Abstract
A central argument behind the Bayh-Dole Act presumed that firms had no incentives to invest in downstream R&D aimed at developing university inventions committed to the public domain. The empirical evidence on university patenting and licensing is partly at odds with the premises of this argument. Non-exclusive licensing of university patents has been common and lucrative, and in the area of biomedical technologies university patents and licensing restrictions may be a hindrance to downstream R&D, rather than a stimulus. The paper presents a model of R&D competition based on a university invention where appropriability conditions are defined by the patentability of downstream innovations and imitation opportunities. A comparison of equilibria under “open access” to university inventions and under “university patenting” shows that only under restrictive conditions the latter regime results in increased R&D investment and social welfare. In general, university licensing royalties are therefore a poor gauge of social welfare gains from university patenting.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Agrawal R. Henderson (2002) ArticleTitle‘Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT’ Management Science 48 IssueID1 44–60 Occurrence Handle10.1287/mnsc.48.1.44.14279
T. Agres (2003) ArticleTitle‘The Fruits of University Research’ The Scientist 17 IssueID14 55
K. Arrow (1962) ‘Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention’ R.R. Nelson (Eds) The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors NBER, Princeton University Press Princeton 609–625
InstitutionalAuthorNameAUTM (Association of University Technology Managers) (2003) AUTM Licensing Survey: FY 2002 Norwalk CT
Bremer, H.W., 2001, University Technology Transfer: Evolution and Revolutions, Council on Governmental Relations, at http://www.cogr.edu/Bremer.htm.
W.M. Cohen R. Florida L. Randazzese J. Walsh (1998) ‘Industry and the Academy: Uneasy Partners in the Cause of Technological Advance’ R. Noll (Eds) Challenges to Research Universities The Brookings Institute Press Washington, DC 171–200
W.M. Cohen R.R. Nelson J.P. Walsh (2002) ArticleTitle‘Links and Impacts: Survey Results on the Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D’ Management Science 48 IssueID1 1–23 Occurrence Handle10.1287/mnsc.48.1.1.14273
J. Colyvas et al. (2002) ArticleTitle‘How Do University Inventions Get Into Practice?’ Management Science 48 61–72 Occurrence Handle10.1287/mnsc.48.1.61.14272
P. Dasgupta J. Stiglitz (1980) ArticleTitle‘Uncertainty, Industrial Structure, and the Speed of R&D’ Bell Journal of Economics 11 1–28 Occurrence Handle10.2307/3003398
P. Dasgupta P.A. David (1994) ArticleTitle‘Towards a New Economics of Science’ Research Policy 23 487–521 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1
P.A. David D.C. Mowery W.E. Steinmueller (1992) ArticleTitle‘Analyzing the Economic Payoffs from Basic Research’ Economics of Innovation and New Technology 2 73–90
R.S. Eisenberg et al. (1996) ArticleTitle‘Public Research and Private Development: Patents and Technology Transfer in Government-Sponsored Research’ Virginia Law Review 83 1663–1727 Occurrence Handle10.2307/1073686
R.S. Eisenberg et al. (2001) ‘Bargaining Over the Transfer of Proprietary Research Tools: Is This Market Failing or Emerging?’ R.C. Dreyfuss (Eds) et al. Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property: Innovation Policy for the Knowledge Society Oxford University Press Oxford 223–50
Feldman, M., 2004, Commercializing Cohen-Boyer: Recombinant DNA as General Purpose Technology, Paper presented at DRUID Summer Conference 2004: Industrial Dynamics, Innovation and Development, Helsingør.
N. Gallini (2002) ArticleTitle‘The Economics of Patents: Lessons from Recent U.S. Patent Reform’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 IssueID2 131–154 Occurrence Handle10.1257/0895330027292
Graham, S. and D.C. Mowery, 2000, Intellectual Property Protection in the U.S. Software Industry, Working Paper, available at http://emlab.berkeley.edu/users/bhhall/swconf.doc.
M.A. Heller R.S. Eisenberg (1998) ArticleTitle‘Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anti-Commons in Biomedical Research’ Science 280 698–701 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.280.5364.698
R. Henderson A.B. Jaffe M. Trajtenberg (1998) ArticleTitle‘Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 1956–1998’ The Review of Economics & Statistics 80 119–127 Occurrence Handle10.1162/003465398557221
Henry, M.R., M.K. Cho, M.A. Weaver, and J.F. Merz, 2002, ‘DNA Patenting and Licensing’. Science 297, 23 August, 1279.
A.B. Jaffe (2000) ArticleTitle‘The U.S. Patent System in Transition: Policy Innovation and the Innovation Process’ Research Policy 29 531–558 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00088-8
R. Jensen M. Thursby (2001) ArticleTitle‘Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions’ American Economic Review 91 IssueID1 240–259 Occurrence Handle10.1257/aer.91.1.240
R. Levin A.K. Klevorick R.R. Nelson S.C. Winter (1987) ArticleTitle‘Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development’ Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3 783–831 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2534454
Lowe, R.A. and A.A. Ziedonis, 2004, Start-Ups, Established Firms, and the Commercialization of University Inventions, Paper presented at conference on Academic Spin-offs, UQAM, February 27, 2004.
E. Mansfield (1980) ArticleTitle‘Basic Research and Productivity Increase in Manufacturing’ American Economic Review 70 863–873
E. Mansfield (1986) ArticleTitle‘Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study’ Management Science 32 173–181 Occurrence Handle10.1287/mnsc.32.2.173
Mazzoleni, R., 2004, University Patents, R&D Competition, and Social Welfare, Paper presented at conference on Academic Spin-offs, UQAM, February 27, 2004.
R. Mazzoleni R.R. Nelson (1998) ArticleTitle‘The Benefits and Costs of Strong Patent Protection: A Contribution to the Current Debate’ Research Policy 27 273–284 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00048-1
D.C. Mowery R.R. Nelson B. Sampat A. Ziedonis (2001) ArticleTitle‘The Growth of Patenting and Licensing by U.S. Universities: An Assessment of the Effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980’ Research Policy 30 99–119 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00100-6
D.C. Mowery B. Sampat (2001a) ArticleTitle‘University Patents, Patent Policies, and Patent Policy Debates’ Industrial and Corporate Change 10 781–814 Occurrence Handle10.1093/icc/10.3.781
D.C. Mowery B. Sampat (2001b) ArticleTitle‘Patenting and Licensing University Inventions: Lessons from the History of the Research Corporation’ Industrial and Corporate Change 10 317–355 Occurrence Handle10.1093/icc/10.2.317
F. Narin K.S. Hamilton D. Olivastro (1997) ArticleTitle‘The Increasing Linkage Between U.S. Technology and Public Science’ Research Policy 26 317–330 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00013-9
InstitutionalAuthorNameNational Research Council (1997) Intellectual Property Rights and the Dissemination of Research Tools in Molecular Biology National Academy Press Washington, DC
R.R. Nelson (1959) ArticleTitle‘The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific␣Research’ Journal of Political Economy 67 IssueID3 297–306 Occurrence Handle10.1086/258177
R.R. Nelson (1982) ArticleTitle‘The Role of Knowledge in R&D Efficiency’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 97 IssueID3 453–470 Occurrence Handle10.2307/1885872
R.R. Nelson (1992) ‘What is Commercial and What is Public about Technology, and What Should Be?’ N. Rosenberg R. Landau D. Mowery (Eds) Technology and the Wealth of Nations Stanford University Press Stanford 57–71
Niosi, J., 2004, Success factors in Canadian academic spin-offs, Paper presented at conference on Academic Spin-offs, UQAM, February 27, 2004.
Oliver, A.L. and J.P. Liebeskind, 2003, Public Research and Intellectual Property Rights: A Tale of Two Inventions, Working Paper.
K.L. Pavitt (1991) ArticleTitle‘What Makes Basic Research Economically Useful?’ Research Policy 20 109–119 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0048-7333(91)90074-Z
A.K. Rai (1999) ArticleTitle‘Regulating Scientific Research: Intellectual Property Rights and the Norms of Science’ Northwestern University Law Review 94 77–152
N. Reimers (1998) Stanford’s Office of Technology Licensing and the Cohen/Boyer Cloning Patents Oral History Collection: University of California Berkeley
N. Rosenberg (1994) ‘Science—Technology—Economy Interactions’ O. Granstrand (Eds) Economics of Technology North Holland – Elsevier Amsterdam 355–374
B. Sampat R.R. Nelson (2002) ‘The Emergence and Standardization of University Technology Transfer Offices: A Case Study of Institutional Change’ P. Ingram B.S. Silverman (Eds) The New Institutionalism in Strategic Management, Special Issue of Advances in Strategic Management NumberInSeriesvol. 19 Elsevier Amsterdam
C.T. Taylor Z.A. Silberston (1973) The Economic Impact of the Patent System: A Study of the British Experience Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK
J.G. Thursby M.C. Thursby (2002) ArticleTitle‘Who is Selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growth in University Licensing’ Management Science 48 90–104 Occurrence Handle10.1287/mnsc.48.1.90.14271
Thursby, J.G. and M.C. Thursby, 2003, University Licensing under Bayh-Dole: What Are the Issues and Evidence? Working Paper (at http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/Thursby.pdf).
J.G. Thursby M.C. Thursby (2004) ArticleTitle‘Are Faculty Critical? Their Role in University–Industry Licensing,’ Contemporary Economic Policy 22 162–178 Occurrence Handle10.1093/cep/byh012
J.P. Walsh A. Arora W.M. Cohen (2003) ‘Research Tool Patenting and Licensing and Biomedical Innovation’ W.M. Cohen S. Merrill (Eds) Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy National Academies Press Washington, DC 285–340
L.G. Zucker M. Darby (1996) ArticleTitle‘Star Scientists and Institutional Transformation: Patterns of Invention and Innovation in the Formation of the Biotechnology Industry’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 IssueID23 12709–12716 Occurrence Handle10.1073/pnas.93.23.12709
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mazzoleni, R. The Effects of University Patenting and Licensing on Downstream R&D Investment and Social Welfare. J Technol Transfer 31, 431–441 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-0004-x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-0004-x