The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 36, Issue 6, pp 581–586 | Cite as

Introduction to the symposium issue: nanotechnology innovation and policy—current strategies and future trajectories

Article

References

  1. Bennett, I., & Sarewitz, D. (2006). Too little, too late? Research policies on the societal implications of nanotechnology in the United States. Science as Culture, 15(4), 309–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Besley, J., Kramer, V., & Priest, S. (2008). Expert opinion on nano-technology: Risks, benefits, and regulation. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10(4), 549–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. HM Government. (2010). UK nanotechnologies strategy: Small technologies, great opportunities. London: Ministerial Group on Nanotechnologies. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/interactive.bis.gov.uk/nano/.
  4. Lux Research. (2004). The nanotech report: Investment overview and market research for nanotechnology. New York: Lux Research.Google Scholar
  5. Lux Research. (2007). The nanotech report 2006: Investment overview and market research for nanotechnology. New York: Lux Research.Google Scholar
  6. Lux Research. (2009). The recession’s ripple effect on nanotech. State of the Market Report. New York (June 9).Google Scholar
  7. NSET. (2007). The national nanotechnology initiative: Research and development leading to a revolution in technology and industry. Washington DC: Subcommittee on Nanoscale Science, Engineering and Technology, Committee on Technology, National Science and Technology Council, Executive Office of the President.Google Scholar
  8. PCAST. (2010). Report to the president and congress on the third assessment of the national nanotechnology initiative. Washington DC: Executive Office of the President and President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.Google Scholar
  9. PEN. (2009). Nanotech-enabled consumer products top the 1,000 mark. Release no. 64–09. Washington, DC: Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.Google Scholar
  10. Roco, M. C., & Bainbridge, W. S. (Eds.). (2001). Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Roco, M. C., Hersam, M. C., & Mirkin, C. A. (Eds.). (2011). Nanotechnology research directions for societal needs in 2020: Retrospective and outlook. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Shapira, P., & Wang, J. (2010). Follow the money. What was the impact of the nanotechnology funding boom of the past ten years? Nature, 468, 627–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, Manchester Business SchoolUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
  2. 2.School of Public PolicyGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.Enterprise Innovation Institute and School of Public PolicyGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations