Adams, J. D. (1990). Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth. Journal of Political Economy,
Albert, M. B., Avery, D., Narin, F., & McAllister, P. (1991). Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Research Policy,
Azoulay, P., Ding, W., & Stuart, T. (2009). The effect of academic patenting on the rate, quality, and direction of (public) research output. Journal of Industrial Economics,
Beise, M., & Stahl, H. (1999). Public research and industrial innovation in Germany. Research Policy,
Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Diederen, B., Lokshin, B., & Veugelers, R. (2004a). Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies. International Journal of Industrial Organization,
Belderbos, R., Carree, M., & Lokshin, B. (2004b). R&D Cooperation and firm performance. Research Policy,
Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2005). From publishing to patenting: Do productive scientists turn into academic inventors. Revue d’Economie Industrielle,
Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2007). The scientific productivity of academic inventors: New evidence from Italian data. Economics of Innovation and New Technology,
Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2008). University patenting and scientific productivity: A quantitative study of Italian academic scientists. European Management Review,
Calderini, M., & Franzoni, C. (2004). Is academic patenting detrimental to high quality research? An empirical analysis of the relationship between scientific careers and patent applications. CESPRI working paper 162. Università Bocconi, Milan.
Callaert, J., Van Looy, B., Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., & Thijs, B. (2004). Traces of prior art: An analysis of non-patent references found in patent documents. Scientometrics,
Capron, H., & Cincera, M. (2003). Industry-university S&T transfer: Belgian evidence on CIS data. Brussels Economic Review,
Cassiman, B., Veugelers, R., & Zuniga, M. P. (2008). In search of performance effects of (In)direct industry science links. Industrial & Corporate Change,
Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Van de Velde, E., & Vohora, A. (2005). Spinning out new ventures: A typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions. Journal of Business Venturing,
Cohen, W., Goto, A., Nagata, A., Nelson, R., & Walsh, J. (2002). R&D Spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States. Research Policy,
Crespi, G. A., Geuna, A., & Nesta, L. J. J. (2006). Labour mobility of academic inventors. Career decision and knowledge transfer. SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series 139, University of Sussex.
Czarnitzki, D., Glänzel, W., & Hussinger, K. (2007). Patent and publication activities of German professors: An empirical assessment of their co-activity. Research Evaluation,
Czarnitzki, D., Glänzel, W., & Hussinger, K. (2009a). Heterogeneity of patenting activity and its implications for scientific research. Research Policy,
Czarnitzki, D., Hussinger, K., & Schneider, C. (2009b). Why challenge the ivory tower? New evidence on the basicness of academic patents. Kyklos,
Dasgupta, P., & Paul, P. A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23(5), 487–521.
Debackere, K., & Veugelers, R. (2005). Improving industry science links through university technology transfer units: An analysis and a case. Research Policy,
Della Malva, A., Lissoni, F., & Llerena, P. (2008). Institutional change and academic patenting: French universities and the innovation act of 1999. Document de travail no 2008–9. Strasbourg: BETA.
Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Research Policy,
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: The invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy,
Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. (2004). Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8–9), 909–928.
Foray, D., & Lissoni, F. (2010). University research and public-private interaction. In B. H. Hall, & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Hand book of economics of technical change (forthcoming).
Franzoni, C., & Lissoni, F. (2006). Academic entrepreneurship, patents, and spin-offs: Critical issues and lessons for Europe. KITeS Working Papers 180, Universita’ Bocconi, Milano, Italy.
Franzoni, C., & Lissoni, F. (2009). Academic entrepreneurship: Critical issues and lessons for europe. In A. Varga (Ed.), Academic entrepreneurship and regional development (pp. 163–190). UK: Edward Elgar.
Gambardella, A., Harhoff, D., & Verspagen, B. (2008). The value of European patents. European Management Review,
Geuna, A., & Nesta, L. J. J. (2006). University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence. Research Policy,
Goddar, H. (2005). Recent development in the business of patent licensing—technology transfer from universities and research institutions to industry in Germany. International Journal of Intellectual Property—Law, Economy and Management,
Grimpe, C., & Hussinger, K. (2008a). Pre-empting technology competition through firm acquisitions. Economics Letters,
Grimpe, C., & Hussinger, K. (2008b). Building and blocking: The two faces of technology acquisitions. Mannheim: ZEW discussion paper no. 08-069.
Guellec, D., Martinez, C., & Zuniga, P. (2008). More exclusion than invention: Blocking patents at work. Mimeo: OECD.
Gulbrandsen, M., & Smedy, S. G. (2005). Industry funding and university professors’ research performance. Research Policy,
Hall, B. H., & Harhoff, D. (2001). Intellectual property strategy in the global cosmetics industry: A soap opera. Mimeo: University of Munich.
Hall, B. H., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2003). Universities as research partners. Journal of Economic Studies,
Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics,
Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (1999). Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3), 511–515.
Harhoff, D., & Wagner, S. (2005). Modeling the duration of patent examination at the European patent office. London: CEPR Discussion Paper No. 5283.
Harhoff, D., & Wagner, S. (2009). The duration of patent examination at the European Patent Office. Management Science, 55(2), 1969–1984.
Harhoff, D., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (2003). Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights—evidence from Germany. Research Policy,
Hausman, J., & McFadden, D. (1984). Specification tests for the multinomial logit model. Econometrica,
Henderson, R., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (1998). Universities as a source of commercial technology. Review of Economics and Statistics,
Jaffe, A. (1989). The Real Effects of Academic Research. American Economic Review,
Jaffe, A., Fogarty, M. S., & Trajtenberg, M. (2000). Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: Evidence from a survey of inventors. American Economic Review,
Kilger, C., & Bartenbach, K. (2002). New rules for german professors. Science,
Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. (2001). Characteristics of patent litigation: A window on competition. RAND Journal of Economics,
Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. (2004). Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators. Economic Journal,
Lerner, J. (1994). The importance of patent scope: An empirical analysis. RAND Journal of Economics,
Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., & Bozeman, B. (2007). An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer. Industrial & Corporate Change,
Lissoni, F., Llerena, P., McKelvey, M., & Sanditov, B. (2008). Academic patenting in Europe: New evidence from the KEINS database. Research Evaluation,
Mansfield, E. (1991). Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy,
Mansfield, E. (1998). Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings. Research Policy,
Meyer, M. (2000). Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature. Research Policy,
Meyer, M. (2006). Knowledge integrators or weak links? An exploratory comparison of patenting researchers with their non-inventing peers in nanoscience and technology. In: P. Ingwersen, & B. Larsen (Eds.), Proceedings of ISSI 2005—the 10th international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics (pp. 34–44). Karolinska University Press, Stockholm, Sweden, July 24–28, 2005.
Mohnen, P., & Hoareau, C. (2003). What type of enterprise forges close links with universities and government labs? Evidence from CIS 2. Managerial and Decision Economics,
Mowery, D., & Sampat, B. (2001). Patenting and licensing university inventions: Lessons from the history of the research corporation. Industrial & Corporate Change,
Mowery, D., & Ziedonis, A. (2002). Academic patenting quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States. Research Policy,
Mowery, D., Sampat, B., & Ziedonis, A. (2002). Learning to patent: Institutional experience, learning and the characteristics of U.S. university patents after the Bayh-Dole act, 1981–1992. Management Science,
Mueller, P. (2006). Exploring the knowledge filter: How entrepreneurship and university-industry relationships drive economic growth. Research Policy,
Mustar, P. (1997). Spin-off enterprises. How French academics creates high tech companies: Conditions for success or failure. Science and Public Policy,
Popp, D., Juhl, T., & Johnson, D. K. N. (2004). Time in purgatory: Examining the grant lag for U.S. patent applications. Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy,
ProTon. (2006). The Proton Europe. Fourth annaual survey report (fiscal year 2006). http://www.protoneurope.org/news/PatentPolicyStatement.
Rothaermel, F. T., Agung, S., & Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature. Industrial & Corporate Change,
Salter, A. J., & Martin, B. R. (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: A critical review. Research Policy,
Sampat, B. (2006). Patenting and US academic research in the 20th century: The world before and after Bayh- Dole. Research Policy,
Sampat, B., Mowery, D., & Ziedonis, A. (2003). Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole Act: A re-examination. International Journal of Industrial Organization,
Sapsalis, E., de la Potterie, B., & Navon, R. (2006). Academic versus industry patenting: An in-depth analysis of what determines patent value. Research Policy,
Saragossi, S., & de la Potterie, B. (2003). What patent data reveal about universities: The case of Belgium. Journal of Technology Transfer,
Schmoch, U. (1997). Indicators and the relation between science and technology. Scientometrics,
Small, K. A., & Hsiao, C. (1985). Multinomial logit specification tests. International Economic Review,
Stern, S. (2004). Do scientists pay to be scientists? Management Science, 50(6), 835–853.
Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Wasgington, DC: Brookings Institute.
Thursby, J. G., Fuller, A., & Thursby, M. C. (2009). U.S. faculty patenting: Inside and outside the university. Research Policy,
Toole, A. A. (2007). The impact of public basic research on industrial innovation: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Mimeo: Rutgers University, earlier version available as Stanford University (SIEPR) (Discussion Paper 00-07).
Toole, A. A., & Czarnitzki, D. (2007). Biomedical academic entrepreneurship through the SBIR program. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,
Toole, A. A., & Czarnitzki, D. (2009). Exploring the relationship between scientist human capital and firm performance: The case of biomedical academic entrepreneurs in the SBIR program. Management Science,
Toole, A. A., & Czarnitzki, D. (2010). Commercializing science: Is there a university ‘Brain Drain’ from academic entrepreneurship? Management Science (forthcoming).
Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. The Rand Journal of Economics,
Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., & Jaffe, A. B. (1997). University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Economics of Innovation and New Technologies,
Van Looy, B., Ranga, M., Callaert, J., Debackere, K., & Zimmermann, E. (2004). Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academic: Towards a compounded and reciprocal matthew-effect? Research Policy,
Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2007). Hot patent issues: Quantitative evidence. In D. Guellec & B. Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie (Eds.), The economics of the European patent system—IP policy for innovation and competition (pp. 184–215). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Verspagen, B. (2006). University research, intellectual property rights and European innovation systems. Journal of Economic Survey,
Veugelers, C., & Cassiman, B. (2005). R&D Cooperation between firms and universities: Some evidence from Belgian manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Organization,
Webb C., Dernis, H., Harhoff, D., & Hoisl K. (2005). Analyzing European and international patent citations: A set of EPO database building blocks. STI working paper 2005/9, OECD.
Zucker, L. G., & Darby, M. R. (1996). Star scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. Proceedings of the National Academies of Science,
Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Brewer, M. B. (1998). Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. American Economic Review,