We present a solution of Exercise 1.2.1 in [1] which yields a short new proof of a key step in one of proofs of Brouwer’s fixed point theorem (1910). A few people asked the author about the details of the solution, and this note might be interesting to a broader audience. Our approach is absolutely different from the ones using algebraic or differential topology or differential calculus and is based on a simple observation which somehow escaped many authors treating this theorem in the past.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
N. V. Krylov, Lectures on Elliptic and Parabolic Equations in Sobolev Spaces, Am. Math. Soc., Providence, RI (2008).
N. Dunford and J.T. Schwartz, Linear Operators. I. General Theory, Interscience, New York etc. (1958).
W. Kulpa, “An integral theorem and its applications to coincidence theorems,” Acta Univ. Carol., Math. Phys. 30, No 2, 83–90 (1989).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Problemy Matematicheskogo Analiza 126, 2024, pp. 17-20.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Krylov, N.V. On a New Proof of the Key Step in the Proof of Brouwer’s Fixed Point Theorem. J Math Sci 279, 468–471 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-024-07025-z
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-024-07025-z