Skip to main content
Log in

Mean-Square Risk of the Threshold Processing in the Problem of Inverting the Radon Transform with a Random Sample Size

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Methods for reconstructing tomographic images based on the inversion of the Radon transform are used in problems arising in medicine, biology, astronomy, and many other fields. In the presence of noise in the projection data, as a rule, it is necessary to apply regularization methods. Recently, methods of the threshold processing of wavelet expansion coefficients have become popular. The analysis of errors of these methods is an important practical task, since it makes it possible to assess the quality of both the methods themselves and the equipment used. When using threshold processing, it is usually assumed that the number of expansion coefficients is fixed, and the noise distribution is Gaussian. This model is well studied in the literature, and the optimal values of the threshold processing parameters are calculated for different classes of functions. However, in some situations, the amount of data is not known in advance and has to be modeled with a certain random variable. In this paper, we consider a model with a random amount of data containing Gaussian noise, and estimate the order of the mean-square risk with an increasing number of decomposition coefficients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Donoho, “Nonlinear solution of linear inverse problems by wavelet-vaguelette decomposition,” Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., 2, 101–126 (1995).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Jansen, Noise Reduction by Wavelet Thresholding, Springer Verlag (2001).

  3. N. Lee, Wavelet-vaguelette decompositions and homogenous equations, Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette (1997).

  4. F. Abramovich and B. W. Silverman, “Wavelet decomposition approaches to statistical inverse problems,” Biometrika, 85, No. 1, 115–129 (1998).

  5. A.V. Markin and O. V. Shestakov, “Asymptotics of the risk estimate for the threshold processing of wavelet-vaguelette coefficients in a tomography problem,” Inform. Appl., 4, No. 2, 36–45 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  6. O. V. Shestakov, “Mean-square thresholding risk with a random sample size,” Inform. Appl., 12, No. 3, 14–17 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  7. O. V. Shestakov, “Averaged probability of the error in calculating wavelet coefficients for the random sample size,” J. Math. Sci., 237, No. 6, 826–830 (2019).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Mallat, A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing, Academic Press, New York (1999).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. A. A. Eroshenko and O. V Shestakov, “Asymptotic properties of risk estimate in the problem of reconstructing images with correlated noise by inverting the Radon transform,” Inform. Appl., 8, No. 4, 32–40 (2014).

  10. D. Donoho, I. M. Johnstone, G. Kerkyacharian, and D. Picard, “Wavelet shrinkage: Asymptopia?” J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 57, No. 2, 301–369 (1995).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. T. Cai and L. Brown, “Wavelet estimation for samples with random uniform design,” Stat. Prob. Lett., 42, 313–321 (1999).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. V. Shestakov.

Additional information

Proceedings of the XXXV International Seminar on Stability Problems for Stochastic Models, Perm, Russia, September 24–28, 2018. Part II.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shestakov, O.V. Mean-Square Risk of the Threshold Processing in the Problem of Inverting the Radon Transform with a Random Sample Size. J Math Sci 248, 46–50 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-020-04854-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-020-04854-6

Navigation