Skip to main content
Log in

On the modularity of rigid Calabi−Yau threefolds: epilogue

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

In a recent paper by F. Gouvea and N. Yui, a detailed account is given of a patching argument due to Serre that proves that the modularity of all rigid Calabi–Yau threefolds defined over \( \mathbb{Q} \) follows from Serre’s modularity conjecture (now a theorem). In this note, we give an alternative proof of this implication. The main difference with Serre’s argument is that instead of using as a main input residual modularity in infinitely many characteristics, we just require residual modularity in a suitable characteristic. This is combined with the effective Chebotarev theorem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. Diamond, M. Flah, and L. Guo, “The Tamagawa number conjeture of adjoint motives of modular forms,” Ann. Si. École Norm. Sup., 37, 663–727 (2004).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. L. V. Dieulefait, “Remarks on Serre’s modularity conjeture,” preprint (2006).

  3. L. V. Dieulefait and J. Manoharmayum, “Modularity of rigid Calabi-Yau threefolds over \( \mathbb{Q} \),” in: Calabi-Yau Varieties and Mirror Symmetry, Fields Inst. Commun., 38, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, Rhode Island (2003), pp. 159–166.

  4. F. Gouvea and N. Yui, “Rigid Calabi-Yau threefolds over \( \mathbb{Q} \) are modular: a footnote to Serre,” preprint (2009).

  5. K. Hulek, R. Kloosterman, and M. Schuett, “Modularity of Calabi-Yau varieties,” in: F. Catanese, H. Esnault, A. Hukleberry, K. Hulek, and T. Peternell (eds.), Global Aspects of Complex Geometry, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2006), pp. 271-309.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. C. Khare and J.-P. Wintenberger, “Serre’s modularity conjeture. I,” Invent. Math., 178, 485–504 (2009).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. C. Khare and J.-P. Wintenberger, “Serre’s modularity conjeture. II,” Invent. Math., 178, 505–586 (2009).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Kisin, “Modularity of 2-adic Barsotti-Tate representations,” Invent. Math., 178, 587–634 (2009).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. K. Ribet, “On l-adic representations attahed to modular forms. II,” Glasgow Math. J., 27, 185–194 (1985).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. J.-P. Serre, “Quelques appliations du théorème de densité de Chebotarev,” in: Oeuvres, Vol. III, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.-P. Serre, “Sur les représentations modulaires de degré 2 de Gal\(\bar{\mathbb{Q}}/\mathbb{Q} \),” Duke Math. J., 54, 179–230 (1987).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Taylor, “On the meromorphic continuation of degree two L-funtions”, Doc. Math., Extra Vol.: John Coates’ Sixtieth Birthday, 729-779 (2006).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Dieulefait.

Additional information

Published in Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI, Vol. 377, 2010, pp. 44–49.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dieulefait, L. On the modularity of rigid Calabi−Yau threefolds: epilogue. J Math Sci 171, 725–727 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-010-0175-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-010-0175-8

Keywords

Navigation