Skip to main content
Log in

Dependence of the Behaviors of Trajectories of Dynamic Conflict Systems on the Interaction Vector

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

We study several models of dynamic conflict systems. Their behaviors are characterized by a certain quantity called an interaction vector. The interaction vector determines the dynamics of the entire system and its limit states. The existence of the equilibrium limit states of these systems is proved and the conditions for the existence of limit cycles are established. The nonlinear dynamics of the system is illustrated by specific computer examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. D. Koshmanenko and N. V. Kharchenko, “Invariant points of a dynamical system of conflict in the space of piecewise-uniformly distributed measures,” Ukr. Mat. Zh., 56, No. 7, 927–938 (2004); English translation: Ukr. Math. J., 56, No. 7, 1102–1116 (2004).

  2. V. Koshmanenko, “Theorem of conflicts for a pair of probability measures,” Math. Methods Oper. Res., 59, No. 2, 303–313 (2004).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. V. D. Koshmanenko, “Theorem on conflict for a pair of stochastic vectors,” Ukr. Mat. Zh., 55, No. 4, 555–560 (2003); English translation: Ukr. Math. J., 55, No. 4, 671–678 (2003).

  4. V. D. Koshmanenko, Spectral Theory of Dynamical Conflict Systems [in Ukrainian], Naukova Dumka, Kyiv (2016).

  5. V. D. Koshmanenko, “Existence theorems of the ω-limit states for conflict dynamical systems,” Meth. Funct. Anal. Topol., 20, No. 4, 379–390 (2014).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. T. V. Karataeva, V. D. Koshmanenko, and S. M. Petrenko, “Explicitly solvable models of redistribution of the conflict space,” Nelin. Kolyv., 20, No. 1, 98–112 (2017); English translation: J. Math. Sci., 229, No. 4, 439–454 (2018).

  7. V. Koshmanenko and N. Kharchenko, “Fixed points of complex system with attractive interaction,” Meth. Funct. Anal. Topol., 23, No. 2, 164–176 (2017).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. O. R. Satur, “Limit states of multicomponent discrete dynamical systems,” Nelin. Kolyv., 23, No. 1, 77–89 (2020); English translation: J. Math. Sci., 256, No. 5, 648–662 (2021); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-021-05451-x.

  9. V. D. Koshmanenko and O. R. Satur, “Sure event problem in multicomponent dynamical systems with attractive interaction,” Nelin. Kolyv., 22, No. 2, 220–234 (2019); English translation: J. Math. Sci., 249, No. 4, 629–646 (2020); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-020-04962-3.

  10. T. V. Karataeva and V. D. Koshmanenko, “Society, mathematical model of a dynamical system of conflict,” Nelin. Kolyv., 22, No. 1, 66–85 (2019); English translation: J. Math. Sci., 247, No. 2, 291–313 (2020).

  11. V. D. Koshmanenko and S. M. Petrenko, “Hahn–Jordan decomposition as an equilibrium state in the conflict system,” Ukr. Mat. Zh., 68, No. 1, 64–77 (2016); English translation: Ukr. Math. J., 68, No. 1, 67–82 (2016).

  12. T. Karataieva, V. Koshmanenko, M. Krawczyk, and K. Kulakowski, “Mean field model of a game for power,” Phys. A, 525, 535–547 (2019).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. P. Ashwin, C. Bick, and O. Burylko, “Identical phase oscillator networks: bifurcations, symmetry and reversibility for generalized coupling,” Front. Appl. Math. Stat., 2, No. 7, 17 p. (2016).

  14. O. Burylko, Y. Kazanovich, and R. Borisyuk, “Bifurcation study of phase oscillator systems with attractive and repulsive interaction,” Phys. Rev. E, 90, No. 2, 022911-1-022911-18 (2014).

  15. O. Burylko, Y. Kazanovich, and R. Borisyuk, “Winner-take-all in a phase oscillator system with adaptation,” Sci. Rep., 8, No. 416, 24 (2018).

  16. S. Majhi, S. Nag Chowdhury, and D. Ghosh, “Perspective on attractive-repulsive interactions in dynamical networks: progress and future,” Europhys. Lett., 132, 20001 (2020); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/132/20001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Sharma and B. Rakshit, “Dynamical robustness in presence of attractive-repulsive interactions,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 156, 111823 (2022); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111823.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. G. Deffuant, D. Neau, F. Amblard, and G. Weisbuch, “Mixing beliefs among interacting agents,” Adv. Complex Syst., 3, 87–98 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. R. Hegselmann and U. Krause, “Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis and simulations,” J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul., 5, No. 3 (2002).

  20. H. Hu, “Competing opinion diffusion on social networks,” R. Soc. Open Sci., 4, 171160 (2017).

  21. L. Li, A. Scaglione, A. Swami, and Q. Zhao, “Consensus, polarization and clustering of opinions in social networks,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas in Comm., 31, No. 6, 1072–1083 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. L. Li, A. Scaglione, A. Swami, and Q. Zhao, “Trust, opinion diffusion and radicalization in social networks,” in: Proc. of Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, Pacific Grove, USA, November 6–9 (2011), pp. 691–695.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. R. Satur.

Additional information

Translated from Neliniini Kolyvannya, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 72–88, January–March, 2022.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Satur, O.R. Dependence of the Behaviors of Trajectories of Dynamic Conflict Systems on the Interaction Vector. J Math Sci 274, 76–93 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-023-06572-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-023-06572-1

Navigation