Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Business incubators and the networks of technology-based firms

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper looks to broaden understanding about the networks of firms located in Business Incubators (BIs). To achieve this objective, a framework for understanding the networks of incubator firms was constructed. We argue that networks at incubators can be seen in two dimensions. In the first dimension, we define incubator firm networking activities in terms of resource type, i.e. tangible and intangible resources. In the second dimension, we define networks of incubator firms as external and internal. Internal networks refer to the relationship among tenants while external networks refer to the firm’s relationship with other institutions such as a university and/or research centre. Networks of firms located at the Daresbury Science and Innovation Campus in the United Kingdom were investigated using a tenant survey. Findings show that incubator firms develop more networks to access intangible resources than tangible resources. The analysis explored and compared types of networks for highly innovative firms and medium to low innovative firms and found differences in their networking activity. With regards to policy recommendations, this study shows network support for incubator firms can be improved. It also shows that those concerned with developing BI policy need to recognize and appreciate that not all incubator firms have the same needs. This should be taken into account when developing network support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1992). Innovation and small firms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1992). Real effects of academic research: Comment. American Economic Review, 82(1), 363–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aernoudt, R. (2004). Incubators: Tool for entrepreneurship? Small Business Economics, 23, 127–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D. N., & McClusky, R. (1990). Structure, policy, service, and performance in the business incubator industry. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(2), 61–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Fledman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 630–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakouros, Y. L., Dimitri, C. M., & Nikos, C. V. (2002). Science park, a high tech fantasy? An analysis of the science parks of Greece. Technovation, 22(2), 123–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B., & Clark, D. N. (2007). Resource-based theory: Creating and sustaining competitive advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, C. (2001). Incubators—Realist’s guide to the world’s new business accelerators. NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergek, A., & Norrman, C. (2008). Incubator best practice: A framework. Technovation, 28(1–2), 20–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birch, D. L. (1981). Who creates job? The Public interest, 65, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bøllingtoft, A., & Ulhøi, J. P. (2005). The networked business incubator—Leveraging entrepreneurial agency? Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 265–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and Theory. Research Policy, 2, 627–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broström, A. (2010). Firms’ rationales for interaction with research universities and the principles for public co-funding. Journal of Technology Transfer. doi:10.1007/s10961-010-9177-4.

  • Campbell, C., & Allen, D. N. (1987). The small business incubator industry: Micro-level economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 1(2), 178–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. F., & Lau, T. (2005). Assessing technology incubator programs in the science park: The good, the bad and the ugly. Technovation, 25(10), 1215–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Van de Velde, E., & Vohora, A. (2005). Spinning out new ventures: a typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 183–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D., & Prusak, L. (2001). In good company. How social capital makes organizations work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, M. G., & Delmastro, M. (2002). How effective are technology incubators? Evidence from Italy. Research Policy, 31(7), 103–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, M. G., & Grilli, L. (2005). Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view. Research Policy, 34(6), 795–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, M. G., Grilli, L., & Piva, E. (2006). In search of complementary assets: The determinants of alliance formation of high-tech start-ups. Research Policy, 35(8), 1166–1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, M., Mustar, P., & Wright, M. (2010). Dynamics of science-based entrepreneurship. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Regional development in the knowledge-based economy: The construction of advantage. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C. E., Hamel., S. A., & Connaughton, S. L. (2010). Motivations and obstacles to networking in a university business incubator. Journal of Technology Transfer. doi:10.1007/s10961-010-9189-0.

  • Dettwiler, P., Lindelöf, P., & Löfsten, H. (2006). Utility of location: A comparative survey between small new technology-based firms located on and off Science Parks-Implications for facilities management. Technovation, 26(4), 506–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504–1511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duff, A. (1994). Best practice in business incubator management. Booragoon, Australia: AUSTEP Strategic Partnering Pty.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, E., Montes, J. M., & Vazquez, C. J. (2000). Typology and strategic analysis of intangible resources: A resource-based approach. Technovation, 20, 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. A., & Renault, C. S. (2004). Contributions of universities to regional economic development: A quasi-experimental approach. Regional Studies, 38(7), 733–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation, California Management Review, 33, 3, 114–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimaldi, R., & Grandi, A. (2005). Business incubators and new Venture Creation: An assessment of incubating models. Technovation, 25(2), 111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groen, A., Jenniskens, I., & van der Sijde, P. (2005). Needs of start-up technology-driven enterprises: Starting points for government policy. In W. During, R. Oakey, & S. Kauser (Eds.), New technology-based firms in the new millennium (Vol. IV, pp. 219–234). Elsevier: Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, S. M., & Dilts, D. M. (2004). A real option-driven theory of business incubation. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, S. M., & Dilts, D. M. (2008). Inside the black box of business incubation: Study B—Scale assessment, model refinement, and incubation outcomes. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(5), 439–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. (1992). The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 135–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. (1993). A framework linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 607–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannon, P. D., & Chaplin, P. (2003). Are incubators good for business? Understanding incubation practice—The challenges for policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 21(6), 861–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. T., Chesbrough, H. W., Nohria, N., & Sull, D. N. (2000). Networked incubators: Hothouses of the new economy. Harvard Business Review, 78(5), 74–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, F., Husted, K., & Vestergaard, J. (2005). Second generation science parks: from structural holes jockeys to social capital catalysts of the knowledge society. Technovation, 25(9), 1039–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindle, K., & Yencken, J. (2004). Public research commercialisation, entrepreneurship and new technology based firms: an integrated model. Technovation, 24(10), 793–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M., Ireland, R. D., & Morgan, R. E. (2007). Stimulating dynamic value: Social capital and business incubation as a pathway to competitive success. Long Range Planning, 40, 154–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. B. (1989). Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review, 79, 957–970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F., & LaFollette, W. R. (1987). Small business incubators for local economic development. Economic Development Review, 5(2), 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, B. W., Li, P. C., & Chen, J. S. (2006). Social capital, capabilities, and entrepreneurial strategies: A study of Taiwanese high-tech new ventures. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(2), 168–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindelöf, P., & Löfsten, H. (2003). Science Park location and new technology-based firms in Sweden–Implications for strategy and performance. Small Business Economics, 20(3), 245–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2007). The economics of university research parks. Oxford Rev Econ Policy., 23(4), 661–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löfsten, H., & Lindelöf, P. (2002). Science Parks and the growth of new technology-based firms—academic-industry links, innovation and markets. Research Policy, 31(6), 859–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löfsten, H., & Lindelöf, P. (2005). R&D networks and product innovation patterns-academic and non-academic new technology-based firms on Science Parks. Technovation, 25(9), 1025–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, T. S. (2000). Building Social Capital for Sustainable Enterprise Development in Country Towns and Regions: Successful Practices from the United States. Paper presented at the First National Conference on the Future of Australia’s Country Towns, LaTrobe University, Center for Sustainable Regional Communities, Australia.

  • McAdam, M., & Marlow, S. (2008). A preliminary investigation into networking activities within the university incubator. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 14(4), 219–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, M., & McAdam, R. (2006). The networked incubator: the role and operation of entrepreneurial networking with the university science park incubator (USI). The international Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 7(2), 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mian, S. A. (1996). Assessing value-added contributions of university technology business incubators to tenant firms. Research Policy, 25(3), 325–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mian, S. A. (1997). Assessing and managing the university technology business incubator: An integrative framework. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(4), 251–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moray, N., & Clarysse, B. (2005). Institutional change and resource endowments to science-based entrepreneurial firms. Research Policy, 34, 1010–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2001). Fostering high-tech spin-offs: A public strategy for innovation. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, D., Warren, L., & Bream, D. (2009). Elements that underpin high-tech business incubation process. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(6), 621–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, L., Rice, M., & Sundararajan, M. (2004). The role of incubators in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, S., & Garnsey, E. (1998). Incubation policy and resource provision: Meeting the needs of young, innovative firms. In R. Oakey & W. During (Eds.), New technology-based firms in the 1990s (Vol. V, pp. 67–80). London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynold, P., Storey, D. J., & Westhead, P. (1994). Cross-national comparisons of the variation in new firm formation rates’. Regional Studies, 28(4), 443–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, M. P. (2002). Co-production of business assistance in business incubators: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(2), 163–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1077–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothaermel, R. T., Agung, S. D., & Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 691–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. (2009). Beyond incubation: An analysis of firm survival and exit dynamics in the post-graduation period. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(4), 403–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scillitoe, J. L., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (2005). The sources of social capital within technology incubators: The roles of historical ties and organizational facilitation. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 2(4), 327–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smilor, R. W., & Gill, M. D. (1986). The new business incubator: Linking talent, technology, capital, and know-how. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soetanto, D. P., & Van Geenhuizen, M. (2010). Social capital through networks: The case of university spin-offs in different stages. Journal of Economic and Social Geography, 101, 509–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamasy, T. (2007). Rethinking technology-oriented business incubators: Developing a Robust policy instrument for entrepreneurship, innovation, and regional development? Growth and Change, 38(3), 1468–2257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tötterman, H., & Sten, J. (2005). Start-ups: Business incubation and social capital. International Small Business Journal, 23, 487–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dierdonck, R., Debackere, K., & Rappa, M. A. (1991). An assessment of science parks: Towards a better understanding of their role in the diffusion of technological knowledge. R&D Management, 21(2), 109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Geenhuizen, M., & Soetanto, D. P. (2009). Academic spin-offs at different ages: A case study in search of obstacles to growth. Technovation, 29(10), 671–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vedovello, C., & Godinho, M. (2003). Business incubators as a technological infrastructure for supporting small innovative firms’ activities. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 3(1/2), 4–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Zedtwitz, M., & Grimaldi, R. (2006). Are service profiles incubator-specific? Result from an empirical investigation in Italy. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(4), 459–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, L., Patton, D., & Bream, D. (2009). Knowledge acquisition processes during the incubation of new high technology firms. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 5, 481–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westhead, P., & Batstone, S. (1998). Independent technology-based firms: The perceived benefits of a Science Park location. Urban Studies, 35, 2197–2219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., Birley, S., & Mosey, S. (2004). Entrepreneurship and University Technology Transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3), 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank John Leake and Stephanie Forbisser from The Daresbury SIC for their support and helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Entrepreneurship and Enterprise Development, Lancaster University Management School, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4YX, UK

    Danny P. Soetanto & Sarah L. Jack

Authors
  1. Danny P. Soetanto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sarah L. Jack
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danny P. Soetanto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soetanto, D.P., Jack, S.L. Business incubators and the networks of technology-based firms. J Technol Transf 38, 432–453 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-011-9237-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-011-9237-4

Keywords

JEL classification

Search

Navigation