Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-Period Markowitz Model and Optimal Self-Financing Strategy with Commission

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The optimal strategy selection problem for multi-period self-financing portfolio transaction with discrete time and fixed commission is solved for the so-called Markowitz model (only long positions are allowed for this model). It is assumed that the portfolio restructuring at any time moment does not occupy and does not release the funds. In particular, all the money released from the sale of some assets at a time moment t is invested in the acquisition of other assets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Akian, J. Menaldi, and A. Sulem, “On an investment-consumption model with transaction costs,” J. Control Optim., 34, No. 1, 329–364 (1996).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. M. S. Al-Nator, S.V. Al-Nator, and Yu.F. Kasimov, “Portfolio analysis with transaction costs under uncertainty,” J. Math. Sci., 214, 12–21 (2016).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. M. S. Al-Nator, “Portfolio analysis with general commission,” J. Math. Sci., 234, 793–801 (2018).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. M. S. Al-Nator, “On the choice of an optimal portfolio with commission for the Markowitz model,” in: Materials of Conference on Information and Telecommunication Technologies and Mathematical Simulation of Hi-Tech Systems, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Russia, Moscow (2016), pp. 214–216.

  5. M. S.Al-Nator and S.V.Al-Nator, “Analysis of two-dimensional portfolios with commission under uncertainty,” in: Materials of Conference on Information and Telecommunication Technologies and Mathematical Simulation of Hi-Tech Systems, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Russia, Moscow (2016), pp. 217–219.

  6. M. S. Al-Nator, Yu. F. Kasimov, and A. N. Kolesnikov, Fundamentals of Financial Calculations, Part 2, Izdatelstvo Finansovogo Universiteta, Moscow (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. S. Al-Nator, Yu. F. Kasimov, and A. N. Kolesnikov, Fundamentals of Financial Calculations, Part 3, Izdatelstvo Finansovogo Universiteta, Moscow (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  8. N.Amenc and V. Le Sourd, Portfolio Theory and Performance Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. Atkinson and E. Storey, “Building an optimal portfolio in discrete time in the presence of transaction cost,” Appl. Math. Fin., 17, No. 4, 323–357 (2010).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Atkinson, G. Quek, “Dynamic portfolio optimization in discrete-time with transaction costs,” Appl. Math. Fin., 197, No. 3, 265–298 (2012).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. C. R. Bacon, Practical Portfolio Performance Measurement and Attribution, John Wiley & Sons (2008).

  12. D. Bertsimas and D. Pachamanova, “Robust multiperiod portfolio management in the presence of transaction costs,” Comput. Op. Res., 35, No. 1, 3–17 (2008).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Best and J. Hlouskova, “Quadratic programming with transaction costs,” Comput. Op. Res., 35, No. 1, 18–33 (2008).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Chellathurai and T. Draviam, “Dynamic portfolio selection with fixed and/or proportional transaction costs using non-singular stochastic optimal control theory,” J. Econ. Dyn. Control, 31, No. 7, 2168–2195 (2007).

  15. G. Constantinides, “Optimal portfolio revision with proportional transaction costs: Extension to HARA utility function and exogenous deterministic income,” Manag. Sci., 22, No. 8, 921–923 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Davis and A. Norman, “Portfolio selection with transaction costs,” Math. Op. Res., 15, No. 4, 676–713 (1990).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. N. Framstad, B. Oksendal, and A. Sulem, “Optimal consumption and portfolio in a jump diffusion market with proportional transaction costs,” J. Math. Econ., 35, No. 2, 233–257. (2001)

  18. G. Gennotte and A. Jung, “Investment strategies under transaction costs: The finite horizon case,” Manag. Sci., 40, No. 3, 385–404 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. B. Jang, “Optimal portfolio selection with transaction costs when an illiquid asset pays cash dividends,” J. Kor. Math. Soc. ,40, No. 1, 139–150 (2007).

  20. J. Kamin, “Optimal portfolio revision with a proportional transaction cost,” Manag. Sci., 21, No. 11, 1263–1271 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. U. Çlikyurt and S. Ökici, “Multiperiod portfolio optimization models in stochastic markets using the mean-variance approach,” Europ. J. Oper. Res., 179, No. 7, 186–202 (2007).

  22. M. S. Lobo, M. Fazel, S. Boyd, “Portfolio optimization with linear and fixed transaction costs,” Ann. Oper. Res., 152, No. 1, 341–365 (2007).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. D. G. Luenberger, Investment Science, Oxford University Press, New York (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  24. H. M. Markowitz, Portfolio Selection, J. Wiley & Sons, New York (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Merton, “Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: The continuous-time case,” Rev. Econ. Stat., 51, No. 3, 247–257 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. K. Muthuraman, “A computational scheme for optimal investment-consumption with proportional transaction costs,” J. Econ. Dyn., 31, No. 4, 1132–1159 (2007).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. P. Phelim and F.C.I.A. Boyle, “Optimal portfolio selection with transaction costs,” N. Am. Actuar. J., 1, No. 2, 27–39 (1972).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. J.-L. Prigent, Portfolio Optimization and Performance Analysis, Chapman & Hall/CRC (2007).

  29. W. Sharpe, G. J. Alexander, and J. W. Bailey, Investments, Prentice Hall (1998).

  30. Z. Wang and S. Liu, “Multi-period mean-variance portfolio selection with fixed and proportional transaction cost,” J. Ind. Manag. Opt., 9, No. 3, 643–657 (2013).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. M.Woodside-Oriakhi, C. Lucas, and J. E. Beasley, “Portfolio rebalancing with an investment horizon and transaction costs,” Omega, 41, No. 2, 406–39 (2013).

  32. H. Yao, “A simple method for solving multiperiod mean-variance asset-liability management problem,” Procedia Eng., 23, 387–391 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. L. Yi, Z. L,i and D. Li, “Multi-period portfolio selection for asset-liability management with uncertain investment horizon,” J. Ind. Manag. Opt., 4, No. 3, 535–552 (2008).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to M. S. Al-Nator, S.V. Al-Nator or Y. F. Kasimov.

Additional information

Proceedings of the XXXV International Seminar on Stability Problems for Stochastic Models, Perm, Russia, September 24–28, 2018. Part II.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Nator, M.S., Al-Nator, S. & Kasimov, Y.F. Multi-Period Markowitz Model and Optimal Self-Financing Strategy with Commission. J Math Sci 248, 33–45 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-020-04853-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-020-04853-7

Navigation