The classical results by Kräuter and Seifter concerning the divisibility of permanents for (±1)-matrices by large powers of 2 are useful in testing whether the permanent function is nonvanishing. This paper suggests a new approach to this problem, allowing one to obtain a short combinatorial proof of the results by Kräuter and Seifter.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. A. Brualdi and H. J. Ryser, Combinatorial Matrix Theory, Cambridge Univ. Press (1991).
D. K. Faddeev and I. S. Sominskiĭ, Problems in Higher Algebra [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1968).
A. R. Kräuter, “Recent results on permanents of (1, −1)-matrices,” Ber. Math.-Statist. Sekt. Forschungsgesellschaft Joanneum Graz, 249, 1–25 (1985).
A. R. Kräuter and N. Seifter, “On some questions concerning permanents of (1, −1)-matrices,” Isr. J. Math., 45, No. 1, 53–62 (1983).
M. Marcus and M. Newman, “Inequalities for the permanent function,’ Ann. Math., 75, No. 1, 47–62 (1962).
H. Perfect, “Positive diagonals of ±1-matrices,” Monatsh. Math., 77, 225–240 (1973).
S. Reich, “Another solution of an old problem of Pólya,” Amer. Math. Monthly, 78, 649–650 (1971).
R. Simion and F. W. Schmidt, “On (+1, −1)-matrices with vanishing permanent,” Discrete Math., 46, 107–108 (1983).
E. T. H. Wang, “On permanents of (1, −1)-matrices,” Isr. J. Math., 18, 353–361 (1974).
I. M. Wanless, “Permanents of matrices of signed ones,” Linear Multilinear Algebra, 53, No. 6, 427–433 (2005).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI, Vol. 439, 2015, pp. 26–37.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Budrevich, M.V., Guterman, A.E. & Taranin, K.A. On the Divisibility of Permanents for (±1)-Matrices. J Math Sci 216, 738–745 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-016-2937-4
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-016-2937-4