The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 367–375 | Cite as

The Impact of Gender and Department Climate on Job Satisfaction and Intentions to Quit for Faculty in Science and Engineering Fields

Abstract

This study investigates whether gender and the perceptions of department climate affects faculty job satisfaction and intentions to quit (work outcomes) with surveys responses from 308 faculty members in science and engineering fields. The study finds that both gender and department climate are related to work outcomes and that two facets of department climate (affective and instrumental) mediate the relationship between gender and both job satisfaction and intention to quit. This finding suggests that universities can benefit from improving department climate, which then may improve the retention of both male and female faculty, but may have an even greater impact on improving job satisfaction and reducing intentions to quit of female faculty.

Keywords

gender climate work outcomes regression and/or mediation analysis faculty 

JEL Classifications

D23 M14 I20 C42 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acker, J. 1990‘Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.’Gender and Society4139158Google Scholar
  2. Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A. 1986‘The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations’Journal of Personality and Social Psychology5111731182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bem, S.L. 1993The Lenses of Gender: Transforming the Debate on Sexual InequalityYale University PressNew Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  4. Carr, J.Z., Schmidt, A.M., Ford, K., DeShon, R.P. 2003‘Climate Perceptions Matter: A Meta-Analytic Path Analysis Relating Molar Climate, Cognitive and Affective States and Individual Level Work Outcomes’Journal of Applied Psychology88605619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark, B.R. 1987The Academic Life: Small Worlds, Different WorldsCarnegie Foundation for the Advancement of TeachingPrinceton, NJGoogle Scholar
  6. Cook, J.D., Hepworth, S.H., Wall, T.D., Warr, P.B. 1981The Experience of Work: A Compendium and Review of Measures and their UseAcademic PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Cross, S.E., Madsen, L. 1997‘Models of the Self: Self Construals and Gender’Psychological Bulletin122537Google Scholar
  8. Dillman Don, A. 2000Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design MethodWileyNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Edmondson, A. 1999‘Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams’Administrative Science Quarterly44350383Google Scholar
  10. Gutek, B.A., Searle, S., Klepa, L. 1991‘Rational Versus Gender Role Explanations for Work-Family Conflict’Journal of Applied Psychology76560568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hackman, J.R., Oldham, G.R. 1975‘Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey’Journal of Applied Psychology60159170Google Scholar
  12. Hopkins, P., (February 2004), ‘Presentation: “Building Job Offers” at University of Washington department chair training meeting,’ Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  13. Locke, E.A. 1984

    ‘Job Satisfaction’

    Gruneberg, J.Wall,  T. eds. Social Psychology and Organizational BehaviorJohn WileyLondon93117
    Google Scholar
  14. Lorber, J. 2000

    ‘The Social Construction of Gender’

    Ore, T. eds. The Social Construction of Difference and Inequality: Race, Class, Gender and SexualityMayfieldMountain View, CA106113
    Google Scholar
  15. Jones, A.P., James, L.R. 1979‘Psychological Climate: Dimensions and Relationships of Individual and Aggregated Work Environment Perceptions’Organizational Behavior and Human Performance23201250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Joyce, W.F., Slocum, J.W. 1984‘Collective Climate: Agreement as a Basis for Defining Aggregate Climates in Organizations’Academy of Management Journal27721742Google Scholar
  17. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1999, ‘A Study on the Status of Women Faculty in Science at MIT,’ Retrieved June 1, 2002, from http://web.mit.edu/faculty/reports/overview.html.
  18. National Science Foundation, 2004, ‘Division of Science Resources Statistics, “Doctoral Scientists and Engineers: 2001 Profile Tables”,’ NSF 04-312, Project Officer, Kelly H. Kang (Arlington, VA).Google Scholar
  19. Oreg, S. 2003‘Resistance to Change: Developing an Individual Difference Measure’Journal of Applied Psychology88680693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ostroff, C. 1993‘The Effects of Climate and Personal Influences on Individual Behavior and Attitudes in Organizations’Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process565690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Preacher, K.J. and G.J. Leonardelli, 2001, ‘Calculation for the Sobel Test: An Interactive Calculation Tool for Mediation Tests,’ [Computer software]. Available from http://www.unc.edu/~preacher/sobel/sobel.htm. Retrieved March 18, 2005.
  22. Rapoport, R., Bailyn, L., Fletcher, J.K., Pruitt, B.H. 2002Beyond Work-Family Balance: Advancing Gender Equity and Workplace PerformanceJossey-BassSan FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  23. Sobel, M.E. 1982

    ‘Asymptotic Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equations Models’

    Leinhart, S. eds. Sociological MethodologyJossey-BassSan Francisco290312
    Google Scholar
  24. Spreitzer, G.M. 1995‘Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation’Academy of Management Journal3814421465Google Scholar
  25. Spreitzer, G.M. 1996‘Social Structural Characteristics of Psychological Empowerment’Academy of Management Journal39483504Google Scholar
  26. Wanous, J.P., Reichers, A.E., Austin, J.T. 2000‘Cynicism about Organizational Change: Measurements, Antecedents and Correlates’Group & Organization Management25132153Google Scholar
  27. Wergin, J.F. 2003Departments that Work: Building and Sustaining Cultures of Excellence in Academic ProgramsAnker PublishingBolton, MAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Management and Human Resources DepartmentUtah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations