We study several models of dynamic conflict systems. Their behaviors are characterized by a certain quantity called an interaction vector. The interaction vector determines the dynamics of the entire system and its limit states. The existence of the equilibrium limit states of these systems is proved and the conditions for the existence of limit cycles are established. The nonlinear dynamics of the system is illustrated by specific computer examples.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
V. D. Koshmanenko and N. V. Kharchenko, “Invariant points of a dynamical system of conflict in the space of piecewise-uniformly distributed measures,” Ukr. Mat. Zh., 56, No. 7, 927–938 (2004); English translation: Ukr. Math. J., 56, No. 7, 1102–1116 (2004).
V. Koshmanenko, “Theorem of conflicts for a pair of probability measures,” Math. Methods Oper. Res., 59, No. 2, 303–313 (2004).
V. D. Koshmanenko, “Theorem on conflict for a pair of stochastic vectors,” Ukr. Mat. Zh., 55, No. 4, 555–560 (2003); English translation: Ukr. Math. J., 55, No. 4, 671–678 (2003).
V. D. Koshmanenko, Spectral Theory of Dynamical Conflict Systems [in Ukrainian], Naukova Dumka, Kyiv (2016).
V. D. Koshmanenko, “Existence theorems of the ω-limit states for conflict dynamical systems,” Meth. Funct. Anal. Topol., 20, No. 4, 379–390 (2014).
T. V. Karataeva, V. D. Koshmanenko, and S. M. Petrenko, “Explicitly solvable models of redistribution of the conflict space,” Nelin. Kolyv., 20, No. 1, 98–112 (2017); English translation: J. Math. Sci., 229, No. 4, 439–454 (2018).
V. Koshmanenko and N. Kharchenko, “Fixed points of complex system with attractive interaction,” Meth. Funct. Anal. Topol., 23, No. 2, 164–176 (2017).
O. R. Satur, “Limit states of multicomponent discrete dynamical systems,” Nelin. Kolyv., 23, No. 1, 77–89 (2020); English translation: J. Math. Sci., 256, No. 5, 648–662 (2021); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-021-05451-x.
V. D. Koshmanenko and O. R. Satur, “Sure event problem in multicomponent dynamical systems with attractive interaction,” Nelin. Kolyv., 22, No. 2, 220–234 (2019); English translation: J. Math. Sci., 249, No. 4, 629–646 (2020); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-020-04962-3.
T. V. Karataeva and V. D. Koshmanenko, “Society, mathematical model of a dynamical system of conflict,” Nelin. Kolyv., 22, No. 1, 66–85 (2019); English translation: J. Math. Sci., 247, No. 2, 291–313 (2020).
V. D. Koshmanenko and S. M. Petrenko, “Hahn–Jordan decomposition as an equilibrium state in the conflict system,” Ukr. Mat. Zh., 68, No. 1, 64–77 (2016); English translation: Ukr. Math. J., 68, No. 1, 67–82 (2016).
T. Karataieva, V. Koshmanenko, M. Krawczyk, and K. Kulakowski, “Mean field model of a game for power,” Phys. A, 525, 535–547 (2019).
P. Ashwin, C. Bick, and O. Burylko, “Identical phase oscillator networks: bifurcations, symmetry and reversibility for generalized coupling,” Front. Appl. Math. Stat., 2, No. 7, 17 p. (2016).
O. Burylko, Y. Kazanovich, and R. Borisyuk, “Bifurcation study of phase oscillator systems with attractive and repulsive interaction,” Phys. Rev. E, 90, No. 2, 022911-1-022911-18 (2014).
O. Burylko, Y. Kazanovich, and R. Borisyuk, “Winner-take-all in a phase oscillator system with adaptation,” Sci. Rep., 8, No. 416, 24 (2018).
S. Majhi, S. Nag Chowdhury, and D. Ghosh, “Perspective on attractive-repulsive interactions in dynamical networks: progress and future,” Europhys. Lett., 132, 20001 (2020); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/132/20001.
A. Sharma and B. Rakshit, “Dynamical robustness in presence of attractive-repulsive interactions,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 156, 111823 (2022); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111823.
G. Deffuant, D. Neau, F. Amblard, and G. Weisbuch, “Mixing beliefs among interacting agents,” Adv. Complex Syst., 3, 87–98 (2000).
R. Hegselmann and U. Krause, “Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis and simulations,” J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul., 5, No. 3 (2002).
H. Hu, “Competing opinion diffusion on social networks,” R. Soc. Open Sci., 4, 171160 (2017).
L. Li, A. Scaglione, A. Swami, and Q. Zhao, “Consensus, polarization and clustering of opinions in social networks,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas in Comm., 31, No. 6, 1072–1083 (2013).
L. Li, A. Scaglione, A. Swami, and Q. Zhao, “Trust, opinion diffusion and radicalization in social networks,” in: Proc. of Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, Pacific Grove, USA, November 6–9 (2011), pp. 691–695.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Neliniini Kolyvannya, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 72–88, January–March, 2022.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Satur, O.R. Dependence of the Behaviors of Trajectories of Dynamic Conflict Systems on the Interaction Vector. J Math Sci 274, 76–93 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-023-06572-1
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-023-06572-1