Skip to main content
Log in

What do the Engel laws and positive laws have in common?

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The work is inspired by a question of R. Burns: What do the Engel laws and positive laws have in common that forces finitely generated, locally graded groups satisfying them to be nilpotent-by-finite? The answer is that these laws have the same so-called Engel construction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. I. Adian, The Burnside Problem and Identities in Groups [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1975). See also trans. J. Lennox and J. Wiegold, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, Vol. 92, Springer, Berlin (1979).

  2. R. G. Burns, O. Macedońska, and Yu. Medvedev, “Groups satisfying semigroup laws, and nilpotent-by-Burnside varieties,” J. Algebra, 195, 510–525 (1997).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. R. G. Burns and Yu. Medvedev, “Group laws implying virtual nilpotence,” J. Aust. Math. Soc., 74, 295–312 (2003).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. S. N. Chernikov, “Infinite non-Abelian groups with an invariance condition for infinite non-Abelian subgroups,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 194, 1280–1283 (1970).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. J. R. J. Groves, “Varieties of soluble groups and a dichotomy of P. Hall,” Bull. Aust. Math. Soc., 5, 391–410 (1971).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. K. W. Gruenberg, “Two theorems on Engel groups,” Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 49, 377–380 (1953).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. K. Kim and A. H. Rhemtulla, “Weak maximality conditions and polycyclic groups,” Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 123, 711–714 (1995).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Milnor, “Growth of finitely generated solvable groups,” J. Differential Geom., 2, 447–449 (1968).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. H. Neumann, Varieties of Groups, Springer, Berlin (1967).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Yu. Ol’shanskii and A. Storozhev, “A group variety defined by a semigroup law,” J. Aust. Math. Soc. Ser. A, 60, 255–259 (1996).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. F. Point, “Milnor identities,” Commun. Algebra, 24, No. 12, 3725–3744 (1996).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Rosset, “A property of groups of non-exponential growth,” Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 54, 24–26 (1976).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. J. F. Semple and A. Shalev, “Combinatorial conditions in residually finite groups. I,” J. Algebra, 157, 43–50 (1993).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. J. S. Wilson, “Two-generator conditions for residually finite groups,” Bull. London Math. Soc., 23, 239–248 (1991).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. Macedońska.

Additional information

Translated from Fundamentalnaya i Prikladnaya Matematika, Vol. 14, No. 7, pp. 175–183, 2008.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Macedońska, O. What do the Engel laws and positive laws have in common?. J Math Sci 164, 272–277 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-009-9728-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-009-9728-0

Keywords

Navigation