The mathematics of matrix models for age- and/or stage-structured population dynamics substantiates the use of the dominant eigenvalue λ 1 of the projection matrix L as a measure of the growth potential, or of adaptation, for a given species population in modern plant or animal demography. The calibration of L = T +F on the “identified-individuals-of-unknown-parents” kind of empirical data determines precisely the transition matrix T, but admits arbitrariness in the estimation of the fertility matrix F. We propose an adaptation principle that reduces calibration to the maximization of λ 1(L) under the fixed T and constraints on F ensuing from the data and expert knowledge. A theorem has been proved on the existence and uniqueness of the maximizing solution for projection matrices of a general pattern. A conjugated maximization problem for a “potential-growth indicator” under the same constraints has appeared to be a linear-programming problem with a ready solution, the solution testing whether the data and knowledge are compatible with the population growth observed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
R. H. Akcakaya, M. A. Burgman, and L. R. Ginzburg, Applied Population Ecology: Principles and Computer Exercises Using RAMAS EcoLab 2.0, Sinauer, Sunderland (1999).
H. Bernardelli, “Population waves,” J. Burma Res. Soc., 31, 1–18 (1941).
K. K. Brewster-Geisz and T. J. Miller, “Management of the sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus: implications of a stage-based model,” Fish. Bull., 98, 236–249 (2000).
T. de Camino-Beck and M. A. Lewis, “On net reproductive rate and the timing of reproductive output,” Am. Naturalist, 172, No. 1, 128–139 (2008).
H. Caswell, Matrix Population Models: Construction, Analysis, and Interpretation, Sinauer, Sunderland (1989).
H. Caswell, Matrix Population Models: Construction, Analysis, and Interpretation, Sinauer, Sunderland (2001).
A. I. Csetenyi and D. O. Logofet “Leslie model revisited: some generalizations for block structures,” Ecol. Model., 48, 277–290 (1989).
P. Cull and A. Vogt, “The periodic limits for the Leslie model,” Math. Biosci., 21, 39–54 (1974).
J. M. Cushing and Z. Yicang, “The net reproductive value and stability in matrix population models,” Nat. Resour. Model., 8, 297–333 (1994).
G. M. Fikhtengol’ts, A Course in Differential and Integral Calculus [in Russian], Vol. 1, Nauka, Moscow (1970).
F. R. Gantmakher, Theory of Matrices [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1967).
J. M. Geramita and N. J. Pullman, An Introduction to the Application of Nonnegative Matrices to Biological Systems, Queen’s Papers Pure Appl. Math., No. 68. Queen’s Univ., Kingston, Ontario, Canada (1984).
L. A. Goodman, “The analysis of population growth when the birth and death rates depend upon several factors,” Biometrics, 25, 659–681 (1969).
P. E. Hansen, “Leslie matrix models: A mathematical survey,” in: A. I. Csetenyi, ed., Papers on Mathematical Ecology, I, Karl Marx Univ. of Economics, Budapest (1986), pp. 54–106.
F. Harary, R. Z. Norman, and D. Cartwright, Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs, Wiley, New York (1965).
R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson, Matrix Analysis, Cambridge Univ. Press, London (1990).
J. Impagliazzo, Deterministic Aspects of Mathematical Demography: An Investigation of Stable Population Theory Including an Analysis of the Population Statistics of Denmark, Biomathematics, Vol. 13, Springer, Berlin (1985).
I. N. Klochkova, “Expansion of the reproductive potential theorem for Logofet matrices,” Vestn. Mosk. Univ. Ser. 1 Mat. Mekh., No. 3, 45–48 (2004).
G. Korn and T. Korn, Mathematical Handbook for Scientists and Engineers [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1973).
L. P. Lefkovitch, “The study of population growth in organisms grouped by stages,” Biometrics, 21, 1–18 (1965).
P. H. Leslie, “On the use of matrices in certain population mathematics,” Biometrika, 33, 183–212 (1945).
E. G. Lewis, “On the generation and growth of a population,” Sankhya: Indian J. Stat., 6, 93–96 (1942).
C.-K. Li and H. Schneider, “Application of Perron–Frobenius theory to population dynamics,” J. Math. Biol., 44, 450–462 (2002).
D. O. Logofet, “The theory of matrix models for population dynamics with age and additional structures,” Zh. Obshch. Biol., 52, No. 6, 793–804 (1991).
D. O. Logofet, Matrices and Graphs: Stability Problems in Mathematical Ecology, CRC Press, Boca Raton (1993).
D. O. Logofet, “Paths and cycles as tools for characterizing some classes of matrices,” Dokl. Math., 60, No. 1, 46–49 (1999).
D. O. Logofet, “Three sources and three constituents of the formalism for a population with discrete age and stage structures,” Mat. Model., 14, 11–22 (2002).
D. O. Logofet, “Convexity in projection matrices: projection to a calibration problem,” Ecol. Model., 216, 217–228 (2008).
D. O. Logofet, “Svirezhev’s substitution principle and matrix models for the dynamics of populations with complex structures,” Zh. Obshch. Biol., 71, No. 1, 30–40 (2010), http://elementy.ru/genbio/synopsis?artid=292.
D. O. Logofet and I. N. Belova, “Nonnegative matrices as a tool to model population dynamics: classical models and contemporary expansions,” J. Math. Sci., 155, No. 6, 894–907 (2008).
D. O. Logofet and I. N. Klochkova, “Mathematics of the Lefkovitch model: the reproductive potential and asymptotic cycles,” Mat. Model., 14, 116–126 (2002).
D. O. Logofet, N. G. Ulanova, I. N. Klochkova, and A. N. Demidova, “Structure and dynamics of a clonal plant population: Classical model results in a non-classic formulation,” Ecol. Model., 192, 95–106 (2006).
J. S. Maybee, D. D. Olesky, P. van den Driessche, and G. Wiener, “Matrices, digraphs, and determinants,” SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 10, 500–519 (1989).
V. Romanovsky, Un théorème sur les zeros des matrices non négatives, Bull. Soc. Math. Fr., 61, 213–219 (1933).
R. Salguero-Gómez and B. B. Casper, “Keeping plant shrinkage in the demographic loop,” J. Ecol., 98, No. 2, 312–323 (2010).
R. Salguero-Gómez and H. de Kroon, “Matrix projection models meet variation in the real world,” J. Ecol., 98, 250–254 (2010).
E. Seneta, Non-Negative Matrices and Markov Chains, Springer, New York (1981).
Yu. M. Svirezhev and D. O. Logofet, Stability of Biological Communities, Mir, Moscow (1983).
N. G. Ulanova, “Plant age stages during succession in woodland clearing in central Russia,” in: Vegetation Science in Retrospect and Perspective, Opulus, Uppsala (2000), pp. 80–83.
N. G. Ulanova, I. N. Belova, and D. O. Logofet, “On the competition among discrete-structured populations: a matrix model for population dynamics of woodreed and birch growing together,” Zh. Obshch. Biol., 69, No. 6, 478–494 (2008).
N. G. Ulanova and A. N. Demidova, “The population biology of woodreed (Calamagrostis canescens (Web.) Roth) in spruce clearings of the southern taiga,” Byull. Mosk. Obshch. Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Biol., 106, No. 5, 51–58 (2001).
N. G. Ulanova, A. N. Demidova, D. O. Logofet, and I. N. Klochkova, “Structure and dynamics of the woodreed Calamagrostis canescens coenopopulation: a model approach,” Zh. Obshch. Biol., 63, No. 6, 509–521 (2002).
V. V. Voyevodin and Yu. A. Kuznetsov, Matrices and Calculations [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1984).
Translated from Fundamentalnaya i Prikladnaya Matematika, Vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 41–63, 2011/12.
About this article
Cite this article
Logofet, D.O. Projection matrices revisited: a potential-growth indicator and the merit of indication. J Math Sci 193, 671–686 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-013-1494-3
- Matrix Model
- Vertex Versus
- Projection Matrice
- Nonnegative Matrice
- Sandbar Shark