 2008.
- Yin, R. (1984). Case study research, design and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Young, B., Hewitt-Dundas, N., & Roper, S. (2008). Intellectual Property management in publicly funded R&D centres. A comparison of university-based and company-based research centres. Technovation 28(8), 473–484.Google Scholar