Skip to main content
Log in

The university’s unknown knowledge: tacit knowledge, technology transfer and university spin-offs findings from an empirical study based on the theory of knowledge

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The assumption that research findings provide the basis for spin-off projects at universities has been found up to now in literature and the practice. Supported by the theory of knowledge, the empirical study presented here shows that this idea is too limited. Only 45 % of spin-offs use codified research findings from the university, while 55 % use tacit knowledge that was acquired at the university. These spin-offs use knowledge beyond research findings, starting companies in the shadow of publications by academic institutions and drawing from the realm of tacit knowledge at universities. Tacit start-up knowledge is present in all scientific disciplines of universities; even the exploitation- and patent-oriented engineering sciences account for almost half of the start-ups. Start-ups based on tacit knowledge lead to both technology-oriented and service companies. They also do not differ from codified knowledge-based start-ups in the number of jobs that they create. The discovery of the tacit knowledge spin-offs as a phenomenon has an entire series of implications for the practice and research. The tacit start-up potential was not considered previously in the university promotion instruments and start-up consultancies. Furthermore, we can assume that tacit knowledge-based start-ups are only an initial indication of the innovation potential within the tacit realm of knowledge for universities and research institutes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Rothaermel et al. (2007) and Djokovic and Souitaris (2008) for a detailed literature analysis of the research on university entrepreneurships.

    Druilhe and Garnsey (2004) explore typologies of spin-offs, using a Penrosean conceptualization of entrepreneurial activity.

References

  • Agrawal, A. (2001). University-to-industry knowledge transfer: Literature review and unanswered questions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(4), 285–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A. (2006). Engaging the inventor: Exploring licensing strategies for university inventions and the role of latent knowledge. Strategic Management Review, 27, 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosini, V., & Bowman, C. (2001). Tacit knowledge: Some suggestions for operationalization. Journal of Management Studies, 38(6), 811–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Stephan, P. E. (1996). The case of biotechnology. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 641–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barley, S. R., & Bechky, B. A. (1994). In the backrooms of science: The work of technicians in science labs. Work and Occupations, 21(1), 85–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djokovic, D., & Souitaris, V. (2008). Spinouts from academic institutions: A literature review with suggestions for further research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 225–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Druilhe, C. L., & Garnsey, E. (2004). Do academic spin-outs differ and does it matter? Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 269–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, M. E. (2002). Types of Knowledge and Their Roles in Technology Transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27, 219–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güldenberg, S., & Helting, H. (2004). Wissensmanagement falsch verstanden? Eine Fortsetzung des Dialoges zur Neuorientierung des Wissensmanagement. Die Betriebswirtschaft, DBW, 64(5), 523–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howells, J. (1996). Tacit knowledge, innovation and technology transfer. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 8(2), 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Josten, M., van Elkan, M., Laux, J., & Thomm, M. (2008). Gründungspotenziale bei Studierenden. Zentrale Ergebnisse der Studierendenbefragung an 37 deutschen Hochschulen. Bonn/Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Hrsg.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, N., & Insch, G. S. (2005). Tacit knowledge in academia: A proposed model and measurement scale. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 136(6), 465–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, R. A. (2006). Who develops a university invention? The impact of tacit knowledge and licensing policies. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 415–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1997). Die Organisation des Wissens: Wie japanische Unternehmen eine brachliegende Ressource nutzbar machen. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, A., Brockhoff, K., & von Boehmer, A. (1993). Decision parameters in global R&D management. R&D Management, 23(3), 249–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisano, G. P., Shan, W., & Teece, D. J. (1988). Joint ventures and collaboration in the biotechnology industry. In D. C. Mowery (Ed.), International collaborative ventures in U.S. manufacturing (pp. 183–222). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1985). Implizites Wissen (orig.: The Tacit Dimension, Garden City/N.Y. 1966). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothaermel, F. T., Agung, S. D., & Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 691–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spielkamp, A., Egeln, J., Gottschalk, S., & Rammer, C. (2004). Spin-offs in Germany: Conceptual considerations and empirical evidence. In M. Dowling, J. Scmude, & D. Knyphausen-Aufsess (Eds.), Advances iin Interdisziplinary European Entrepreneurship Research (vol. 3) (pp. 153–181). Germany: LIT Verlag Münster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1994). Tacit knowledge and job success. In N. Anderson & P. Herriot (Eds.), Assessment and selection in organisation: Methods and practice for recruitment and appraisal (pp. 27–39). London: JohnWiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., Forsythe, G. B., Hedlund, J., Horvath, J. A., Wagner, R. K., Williams, W. M., et al. (2000). Practical intelligence in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., Wagner, R. K., Williams, W. M., & Horvath, J. A. (1995). Testing common sense. American Psychologist, 50, 912–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K. (1987). Tacit knowledge in everyday intelligence behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1236–1247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellek, S. (2010). Testing statistical hypotheses of equivalence and noninferiority. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G., & Darby, M. R. (2001). Capturing technological opportunity via Japan’s star scientists: Evidence from Japanese firms’ biotech patents and products. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 37–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., Armstrong, J. (1994). Intellectual capital and the firm: The technology of geographically localized knowledge spillovers. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 4946.

  • Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Armstrong, J. (1998a). Geographically localized knowledge: Spillovers or markets? Economic Inquiry, 36(1), 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Armstrong, J. (2002). Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Science, 48(1), 138–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Brewer, M. B. (1998b). Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. American Economic Review, 88(1), 290–306.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fritjof Karnani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karnani, F. The university’s unknown knowledge: tacit knowledge, technology transfer and university spin-offs findings from an empirical study based on the theory of knowledge. J Technol Transf 38, 235–250 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9251-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9251-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation