Skip to main content
Log in

Physical Interpretation of Strict Solutions of Diffraction Problems by Heuristic Relations

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a new approach to construct heuristic relations describing solutions of diffraction problems. Those relations are based on physical principles and allow one to interpret mathematically strict solutions. Since the heuristic relations possess high performance and accuracy, they can also be used along with any strict approach or experimental results for a significant improvement of efficiency of solutions of practical problems related to applications of the diffraction theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V.M. Babich and V. S. Buldyrev, Asymptotics Methods in Problems of Diffraction of Short Waves [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1972).

  2. S. E. Bankov and I.V. Levchenko, “Equivalent boundary-value conditions for a band high-frequency array on the boundary separating two media,” Radiotech. Electron., 33, No. 10, 2045 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. A. Biryukov, M.V. Muratov, I.B. Petrov, A. V. Sannikov, and A.V. Favorskaya, “Application of the net-characteristic method to unstructured tetrahedral nets for solution of direct problems in seismography of fissured strata,” Comput. Math. Math. Phys., 55, No. 10, 1762–1772 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. V. A. Borovikov, Diffraction on Polygons and Polyhedrons [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1966).

  5. V. A. Fok, Problems of Diffraction and Propagation of Magnetic Waves [in Russian], Sov. Radio, Moscow (1970).

  6. Ph. Frank and R. Mises, Differential and Integral Equations of Mathematical Physics [Russian translation], ONTI, Moscow–Leningrad (1937).

  7. W. B. Gordon, “Far field approximations to the Kirchhoff–Helmholtz representations of scattered fields,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., AP-23, 590–592 (1975).

  8. G. A. Grinberg, Selected Topics of Mathematical Theory of Electric and Magnetic Phenomena [in Russian], AN SSSR, Moscow (1948).

  9. G. L. James, Geometrical Theory of Diffraction for Electromagnetic Waves, Peter Peregrinus Ltd, London (1976).

  10. J. B. Keller, “Geometrical theory of diffraction,” J. Opt. Soc. Am., 52, No. 2, 116–130 (1962).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Kh. Khenl, A. Maue, and K. Vestpfal’, Diffraction Theory [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1964).

  12. Yu. A. Kravtsov and N. Ya. Zhu, Theory of Diffraction: Heuristic Approaches, Alpha Science Int. Ltd, Oxford (2010).

  13. V. B. Levyant, I. B. Petrov, and M. V. Muratov, “Numeric simulation of wave responses from a system (cluster) of subvertical macrofissures,” Technol. Seismogr., 1, 5–21 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. A. Lyalinov and N.Ya. Zhu, Scattering of Waves by Wedges and Cones with Impedance Boundary Conditions, SciTech Publishing Inc, Raileigh (2012).

  15. G.T. Markov and A. F. Chaplin, Launching of Electromagnetic Waves [in Russian], Energiya, Moscow–Leningrad (1967).

  16. E. I. Nefedov, Diffraction of Electromagnetic Waves on Dielectric Structures [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1979).

  17. B. Nobl, The Wiener–Hopf Method for Solution of Partial Differential Equations [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1982).

  18. G. Pelosi, Ya. Rahmat-Samii, and J. L. Volakis, “High-frequency techniques in diffraction theory: 50 years of achievements in GTD, PTD, and related approaches,” IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., 55, No. 3, 16 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Sommerfeld, “Zur analytischen Theorie der W¨armeleitung,” Math. Ann., 45, 263–277 (1894).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Sommerfeld, “Mathematische Theorie der Diffraction,” Math. Ann., 47, 317–374 (1896).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Taylor, Pseudodifferential Operators [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1985).

  22. P.Ya. Ufimtsev, Method of Edge Waves in Physical Theory of Diffraction [in Russian], Sov. Radio, Moscow (1962).

  23. P.Ya. Ufimtsev, Essentials of Physical Theory of Diffraction [in Russian], BINOM. Laboratoriya znaniy, Moscow (2009).

  24. P.Ya. Ufimtsev, Theory of diffractional edge waves in electrodynamics. Introduction to physical theory of diffraction [in Russian], BINOM. Laboratoriya znaniy, Moscow (2012).

  25. L. A. Vaynshteyn, Electromagnetic Waves [in Russian], Radio i svyaz’, Moscow (1988).

  26. M. V. Vesnik, “Using two-dimensional solutions in three-dimensional problems,” Radiotech. Electron., 38, No. 8, 1416–1423 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  27. M.V. Vesnik, “Elimination of infinities in diffraction coefficients of physical optics current’s components for a shadow contour of a scatterer,” Proc. of the International Symposium on Electromagnetic Theory, St. Petersburg, 407–409 (1995).

  28. M.V. Vesnik, “Analytic solution of the boundary-value problem for the Helmholtz equation,” Radiotech. Electron., 45, No. 1, 66–76 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. V. Vesnik, “The analytical solution for the electromagnetic diffraction on 2-D perfectly conducting scatterers of arbitrary shape,” IEEE Trans. Antennas and Propagation, AP-49, No. 12, 1638–1644 (2001).

  30. M.V. Vesnik, “Analytic solution of boundary-value problems in the diffraction theory by the method of generalized eikonal,” Radiotech. Electron., 48, No. 9, 1078–1084 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  31. M.V. Vesnik, “Analytic solution of boundary-value problems for the wave equation with variable wave number by the method of generalized eikonal,” Nonlinear World, 1, No. 1-2, 59–63 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  32. M.V. Vesnik, “Computing diffraction coefficients for two-dimensional semi-infinite perfectly conductive scatterer by means of the generalized eikonal method,” Electromag. Waves Electron. Syst., 9, No. 11, 23–29 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  33. M. V. Vesnik, “Method of generalized eikonal as a new approach to diffraction process description,” Abstr. of the International Seminar “Days on Diffraction,” St. Petersburg, 79-80 (2006).

  34. M. V. Vesnik, “Analytic solution of the diffraction problem for an electromagnetic wave on twodimensional perfectly conductive half-plate by the method of generalized eikonal,” Radiotech. Electron., 53, No. 2, 144–156 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  35. M. V. Vesnik, “On construction of the refined heuristic solution in the diffraction problem for a flat angular sector,” Radiotech. Electron., 56, No. 5, 573–586 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  36. M. V. Vesnik, “Analytic solution of two-dimensional diffraction problem for an electromagnetic wave on a truncated wedge,” Radiotech. Electron., 57, No. 10, 1053–1065 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  37. M. V. Vesnik, “Analytical heuristic solution for the problem of elastic wave diffraction by a polygonal flat 3D scatterer,” Abstr. of the International Conference “Days on Diffraction,” St. Petersburg, 89 (2013).

  38. M. V. Vesnik, “Efficiency of different heuristic approaches to calculation of electromagnetic diffraction by polyhedrons and other scatterers,” Radio Science, 49, No. 10, 945–953 (2014).

  39. M. V. Vesnik, “Construction of heuristic diffraction coefficients in analytic solutions of scattering problems for wave fields of various physical nature on flat polygonal plates with compound boundary-value conditions,” Radiotech. Electron., 59, No. 6, 543–551 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  40. M. V. Vesnik, “Refinement of physical optics approximations in the diffraction problems on threedimensional objects,” Proc. of the Second All-Russian Microwave Conference, Moscow, 443–448 (2014).

  41. M. V. Vesnik, The method of the Generalized Eikonal. New Approaches in the Diffraction Theory, Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin–Boston (2015).

  42. M. V. Vesnik, “Deterministic theory of radio-waves propagation in urban environment,” Proc. of the International Scientific Conference “Radiation and Scattering of Electromagnetic Waves,” Rostov-on-Don, 378–382 (2015).

  43. M. V. Vesnik, “Heuristic expression for the diffraction coefficient of a semitransparent half-plane,” Proc. of the Third All-Russian Microwave Conference, Moscow, 281–285 (2015).

  44. M. Vesnik and Yu. A. Kravtsov, “Diffraction by bodies with wedges: method of generalized eikonal (MGE),” Theory of Diffraction: Heuristic Approaches, Alpha Science Int. Ltd., Oxford, 243–246 (2010).

  45. M. V. Vesnik and P.Y. Ufimtsev, “An asymptotic feature of corner waves scattered by polygonal plates,” Electromagnetics, 12, No. 3-4, 265–272 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. N. N. Voytovich, B. Z. Katsenelenbaum, E.N. Korshunova, L. I. Pangonis, M. L. Pereyaslavets, A.N. Sivov, and A.D. Shatrov, Electrodynamics of Antennas with Semitransparent Surfaces: Methods of Constructive Synthesis [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1989).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. V. Vesnik.

Additional information

Translated from Sovremennaya Matematika. Fundamental’nye Napravleniya (Contemporary Mathematics. Fundamental Directions), Vol. 62, Differential and Functional Differential Equations, 2016.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vesnik, M.V. Physical Interpretation of Strict Solutions of Diffraction Problems by Heuristic Relations. J Math Sci 239, 751–770 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-019-04324-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-019-04324-8

Navigation