Skip to main content
Log in

Klein Sail and Diophantine Approximation of a Vector

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

In the papers by V. I. Arnold and his successors based upon the ideas of H. Poincaré and F. Klein, it was the Klein sail associated with an operator in ℝn that they considered to play the role of a multidimensional continued fraction, and in these terms generalizations of Lagrange’s theorem on continued fractions were formulated. A different approach to generalization of the notion of continued fraction was based upon modifications of Euclid’s algorithm for constructing, given an irrational vector, an approximating sequence of rational vectors.

We suggest a modification of the Klein sail that is constructed directly from a vector, without any operator. We introduce a numeric characteristic of a Klein sail, its asymptotic anisotropy associated with a one-parameter transformation semigroup of the lattice generating the sail and of its Voronoi cell. In terms of this anisotropy, we hope to give a geometric characterization of irrational vectors worst approximated by rational ones. In the three-dimensional space, we suggest a vector (related to the smallest Pisot–Vijayaraghavan number) that is a candidate for this role. This vector may be called an analog of the golden number, which is the real number worst approximated by rationals in the classical theory of Diophantine approximations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Ya. Khinchin, Continued Fractions, University of Chicago Press (1964).

  2. V. I. Arnold, Continued Fractions [in Russian], MCCME, Moscow (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. I. Korkina, “Two-dimensional continued fractions. The simplest examples,” Proc. Steklov Inst. Math., 209, 124–144 (1995).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. M. L. Kontsevich and Yu. M. Suhov, “Statistics of Klein polyhedra and multidimensional continued fractions,” in: Pseudoperiodic Topology, Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. Ser. 2, 197, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, Rhode Island (1999), pp. 9–27.

  5. G. Lachaud, “Voiles et polyèdres de Klein,” Prétirage n°95–22, Laboratoire de Mathématiques Discretes du C.N.R.S (1995).

  6. G. Lachaud, “Sails and Klein polyhedra,” in: Number theory (Tiruchirapalli, 1996), Contemp. Math., 210, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, Rhode Island (1998), pp. 373–385.

  7. O. N. Karpenkov, “On tori triangulations associated with two-dimensional continued fractions of cubic irrationalities,” Funct. Anal. Appl., 38, No. 2, 102–110 (2004).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. O. N. German, “Sails and norm minima of lattices,” Sb. Math., 196, No. 3, 337–365 (2005).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. A. J. Brentjes, Multidimensional Continued Fraction Algorithms, Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam (1981).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. A. D. Bryuno and V. I. Parusnikov, “Comparison of various generalizations of continued fractions,” Math. Notes, 61, 278–286 (1997).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. S. M. Bliudze, “Optimal continued fractions,” Master thesis, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg (1998); St. Petersburg Math. Soc. Preprint, 2020-01 (2020).

  12. T. van Ravenstein, “Optimal spacing of points on a circle,” Fibonacci Quart., 27, No. 1, 18–24 (1989).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. L. S. Levitov, “Phyllotaxis of flux lattices in layered superconductors,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 66, No. 2, 224–227 (1991).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. H. W. Lee and L. S. Levitov, “Universality in phyllotaxis: a mechanical theory,” in: Symmetry in Plants, World Scientific, Singapore (1998), pp. 619–653.

  15. A. A. Lodkin, “Mathematical modelling of phyllotaxis,” in: V-th All-Union School on Theoretical Morphology of Plants [in Russian], Lvov (1987), pp. 59–65.

  16. P. Atela, C. Golé, and S. Hotton, “A dynamical system for plant pattern formation: a rigorous analysis,” J. Nonlinear Sci., 12, No. 6, 1–39 (2002).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. A. A. Lodkin, “Klein sail and Dyophantine approximation of a vector,” St. Petersburg Math. Soc. Preprint, 2018-07 (2018).

  18. F. Bergeron and C. Reutenauer, “Golden ratio and phyllotaxis, a clear mathematical link,” J. Math. Biology, 78, No. 1–2, 1–19 (2019).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. A. A. Lodkin, “Multidimensional generalization of phyllotaxis,” Cybern. Phys., 8, No. 3, 153–160 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Lodkin.

Additional information

Translated from Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI, Vol. 481, 2019, pp. 63–73.

Supported by the RFBR grant No. 17-01-00433.

Translated by A. A. Lodkin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lodkin, A.A. Klein Sail and Diophantine Approximation of a Vector. J Math Sci 247, 680–687 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-020-04830-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-020-04830-0

Navigation