Abstract
In this paper, I propose a theoretical model to illustrate how the inventor know-how affects whether the inventor starts a firm to develop her idea or licenses an invention to an established firm for development. Inventor start-ups are characterized as development organizations that serve a temporary role in the invention–innovation process, developing an invention until they can sell the developed invention to an established firm that owns requisite complementary assets for commercialization. This model is then used to analyze the role and impact of a university technology transfer office (TTO) on this process to understand how TTO’s may both positively and negatively impact the transaction. The model posits a general theory of inventor–entrepreneur behavior in university and corporate research labs based on two factors: the importance of know-how and the distribution of inventors’ personal costs to transfer that know-how.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. Aghion J. Tirole (1994) ArticleTitle‘The Management of Innovation’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 109 IssueID4 1185–1209 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2118360
Agrawal, A., 2000, Why the Successful Commercialization of University Science is an Art- Not a Science: An Empirical Investigation of the Systemic Effects of Tacit Knowledge Transfer on University Licensing, Dissertation, University of British Columbia.
A. Arora (1995) ArticleTitle‘Licensing Tacit Knowledge: Intellectual Property Rights and the Market for Know-how’ Economics of New Technology and Innovation 4 41–59
W.M. Cohen D.A. Levinthal (1990) ArticleTitle‘Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation’ Administrative Science Quarterly 35 IssueID1 128–152 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2393553
N.T. Gallini B.D. Wright (1990) ArticleTitle‘Technology Transfer Under Asymmetric Information’ RAND Journal of Economics 21 IssueID1 147–160 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2555500
Jansen, C. and H.F. Dillon, 1999, ‘Where Do the Leads for Licenses Come From? Source Data from Six Institutions,’ The Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers XI.
R. Jensen M. Thursby (2001) ArticleTitle‘Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions’ American Economic Review 91 IssueID1 240–259 Occurrence Handle10.1257/aer.91.1.240
R.E. Kihlstrom J.J. Laffont (1979) ArticleTitle‘A General Equilibrium Entrepreneurial Theory of Firm Formation Based on Risk Aversion’ The Journal of Political Economy 87 IssueID4 719–748 Occurrence Handle10.1086/260790
P. Klemperer (1990) ArticleTitle‘How Broad Should the Scope of Patent Protection Be?’ RAND Journal of Economics 21 IssueID1 113–130 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2555498
S. Klepper (2001) ArticleTitle‘Employee Startups in High-technology Industries’ Industrial and Corporate Change 10 IssueID3 639–674 Occurrence Handle10.1093/icc/10.3.639
R.A. Lowe (2001) ‘The Role and Experience of Start-ups in Commercializing University Inventions,’ G. Libecap (Eds) Entrepreneurial Inputs and Outcomes JAI Press Amsterdam
M. Polanyi (1958) Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy University of Chicago Press Chicago
S. Shane (2001) ArticleTitle‘Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation’ Management Science 47 205–220 Occurrence Handle10.1287/mnsc.47.2.205.9837
L.G. Zucker M.R. Darby M.B. Brewer (1998) ArticleTitle‘Intellectual Human Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprise’ American Economic Review 88 IssueID1 290–306
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lowe, R.A. Who Develops a University Invention? The Impact of Tacit Knowledge and Licensing Policies. J Technol Transfer 31, 415–429 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-0003-y
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-0003-y