In order to provide a new, more computation-friendly, construction of the stable motivic category SH(k), V. Voevodsyky laid the foundation of delooping motivic spaces. G. Garkusha and I. Panin based on joint works with A. Ananievsky, A. Neshitov, and A. Druzhinin made that project a reality. In particular, G. Garkusha and I. Panin proved that for an infinite perfect field k and any k-smooth scheme X, the canonical morphism of motivic spaces \( {C}_{\ast } Fr(X)\to {\Omega}_{{\mathrm{\mathbb{P}}}^1}^{\infty }{\sum}_{{\mathrm{\mathbb{P}}}^1}^{\infty}\left({X}_{+}\right) \) is a Nisnevich locally group-completion.
In the present paper, a generalization of that theorem is established to the case of smooth open pairs (X,U), where X is a k-smooth scheme and U is its open subscheme intersecting each component of X in a nonempty subscheme. It is claimed that in this case the motivic space C*Fr((X,U)) is a Nisnevich locally connected, and the motivic space morphism \( {C}_{\ast } Fr\left(\left(X,U\right)\right)\to {\Omega}_{{\mathrm{\mathbb{P}}}^1}^{\infty }{\sum}_{{\mathrm{\mathbb{P}}}^1}^{\infty}\left(X/U\right) \) is Nisnevich locally weak equivalence. Moreover, it is proved that if the codimension of S = X−U in each component of X is greater than r ≥ 0, then the simplicial sheaf C*Fr((X,U)) is locally r-connected.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
I. A. Panin, “A moving lemma for motivic spaces,” St. Petersburg Math. J., 29, No. 6, 993–995 (2018).
G. Garkusha and I. Panin, “Framed motives of algebraic varieties (after V. Voevodsky),” arXiv:1409.4372 [math.KT] (2014).
G. Garkusha, A. Neshitov, and I. Panin, “Framed motives of relative motivic spheres,” arXiv:1604.02732 [math.KT] (2016).
A. Ananyevskiy, G. Garkusha, and I. Panin, “Cancellation theorem for framed motives of algebraic varieties,” arXiv:1601.06642 [math.KT] (2016).
A. Druzhinin and I. Panin, “Surjectivity of the étale excision map for homotopy invariant framed presheaves,” arXiv:1808.07765 [math.KT] (2018).
J. F. Jardine, “Simplicial presheaves,” J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 47, 35–87 (1987).
S. Schwede, “An untitled book project about symmetric spectra,” available at www.math.uni-bonn.de/people/schwede/SymSpec-v3.pdf (version April, 2012).
G. Garkusha and I. Panin, “Homotopy invariant presheaves with framed transfers,” Cambridge J. Math., 8, No. 1, 1–94 (2020).
A. Suslin and V. Voevodsky, “Bloch-Kato Conjecture and Motivic Cohomology with Finite Coefficients,” in: The Arithmetic and Geometry of Algebraic Cycles, Springer, Dordrecht (2000), pp. 117–189.
G. Segal, “Categories and cohomology theories,” Topology, 13, 293–312 (1974).
F. Morel and V. Voevodsky, “𝔸1-homotopy theory of schemes,” Publ. Math. IHES, 90, 45–143 (1999).
J. Milne, Étale Cohomology, Princeton University Press (1980).
C. Mazza, V. Voevodsky, and C. Weibel, Lectures on Motivic Cohomology, Clay Mathematics Monographs, 2 (2006).
V. Voevodsky, “Notes on framed correspondences,” unpublished (2001).
V. Voevodsky, “A1-homotopy theory,” in: Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Vol. I (1998), pp. 579–604.
A. A. Mingazov, “Some remarks on relative framed motives,” arXiv:1911.04860 (2019).
D. Eisenbud, Commutative Algebra with a View to Algebraic Geometry, Springer-Verlag, New York (1995).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI, Vol. 484, 2019, pp. 165–184.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tsybyshev, A. A Motivic Segal Theorem for Pairs (Announcement). J Math Sci 252, 860–872 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-021-05206-8
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-021-05206-8